URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Renewable Revolution
  HTML https://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Catastrophic Climate Change
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 504--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 🚩 Global Climate Chaos ☠️
       By: AGelbert Date: December 6, 2013, 1:34 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m6pFDu7lLV4&feature=player_embedded<br
       />
       #Post#: 561--------------------------------------------------
       Re: &#128681; Global Climate Chaos &#9760;&#65039;
       By: AGelbert Date: December 16, 2013, 5:25 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2xYWIbgr_v0&feature=player_embedded
       #Post#: 623--------------------------------------------------
       Re: &#128681; Global Climate Chaos &#9760;&#65039;
       By: AGelbert Date: December 26, 2013, 2:39 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Climate Change Threatens Peru’s Economic Progress As Amazon
       Becomes Net Emitter of CO2  :(
       Climate Change Threatens Peru’s Economic Progress As Amazon
       Becomes Net Emitter of CO2
       Climate News Network | December 26, 2013 12:22 pm | Comments
       By Alex Kirby
       Peru is the country chosen to host the 2014 United Nations (UN)
       climate conference, a key meeting for trying to advance an
       ambitious plan to rein in greenhouse emissions which is planned
       for agreement in 2015.
       Scientists think Peru’s role reversal from being a carbon sink
       to a net emitter of CO2 in 2012 is result of droughts in the
       western Amazon.
       But the country has recently earned a rather more dubious
       distinction. In 2012, for the first time, the Peruvian Amazon
       became a net emitter of carbon dioxide (CO2) rather than oxygen,
       according to the latest human development country report of the
       UN Development Programme (UNDP).
       The Amazon rainforest usually acts as a carbon sink, absorbing
       atmospheric CO2 rather than releasing it. Scientists think this
       reversal of its normal behavior results from the droughts in the
       western Amazon in 2005 and 2010 and say it shows Peru’s
       vulnerability to climate change.
       Peru has more than halved its poverty rate in the last decade,
       from 48.5 percent in 2004 to 25.8 percent in 2012. But the 2013
       UNDP report said its vulnerability to a warming climate could
       cancel the progress it has made in directing economic growth
       into sustained poverty reduction.
       Glaciers Going
       One of the UNDP report’s authors, Maria Eugenia Mujica, said:
       “If we disregard [environmental] sustainability, whatever
       progress we have made in poverty reduction or improvement of
       human development will just be erased due to climate change.”
       With a temperature rise in the Andes of 0.7 degrees Celsius
       between 1939 and 2006, Peru has already lost 39 percent of its
       tropical glaciers. Temperature rises of up to 6 degrees Celsius
       are expected in many parts of the Andes by the end of this
       century.
       Peru’s economic success is in some cases directly linked to
       activities which contribute to climate change, for example
       illegal gold mining and logging, and the cocaine trade—all of
       them environmentally destructive, but lucrative.
       “The growth does not come from education or health, but from
       predatory activities, like [resource] extraction and mining,”
       said Francisco Santa Cruz, another of the report’s authors.
       Peru is trying to protect itself against the ravages of a warmer
       world, but the odds are against it. It recently announced plans
       to invest $6 billion USD in renewable energy projects: around
       the same time came predictions that climate change could cost
       between 8 percent and 34 percent of its GDP. A report by the
       Inter-American Development Bank has said the entire Latin
       American and Caribbean region will face annual damages from
       global warming of about $100 billion USD by 2050.
       Taken for Granted
       The Global Canopy Programme and the International Center for
       Tropical Agriculture, describing climate change as “a threat
       multiplier,” called in a report this month for a new security
       agenda for Amazonia and the countries of the region.
       Manuel Pulgar, Peru’s environment minister, said at the report’s
       launch: “Climate change is a global problem, but one that will
       multiply local and regional problems in unforeseeable ways.”
       “In Latin America, we have taken Amazonia and its seemingly
       limitless water and forests as a given,” Pulgar continued. “But
       recent unprecedented droughts have shown us just what happens
       when that water security falters.
