DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
Renewable Revolution
HTML https://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Who CAN you trust?
*****************************************************
#Post#: 2005--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mechanisms of Prejudice: Hidden and Not Hidden
DIR By: AGelbert
Date: October 8, 2014, 11:52 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Fresh from New York City comes the lawful, obedient and
wonderful experience of a BLACK youth brutalized for the hell of
it by police
hoodlums!
HTML http://www.websmileys.com/sm/violent/sterb050.gif
>:(
Watch the video. enjoy the show. Don't forget to be a "GOOD
GERMAN" and obey the laws because, uh, they are LAWFUL! And, um,
ah, uh, as long as you ain't black, it will NEVER BITE YA IN
THE ASS. LOL! The Fourth Reich is HERE!
HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-200714183404.bmp<br
/>
While NYPD Police Commissioner William Bratton has taken the
rather rare step of suspending David Afandor WITHOUT pay, Tyrane
Isaac, who started the brutality and clearly demonstrated
excessive and unnecessary force with the repeated punches to the
face and body of Tribble, is just on modified duty WITH pay as
is the other officer who did nothing to intervene or support
this young victim of police violence.
Read more about this breaking story here and write Commissioner
Bratton a tweet here to let him know how you feel and that you
want him to keep his recent promise of firing the officers who
are "poisoning the well—the brutal, the corrupt, the racist, the
incompetent."[/size][/color][/quote]
--- Quote ---
>
> In the video below you are witnessing 16-year-old Kahreem
Tribble of Brooklyn, New York, fully non-violent and
surrendered, being brutally beaten with the fists of New York
City Police Department Officer Tyrane Isaac, then smashed in the
face with the loaded gun of NYPD Officer David Afanador.
--- End Quote ---
Caught on hidden camera, NYPD officers beat surrendered, unarmed
teenager with gun and fists
HTML http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/10/07/1334870/-Caught-on-hidden-camera-NYPD-officers-beat-surrendered-unarmed-teenager-with-gun-and-fists
HTML http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/10/07/1334870/-Caught-on-hidden-camera-NYPD-officers-beat-surrendered-unarmed-teenager-with-gun-and-fists
Agelbert NOTE: And yeah!, SURE! If the kid had been white this
would have happened EXACTLY the way it happened, RIGHT?
HTML http://www.desismileys.com/smileys/desismileys_2932.gif
And I would have ignored it because it was a white kid,
RIGHT!!!?
HTML http://www.desismileys.com/smileys/desismileys_2932.gif
--- Quote ---
> Leges Sine Moribus Vanae, means "Laws without morals are
useless".
> Even so faith, if it has not works, is dead, being alone.
James 2:17
--- End Quote ---
#Post#: 2006--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mechanisms of Prejudice: Hidden and Not Hidden
DIR By: AGelbert
Date: October 9, 2014, 1:04 am
---------------------------------------------------------
A proud Representative of the Ferguson Police Department appears
satisfied with the Grand Jury deliberations.
[img]
HTML http://img4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20080719200951/uncyclopedia/images/e/e0/Downarrow.PNG[/img]
[img width=640
height=380]
HTML http://www.doomsteaddiner.net/forum/MGalleryItem.php?id=1666[/img]
Yeah, I'm blonde. Ya got a problem wid dat!!? We hire African
Americans too ([i]as long as they have blonde hair ;). Hey,
don't look at me! I don't make the rules; I just enforce the
LAW. ;D )[/i]
[img width=640
height=480]
HTML http://www.doomsteaddiner.net/forum/MGalleryItem.php?id=402[/img]
Check out the NEW, APPROVED HANG OUT for our LAW ABIDING
([i]whatever they fucking DO, IS the LAW! - so there!
HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-200714191329.bmp)<br
/>"honorable" police officers:
[/i]
[img]
HTML http://img4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20080719200951/uncyclopedia/images/e/e0/Downarrow.PNG[/img]
[img width=640
height=380]
HTML http://www.doomsteaddiner.net/forum/MGalleryItem.php?id=612[/img]
:icon_mrgreen:
The Grand Jury has, in their profound wisdom, and to preserve
the domestic tranquility of the whitey citizens of
Fergut-them-blackies, MO., issued guidelines for all citizens
with more than a drop of black blood more than the "average"
MeriKan
HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-200714191329.bmp<br
/> melanin concentration in order to avoid charges of assaulting
police officers and gratuitous free, high speed bullets when
driving anything other than a pizza delivery vehicle. ;D
[img]
HTML http://img4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20080719200951/uncyclopedia/images/e/e0/Downarrow.PNG[/img]
[img width=640
height=280]
HTML http://www.doomsteaddiner.net/forum/MGalleryItem.php?id=550[/img]
[img width=640
height=380]
HTML http://www.doomsteaddiner.net/forum/MGalleryItem.php?id=557[/img]
#Post#: 2007--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mechanisms of Prejudice: Hidden and Not Hidden
DIR By: AGelbert
Date: October 9, 2014, 7:18 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
GO said,
--- Quote ---
> May I make a remark with regards to our mutual friend Ashvin?
I really think you are going a bit rough on him in regards to
this issue.
--- End Quote ---
You are probably right. I can be a royal pain in ass at times.
HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-200714191329.bmp
But here's the deal, GO. God has given Ashvin a mind, a fabulous
talent for logic and a loquacious vocabulary for a purpose that
goes way beyond a little pro bono work for the poor here and
there. This man is brilliant. there is no question about that.
That brilliance was given to him by God. Ashvin has a
responsibility to go to bat against a fascist regime's brutality
that is above ours BECAUSE he is a lawyer and BECAUSE he risks
disbarment by fighting corruption.
Christ said we would have TRIBULATION in the world His statement
that we should not despair because He has defeated the world has
nothing to do with THIS life until His return. It's PAR FOR THE
COURSE for a Christian to get shafted six ways from sunday
defending truth and justice in a corrupt world. I've been there
(often! :(
HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-200714183312.bmp).<br
/>
Christianity is not now, or ever was, a walk in the park; it's
HARD! The superb mind, talents and law degree Ashvin has are God
given for a purpose in these dark times. With great talents come
great responsibilities. Getting the big house, the car and the
fat portfolio is nice, but not the sine qua non of a Lawyer in
the Service of Christ; attacking injustice IS.
