URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Roller Pigeons
  HTML https://rollerpigeon.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Genetics
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 6686--------------------------------------------------
       College Educations
       By: WhiteWing Date: April 28, 2011, 1:07 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Tony Chavarria link=topic=466.msg5884#msg5884
       date=1301786453]
       Here is something that some might find interesting regarding why
       Mendelian inheritance doesn't work when considering the roll
       factor in Birmingham Rollers; this comes from wikipedia:[/quote]
       
       Good topic. . . bad information source.  Not saying that this
       article is not 100% correct because I am not a geneticist
       myself, but anyone and I mean absolutely ANYONE can write these
       articles on wikipedia.  They are not "scholarly" works, meaning
       they are not written, reviewed, and revised by a board of
       educated specialists in that particular field.  I could write an
       article on wikipedia about how I have successfully bred pink
       flying elephants, and they would publish it onto their site as
       true information.
       
       Wikipedia is never, in any case, allowed as a source for cited
       works on any papers at the college in which I attend, or for
       that matter, most colleges.
       
       Not trying to stir the pot, just a simple fact for future
       reference.  ;D
       #Post#: 6687--------------------------------------------------
       Re: College Educations
       By: Tony Chavarria Date: April 28, 2011, 2:18 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=WhiteWing link=topic=466.msg6686#msg6686
       date=1304014071]
       [quote author=Tony Chavarria link=topic=466.msg5884#msg5884
       date=1301786453]
       Here is something that some might find interesting regarding why
       Mendelian inheritance doesn't work when considering the roll
       factor in Birmingham Rollers; this comes from wikipedia:[/quote]
       
       Good topic. . . bad information source.  Not saying that this
       article is not 100% correct because I am not a geneticist
       myself, but anyone and I mean absolutely ANYONE can write these
       articles on wikipedia.  They are not "scholarly" works, meaning
       they are not written, reviewed, and revised by a board of
       educated specialists in that particular field.  I could write an
       article on wikipedia about how I have successfully bred pink
       flying elephants, and they would publish it onto their site as
       true information.
       
       Wikipedia is never, in any case, allowed as a source for cited
       works on any papers at the college in which I attend, or for
       that matter, most colleges.
       
       Not trying to stir the pot, just a simple fact for future
       reference.  ;D
       [/quote]
       LOL Glad you find the topic interesting. However, I did go to
       other sources. I chose wiki to cite. BTW:...and colleges churn
       out useless certificate bearing graduates whom too often cannot
       find gainful employment in said field. I doubt your experience
       with profit motivated college qualifies you to comment
       meaningfully on this topic as I doubt your source has provided
       you with sufficient critical thinking skills.   :P
       #Post#: 6688--------------------------------------------------
       Re: College Educations
       By: wannaroll Date: April 28, 2011, 3:44 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=WhiteWing link=topic=466.msg6686#msg6686
       date=1304014071]
       [quote author=Tony Chavarria link=topic=466.msg5884#msg5884
       date=1301786453]
       Here is something that some might find interesting regarding why
       Mendelian inheritance doesn't work when considering the roll
       factor in Birmingham Rollers; this comes from wikipedia:[/quote]
       
       Good topic. . . bad information source.  Not saying that this
       article is not 100% correct because I am not a geneticist
       myself, but anyone and I mean absolutely ANYONE can write these
       articles on wikipedia.  They are not "scholarly" works, meaning
       they are not written, reviewed, and revised by a board of
       educated specialists in that particular field.  I could write an
       article on wikipedia about how I have successfully bred pink
       flying elephants, and they would publish it onto their site as
       true information.
       
       Wikipedia is never, in any case, allowed as a source for cited
       works on any papers at the college in which I attend, or for
       that matter, most colleges.
       
       Not trying to stir the pot, just a simple fact for future
       reference.  ;D
       [/quote]
       
       How much do you get for the Elephants? I've been try to find
       some for awhile now. I'm looking to have a whole kit of pink
       roller elephants.
       #Post#: 6691--------------------------------------------------
       Re: College Educations
       By: WhiteWing Date: April 28, 2011, 4:54 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Tony Chavarria link=topic=466.msg6687#msg6687
       date=1304018319]
       [quote author=WhiteWing link=topic=466.msg6686#msg6686
       date=1304014071]
       [quote author=Tony Chavarria link=topic=466.msg5884#msg5884
       date=1301786453]
       Here is something that some might find interesting regarding why
       Mendelian inheritance doesn't work when considering the roll
       factor in Birmingham Rollers; this comes from wikipedia:[/quote]
       
       Good topic. . . bad information source.  Not saying that this
       article is not 100% correct because I am not a geneticist
       myself, but anyone and I mean absolutely ANYONE can write these
       articles on wikipedia.  They are not "scholarly" works, meaning
       they are not written, reviewed, and revised by a board of
       educated specialists in that particular field.  I could write an
       article on wikipedia about how I have successfully bred pink
       flying elephants, and they would publish it onto their site as
       true information.
       