       “It impacts food and energy production, it affects the wellbeing
       of entire populations, and it leaves governments and businesses
       with a big bill to pay,” Pulgar concluded. “The science is
       clear, so we cannot afford to miss the opportunity for positive
       action now.” [img width=100
       height=70]
  HTML http://www.nhclc.org/files/nhclc/u38/fl-church-translators-20120622-001.jpg[/img]
  HTML http://ecowatch.com/2013/12/26/climate-change-threatens-perus-amazon-net-emitter-co2/
       #Post#: 646--------------------------------------------------
       Re: &#128681; Global Climate Chaos &#9760;&#65039;
       By: AGelbert Date: January 1, 2014, 10:34 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GhJR3ywIijo&feature=player_embedded
       #Post#: 677--------------------------------------------------
       Re: &#128681; Global Climate Chaos &#9760;&#65039;
       By: AGelbert Date: January 8, 2014, 8:54 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [font=arial black]New Report Affirms Dark Money Lines Utility
       Pockets[/font]
       The rooftop solar industry closed out 2013 with a 4-0 winning
       streak against the monopoly utilities’ attempts to eliminate net
       metering. Net metering gives rooftop solar customers full retail
       credit for the excess electricity they deliver to the electric
       grid. The utility turns around and sells this electricity to
       homes and businesses nearby, and saves money on big costs like
       transmission and distribution.
       Idaho, Louisiana, California, and Arizona all upheld net
       metering this year, siding with public opinion, consumer choice,
       and competition. The battle in Arizona was particularly heated,
       as Arizona Public Service (APS) took the fight to new levels
       with dark money tactics and a multimillion-dollar
       campaign against rooftop solar. After reports from October
       exposed the utility for lying about funding anti-solar ad
       campaigns and phony grassroots organizations, a web of dark
       money surfaced.
       In response, Arizonans came out in droves to support the energy
       choice and competition that rooftop solar provides. More than
       30,000 Arizonans wrote to the state’s Corporation Commission to
       defend net metering, particularly notable considering there are
       only 18,000 rooftop solar customers in the state. On the day of
       the final hearing in November, more than 1,000 Arizonans
       descended on the Arizona Corporation Commission headquarters.
       Ultimately, Arizona Public Service failed to get the large solar
       tax they had requested, and net metering was upheld.
       The Arizona activities make us question which other utilities
       are using dark money tactics in their state-by-state campaigns
       against rooftop solar. Yet other utilities and their trade
       association, Edison Electric Institute (EEI), remain silent on
       this issue, even after a request that they disavow such tactics.
       A recent Washington Post article validates the pervasiveness of
       dark money in climate change denial and the fights against
       solar. The piece, titled, “The Dark Money in Climate Change,”
       reports:
       The thrust of the study, done by Dr. Robert J. Brulle, is that
       climate-denial money has largely been driven underground to
       dark-money sources. About 75 percent of the money backing
       climate-denial efforts is untraceable, primarily via
       conservative foundations and shadowy tax-exempt groups that
       obscure their funding sources.
       The story goes on to explain that untraceable funding to attack
       climate change has increased at the same time that publicly
       traceable funding from major industrial donors has decreased.
       Notable industrial donors whose public funding has dwindled of
       late include ExxonMobil and Koch Industries. As the Washington
       Post states, “You don’t have to be a genius to figure out what’s
       happening there.”
       As we enter 2014, net metering battles are already underway in
       notable solar markets such as Colorado. Fortunately, while the
       solar industry doesn’t have the deep pockets of fossil fuel
       supporters, we do have the public on our side. According to a
       new poll, nearly four in five Colorado voters (78%) support
       solar net metering. What’s more, these results match other
       state-by-state findings across the country – including
       California, Arizona and Hawaii – that show overwhelming public
       support for rooftop solar.
       The Washington Post affirms that there’s no shortage of dark
       money supporting monopoly utilities. It remains to be seen where
       and how it will surface in 2014.
