DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
RoyalChatter
HTML https://royalchatter.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Harry and Meghan
*****************************************************
#Post#: 12135--------------------------------------------------
Re: Another Sussex baby
By: Chris Date: February 15, 2021, 8:08 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Do you suppose Meghan's previously announced miscarriage and the
announcement of this pregnancy are referring to the same thing?
She looks like she's at least four months along, which would
make her already pregnant at the end of November when she shared
the news of her miscarriage. She wouldn't make up the
miscarriage story in order to get publicity or out-do Eugenie's
baby news, would she? Just two months after Eugenie announced
her pregnancy at the end of September? Knowing that she could
then get even more publicity by waiting a couple of months and
then telling the world about her "new" pregnancy? I feel pretty
tacky just saying something like that, and yet....
#Post#: 12136--------------------------------------------------
Re: Another Sussex baby
By: ABS Date: February 16, 2021, 7:13 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Chris, I think you are exactly right! I put nothing past this
couple after the cemetery stunt. That was as low as it gets,
they did it and clearly thought that was an OK thing to do. They
will stop at nothing.
Harry´s dirty feet in our faces - bet that was thought through
and gave them a good giggle. She is hiding her abominable feet
though.
#Post#: 12137--------------------------------------------------
Re: Another Sussex baby
By: Jolene Date: February 16, 2021, 3:11 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=Chris link=topic=275.msg12135#msg12135
date=1613441290]
Do you suppose Meghan's previously announced miscarriage and the
announcement of this pregnancy are referring to the same thing?
She looks like she's at least four months along, which would
make her already pregnant at the end of November when she shared
the news of her miscarriage. She wouldn't make up the
miscarriage story in order to get publicity or out-do Eugenie's
baby news, would she? Just two months after Eugenie announced
her pregnancy at the end of September? Knowing that she could
then get even more publicity by waiting a couple of months and
then telling the world about her "new" pregnancy? I feel pretty
tacky just saying something like that, and yet....
[/quote]
The timing is off to me....
#Post#: 12138--------------------------------------------------
Re: Another Sussex baby
By: ABS Date: February 16, 2021, 4:04 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Her pregnancies are very mysterious!
#Post#: 12143--------------------------------------------------
Re: Another Sussex baby
By: Chris Date: February 17, 2021, 11:15 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=Quo link=topic=275.msg12133#msg12133
date=1613411455]
I've just seen a report that they are being interviewed by Oprah
(no surprise) about their life... to be aired early March
apparently.. so much for privacy indeed
[/quote]
I saw an article about that upcoming interview with Oprah which
said Meghan met Oprah only one time before inviting her to her
wedding. That answers one question we all had at the time Harry
and MeMe were married, which was "how well do all the Hollywood
wedding guests know the bride and groom?" The answer,
obviously, is "not well at all."
#Post#: 12144--------------------------------------------------
Re: Another Sussex baby
By: Jolene Date: February 17, 2021, 9:01 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=Chris link=topic=275.msg12143#msg12143
date=1613582137]
[quote author=Quo link=topic=275.msg12133#msg12133
date=1613411455]
I've just seen a report that they are being interviewed by Oprah
(no surprise) about their life... to be aired early March
apparently.. so much for privacy indeed
[/quote]
I saw an article about that upcoming interview with Oprah which
said Meghan met Oprah only one time before inviting her to her
wedding. That answers one question we all had at the time Harry
and MeMe were married, which was "how well do all the Hollywood
wedding guests know the bride and groom?" The answer,
obviously, is "not well at all."
[/quote]
I'm not an actress so I guess I don't get it, but I can't
imagine inviting celebs I don't know to my wedding. I know Will
and Kate had to do some invites since he's a future king or
maybe friends of the parents/grandparents, but Oprah? Clooney?
Suits co-stars, Serena, and Priyanka at least made sense.
#Post#: 12146--------------------------------------------------
Re: Another Sussex baby
By: ABS Date: February 18, 2021, 4:57 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Or, not at all.
Some celebs wondered WHY they got an invitation for the wedding,
since they had never met neither bride nor groom.
I remember one saying that she was really surprised to get an
invite - then just discarded it. I don´t remember who it was.
There must have been a few of those.
Who does that? Invites a bunch of family and ONE family member?!
UGH
#Post#: 12743--------------------------------------------------
Re: Another Sussex baby
By: Jolene Date: June 6, 2021, 11:08 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Baby girl Lilibet "Lili" Diana Mountbatten-Windsor arrived June
4 at 11:40.
HTML https://people.com/royals/meghan-markle-prince-harry-welcome-baby-girl-named-lilibet/
#Post#: 12745--------------------------------------------------
Re: Another Sussex baby
By: ABS Date: June 6, 2021, 11:47 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Welcome to the world, baby girl. I won´t congratulate her
parents.
I have a problem with both names.
#Post#: 12746--------------------------------------------------
Re: Another Sussex baby
By: Chris Date: June 6, 2021, 12:21 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"Lilibet" is the queen's childhood nickname, given to her by her
baby sister because Margaret couldn't pronounce "Elizabeth." As
far as I know, the Duke of E was the only one who continued to
use that name for his wife. While it's a sweet reminder of the
queen's early girlhood, I think "Elizabeth" would have been a
better name choice. "Lilibet" could have been her nickname,
just like her great-grandmother. Princess Lilibet and Prince
Archie? I hope their parents don't accept titles for them when
the time comes!
*****************************************************
DIR Next Page