DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
M Paul Lloyd
HTML https://roundtable.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: General Discussion
*****************************************************
#Post#: 21--------------------------------------------------
Re: Any Port In a Storm
By: Shadowwolf Date: March 31, 2010, 6:29 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
The drugs will help so think again before passing on them.
"Consider his Farsightedness duly ignored Mr.S."
Cheers Mr M, my heart skipped a beat when Mr Nemisis posted but
he luckily ignored his Farsightedness who was randomly posting
anyway, hopefully he might go away but alas it is unlikely.
#Post#: 22--------------------------------------------------
Re: Any Port In a Storm
By: M Paul Lloyd Date: April 1, 2010, 12:32 am
---------------------------------------------------------
I felt a similar response when Jypiggery reappeared. ;)
All seems well this morning, but despite Flakkarins best efforts
I'm not seeing the avalanche of pro AGW evidence that I had
hoped for, especially from Mr. Byatt, but perhaps he is busy
information gathering? :-\
#Post#: 23--------------------------------------------------
Re: Any Port In a Storm
By: Shadowwolf Date: April 1, 2010, 11:26 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Indeed but jypetc does seem small potatoes when compared to his
glory, sometimes, just sometimes jypetc can be convinced he is
incorrect.
As for AGW, well I don't think you will see an avalanche of
evidence and not just because Mr Byatt does not appear to know
that much. My impression is that it is an incredibly complex
subject that has severe difficulty in being condensed down,
essentially it loses coherency. One must do an awful lot of
ones own research to get a useful insight. Tis why I cannot
really argue against it and must provisionally accept that as
the greater majority of trained experts have found in favour of
AGW so must I. Until such a time as I do the leg work and find
good cause to say otherwise.
Getting a balanced view shall be difficult, I don't think that
many anti-AGW sites are that useful, too many are mired in
bullshit arguments or have an uncomfortable association with
conservative politics or other nay saying like creationism.
That said, many pro-sites are heavily invested in the whole
green movement or get very shrill when people don't believe.
#Post#: 24--------------------------------------------------
Re: Any Port In a Storm
By: Pandora Date: April 1, 2010, 11:29 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Going for a tootle round the forum chaps. They better be well
behaved or I'll breathe on them... :P
#Post#: 25--------------------------------------------------
Re: Any Port In a Storm
By: Shadowwolf Date: April 1, 2010, 11:34 am
---------------------------------------------------------
So how fares thee this day my lady?
#Post#: 26--------------------------------------------------
Re: Any Port In a Storm
By: Shadowwolf Date: April 1, 2010, 2:30 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Ah bless, an excuse to add in a load of unnecessary pictures
::)
Is it just my connection or are they slowing down the page load
in general, certainly they did not need to be so damn big.
Oh and the original round table is up, at least it was a moment
ago and nothing on the main page explains why it was all gone.
#Post#: 27--------------------------------------------------
Re: Any Port In a Storm
By: M Paul Lloyd Date: April 1, 2010, 2:41 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
The Sheila will be feeling well crook no doubt, here have some
grog, the Chief pushed a grubby tankard brim full of a vile
infusion towards the Councillor with a very, very long forked
stick. . :)
Yes I guess I am hoping for too much Mr.S, but having cruised a
fair number of anti AGW sites I find very few that appear to be
in the employ of big multinationals (a criticism often leveled
by pro warmists) mostly they are quite ordinary folk who see
their respective life styles being threatened by the draconian
measures being employed (taxation and restriction, the usual
weapons of politics) whereas the pro AGW types carp on about
imaginary enemies and false science being perpetrated by big
business mischief makers whilst not actually looking into the
complexities of the subject for themselves and simply accepting
the given doctrine. I am of the opinion (although I would never
actually say as much) that the majority have been brainwashed
and Flakkarin is I fear amongst that number. The real opposition
often originates from really quite highly qualified
climatologists like Lindzen
HTML http://www-eaps.mit.edu/faculty/lindzen.htm
who I greatly
respect and admire for sticking up for what he believes. He is
also not alone but because the UN based IPCC has such momentum
only the very brave (or stupid like me) dare try and argue
against them. ;D
#Post#: 28--------------------------------------------------
Re: Any Port In a Storm
By: M Paul Lloyd Date: April 1, 2010, 2:43 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
OOps overlapping posts... what pictures be these Mr.S ?? And in
light of this should we abandon ship? ???
#Post#: 29--------------------------------------------------
Re: Any Port In a Storm
By: M Paul Lloyd Date: April 1, 2010, 2:53 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Ah.... sorry Mr.S that would be my fault, I had foolishly
expected links but forgot the Donkey princesses's penchant for
pictures. Sorry. :-[
#Post#: 30--------------------------------------------------
Re: Any Port In a Storm
By: Shadowwolf Date: April 1, 2010, 4:30 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Good idea, I'll see you there.
*****************************************************
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page