  HTML http://cleantechnica.com/2014/01/07/new-report-affirms-dark-money-lines-utility-pockets/#s5p0Yr061R9AJgjQ.99
       [img width=740
       height=600]
  HTML http://s3.amazonaws.com/dk-production/images/63135/large/Climatic_Change_Denial_Funding_zps6e784905.png?1388188139[/img]
       The above is climate denial funding. This is in LOCKSTEP with
       support for utility monopolies. So look to MKing's fossil fueler
       pals above who claim they are more "competitive" that Renewable
       Energy
       #Post#: 716--------------------------------------------------
       Re: &#128681; Global Climate Chaos &#9760;&#65039;
       By: AGelbert Date: January 21, 2014, 8:04 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       
  HTML http://www.freesmileys.org/emoticons/emoticon-anime-034.gif
       NOAA: 2013 Was Tied For The Fourth-Hottest Year On Record
       By Ryan Koronowski
       While Americans deal with a wintery January and try to
       understand what a polar vortex is, one thing is clear: 2013 was
       one of the ten hottest years since records began in 1880. For
       the 37th consecutive year, global temperatures were higher than
       average.
       The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
       reported Tuesday that 2013 was tied with 2003 as the
       fourth-warmest year since records began in 1880 — annual land
       and ocean surface temperatures were 0.62°C (1.12°F) higher than
       average. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration
       (NASA) reported that along with 2009 and 2006, 2013 was tied for
       the seventh-warmest year on record, “continuing a long-term
       trend of rising global temperatures.” NASA used essentially the
       same data — it just processes it slightly differently than NOAA
       does. Indeed, the difference between 4th place and 7th place is
       just two-hundredths of a degree. NASA had the “temperature
       anomaly” — how much the global temperature deviated from the
       average — pegged at 0.60°C and NOAA had 0.58°C.
       
       The data from 2013 is just one report, but it is another data
       point in a trend that people can expect as the atmosphere gets
       more and more filled with increasing amounts of heat-trapping
       greenhouse gases. Gavin Schmidt, Deputy Chief at NASA GISS, told
       reporters on a conference call Tuesday that “long-term trends in
       climate are extremely robust — there is year-to-year
       variability, there is season-to-season variability, there are
       times such as today, when we can have snow, even in a globally
       warmed world.”
       “But the long-term trends are very clear, they’re not going to
       disappear, and people should be aware of that,” Schmidt said. He
       cautioned against allowing short memories and cold snaps to get
       in the way of the data.
       Though cold weather might help people lose weight, it does not
       help them understand the reality of long-term trends like
       climate change. Studies in recent years have found that colder
       days make people less likely to be concerned about — and
       acknowledge — global warming.
       Where was the extra warmth in 2013 concentrated? Almost
       everywhere except the middle of North America and parts of the
       Pacific Ocean. This map shows how observed temperatures in 2013
       compared to the 1951-1980 average:
       [img width=640
       height=880]
  HTML http://www.giss.nasa.gov/research/news/20140121/gistemp_maps_100.jpg[/img]
       NASA2013temperaturemap
       CREDIT: NASA/GSFC/Earth Observatory, NASA/GISS
       A map of where these hot and cold temperature anomalies occur
       can help give a picture of what is happening on a global scale,
       and just how odd it was for parts of North America to be colder
       than normal. Much of the rest of the globe had blooms of reds
       and pinks, signifying hotter-than-average temperatures.
       Watching a video that puts six decades of these maps in one
       constant flow shows quite clearly the warming trend facing
       everyone on Earth, even if some parts experience periodic cold
       snaps:
  HTML http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gaJJtS_WDmI&feature=player_embedded
       NASA’s Schmidt said that “the warmth that we’ve seen in the last
       decade clearly makes this decade the warmest in the historical
       period.” Videos like this help bring a trend like that to life.
       The complete year-by-year animation of 1880-2013 takes longer,
       but can be viewed here.
