DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
Renewable Revolution
HTML https://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Nuke Puke
*****************************************************
#Post#: 182--------------------------------------------------
The nuclear INSANITY of the 1950s
By: AGelbert Date: October 28, 2013, 12:39 am
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://youtu.be/Wwb5UeWmSd0
RADIOACTIVE DUST is placed on a model's FACE! ???
Our government KNEW since the late 1930s what ionizing radiation
did to harm somatic as well as gamete cells in life forms from
fruit flies to mammals yet they allowed health destroying
practices like the above to be tried. These cosmetic company
MORONS thought it was SO CLEVER that a Geiger counter could be
used to measure whether the dust was still on the model's face
because the test dust was "just radioactive enough" to register!
:o
Yep, the commercial above was for some kind of Cleansing Cream!
And WHO was the "independent Lab" that had ACCESS to radioactive
dust!? Can you see the government cleverly inserting the FALSE
idea in the public's mind that the presence of radioactivity
from nuclear explosions or power plants is NO BIG DEAL?
HTML http://www.freesmileys.org/smileys/smiley-devil12.gif
[font=impact] I can. >:([/font]
Madison Avenue sure didn't have any radioactive dust handy for
testing the effectiveness of cleansing creams. Anybody watching
the thing would believe that radiation in dust was just
something you could wash off. No big deal... :P
And then people ask where all the modern day CANCER comes from.
>:(
#Post#: 610--------------------------------------------------
Re: The nuclear INSANITY of the 1950s
By: AGelbert Date: December 23, 2013, 9:42 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
In 1961 we had a mini-Fukushima in the USA. It was covered up,
people were lied to and, worst of all, ALL the lessons they
SHOULD have learned were, not just discarded, but FLIPPED ON
THEIR HEADS in true ORWELLIAN brainf uck!
[img width=640
height=480]
HTML http://frogstorm.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/The-extraction-of-the-reactor.jpg[/img]
What did they learn?
1) It was hell on earth to deal with reactor accidents and took
several months in the case of a tiny nuclear reactor to get the
radiation under control.
2) Extensive monitoring instruments and backup security systems
were not optional in operating a nuclear reactor (i.e. lots of
personnel and instrumentation = lots of money to run them safely
- they conveniently - for them - IGNORED the fact that other
energy sources were, consequently, MUCH cheaper AND safer. WHY?
Because they wanted Plutonium for BOMBS! All the rest was, and
is, LIES to steal money and health from we-the-People.).
3) People aware of the accident could better respond to the
threat and thereby avoid collateral radiation disease injury.
What did they DECIDE?
1) Reactors COULD be used for electrical power cost-effectively.
2) Accidents would be kept from the public to avoid "panic"
(i.e. the truth about these poisonous and super expensive pigs
so the nuke pukes in the MIC could keep driving the "atoms for
Peace" gravy train scam).
3) ANY accident could be EVENTUALLY handled in a small reactor
so ANY accident could be handled in a big one (i.e. they gave
the green light to BIG, REALLY DANGEROUS REACTORS!).
Watch this video that none of us knew existed at the time which
was made for the nuke lovers.
HTML https://youtu.be/FAKcWM-yBkI
NOTE: Somebody with a brain must have seen this video back then
because, you will note, the movie "On the Beach" was made in
1962. Too bad people only thought it had to do with nuclear
bombs...
The secrecy was used to destroy our health and profit the nuke
pukes for over 50 years, not for national security. Nuclear
power needs to be killed or the PEOPLE THAT PROFIT FROM IT will
kill us. These ****ing nuclear greedballs are the ultimate mad
scientists willing to kill most of us off just say they can play
king of the energy hill. [img width=100
height=100]
HTML http://www.emofaces.com/en/emoticons/n/nuclear-emoticon.gif[/img]<br
/>Have a nice day.
[img width=320
height=450]
HTML http://profiles.murdoch.edu.au/myprofile/michael-broderick/files/2012/06/HalfLives_intro.jpg[/img]<br
/>[img width=320
height=450]
HTML http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/5/59/Nuclear_power_is_not_healthy_poster.jpg[/img]
[move]IF YOU WANT A FUTURE FOR HUMANITY, PLEASE PASS THIS
ON.[/move]
#Post#: 643--------------------------------------------------
The Atomic Sailors — Serving aboard the USS Calhoun
By: AGelbert Date: January 1, 2014, 1:17 am
---------------------------------------------------------
The Atomic Sailors — Serving aboard the USS Calhoun County
during its days as a radioactive waste dumpster
USS Calhoun County sailors dumped thousands of tons of
radioactive waste into Atlantic Ocean off the coast of New
Jersey FOR MORE THAN 15 YEARS! VIDEO!