       Wikipedia is never, in any case, allowed as a source for cited
       works on any papers at the college in which I attend, or for
       that matter, most colleges.
       
       Not trying to stir the pot, just a simple fact for future
       reference.  ;D
       [/quote]
       LOL Glad you find the topic interesting. However, I did go to
       other sources. I chose wiki to cite. BTW:...and colleges churn
       out useless certificate bearing graduates whom too often cannot
       find gainful employment in said field. I doubt your experience
       with profit motivated college qualifies you to comment
       meaningfully on this topic as I doubt your source has provided
       you with sufficient critical thinking skills.   :P
       [/quote]
       
       You're right about the critical thinking skills!  That's
       something that can't be learned  ;)  lol
       
       #Post#: 6692--------------------------------------------------
       Re: College Educations
       By: WhiteWing Date: April 28, 2011, 4:56 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Wannaroll link=topic=466.msg6688#msg6688
       date=1304023459]
       [quote author=WhiteWing link=topic=466.msg6686#msg6686
       date=1304014071]
       [quote author=Tony Chavarria link=topic=466.msg5884#msg5884
       date=1301786453]
       Here is something that some might find interesting regarding why
       Mendelian inheritance doesn't work when considering the roll
       factor in Birmingham Rollers; this comes from wikipedia:[/quote]
       
       Good topic. . . bad information source.  Not saying that this
       article is not 100% correct because I am not a geneticist
       myself, but anyone and I mean absolutely ANYONE can write these
       articles on wikipedia.  They are not "scholarly" works, meaning
       they are not written, reviewed, and revised by a board of
       educated specialists in that particular field.  I could write an
       article on wikipedia about how I have successfully bred pink
       flying elephants, and they would publish it onto their site as
       true information.
       
       Wikipedia is never, in any case, allowed as a source for cited
       works on any papers at the college in which I attend, or for
       that matter, most colleges.
       
       Not trying to stir the pot, just a simple fact for future
       reference.  ;D
       [/quote]
       
       How much do you get for the Elephants? I've been try to find
       some for awhile now. I'm looking to have a whole kit of pink
       roller elephants.
       [/quote]
       
       Can't give the darn things away!  Everyone fears a rolldown  ;)
       #Post#: 6697--------------------------------------------------
       Re: College Educations
       By: Tony Chavarria Date: April 28, 2011, 8:26 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       From:
  HTML http://voxday.blogspot.com/search/label/education
  HTML http://voxday.blogspot.com/search/label/education
       Never trust the experts  Zero Hedge underlines one of my
       personal maxims
  HTML http://www.zerohedge.com/article/remember-mit-all-safe-paper:
       <blockquote>Confirming, yet again, that MIT Ph.D.'s (such as
       the FRBNY's Brian Sack) are among the most dangerous around, a
       paper made the rounds yesterday by one Josef Oehmen titled: "Why
       I am not worried about Japan’s nuclear reactors." In the ensuing
       48 hours, anyone who listened to Josef's advice (who
       incidentally is not a scientist) and was also "not worried about
       the reactors" has paid an exorbitant price, possibly up to and
       including their lives. We demand that MIT School of Nuclear
       Science and Engineering clarify their position on the matter,
       and make sure that incidents such as this, where Oehmen's paper
       received top billing due to its perceived "endorsement" by MIT
       and has since been completely discredited, never recur.
       
       Full paper as was originally posted:
       
       </blockquote> I repeat, there was and will *not* be any
       significant release of radioactivity from the damaged Japanese
       reactors.
       An expert is someone who is always correct when it doesn't
       matter and usually wrong when it counts.  This is one of the
       reasons why I never, ever, put any faith in credentials.
       Credentials are completely worthless, they're not worth the
       paper on which they are printed.  Experience is somewhat more
       useful, but when the experienced individual cannot provide clear
       and sensible answers to straightforward and logically sound
       questions, your BS radar should be sounding like a radiation
       alarm at a Fukushima nuclear plant.
       