       The geographic breakdown shows that recent warming has been
       concentrated in parts of the Arctic, Australia, South America,
       and large swaths of Asia and Africa. Many of these areas
       experienced record warms. January 2013 was the hottest month
       ever observed in Australia — last summer was the hottest one
       ever, followed by the third-warmest winter and warmest-ever
       spring. Despite some slightly colder-than-average periods in the
       middle of North America and over the Southern Pacific Ocean,
       [i]not one region of the globe experienced record colds. [/I]
       Even still, most of North America experienced
       warmer-than-average temperatures. Alaska had its second-warmest
       summer on record. Mexico had its hottest summer on record.
       This trapped energy in the atmosphere does not just manifest as
       heat, it also affects the water cycle. Areas that tend to be wet
       often get wetter, because the heat allows the air to hold more
       moisture, increasing the strength of precipitation events. Dry
       areas, as they get hotter, yield more and more of their trapped
       moisture to evaporation, which often gets blown away, sometimes
       worsening droughts. In 2013, precipitation was close to average
       on the whole for the globe, but this fact can hide how some
       regions experienced record drought and some saw record flooding.
       In addition to the massive flash floods on Colorado’s Front
       Range, many parts of the world experienced damage from extended
       precipitation or flash floods of their own, including: the coast
       of Queensland, Australia; La Plata, Argentina; Mozambique and
       Mali; Germany, Poland, Czech Republic, Austria, and Switzerland;
       Northwest India and Nepal; the Russian-Chinese border, and much
       of Mexico. Higher-than-average snowfall hit Moscow, Russia, the
       United Kingdom, Israel, Lebanon, and Jordan.
       Other parts of the planet had a lot less water than normal, and
       suffered serious and sometimes record droughts, including:
       Northeastern Brazil, large parts of the Amazon Basin, and the
       Brazilian Plateau; the Marshall Islands; New Zealand; Angola and
       Namibia; Southern China, and parts of California.
       Another remarkable thing about 2013&#8242;s heat is that there
       was no El Nino — a long-term weather pattern that results in
       periodic warming of the equatorial Pacific region. Gavin Schmidt
       said Tuesday that that the long-term trends caused by an
       increase in greenhouse gases will continue whether there is an
       El Nino or a La Nina. La Nina years are going to be slightly
       cooler than normal, El Nino years are going to be slightly
       warmer than normal. 2013 was one of the warmest neutral years
       (not a strong El Nino or La Nina) on record.
       James Hansen, now an adjunct professor at Columbia University
       (and formerly head of the NASA Goddard Institute for Space
       Studies) noted that because of the likelihood of a strong El
       Nino this year, 2014 or 2015 would probably see another global
       temperature record.
  HTML http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2014/01/21/3187581/noaa-nasa-2013-temperature/
       #Post#: 720--------------------------------------------------
       Re: &#128681; Global Climate Chaos &#9760;&#65039;
       By: AGelbert Date: January 22, 2014, 7:43 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The California drought is bad. REALLY bad. [img width=30
       height=30]
  HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-141113183729.png[/img]:(
       [img width=640
       height=630]
  HTML http://o1.aolcdn.com/dims-shared/dims3/PATCH/format/jpg/quality/82/resize/313x295/http://hss-prod.hss.aol.com/hss/storage/patch/f0ed801e72cd13fa65292c91671818d0[/img]
       You can see the obvious lack of snow pack from one year to the
       next but look closely at the valley where all the fruit and
       vegetables is grown: IT'S BONE DRY!  :P  :(
       [move]California Drought Could Trigger Food Inflation[/move]
       
       Wednesday, 22 Jan 2014 06:49 AM
       By Michael Carr
       A lack of rainfall in California could have a nationwide impact
       on food prices. According to the California Department of Food
       and Agriculture, the state produces almost half of U.S.-grown
       fruits, nuts and vegetables.
       California produces about one-eighth of the nation's total
       farming output. The state accounts for more than 90 percent of
       the U.S. production of artichokes, broccoli, celery, almonds,
       grapes, walnuts and other crops.