And we Christians are called to exhort each other to work as
best we can for Christ. That's why I give you a hahd time every
now and then. :evil4: God put me here for many reasons, most of
which I probably don't know. But it is quite possible that one
my purposes is to remind you every now and then that gold ain't
the only thing with REAL glitter for your soul.
HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-051113192052.png<br
/>
Just sayin'
As to MKing's baseless conclusions, the calm demeanor of a
police officer is NOT the result of training, as MKing
mistakenly assumes. As a pilot, I could do an engine out
procedure in my sleep. This is what proper training for high
stress situations enable you to do. But the cop here broke the
law, period. There was no danger of assault. The cop acted, not
passionately (which would HAVE made his behavior more
appropriate) but CALMLY. That is EVIDENCE of malice and
aforethought, regardless of what a lawyer for the cop might
argue. I understand human nature quite well. When I trained
pilots, I had to slap the white knuckled hands of students that
had a death grip on the controls and tunnel vision from being
overstressed. I KNOW how people behave when they are stressed
and losing control versus when they are bastards doing the
preplanned thing. I had a narcissistic student that wanted to
solo in 7 hours so he would be the "best" in his Air Force ROTC
group. This fucking social climbing asshole wasn't ready yet. I
told him so. He kept pushing. So, having passed his ground
reference maneuvers in the practice area (but still bothered
about his cockiness - as a danger to himself) I had him start
landing practice. He was quite good but still cocky as hell.
MKing would, WRONGLY, say that's a-fucking-okay. It's not. But
MKing doesn't do introspection so he would not understand. In
brief, cockiness in inexperienced pilots, no matter how much
natural skill at piloting, is often, at best, a dinged airplane
or, at worst, a death sentence.
Anyway, he did his touch and goes fine for an hour. The next
lesson wast the 8th hour and he wanted to solo. He even brought
his girlfriend to witness it from the ground. I said, we'll see.
We did touch and goes and a few landings to a full stop and he
was doing fine so, despite my misgivings with this c o c k y Air
Force ROTC f u c k, I soloed him. He had to do three landings to
a full stop and three takeoffs. While in the traffic pattern,
several aircraft started showing up (all light planes at this
airport). I began to worry. Radio chatter can make new pilots
nervous. C o c k y bastards are NOT used to being nervous (they
are naturally quite gifted so they think they can handle
"whatever". When they get surprised, the nerves fuck them up
worse than those used to spotting their own deficiencies and
acting accordingly). On the third landing the tower delayed
landing clearance and he remained too high while on final
approach (He was rather close to the plane landing in front).
The tower offered for him to "Go Around" (overfly the runway,
fly the traffic pattern in a square and line up more
comfortably. OF COURSE, our "super ace" said, NO PROBLEM! So
there he came, diving with full flaps, eating up half the runway
(and getting REAL NERVOUS but trying not to show it). He made a
fine landing despite the high, fast approach...
But he was in a hurry. There was only a third of the runway left
and he was making a touch and go...
So, he FORGOT to raise the flaps (he left them in the full flap
position - this means the aircraft is much lighter over the
runway and will respond to propeller torque and P-factor changes
more quickly). He applied full power and the plane swung to the
left. He panicked, cut the power and braked and the plane swung
HARDER in the OTHER direction. Pulling the power exacerbated the
opposite torque effect which was amplified by the brakes. He
applied power AGAIN while letting off the brakes and hitting
left rudder and the plane swung HARD to the left. In his final,
OH SHIT moment of defeat (not enough runway to take off), he
pulls the power off and slams on the brakes. AGAIN the plane
swings HARD to the right and ground loops with his left wing
scraping the ground and the entire aircraft (wheels and all!)
off the ground in a severe right turn. I thought the plane was
going to flip over. It had executed a complete turn facing the
opposite direction, with an ever increasing bank angle, off the
runway and on to the taxiway.
The plane sort of hovered there on its left wing for a second,
then slammed down on the tricycle gear.
The s h i t eating grin on that c o c k y bastard's face instead
of a repentant, 'I f u c k e d up' look, ended my training with
him right there. He eventually soloed with another flight
instructor LATER than his entire class of eight ROTC pilots.
Humility is required, not just for those of us average plodders,
but for the MKings of this world. Not that it does any good to
tell THEM that.
If that driver in the video above had been black, he would be
dead. MKing is full of c o c k y S3 Baloney. Then again, that
driver is an execellent example of white privilege in action. If
you think a black guy would get out of his car, argue with a cop
there and ask, "What's wrong with you?" when a cop is pointing a
weapon at him, then you must be in MKing's la-la land.
HTML http://www.pic4ever.com/images/ugly004.gif
#Post#: 2008--------------------------------------------------
A hummingbird’s brain: Largest proportion per body weight in the
bird kingdom!
DIR By: AGelbert
Date: October 9, 2014, 8:19 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
MKing,
As President Reagan used to say, "There you go again. ;D".
Hyperbole and extreme examples of irrational behavior are simply
fallacious debating techniques. I'm surprised you have not
called me a hypocrite for not asking everyone to "turn the other
cheek", so to speak. ;) But then, since you are a chief
advocate of separation of "church" (i.e. morality, the golden
rule, etc. ;D) and state, I guess you wouldn't look too good
counseling me to play dead and TAKE IT for Christ's sake.
Sigh.... ::) Mens rea, MKing, invoives malice and aforethought.
It is the essence of the criminal mind and mindset. It involves
premeditation, something that is regarded very seriously in,
what used to be, our justice system.
WHY is that, MKing? Aren't you the guy always talking about
"doing the math?". Isn't the illegal ACT (actus reus - action or
conduct that is a constituent element of a crime, as opposed to
the mental state of the accused.) the main issue in your DO THE
MATH world? For YOU it is, maybe. And I know why.
HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-051113192052.png<br
/>
You have a modus operandi and modus vivendi that evidences mens
rea in almost every statement you make about the fossil fuel
industry, global warming, human rights, appropriate behavior for
police, white privilege and abuse of minorities.
It's all about where YOU are sitting, isn't it? You have money
and benefit from the status quo. So, you "prudently" and
ACTIVELY have set out to undermine anything that could "rock
that boat".
You ponder and, with malice and aforethought, set out to use
your keen intelligence, scientific knowledge, training and
vocabulary to undermine the truth and deny the daily crimes
being committed by the corrupt fascist, racist and fossil fuel
oligarchic status quo. You are AIDING AND ABETTING criminality.
