URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Roller Pigeons
  HTML https://rollerpigeon.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: General Discussion
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 8063--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Establish Professional Judges
   DIR By: Tony Chavarria
       Date: July 10, 2011, 11:41 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: MOTHERLODELOFTS link ---
       >
       > Not apples to apples Tony .. unless they are supposed to be in
       sync with each other .. get a few out of sync and they show like
       a sore thumb. Good teams of quality birds are easy to judge ,
       others are very difficult due to having to sort through the
       garbage.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Hey Scott, I agree, when a team is working together and kitting
       well, it can be easier to see the one's breaking together and
       doing it right. I am flying a mix of older and younger birds
       together and man the "action" looks like crap at times, but then
       they show flashes of brilliance when 8 or so all break
       simultaneously. I can't wait until later this summer when the
       younger ones will have matured a bit and they all start working
       more as a team.
       #Post#: 8068--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Establish Professional Judges
   DIR By: Cliff Ball
       Date: July 11, 2011, 9:43 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Scott  I wish that was the case, but unforunately, they are NOT
       scored by manyjudges. We just had a national judge who, when
       questioned about why this type of performance was not being
       scored, he replied that he was only scoring balled up spiners
       where the wings were not visible. So, I ask, will it be used by
       all judges/flyers in a like manor? Obviously not. If we have
       little or no consistency, we do not have a UNIVERSAL
       understanding.  We may have to add a few more details to your
       minimum D&Q standard just to get more people understanding it
       just the way you do. Cliff
       
       --- Quote from: MOTHERLODELOFTS link ---
       >
       > Cliff .. I think the worst thing that we can do is over
       complicate it .. the min standard that I just described will be
       scored by any judge.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       #Post#: 8070--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Establish Professional Judges
   DIR By: MOTHERLODELOFTS
       Date: July 11, 2011, 11:00 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Ciff , that isn't all I saw scored.. and if it was then everyone
       would have had zero .. many times I think that judges tell what
       they would like to see in what makes a great kit and then it is
       taken that is all he will score.
       That min. standard will be scored by any judge .. the fact is
       they will be hungry to see it. Trust me
       
       
       
       
       --- Quote from: Cliff Ball link ---
       >
       > Scott  I wish that was the case, but unforunately, they are
       NOT scored by manyjudges. We just had a national judge who, when
       questioned about why this type of performance was not being
       scored, he replied that he was only scoring balled up spiners
       where the wings were not visible. So, I ask, will it be used by
       all judges/flyers in a like manor? Obviously not. If we have
       little or no consistency, we do not have a UNIVERSAL
       understanding.  We may have to add a few more details to your
       minimum D&Q standard just to get more people understanding it
       just the way you do. Cliff
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       #Post#: 8072--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Establish Professional Judges
   DIR By: Cliff Ball
       Date: July 11, 2011, 1:16 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Scott,
       Try explaining that to the recent 52 WC qualifiers from the
       US....Wishful thinking will get us nowhere.
       Again....reduce it to writing, in a clear concise easy to
       understand way....a minimum D&Q standard, that you feel is
       UNIVERSAL in its meaning.  Explain the different wing positions
       and faults, that must be taken into consideration and would be
       easy to understand by a veteran judge, an rookie judge, a loose
       judge, a tight judge, or a judge from another country.  If you
       feel it is not possible for you to do........then we are in
       worse shape than I thought.   Just give it a try, you may
       surprise yourself with your thoughts.
       Cliff
       
       
       
       --- Quote from: MOTHERLODELOFTS link ---
       >
       > Ciff , that isn't all I saw scored.. and if it was then
       everyone would have had zero .. many times I think that judges
       tell what they would like to see in what makes a great kit and
       then it is taken that is all he will score.
       > That min. standard will be scored by any judge .. the fact is
       they will be hungry to see it. Trust me
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       #Post#: 8074--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Establish Professional Judges
   DIR By: MOTHERLODELOFTS
       Date: July 11, 2011, 2:39 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Cliff .. keep it simple or complicate it .. your choice .. just
       threw a suggestion to you.
       We are all a product of our envirement and will judge according
       to the standards that we know.. for some there is no standard
       and then it simply goes up from there.
       Every year is a new fly and a new judge.
       Scott
       
       
       
       
       
       --- Quote from: Cliff Ball link ---
       >
       > Scott,
       > Try explaining that to the recent 52 WC qualifiers from the
       US....Wishful thinking will get us nowhere.
       > Again....reduce it to writing, in a clear concise easy to
       understand way....a minimum D&Q standard, that you feel is
       UNIVERSAL in its meaning.  Explain the different wing positions
       and faults, that must be taken into consideration and would be
       easy to understand by a veteran judge, an rookie judge, a loose
       judge, a tight judge, or a judge from another country.  If you
       feel it is not possible for you to do........then we are in
       worse shape than I thought.   Just give it a try, you may
       surprise yourself with your thoughts.
       > Cliff
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       #Post#: 8075--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Establish Professional Judges
   DIR By: Cliff Ball
       Date: July 11, 2011, 4:26 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Scott  Yes...Every year a new fly and a new judge... with a
       different standard, too.  This is so far from a professional
       sport that it looses its so-called integrity and becomes nothing
       more than a mere guessing game.....because...we do not KNOW the
       judge's standard. Until the WC and NBRC come up with one (a
       standard) , we will never know the judge's standard until he is
       standing in our yard.....and all the competitors start
       complaining on the internet again....   I am pleased you are
       happy with the status-quo because we can only go up from here.
       Cliff
       #Post#: 8076--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Establish Professional Judges
   DIR By: MOTHERLODELOFTS
       Date: July 11, 2011, 4:39 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Cliff .. No I don't have any problems with the current system ..
       I know what a good team is at that is what I strive for , and it
       has served me well regardless of the judges standard.
       
       
       --- Quote from: Cliff Ball link ---
       >
       > Scott  Yes...Every year a new fly and a new judge... with a
       different standard, too.  This is so far from a professional
       sport that it looses its so-called integrity and becomes nothing
       more than a mere guessing game.....because... we do not KNOW the
       judge's standard. Until the WC and NBRC come up with one (a
       standard) , we will never know the judge's standard until he is
       standing in our yard.....and all the competitors start
       complaining on the internet again....   I am pleased you are
       happy with the status-quo because we can only go up from here.
       Cliff
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       #Post#: 8084--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Establish Professional Judges
   DIR By: Cliff Ball
       Date: July 12, 2011, 11:22 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Scott   Then you won't mind if those of us that would like to
       see more consistancy in judging (so that scores aren't all over
       the board)develope a more detailed explanation of a Breed
       standard, minimum judging standard, etc. and keep working toward
       a resolution? Thanks for your insight. Cliff
       "Lead....follow...or get out of the way!"
       *****************************************************
       Page 4 of 4
   DIR Previous Page