DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
RoyalChatter
HTML https://royalchatter.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Harry and Meghan
*****************************************************
#Post#: 7936--------------------------------------------------
Sussex Instagram Updates
By: fragrance78 Date: May 12, 2019, 8:31 am
---------------------------------------------------------
12 May 2019
HTML https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D6Xrge7WwAELOey.jpg<br
/>
HTML https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D6Xrge1XsAIBvqT.jpg
Forget-Me-Not flowers in the background - Diana's fav. Well
played, Meg.
#Post#: 7937--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sussex Instagram Updates
By: ABS Date: May 12, 2019, 9:36 am
---------------------------------------------------------
I am no fan of photos of this kind. To me they are tacky and
cliché.
#Post#: 7939--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sussex Instagram Updates
By: Duchess of Verona Date: May 12, 2019, 10:33 am
---------------------------------------------------------
I dont get the whole release pictures of the child that dont
actually show the child thing.
#Post#: 7948--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sussex Instagram Updates
By: Tigerben Date: May 12, 2019, 4:19 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
You know what ... I’m thinking they didn’t title him , not to
raise him out of the spot light but to market him like the
Kardashian’s, Jenner’s ect..do . Make him a millionaire in his
own right by the age of one.
#Post#: 7951--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sussex Instagram Updates
By: ABS Date: May 12, 2019, 5:18 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I can totally see that happening, Tiger!
#Post#: 7955--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sussex Instagram Updates
By: Chris Date: May 12, 2019, 8:00 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
The picture looks like it belongs in Vanity Fair or Tatler, not
in an instagram account set up to keep the public informed of
the royal family's events. Too slick, too artificial, too TOO.
And it was released to celebrate the US Mother's Day, not the
UK's. I take exception to that. I know Meghan is an American,
but she now represents Britain and her child is a member of the
British royal family. Surely she could have waited to publicly
celebrate her first Mother's Day in March 2020, along with the
rest of the British mothers. Poorly done, MeMe, poorly done.
#Post#: 8698--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sussex Instagram Updates
By: fragrance78 Date: June 16, 2019, 7:12 am
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://66.media.tumblr.com/f3b542f6913278361432d9cd287559d0/tumblr_pt6xt5N13m1qge3mco1_540.jpg
#Post#: 8704--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sussex Instagram Updates
By: Chris Date: June 16, 2019, 6:46 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I get the feeling that they're milking this for all it's worth.
First we saw photos of the top of the baby's cap-covered head.
Then a picture of the baby's bare feet sticking out of a shawl.
Now we're teased by a photo of the baby's eyes, with the rest of
his face and body hidden by his father's arm. It appears
someone wants to keep building the public's interest in this
baby. Or am I wrong?
HTML https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7146555/Royal-christening-Archie-Meghan-Harry-return-St-Georges-chapel-baptism.html
#Post#: 8705--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sussex Instagram Updates
By: Cara Date: June 17, 2019, 3:16 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=Chris link=topic=227.msg8704#msg8704
date=1560728766]
I get the feeling that they're milking this for all it's worth.
First we saw photos of the top of the baby's cap-covered head.
Then a picture of the baby's bare feet sticking out of a shawl.
Now we're teased by a photo of the baby's eyes, with the rest of
his face and body hidden by his father's arm. It appears
someone wants to keep building the public's interest in this
baby. Or am I wrong?
HTML https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7146555/Royal-christening-Archie-Meghan-Harry-return-St-Georges-chapel-baptism.html
[/quote]
I certainly agree. This what exactly what I was thinking when I
wrote this shortly after the baby's birth.
[quote author=Cara link=topic=190.msg7794#msg7794
date=1557231848]
i do think that by being quiet they (megz) want(s) to attract
more attention and to increase her and the baby's "
bankability".
[/quote]
#Post#: 8706--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sussex Instagram Updates
By: Chris Date: June 17, 2019, 6:58 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=Cara link=topic=190.msg7794#msg7794
date=1557231848]
i do think that by being quiet they (megz) want(s) to attract
more attention and to increase her and the baby's "
bankability".
[/quote]
Absolutely. This is looking more and more like a publicity tour
to generate interest in a new movie.
*****************************************************
DIR Next Page