You are a willing accessory to injustice and global crime. That
means you have a GUILTY MIND.
You claim you are amoral. Of course! That way, you can justify
absolutely any behavior, no matter how morally repugnant,
because you have gotten away with it. How fucking convenient!
How Machiavellian.
My personal policy is to turn the other cheek and TAKE IT when
dealing with EVERYBODY, not just the police. That said, I do
not, and never will, find fault with a person who, if assaulted
physically by a police officer, responds passionately (NO MENS
REA THERE AT ALL - the natural human propensity to dislike being
beaten and engage in instinctive defensive action is NOT a
premeditated act and should NEVER be considered assault) by
physically defending himself. It is a travesty of the law to
call THAT an assault on a police officer. You know that. You
just don't give a damn because it hasn't rung your personal bell
yet.
All that said, I am in agreement with you and Ashvin that we'll
never solve this problem by attempting to respond in kind if a
police officer brutalizes us. I froze in position while a cop
tried to entrap me into defending myself so he could assault me
(see what an emperor penguin does when a leopard seal tries to
take a bite out of it ;D).
Nevertheless, it is our duty to defend any citizen that does so
and to do everything we can to rein in this police brutality.
It's NOT lawful, no matter what some "law" claims in regard to
"latitude" for the police. It's another step in the march to the
Fourth Reich. When they came for the Blacks, you said nothing.
When they come for YOU, you will remember me. Have a nice day.
[move]NOW for some interesting information to brighten the day
of decent people:
HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-200714183632.bmp[/move]
HTML http://www.curiositiesbydickens.com/wp-content/uploads/colorful-hummingbird.jpg
Hummingbirds are NATIVE AMERICANS!
HTML http://www.coh2.org/images/Smileys/huhsign.gif
HTML http://www.pic4ever.com/images/treeswing.gif
They are only found in the Western Hemisphere — from
southeastern Alaska down to southern Chile — with most living in
the tropics. There are more than 325 species of hummingbirds!
Here are some interesting facts on these beautiful creatures:
The bright radiant color on hummingbirds comes from iridescent
coloring like on a soap bubble or prism, and are used to attract
mates.
A hummingbird’s brain is 4.2% of its body weight, the largest
proportion in the bird kingdom.
Hummingbirds are very smart and they can remember every flower
they have been to and how long it will take a flower to refill.
Hummingbirds can hear better than humans, but have little to no
sense of smell.
Hummingbirds can see farther than humans and can even see
ultraviolet light!
Their heart beats up to 1,260 times per minute and their
metabolism is roughly 100 times that of an elephant. :o
A hummingbird’s heart is 2.5% of the total body weight.
Their body temperature is around 107 degrees Fahrenheit.
Only eight species regularly breed in the United States, though
up to two dozen species may visit the country or be reported as
regular visitors.
Their maximum forward flight speed is 30 miles per hour, though
they can reach up to 60 miles per hour in a dive.
Despite their small size, hummingbirds are one of the most
aggressive bird species and will regularly attack jays, crows
and hawks that enter their territory.
HTML http://www.pic4ever.com/images/cowboypistol.gif
Historically, they were hunted for their vibrant, colorful
feathers. At present, habitat loss/destruction are the
hummingbirds main threat to survival. Every specie of
hummingbirds are currently listed as vulnerable or endangered on
the IUCN red list.
Up Close and Personal with the Hummingbird *videos
HTML http://knowbefore.weatherbug.com/2014/10/09/close-personal-hummingbird/
#Post#: 2011--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mechanisms of Prejudice: Hidden and Not Hidden
DIR By: AGelbert
Date: October 9, 2014, 10:23 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Wed Oct 08, 2014 at 09:42 AM PDT.
Police pepper spray black teen because he couldn't possibly be
part of white family
by I give in to sin
Fuquay-Varina, North Carolina
Foster parents Ricky and Stacy Tyler left the side entrance door
unlocked for 18 year old DeShawn Currie, on Monday afternoon -
aware DeShawn was coming home early that day to an empty house.
A neighbor spotted the teen entering the home and called 911 to
report a break in. Three officers responded in pavlovian
fashion, handling the teen as a suspect rather than putting
aside racial bias and giving the black kid the benefit of the
doubt. After ordering DeShawn to put his hands on the door,
said DeShawn. "I was like, 'For what? This is my house.' I was
like, 'Why are y'all in here?'"
the cops pointed to photos of the Tyler's three white children
and decided he didn't belong there. DeShawn, justly upset,
objected to being treated like a criminal in his own home. Of
course, in Copworld, that translates to being threatening and
belligerent so that's a pepper spraying to the face. Stacy Tyler
arrived home to find E.M.S workers tending to DeShawn. Cops
didn't pepper spray her.
"My 5-year-old last night, she looked at me and said, 'Mama I
don't understand why they hated our brother, and they had to
come in and hurt him.'"
In addition to DeShawn still being alive, the best part of this
story is being reminded that yes, wonderful people still exist.
"He's my baby boy just as much as my other three children are,"
said Stacy.
HTML http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/10/08/1335141/-police-pepper-spray-black-teen-because-he-couldn-t-possibly-be-part-of-white-family
HTML http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/10/08/1335141/-police-pepper-spray-black-teen-because-he-couldn-t-possibly-be-part-of-white-family
But, uh, naturally, this is just an "isolated incident", of
course. I mean, if this had been a BLACK neighborhood and a
BLACK person called 911 that a WHITE prowler was seen....([i]You
get the idea... ;D ;)), I am CERTAIN the police would have
pepper sprayed the WHITE kid after seeing pictures of BLACK kids
on the wall... [/i]
HTML http://www.freesmileys.org/emoticons/tuzki-bunnys/tuzki-bunny-emoticon-026.gif
Racism? What racism? Quit tryin' to play the racist card! Gott
mit uns!
HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-311013200859.png
HTML http://pullzone1.atlas.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Screen-Shot-2014-04-17-at-2.36.23-PM.png
Whoops, wrong picture. :-[ But the past is sometimes prologue.
Have a nice day, GOOD GERMANS!