       How did that M.I.T. PhD-backed prediction hold up?  "Dangerous
       levels of radiation leaking from a crippled nuclear plant forced
       Japan to order 140,000 people to seal themselves indoors Tuesday
       after an explosion and a fire dramatically escalated the crisis
       spawned by a deadly tsunami.  In a nationally televised
       statement, Prime Minister Naoto Kan said radiation had spread
       from the four stricken reactors of the Fukushima Dai-ichi
       nuclear plant along Japan's northeastern coast."
       
       And now we know what an assurance from an M.I.T. PhD is worth.
       How much less, then, is a PhD from a lesser school or in a less
       rigorous discipline to be trusted?  What must always be kept in
       mind is that the expert's primary motivation is not what most
       people assume it to be. Their main motivation is to sound
       credible rather than make an accurate judgment so they will
       always play the probabilities and state the obvious because this
       a) allows them to be correct most of the time, and b) only be
       wrong when everyone else is wrong.
       #Post#: 6699--------------------------------------------------
       Re: College Educations
       By: 2y4life Date: April 28, 2011, 9:12 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       So what exactly is the point of this thread again? To demean
       education? All I have to say is that a person with a Ph.D isn't
       always right but when talking about things in their respective
       field, I'll take a Ph.D over the average joe. If I need brain
       surgery, I'll take my chances with a board certified surgeon
       than some guy with an opinion. To say otherwise is ludicrous.
       #Post#: 6700--------------------------------------------------
       Re: College Educations
       By: WhiteWing Date: April 28, 2011, 10:28 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=2y4life link=topic=513.msg6699#msg6699
       date=1304043129]
       So what exactly is the point of this thread again? To demean
       education? All I have to say is that a person with a Ph.D isn't
       always right but when talking about things in their respective
       field, I'll take a Ph.D over the average joe. If I need brain
       surgery, I'll take my chances with a board certified surgeon
       than some guy with an opinion. To say otherwise is ludicrous.
       [/quote]
       
       Thanks for speaking up 2y4life.  I too would rather have a
       "scholarly" Ph.D operating on me, rather than the average joe,
       and those holding Ph.D's deserve some what respect. I did not
       start this thread as Tony has "fixed" it to appear. Tony himself
       started this thread and pasted my name to it. (NOT appreciated).
       
       I posted a simple fact on another thread and Tony has decided to
       demean education and run wild with a factual comment that I made
       about Wikipedia.
       
       Tony, I was in no means trying to show you up, or degrade your
       post by stating the fact that Wikipedia is not a scholarly site
       (from which you cited a work).  If revenge is your game, then I
       will take my opinions to a site that is focused on bettering the
       Birmingham Roller, rather than bashing fellow rollermen out
       there.
       
       
       #Post#: 6701--------------------------------------------------
       Re: College Educations
       By: MOTHERLODELOFTS Date: April 28, 2011, 11:33 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I thought I was getting a bus to go to college , next thing I
       know some crazy guy is screaming get off the bus and next thing
       I know my head was shaved.  I was wearing OD greens and had a
       M16 in my hands getting an education on field stripping it ,
       couldn't find where they kept the girls either.. obviously
       college wasn't what I expected.
       #Post#: 6703--------------------------------------------------
       Re: College Educations
       By: Tony Chavarria Date: April 29, 2011, 7:58 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       WhiteWing, you started the college education thang, I responded,
       you responded. I been around long enough to know this was going
       to have absolutely nothing to do with the thread itself, so I
       split the topic off. No ill or evil was intended by splitting it
       off or naming the thread title as I did.
       I am not demeaning education at all, I am simply using critical
       thinking skills and don't necessarily place it on a the pedestal
       like so many persons. An education in itself is amoral. Getting
       tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands of dollars in debt to
       earn a Phd may not be all its cracked up to be, especially if
       too many are issued. Who is going to employ them with the
       economy in the tailspin that it is in?
       If one can use it to find gainful employment (not in the
       government) or start a new business enterprise then that is
       great! I am not going to hold up a person having a college
       degree or PhD any better than a High School diploma. However, if
       I need brain surgery then I will hope that only the most
       experienced and successful surgeon will by my doctor. That's a
       no brainer.  :D
       I read more and more about the education bubble and that it too,
       like all bubbles will pop and there will be a glut of educated
       unemployed workers who will still be responsible to pay for
       their student loans regardless. Good luck with that, a mortgage
       is hard enough.  :P
       Do not hate the messenger, hate the message.  ;D
       *****************************************************
   DIR Next Page