  HTML http://www.moneynews.com/MichaelCarr/California-drought-fruit-vegetable/2014/01/22/id/548289#ixzz2rBQw2jp5
  HTML http://www.moneynews.com/MichaelCarr/California-drought-fruit-vegetable/2014/01/22/id/548289#ixzz2rBQw2jp5
       #Post#: 734--------------------------------------------------
       Re: &#128681; Global Climate Chaos &#9760;&#65039;
       By: AGelbert Date: January 28, 2014, 8:13 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       UB said when questioning climate change skeptic Snowleopard
       (fossil fuel defender),[quote]Why doesn't the weather you
       mention suggest warming due to jetstream breakout due to polar
       vortex weakening?[/quote]
       This is the part that always gets me too. The slower Jetstream
       due to less difference in temperature in the equatorial
       atmosphere and the polar one was predicted by climate scientists
       nearly a decade ago! I have brought this up but Snowleopard
       refuses to believe it. It is an effect, not a cause. The
       temperature gradient is reduced between the poles and the
       equator. That takes energy OUT of the Jetstream's velocity. The
       Jetstream begins to meander and produce oxbows that move along
       the northern hemisphere producing horrendous temperature
       extremes. This was ALL PREDICTED by climate scientists as an
       EFFECT of the CO2 CAUSE that brings Global Warming.
       That SAME oxbow pattern, since it has been so extreme in sending
       arctic air at us in the past 50 days or so will probably give us
       a February that will break all records for being so HOT.
       That's the way it works, Snowleopard. As to early frosts, I can
       tell you that the frosts in Vermont are consistently coming
       later, not earlier. But the main issue here is that NOAA figures
       show a warming planet and you don't believe their figures. We
       can sit here and through anecdotes at each other until the cows
       come home but the fact reminds that the average temperature is
       rising, not descending.
       I realize that none of us here have the power to do much about
       it but regardless of how much you think the facts are "fixed" to
       hoax a GW scenario, Cui Bono (i.e. Who stands, or stood, to gain
       from a crime, and so might have been responsible for it?)???
       DOING NOTHING and adopting a WAIT AND SEE attitude BENEFITS THE
       CORRUPT STATUS QUO! WHY don't you see that?  Do you LIKE the way
       our laws and government and energy policy are NOW? According to
       everything you write here, the answer is NO! But then you turn
       around and advocate doing NOTHING. That does not compute!
       EVEN IF the global warming thing was bull**** ( I WISH!),
       destroying the fossil and nuclear fuel industries is a noble
       goal, is it not? Al Capone was finally nailed on income tax
       evasion even though he had murdered hundreds. Get it?  ;)
       It will be a cold day in hell before the energy you use to feed
       yourself will be at a reasonable price unless the centralized
       energy monsters running this planet into the ground are not
       taken apart. By advocating inaction, you are cutting off you
       nose to spite your face. Think about it.
       
  HTML http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u7EHvfaY8Zs&feature=player_embedded
  HTML http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=en9Cz-kdbvc&feature=player_embedded
       #Post#: 737--------------------------------------------------
       Re: &#128681; Global Climate Chaos &#9760;&#65039;
       By: AGelbert Date: January 28, 2014, 11:51 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qgnvbMwRaf8&feature=player_embedded
       #Post#: 742--------------------------------------------------
       Re: &#128681; Global Climate Chaos &#9760;&#65039;
       By: AGelbert Date: January 30, 2014, 1:24 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [font=times new roman]Psalm 27
       7  Hear, O LORD, when I cry with my voice:
       have mercy also upon me, and answer me.
       
       
       8  When thou saidst, Seek ye my face;
       my heart said unto thee,
       Thy face, LORD, will I seek.
       
       
       9  Hide not thy face far from me;
       put not thy servant away in anger:
       thou hast been my help;
       leave me not, neither forsake me,
       O God of my salvation.
       
       
       10  When my father and my mother forsake me,
       then the LORD will take me up.
       
       
       11  Teach me thy way, O LORD,
       and lead me in a plain path,
       because of mine enemies.
       
       
       12  Deliver me not over unto the will of mine enemies:
       for false witnesses are risen up against me,
       and such as breathe out cruelty.
       [/font]
       *****************************************************
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page