#Post#: 2022--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mechanisms of Prejudice: Hidden and Not Hidden
DIR By: AGelbert
Date: October 11, 2014, 5:27 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Protests Continue in St. Louis Over Police Shooting of Another
Black Teen
By Press TV Global Research, October 10, 2014 Region: USA
Theme: Law and Justice, Police State & Civil Rights
Hundreds of angry protesters have clashed with police in the US
city of St. Louis for a second consecutive night after a white
police officer fatally shot another black teenager.
As many as 400 demonstrators chanted and marched through St.
Louis in the state of Missouri on Thursday night following loud
protests the night before over the shooting death of 18-year-old
Vonderrit Myers Jr. by an off-duty white policeman on Wednesday.
The latest police shooting took place two months after Darren
Wilson, a white police officer shot and killed 18-year-old
Michael Brown in Ferguson, a predominantly black suburb of St.
Louis, sparking weeks of violent protests.
Thursday’s demonstration over Myers’ death grew increasingly
chaotic overnight with police arresting several protesters and
one officer getting slightly injured.
Several American flags were also burned and stomped on by the
protesters. “It’s not our flag,” said Elizabeth Vega, an artist
who said she had been protesting since Brown’s death. “Our
children are being killed in the street. This flag doesn’t cover
black or brown people.”
Gina Gowdy, 46, stood for hours waving an upside-down American
flag. “I have three grandsons,” she said. “This has to stop.
They are assassinating our black young men. People are fed up.”
The St. Louis police department has refused to identify the
32-year-old off-duty officer who was working for a private
security firm when he killed Myers.
St. Louis Police Chief Sam Dotson told reporters that the black
teen got into “physical alteration” ;D with the policeman
before he was fatally wounded.
HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-200714191329.bmp<br
/>He said
HTML http://www.u.arizona.edu/~patricia/cute-collection/smileys/lying-smiley.gif<br
/>the suspect allegedly turned and “pointed a gun at the officer
and fired at least
HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-200714191329.bmp<br
/> ;D three rounds at the officer.”
The victim’s family, however, contend that the police are lying.
“The police are lying,” Joseph Cotton, Myers’s grandfather, said
outside the family home on Thursday.
The victim’s mother told The Associated Press by phone Thursday
that her son wasn’t carrying a gun, as police claim. Syreeta
Myers said her son was holding a sandwich when he was killed.
“Police lie. They lied about Michael Brown, too,” she said.
Several civil rights organizations and protest groups have
planned marches during the weekend over the killing of Michael
Brown with Myers’ death on Wednesday expected to add fuel to the
fire.
Police brutality and the unnecessary use of heavy-handed tactics
have become a major concern across the US in recent years. US
police shoot and kill an average of 1,000 people a year >:( ,
1 in 4 of whom are unarmed, according to a report by the Police
Policy Studies Council.
HTML http://www.globalresearch.ca/protests-continue-in-st-louis-over-police-shooting-of-another-black-teen/5407356
HTML http://www.globalresearch.ca/protests-continue-in-st-louis-over-police-shooting-of-another-black-teen/5407356
Agelbert NOTE: SURE, the GRAND JURY is going to sort out this
ISOLATED INCIDENT.
HTML http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-TzWpwHzCvCI/T_sBEnhCCpI/AAAAAAAAME8/IsLpuU8HYxc/s1600/nooo-way-smiley.gif<br
/> Have a nice LEGAL AND LAWFUL day.
#Post#: 2024--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mechanisms of Prejudice: Hidden and Not Hidden
DIR By: AGelbert
Date: October 12, 2014, 6:26 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[move]One can see a distinct change for the worse after 1859,
with a marked increase in callousness, ill-treatment and
brutality towards Aboriginal people [/move]
Agelbert NOTE: I've split this article into two. What follows is
the first part. All jacked up fonts and smileys for accent and
highlighting are my doing.
HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-141113185047.png<br
/>
By the way, the LAW profession was INSTRUMENTAL in making all
that you will now read about, LEGISLATED into being LAWFUL AND
LEGAL. They did not lift a FINGER to stop this despite the fact
that most of them were professing "Christians". In fact, they
were the HANDMAIDENS of the pseudo scientific Social Darwinism
true believers in Government by making BUTCHERY legal.
HTML http://www.websmileys.com/sm/aliens/hae51.gif
Admittedly, SOME
laws EVENTUALLY curtailed OPEN SEASON on Aborigines for
Darwinian "Science" (and good "specimen" prices!). Some
scientists are complaining, to this day, about lawful laws that
got rid of many UNLAWFUL LAWS. ;D
But, of course, to the average Australian White back then,
Christian or not, it was JUST PRACTICAL CFS to go with the
effluent flow.
HTML http://www.websmileys.com/sm/aliens/hae51.gif
<br
/>Korah Wills, a mayor and a fine upstanding citizen (just
GOOGLE
him - no mention is made of his LEGAL Aborigine hunting for
science and profit), made a little money, for the good of
science, of course by killing and dismembering an Aborigine.
HTML http://www.websmileys.com/sm/aliens/hae51.gif
Contrary to what many modern folks may claim, some rather
erudite and well reasoned arguments in favor of this "policy"
were made by intelligent, scholarly, educated, logical, prudent,
practical, etc. keen legal minds and luminaries of that era. I
am not being sarcastic. They really WERE being practical. As
many modern jurists will patiently explain to those people like
myself (that don't know nuttin' about LAW
HTML http://www.desismileys.com/smileys/desismileys_6869.gifhttp://www.pic4ever.com/images/shame.gif<br
/>), being based on morality is not only NOT sine qua none for a
LAW to be LAWFUL, it's irrelevant. They managed to cleverly
undermine and discredit any accusations of iniquity as
"sentimentality" (i.e. MORAL considerations must be IGNORED as
being UNLAWFUL according to their Darwinian Definition of
"natural" LAW). Past can be prologue. Enjoy...
Missing the link between Darwin and racism Part 1 of 2
by Warren Nunn
Published: 12 October 2014 (GMT+10)
In an article titled Sorry, atheists, but you’re wrong: The
death of Love your neighbour
HTML http://creation.com/sorry-atheists-but-youre-wrong,
CMI
highlighted how much Australian society had changed for the
worse and linked that to the increasing acceptance of
evolutionary ideas.