[img width=100
height=100]
HTML http://media.tumblr.com/c6492e4b47cfdbd50e74d285fde3c53e/tumblr_inline_mm3g4yCaZc1qz4rgp.gif[/img]
HTML http://www.tampabay.com/news/military/veterans/the-atomic-sailors/2157927
Don't miss this video commentary by Nuclear Scientist Arnie
Gundersen:
HTML http://fairewinds.org/media/fairewinds-videos/atomic-sailors
#Post#: 736--------------------------------------------------
Re: The nuclear INSANITY of the 1950s
By: AGelbert Date: January 28, 2014, 11:07 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[img width=640
height=480]
HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-280114233337.png[/img]
Published on Feb 27, 2013
The U.S. Army's Top Secret Arctic City Under the Ice! "Camp
Century" Restored Classified Film - In the late 1950s, during
the height of the Cold War, the US military constructed a secret
base in the Arctic for "research" purposes. Some theorists claim
that it was actually used as a covert nuclear weapons storage
&/or testing facility. >:(
Others have made even grander claims - that Camp Century was
actually a weather manipulation experiment ... or a U.S.
Military administered Alien / UFO base! The whole truth may
never be known.
This video is the actual declassified US ARMY FILM documenting
the construction process.
Teaser screenshots from the video:
[img width=640
height=240]
HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-280114232434.png[/img]
[img width=640
height=480]
HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-280114232815.png[/img]
[img width=640
height=440]
HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-280114233042.png[/img]
Agelbert NOTE: This film shows how an entire city was built
under the ice. They moved a 6 thousand tons on SLEDS that looked
like snow trains without rails pulled by caterpillar tractors.
The nuclear reactor (the narrator says it is PORTABLE) was
designed to be FLOWN QUICKLY to the location it is needed but
they chose to ship this one for safety reasons ;D.
Consider HOW MANY of these nukes are laying around in Army bases
TODAY that people nearby know nothing about... If you think
these nuclear nuts stopped making these portable monstrocities,
you are wrong. After viewing this film, I realize the madness
goes FAR BEYOND anything we are aware of and there must be
several thousand of these reactors out there hidden from the
public eye.
Then again, maybe they stopped the program after the SL-1
meltdown. We may never know. :( :P
HTML http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Ujx_pND9wg&feature=player_embedded<br
/>
#Post#: 1812--------------------------------------------------
Re: The nuclear INSANITY of the 1950s
By: AGelbert Date: September 4, 2014, 6:28 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
1955: Why the US Chose Nuclear Energy Over Solar
HTML http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/nuke-puke/no-we-never-needed-lwr-nuclear-power-plants-to-make-nuclear-weapons/msg1810/#msg1810<br
/>[img width=70
height=70]
HTML http://www.emofaces.com/en/emoticons/n/nuclear-emoticon.gif[/img]<br
/>
Snippet 1:
This amazing excerpt from the book, Let It Shine: The 6000-Year
Story of Solar Energy, provides fascinating context to energy
choices the US made in the 1950s. It was a pivotal moment for
the advent of solar energy, but the US supported nuclear
instead.
What's most interesting is all-out backing the US government
gave the nuclear energy industry to get it off the ground.
Similar histories are likely written about government support
for oil and gas when they first emerged. Renewable energy
industries have had no such support - infinitesimal by
comparison. It's a testament to pioneers in the solar and wind
industries and a handful of supportive governments that they are
nearing grid parity today.
Snippet 2:
With fuel apparently so abundant and cheap, electric companies
expanded to meet demand. Liberal government policies made it
easy to procure capital to build larger and more efficient power
plants. Utilities encouraged greater consumption because the
costs of building new plants and installing electric lines could
be recovered more easily if customers used more energy.
"Once you had the lines in, you hoped people would use as much
electricity as possible," a utility executive remarked. "You
wanted to get as much return on your investment as you could."
Gas companies took a similar approach - "if you sell more you
make more."
