URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Roller Pigeons
  HTML https://rollerpigeon.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: In-Breeding Rollers
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 937--------------------------------------------------
       In-Breeding
       By: Ty Coleman Date: October 3, 2010, 12:21 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I wanted to make a post on a conversation that Scott Cambell and
       I had last year during the finals. I asked Scott about
       inbreeding and he said he liked to do a test mating [brother to
       sister] before pursuing a line. His reasoning behind the idea
       was that if the mating could produce good birds. That there were
       more good genes than bad genes in the birds and the line would
       be worth pursuing. I liked his reasoning behind that. I guess
       that's why he is a master flier.
       #Post#: 939--------------------------------------------------
       Re: In-Breeding
       By: BigShawn Date: October 3, 2010, 12:23 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       That sounds good, but wouldnt it hide what was wrong to?  Shawn
       #Post#: 945--------------------------------------------------
       Re: In-Breeding
       By: Ty Coleman Date: October 3, 2010, 3:20 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The way I understood it was it was to see if the faults were
       stronger than the good genes being a even mating.
       #Post#: 979--------------------------------------------------
       Re: In-Breeding
       By: MOTHERLODELOFTS Date: October 4, 2010, 3:10 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Ty .. it is just one test of a line.. inbreeding just for the
       sake of inbreeding without the proper selection of the two birds
       used will take you no where.
       Some families can't handle bringing the blood in tight.. some
       fall apart while others get too strong..it is all about
       selection,selection,selection.. and nothing else can play in .
       The true test of a line is what is happening 5-10 years down the
       line .. a line is the beginning of a developing family as it
       will key around particular key birds.. this is why you don't see
       particular families dominating... only individules to keep an
       eye on due to their selection in the breeding loft.. although
       some can also do ok by breeding sheer numbers also.
       Scott
       
       
       
       #Post#: 994--------------------------------------------------
       Re: In-Breeding
       By: Ty Coleman Date: October 4, 2010, 6:59 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Scott, I understood what you were saying. I did a test mating
       after you left of 449 [one of the cocks you liked] black w\f
       ,son of the blue check, to his full sister 400. Both of the
       birds were the backbone of my 08 kit and have proven to be the
       backbone of my stock loft this year. Well I raised one round,
       the hawk got one and the other is a superstar in my A kit now. I
       will not mate them together again but I can see were 883 will be
       a usefull bird in the stock loft in the future.
       #Post#: 1087--------------------------------------------------
       Re: In-Breeding
       By: Jae Date: October 7, 2010, 2:31 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Interesting, I would agree with Scott Cambell also.
       #Post#: 1367--------------------------------------------------
       Re: In-Breeding
       By: Roller Man 70 Date: October 14, 2010, 5:15 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hey Brothers: The posts from every one are just great, But here
       is just a little input on inbreeding that I have found through
       the years- Inbreeding is the only way to get a pure family, look
       at the cattle,Hog,and also Dogs. Purebred Dogs would not get to
       be purebreds if it wasn't for intellegent inbreeding. They look
       alike, act alike etc. Now, I'm going to hit Roller Men hard,
       most of the roller men I know, and the ones in most of the
       forums on this site will never have a family of purebred
       rollers--We ship birds from the north to the south-east to the
       west- west to the east and most of our familys are so out bred
       that the gene pool is so large that nothing is going to work
       reguarding a family that flys,rolls & acts alike--My hat is off
       to Tony C. and men like Reed, Higgins, Jaconette who inbred and
       have families that act, fly, roll etc. alike.. Sorry if I
       ruffled someones feathers, But I got to tell it like it
       is--------
       #Post#: 1372--------------------------------------------------
       Re: In-Breeding
       By: J_Star Date: October 14, 2010, 8:27 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Roller Man 70, I hate to tell you that your logic is flawed.
       Roller men are not breeding rollers to fan tails or homers to
       come up with a cross and call them pure bred!! When you are
       talking about dogs, people breed the same type of dog to another
       and they will get the same. It all comes down to SELECTION. Even
       with PURE family, if the selection is flawed, the result is a
       PURE desaster.
       
       They are breeding rollers to rollers from different fanciers.
       That will widen the gene pool per-say. However, every successful
       fancier that I know have devoid their family of birds from major
       faults. So, if you mix their birds together and breed them, they
       will produce youngsters of the combined familes that were
       originally devoid of major faults....so where is the hangup!!
       
       You know as I know that every family of birds and no matter how
       PURE it is, still produce plenty of culls. If not, then
       everybody would have not just one winning kit but dozens of them
       and everybody will be winning the competitions.. .don't you
       think? So, since you have only PURE family of rollers, can I ask
       how many dozens of winning kits do you have (lol)?
       
       Jay
       #Post#: 1376--------------------------------------------------
       Re: In-Breeding
       By: birdman Date: October 14, 2010, 9:11 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Ty, why not breed them together for several rounds and see what
       perecentages are A team quality?
       
       Russ
       
       [quote author=Ty Coleman link=topic=110.msg994#msg994
       date=1286236798]
       Scott, I understood what you were saying. I did a test mating
       after you left of 449 [one of the cocks you liked] black w\f
       ,son of the blue check, to his full sister 400. Both of the
       birds were the backbone of my 08 kit and have proven to be the
       backbone of my stock loft this year. Well I raised one round,
       the hawk got one and the other is a superstar in my A kit now. I
       will not mate them together again but I can see were 883 will be
       a usefull bird in the stock loft in the future.
       [/quote]
       #Post#: 1377--------------------------------------------------
       Re: In-Breeding
       By: Ty Coleman Date: October 14, 2010, 9:50 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Damn hawk picked him out of the kit today !!! 2 out of 11 gone
       trying to fly in the finals !!!
       *****************************************************
   DIR Next Page