Anthony B., from France, in a comment on the article, said
evolution should not be blamed and suggested the ‘religious’ had
a part to play in the poor treatment of Aboriginal Australians
in the 19th century. He wrote:
--- Quote ---
> The rise in gratuitous violence is a disgrace, but as to
whether the theory of evolution is to blame is somewhat
controversial. In the 19C in your country the violence meted out
to aborigenes [sic] was carried out when people were far more
religious than today.
--- End Quote ---
Violence is indeed ‘a disgrace’; but it’s a pity that the
perpetrators of the gratuitous violence don’t seem to see it as
such. And how is teaching them an evolutionary view of their
origins going to change their minds?
But in any case, Anthony B. clearly did not think through his
comment and/or chose to ignore the historical record which shows
that it was evolutionary thinking that convinced society that
indigenous Australians were ‘living missing links’. From that
flowed countless heinous acts of murder, etc, many of which were
done for the ‘benefit’ of allegedly ‘scientific’ knowledge.
In his book One Human Family, CMI’s Managing Director Dr Carl
Wieland reveals the depth of the problem. The following extract
shows clearly, with documentation, that it was the rush to adopt
Charles Darwin’s ideas that fuelled a dramatic upsurge in
shameful actions:
Aboriginals bearing the brunt
An unusual book was published in 1974, called Aborigines in
White Australia: A Documentary History of the Attitudes
Affecting Official Policy and the Australian Aborigine
1697–1973.1 Apart from a few introductory/editorial comments, it
consists almost entirely of substantial excerpts from documents.
These are parliamentary transcripts, court records,
HTML http://images.sodahead.com/polls/000370273/polls_Smiley_Angry_256x256_3451_356175_answer_4_xlarge.pngletters<br
/>to editors, anthropological reports, and so forth. Far from
showing a progressive enlightenment in the attitudes of the
colonists as time goes on, one can see a distinct change for the
worse after 1859, with a marked increase in callousness,
ill-treatment and brutality towards Aboriginal people being
evident in official attitudes. This is not lost on the editor of
the above book, who writes:
“In 1859 Charles Darwin’s book On the Origin of Species
popularized the notion of biological (and therefore social)
evolution. Scholars began to discuss civilization as a unilinear
process with races able to ascend or descend a graduated scale.
The European was … the ‘fittest to survive’ … [The Aboriginal]
was doomed to die out according to a ‘natural law’, like the
dodo and the dinosaur. This theory, supported by the facts at
hand [i.e. that Aboriginal folk were dying out from
ill-treatment and disease—CW] continued to be quoted until well
into the twentieth century when it was noticed that the
dark-skinned race was multiplying. Until that time it could be
used to justify neglect and murder.”
HTML http://www.pic4ever.com/images/126fs2277341.gif
HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-121014144740.jpeg
From the book’s transcript of an interrogation of a policeman
during a Royal Commission of Inquiry in 1861 (p. 83), we read
concerning the use of force against tribal Aboriginals:
“‘And if we did not punish the blacks they would look upon it as
a confession of weakness?’
[color=red]‘Yes, that is exactly my opinion.’
‘It is a question as to which is the strongest race—if we submit
to them they would despise us for it?’
‘Yes …’”
HTML http://www.websmileys.com/sm/aliens/hae51.gif
HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-121014153442.png
The lowly state in which some Australians viewed the indigenous
population was evident before Darwin’s ideas began to take hold.
The influence of evolutionary thinking can also be seen in
another excerpt from Aborigines in White Australia, on p. 100.
The writer quoted, also author of an 1888 book, is justifying
the killing of the native population in the State of Victoria.
He writes:
“As to the ethics of the question, there can be drawn no final
conclusion.”
He says that this is because it is
“a question of temperament; to the sentimental it is undoubtedly
an iniquity; to the practical it represents a distinct step in
human progress, involving the sacrifice of a few thousands of an
inferior race. … But the fact is that mankind, as a race, cannot
choose to act solely as moral beings.
HTML http://www.pic4ever.com/images/2z6in9g.gif
They are governed by
animal laws which urge them blindly forward upon tracks they
scarce can choose for themselves.”
HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-300714025456.bmp<br
/>
In other words, he is justifying ‘iniquity’ (another word for
sin) by appealing to the ‘animal laws’ of the evolutionary
struggle for survival. Opposition can be dismissed as
‘sentimental’—lacking understanding of such ‘natural laws’ .
There were isolated voices of protest. On p. 93, we read of a
letter writer to an Australian newspaper in 1880, who, incensed
by the treatment of his fellow man, stated:
[color=green]“This, in plain language, is how we deal with the
aborigines: On occupying new territory the aboriginal
inhabitants are treated exactly in the same way as the wild
beasts or birds the settlers may find there. Their lives and
their property, the nets, canoes, and weapons which represent as
much labor to them as the stock and buildings of the white
settler, are held by the Europeans as being at their absolute
disposal. Their goods are taken, their children forcibly stolen,
their women carried away, entirely at the caprice of white men.
The least show of resistance is answered by a rifle bullet …
[those] who fancied the amusement have murdered, ravished, and
robbed the blacks without let or hindrance. Not only have they
been unchecked, but the Government of the colony has been always
at hand to save them from the consequences of their crime.”2
HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-121014155219.jpeg
But such voices were readily drowned out by the fashionable
science of the day. Three pages further on, we read of someone
else, also writing in an 1880 newspaper, who said:
“Nothing that we can do will alter the inscrutable and withal
immutable laws which direct our progress on this globe. By these
laws the native races of Australia were doomed on the advent of
the white man, and the only thing left for us to do is to assist
in carrying them out [i.e. helping the ‘laws’ of evolution by
hastening the Aborigines’ doom—CW] with as little cruelty as
possible … We must rule the blacks by fear … .”3
HTML http://dl0.creation.com/articles/p096/c09662/Blacks_slain_racism.jpg
This Australian newspaper article highlights how Aboriginals
were butchered in the name of science. The article mentions 19th
century politician Korah Wills who admitted to killing and
dismembering the body of an Aboriginal.
HTML http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/cb/StateLibQld_1_53460_Korah_Holcombe_Wills_(1828_-_1896).jpg
Korah Wills: Politician, Gentleman, Good Family Man and a Man of
Letters!