HTML http://www.pic4ever.com/images/acigar.gif
Agelbert NOTE: REMEMBER THAT every time you hear a pro-nuclear
power or fossil fuel propagandist states that WE CREATED THE
DEMAND BECAUSE WE ARE THE PIGGIES and fossil fuelers and nukers
are JUST ACCEPTING OUR WHINING and being LOYAL SERVANTS. LOL!
Snippet 3:
Congress passed the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, making available
at no cost to the industry "the knowledge acquired by 14 years
and $10 billion worth of government research." In this act, the
government pledged to undertake for the private sector "a
program of conducting, assisting, and fostering research and
development to encourage maximum scientific and industrial
progress." In other words, the government paid all the expenses
and took all the risks for the nascent nuclear energy industry.
[img width=80
height=055]
HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-241013183046.jpeg[/img]
Snippet 4:
Solar energy received virtually no support in the ensuing years,
and by 1963 the association (of scientists for the development
of solar energy) found itself bankrupt.
HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-311013200859.png
The governments of Israel, Australia and Japan deliberately
aided the solar industry,
HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-200714194256.bmp<br
/>
HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-200714191456.bmp<br
/>but the US Congress and White House sat on the sidelines. [img
width=50
height=040]
HTML http://images.sodahead.com/polls/000370273/polls_Smiley_Angry_256x256_3451_356175_answer_4_xlarge.png[/img]<br
/>True, as early as 1952 the President's Materials Commission,
appointed by Harry Truman, came out with a report, Resources for
Freedom, predicting that America and its allies would be short
on fossil fuels by 1975. It urged that solar energy be developed
as a replacement.
"Efforts made to date to harness solar energy are
infinitesimal," the commission chided, despite the fact that the
"US could make an immense contribution to the welfare of the
free world" by exploiting this inexhaustible supply. They
predicted that, given the will to go solar, there could be 13
million solar-heated homes by the mid-1970s.
Atoms For Peace [img width=80
height=40]
HTML http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_9HT4xZyDmh4/TOHhxzA0wLI/AAAAAAAAEUk/oeHDS2cfxWQ/s200/Smiley_Angel_Wings_Halo.jpg[/img]<br
/> [img width=80
height=80]
HTML http://www.imgion.com/images/01/Angry-animated-smiley.jpg[/img]<br
/> [img width=40
height=40]
HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-051113192052.png[/img]<br
/>
The Commission advocated for a 50-50 split for nuclear and solar
contributions to America's energy future, but the US government
lavished billions on atomic power research while spending a
pittance on solar. International cold war politics more than
technological advantages accounted for the difference.
Agelbert NOTE: Yep there is ALWAYS a government STUDY out theIr
that states that 4 minus 5 equals a negative number. LOL! But we
all know that ONLY TOKEN efforts were made to develop solar and
ONLY because they needed panels on space vehicles, PERIOD.
And that's the story of HOW the nuclear industry defrauded (and
still defrauds!) the American Public in our Darwinian Descent to
Civilizational Suicide in the Service of Profit over Planet
Dirty Energy.
Have a nice day.
1955: Why the US Chose Nuclear Energy Over Solar
HTML http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/nuke-puke/no-we-never-needed-lwr-nuclear-power-plants-to-make-nuclear-weapons/msg1810/#msg1810<br
/>[img width=70
height=70]
HTML http://www.emofaces.com/en/emoticons/n/nuclear-emoticon.gif[/img]<br
/>
#Post#: 2273--------------------------------------------------
Re: The nuclear INSANITY of the 1950s
By: AGelbert Date: November 27, 2014, 6:18 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[move]To be filed under: American Horror Stories
HTML http://www.pic4ever.com/images/www_MyEmoticons_com__smokelots.gif<br
/> [/move]
[img width=640
height=380]
HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-271114191643.png[/img]
The breathtaking STUPIDITY of Operation Plowshare. These nuke
nuts even wanted to FRACK with atomic bombs! :o >:(
HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-210714023342.gif
Project Plowshare
HTML http://www.pic4ever.com/images/126fs2277341.gif
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=YUr7EVc44f8
ALL THOSE SITES are STILL RADIOACTIVE... and will CONTINUE TO BE
RADIOACTIVE be for more than a THOUSAND YEARS! >:(
HTML http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Usa/Tests/Ustestmap3.jpg
Nuclear explosion test sites...EVEN IN HATTIESBURG, Mississippi
and AMCHITKA, ALASKA! :o >:(
#Post#: 2274--------------------------------------------------
Re: The nuclear INSANITY of the 1950s
By: AGelbert Date: November 27, 2014, 7:26 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[img width=640
height=380]
HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-271114201559.png[/img]
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LnqxYl8R4c8&feature=player_embedded
Underwater Atomic Test, Mark 90 Betty A-Bomb: "Operation Wigwam"
pt2-3 1955 [img width=100
height=100]
HTML http://www.clipartbest.com/cliparts/Rcd/B9j/RcdB9jzc9.jpeg[/img]
#Post#: 2275--------------------------------------------------
Re: The nuclear INSANITY of the 1950s
By: AGelbert Date: November 27, 2014, 8:04 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
This Pro Nuke Propaganda Film begins with the statement that the
film has been "Sanitized" ;D.