HTML http://www.pic4ever.com/images/2rzukw3.gif
Australian secular historian Joanna Cruickshank acknowledges, if
somewhat reluctantly, not only the baneful effects of the
Darwin-inspired ‘scientific racism’ on Australian Aboriginals,
but the way in which belief in our common descent from Adam and
Eve operated to temper such thinking. In a recent article4 on
the topic, she writes:
“Supporters of Darwin have understandably often been reluctant
to acknowledge how closely entangled Darwinism and social
Darwinism were, preferring to distance Darwin from his theory’s
evil twin." ;)
Yet those who debated the theory of evolution in the late
nineteenth century were keenly aware of this connection … .
Nowhere was this more obvious than in Australia.”
She writes how by 1876, the library of a typical squatter
(pastoralist) consisted of books by Shakespeare, John Stuart
Mill, and Darwin. The pattern, widespread today, of church
leaders anxious to compromise with this new ‘scientific’
ideology, was already evident. She writes how in 1869, a
Reverend Bromby gave a public lecture defending Darwin’s book,
in which he
“followed Darwin’s logic in using the apparent dying out of
Aboriginal people as evidence for evolution.
“In response, the Anglican Bishop of Melbourne, Charles Perry,
attacked both Bromby’s evidence and his conclusions. Perry
critiqued what he saw as the scientific inadequacies of Darwin’s
book.
“In particular, however, Perry attacked the view that human
beings could be divided by race—or any other category—into
‘savage’ and ‘civilised’ … .”
HTML http://www.pic4ever.com/images/301.gif
Cruickshank explains that Bromby represented the ‘progressive’
wing of the Church of England. Betraying her pro-evolution bias,
she calls him “open to scientific evidence” and “dismissive of
biblical literalism.” ;D
She continues:
“Perry, by contrast, was a staunch evangelical, uncomfortable
with the theological implications of Darwin’s theory and
horrified at what he saw as a threat to the biblical claim that
all humanity was formed of ‘one blood.’”
Cruickshank goes on to say that when legislation
HTML http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_9HT4xZyDmh4/TOHhxzA0wLI/AAAAAAAAEUk/oeHDS2cfxWQ/s200/Smiley_Angel_Wings_Halo.jpg<br
/>was passed “enshrining the ‘White Australia’ policy and
effectively denying Aboriginal people the vote, few voices were
raised in protest. Progressives and conservatives alike saw the
preservation of the more evolved white race as central to
national identity. ;D
Following Darwin and his contemporaries, they [Aboriginals] were
regarded by scientists and other evolutionary enthusiasts as
‘living missing links’ >:(
“Those few protests against the policy came from unlikely
quarters. The fledgling New South Wales Aborigines Mission, a
small evangelical organization, pointed out that while most
politicians claimed ‘to be ultrademocratic, they are sadly
conservative in democratic practice, and unChristian both in
theory and in practice when they say that a native born
Australian is not a man and a brother because his skin happens
to be a few shades darker than their own.’
HTML http://www.desismileys.com/smileys/desismileys_0293.gif
Finally, and very significantly for our purposes here, this
secular historian states:
“In earlier periods, one of the few persistent barriers to
social Darwinist theory in Australia was the Christian doctrine
that all human beings were of ‘one blood.’”
Agelbert NOTE: We ALL KNOW what SCIENCE and GOVERNMENT DOES
about persistent barriers to "proper modern, progressive, Gott
mit uns, scientific" thinking, now don't we?
HTML http://www.imgion.com/images/01/Angry-animated-smiley.jpg
A gruesome trade; Darwin's Bodysnatchers for "Science"
Continued in part 2:
Missing the link between Darwin and racism Part 2 of 2
HTML http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/who-can-you-trust/mechanisms-of-prejudice-hidden-and-not-hidden/msg2025/#msg2025
#Post#: 2025--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mechanisms of Prejudice: Hidden and Not Hidden
DIR By: AGelbert
Date: October 12, 2014, 7:47 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Missing the link between Darwin and racism Part 2 of 2
--- Quote ---
> Pickled Aboriginal brains were also in demand, to try to
demonstrate that they were inferior to those of whites. >:(
--- End Quote ---
A gruesome trade; Darwin's Bodysnatchers for "Science"
The body parts of Australian Aboriginal folk were keenly sought
after. Following Darwin and his contemporaries, they were
regarded by scientists and other evolutionary enthusiasts as
‘living missing links’. The remains of some 10,000 dead
Aboriginal people in all were shipped to British museums over
the course of this frenzy to provide specimens for this ‘new
science’.5
David Monaghan, an Australian journalist, extensively documented
these—and far worse—effects of evolutionary belief. He spent 18
months researching his subject in London, culminating in an
article in Australia’s Bulletin magazine6 and a TV documentary
called Darwin’s Body-Snatchers. This aired in Britain on October
8, 1990.
Along with museum curators from around the world, Monaghan says,
some of the top names in British science were involved in this
large-scale grave-robbing trade. These included anatomist Sir
Richard Owen, anthropologist Sir Arthur Keith, and Charles
Darwin himself. Darwin wrote asking for Tasmanian skulls when
only four full-blooded native Tasmanians were left alive. (Ever
the Victorian gentleman, his request came with a caveat;
provided, that is, that it would not upset their feelings.)
American evolutionists, too, were strongly involved in this
flourishing ‘industry’ of gathering specimens of ‘sub-humans’,
according to Monaghan. The Smithsonian Institution in Washington
holds the remains of 15,000 individuals of various groups of
people.
Museums were not only interested in bones, but in fresh skins as
well. These would provide interesting evolutionary displays when
stuffed. Pickled Aboriginal brains were also in demand, to try
to demonstrate that they were inferior to those of whites.
Good prices were being offered for such specimens.
HTML http://www.smilies.4-user.de/include/Spiele/smilie_game_017.gif<br
/>Monaghan shows, on the basis of written evidence from the
time,
that there is little doubt that many of the ‘fresh’ specimens
were obtained by simply going out and killing the Aboriginal
people. The way in which the requests for specimens were
announced was often a poorly disguised invitation to do just
that. A death-bed memoir from Korah Wills, who became mayor of
Bowen, Queensland, in 1866, graphically described how he killed
and dismembered a local tribesman in 1865 to provide a
scientific specimen.
Monaghan’s research indicated that Edward Ramsay, curator of the
Australian Museum in Sydney for 20 years from 1874, was
particularly heavily involved. He published a museum booklet
which appeared to include his, my and your Aboriginal relatives
under the designation of ‘Australian animals’. It also gave
instructions not only on how to rob graves, but also on how to
plug up bullet wounds in freshly killed ‘specimens’.
Many freelance collectors worked under Ramsay’s guidance. Four
weeks after he had requested skulls of Bungee (Russell River)
blacks, a keen young science student sent him two, announcing
that they, the last of their tribe, had just been shot. In the
1880s, Monaghan writes, Ramsay complained that laws recently
passed in Queensland to stop the slaughter of Aboriginals were
affecting his supply.
The Angel of Black Death
HTML http://gutenberg.spiegel.de/gutenb/berend/altezeit/bilder/0224.jpg
[i]The 19th century German naturalist Amalie Dietrich was part
of the gruesome trade for Australian Aboriginals—one of Darwin’s
bodysnatchers.
According to Monaghan’s Bulletin article, that was the nickname
given to a German evolutionist, Amalie Dietrich. She came to
Australia asking station7 owners for their Aboriginal workers to
be shot for specimens. 'She was particularly interested in skin
for stuffing and mounting for her museum employers. Although
evicted from at least one property, she shortly returned home
with her specimens.
Monaghan also recounts how a New South Wales missionary was a
horrified witness to the slaughter by mounted police of a group
of dozens of Aboriginal men, women and children. Forty-five
heads were then boiled down and the ten best skulls were packed
off for overseas.
Still in recent times
As much as one would like to think that such attitudes are long
gone, remnants still linger, including in the scientific
community itself. This is shown by a telling extract from a
secular writer in 2004 (emphasis added):
“It has been estimated that the remains of some 50,000
Aborigines are housed in medical and scientific institutions
abroad.
HTML http://www.pic4ever.com/images/swear1.gif
>:( The
Tasmanian Aboriginal remains in particular are there for two
reasons. First, at the time of collection they were considered
to be the most primitive link in the evolutionary chain, and
therefore worthy of scientific consideration. Second, each skull
fetched between five and ten shillings. … in anthropological
terms, while the remains maintain currency as a museum item, the
notion that they are a scientific curiosity remains. Put simply,
if it is now accepted that Tasmanian Aborigines are not the
weakest evolutionary link, that they are simply another group of
people with attendant rights to dignity and respect, there is no
longer any reason to keep their remains for study. Institutions
should acknowledge that by returning the remains. There are two
reasons why this is not as straightforward as it appears. First,
the British Museum Act of 1962 did not allow British government
institutions to deaccess stored material. Second, a number of
scientists haven’t accepted that Tasmanian Aborigines are not on
the bottom of Social Darwinist scales, and until they do, feet
are being dragged.”8
Darwinist views about the racial inferiority of Aboriginal
Australians drastically influenced their treatment in other ways
too. These views were backed up by alleged biological evidences,
which were only much later seen for what they were—distortions
based on bias.
HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-200714183337.bmp<br
/>In 1908 an inspector from the Department of Aborigines in the
West Kimberley region wrote that he was glad to have received an
order to transport all half-castes away from their tribe to the
mission. He said it was “the duty of the State” to give these
children (who, by their evolutionary reasoning, were going to be
intellectually superior to full-blooded Aboriginal ones) a
“chance to lead a better life than their mothers”. He wrote: “I
would not hesitate for one moment to separate a half-caste from
an Aboriginal mother, no matter how frantic her momentary
grief”.9 Notice the use of the word ‘momentary’ to qualify
‘grief’; such lesser-evolved beings, sub-human as they were,
were to him clearly not capable of feeling real grief.
Many genuine Australian Christians and church institutions,
though patronizing on occasion, seem to have tried to protect
Aboriginal people from the full brunt of the many inhumanities
sanctioned by evolutionary thinking. However, like today, most
church leaders and institutions compromised in some form or
another with this new Darwinian ‘science’. [size=12pt] Virtually
no Christian voice in Australia did what was required—to affirm
boldly the real history of mankind as given in the Bible. For
the church to have stressed regarding Aboriginal people that we
all go back only a few thousand years, to Noah’s family, would
have helped strongly refute both pre-Darwinian racism and the
maxi-spurt it received from Darwin, It would also have
anticipated the findings of modern genetics, that biologically
we are all extremely closely related.
HTML http://www.dw.de/image/0,,2362526_4,00.jpg
Aborigine Bob Weatherall protested in London against the Museum
of Natural History's decision to test indigenous bones.
Australia calls for German museums to give back human bones
HTML http://www.dw.de/australia-calls-for-german-museums-to-give-back-human-bones/a-2426639
HTML http://www.dw.de/image/0,,2426771_4,00.jpg
Whoopie! Great Grandma is doing her part for SCIENCE!
HTML http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-TzWpwHzCvCI/T_sBEnhCCpI/AAAAAAAAME8/IsLpuU8HYxc/s1600/nooo-way-smiley.gif
Related Articles
The scars of a nation
Genetics and the human family - Chapter 3 of "One Blood"by Ken
Ham, Dr Don Batten and Dr Carl Wieland
HTML http://creation.com/one-blood-chapter-3-genetics-and-the-human-familyOne<br
/>Blood
Sorry, atheists, but you’re wrong: The death of Love your
neighbour
HTML http://creation.com/sorry-atheists-but-youre-wrong
Darwin’s bodysnatchers: new horrors
The Australian Aboriginal
Further Reading
Blood brothers
Aboriginal cannibalism?—and our
Pre-Adamic man: were there human beings on Earth before Adam?
‘Race mixing’ and animal hybrids—condemned by God?
Australian Aboriginal Flood Stories
References and notes
Edited by Sharman Stone, Heinemann Educational Books, Melbourne,
1974.
The full text (which makes interesting reading) can be found at
trove.nla.gov.au. .
Full text at trove.nla.gov.au.
Cruickshank, J., Darwin, race and religion in Australia, ABC
Religion and Ethics, abc.net.au, 11 Apr 2011, accessed 13 April
2011. .
Darwin’s bodysnatchers, Sydney Morning Herald, March 3, 1990,
cited in Creation 12(3):21, 1990.
The original apparently stated that only 3,000 sets of remains
were left after the bombing raids of World War II.
Monaghan, D., The body-snatchers, The Bulletin, 12 November
1991, pp. 30–38. Return to text.
‘Station’ (e.g. cattle station, sheep station) is the Australian
designation for what would be termed ‘ranch’ in the US. Many
Aboriginal people worked on stations, often as stockmen (the
equivalent of ‘cowboys’ or ‘cowhands’).
Onsman, A., Truganini’s funeral, Island, No. 96, 2004. Truganini
was the last surviving female full-blood Tasmanian. .
Ref. 6. p.38. .
HTML http://creation.com/missing-the-link-between-darwin-and-racism
Agelbert NOTE: If you are an Aborigine, FORGET damages awards of
portions of the estates from, or RETROACTIVE MURDER CHARGES AND
posthumous trials for, all these serial murderers. ???
Lawyers will calmly state that the murder wasn't murder when it
was committed because it was, uhm, LEGAL and LAWFUL then. ;D
Water under bridge, old boy. But our law firm will be happy to
sue a British, German or American Museum (Hello, Smithsonian!
;D) to get the bones of your great grand pappy for a reasonable
fee. No, we can't get them to stop displaying the bones for
science until we win the lawsuit. No, sorry, we can't get all
the pictures taken of your deceased relatives in the museum
files collected and given to you. Science must, after all, be
considered. Just consider that your relatives "donated" their
bodies to science like people do today when they sign that part
of their driver's license. Remember, our legal system is JUST!
Trust us. We are lawyers. We know the LAW and we are the ONLY
defense you have and bulwark you can rely on to protect you from
injustice, abusive government and anarchy!
Would you like to engage our firm to get justice for you and
your family from this heinous act done to your relatives? I
would be incensed if this outrage had been perpetrated on my
ancestors! Justice must be done!
HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-300614160245.gif
Excuse me?
No, we are unable to take the case on contingency or pro bono.
Sorry. Now, if you will excuse me, I have an appointment with a
paying client. Best of luck to you, and God Bless you.
HTML http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_9HT4xZyDmh4/TOHhxzA0wLI/AAAAAAAAEUk/oeHDS2cfxWQ/s200/Smiley_Angel_Wings_Halo.jpg<br
/>
HTML http://www.kenjacobs.com/lawyer3ag.jpg
#Post#: 2136--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mechanisms of Prejudice: Hidden and Not Hidden
DIR By: AGelbert
Date: November 1, 2014, 5:42 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Fri Oct 31, 2014 at 04:01 PM EDT.
The complete guide to every public eyewitness interview in the
shooting death of Mike Brown
by
Shaun King
Mike Brown was shot and killed by Officer Darren Wilson in broad
daylight on a hot Saturday afternoon in Ferguson, Missouri.
Consequently, eyewitnesses were standing at virtually every
angle to observe exactly what happened that day. Seven have come
forward publicly. Many gave interviews in the immediate
aftermath of the shooting on Canfield Drive. Below is an
annotated list of every public interview and video given by each
eyewitness.
Dorian Johnson
HTML http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qQeni0qt8Vo&feature=player_embedded<br
/>
Dorian Johnson is an essential eyewitness. He was walking with
Mike Brown when they were first confronted by Officer Wilson and
has given the only public account of what was said and done
throughout the early stages of that confrontation.
Agelbert NOTE: Go link at bottom for links to all interviews.
• Here is the video interview with Johnson still on the scene
soon after Brown was killed in which he describes everything he
saw.
• Here is the same video from Johnson, but from a different
camera angle.
• A very detailed 12-minute interview with Johnson by Al
Sharpton in which he recounts every detail he could remember.
• Here Johnson does a video interview with the local press in
which he recounts the story, the same as he said when he was on
the scene. But he adds that it felt as if Brown was gunned down
"like an animal."
• Here is an interview Johnson did with Chris Hayes just days
after Brown was killed.
• Here Johnson does an interview with CNN's Wolf Blitzer.
• Here Johnson does an interview with CNN's Don Lemon after
Brown's funeral.
• Here Johnson gives an interview more two months later, on Oct.
30, again with CNN's Lemon, and stands by every aspect of his
previous account.
Additional ALL links to interviews can be found below the fold
at the link below.
HTML http://www.pic4ever.com/images/301.gif
HTML http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/10/31/1340611/-The-complete-guide-to-every-public-eyewitness-interview-in-the-shooting-death-of-Mike-Brown
--- Quote ---
> “We as a nation must undergo a radical revolution of values…
when machines and computers, profit motives and property rights,
are considered more important than people, the giant triplets of
racism, materialism and militarism are incapable of being
conquered.”
> -- Martin Luther King, Jr. April 4, 1967
--- End Quote ---
--- Quote ---
>
> "It is said that no one truly knows a nation until one has
been inside its jails. [b]A nation should not be judged by how
it treats its highest citizens, but its lowest ones."
> Gandhi
--- End Quote ---
Kajieme Powell's Sacrifice
HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-220814142854.png
HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-220814234357.png
It's time to listen to Martin Luther King, Jr., Gandhi, Kajieme
Powell, Chris Hedges and Will Allen. If we don't, mankind is
doomed.
HTML http://www.desismileys.com/smileys/desismileys_2955.gif
HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-211213180651.png
HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-080814213147.png
[I]The Concept of Race.[/I]
HTML http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/geopolitics/power-structures-in-human-society-pros-and-cons-part-1/msg767/#msg767
#Post#: 2137--------------------------------------------------
The Mike Brown Shooting: What You're Not Being Told
DIR By: AGelbert
Date: November 1, 2014, 6:10 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9_icVWKO4_o&feature=player_embedded<br
/>
The Mike Brown Shooting What You're Not Being Told
Mike Brown was MURDERED in cold blood, PERIOD.
HTML http://images.sodahead.com/polls/000370273/polls_Smiley_Angry_256x256_3451_356175_answer_4_xlarge.png
HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-161014203318.jpeg
HTML https://secure2.convio.net/pep/images/content/pagebuilder/darrenwilson.jpg
So why does DARREN the RACIST MURDERER look unconcerned?
HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-291014182422.png
[center][img]
HTML http://img4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20080719200951/uncyclopedia/images/e/e0/Downarrow.PNG[/img][/center]
[center]
HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-280914173045.png[/center]
DARREN "understands" Our Court System and the Constitution QUITE
WELL...
HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-241013183046.jpeg
*****************************************************
Page 7 of 38
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page