That is, all classified material has been removed. Only the
neato portions of ships getting the big boom are included. It's
all very explosive and scary. I think that was the point.
However, these military morons doing their destructive, ocean
life killing activity forgot the fact that in the future we
could look back and remember all the social problems that
required money be spent on them BACK THEN. Instead, these war
welfare queens spent money lavishly on new and better ways to
kill people and destroy things. Do you think the view of these
Predatory, power mad, weapons loving goons has changed?
HTML http://www.desismileys.com/smileys/desismileys_2932.gif
LOOK
AROUND. >:( STILL the social problems are IGNORED (even more!
:() while more and more money is devoted to WAR, war
profiteering and weapons developing welfare queens.
In the meantime our degraded biosphere (AND DEMOCRACY) continues
to threaten our future.
HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-200714183404.bmp
This country's fascist Military Industrial
HTML http://www.pic4ever.com/images/acigar.gifComplex
is destroying
our future. [img width=30
height=30]
HTML http://www.freesmileys.org/emoticons/emoticon-object-015.gif[/img]What<br
/>you see in this film had NOTHING to do with National Security
and EVERYTHING to do with Military Industrial Complex JOB
SECURITY. [img width=100
height=080]
HTML http://images.sodahead.com/polls/000370273/polls_Smiley_Angry_256x256_3451_356175_answer_4_xlarge.png[/img]
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ZyFEPqArFI&feature=player_embedded
#Post#: 2276--------------------------------------------------
Re: The nuclear INSANITY of the 1950s
By: AGelbert Date: November 27, 2014, 8:55 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
The TWO underground atomic tests in the USA that were EAST of
the Mississippi river were done in Mississippi. Yes, they are
going to be HOT for millennia. :P
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RIw0RU4JFOA&feature=player_embedded
#Post#: 3391--------------------------------------------------
Re: The nuclear INSANITY of the 1950s
By: AGelbert Date: July 2, 2015, 7:15 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
The Marshall Islands Tried to Keep the World’s Nuclear Powers
Honest
The tiny republic knows the cost of nuclear weapons better than
most
At the end of World War II, the United States took control of
the Marshall Islands away from Japan. The area became an
American Trust Territory. Washington quickly betrayed that
trust.
In 1946, the Pentagon began testing nukes in the waters off the
Marshall Islands. From ’46 to ’58, the U.S. detonated 67 nuclear
weapons in the waters. The Islands and its people have never
been the same.
American scientists at the time viewed the Marshallese as test
subjects for the effects of radiation poisoning. “That island is
safe to live on but is by far the most contaminated place in the
world and it will be very interesting to go back and get good
environmental data,” one scientist noted during a meeting of the
U.S. Atomic Energy Commission in 1956.
[quote]“These people do not live … the way Westerners
do — civilized people,” the scientist continued. “It
is … also true that these people are more like us than
mice.”[/quote]
The Marshall Islands still aren’t completely habitable.
... the Marshall Islands brought litigation against nine nuclear
powered countries — including America, Britain and
Russia — back in 2014. The island republic filed
nine separate cases in the international court of justice in The
Hague.
The Marshallese filed a separate case against Washington in the
American federal court system. The defense asked a federal judge
to dismiss the case on the grounds that the Marshall Islands
lacked the proper authority to file such a case.
Federal judge Jeffrey White agreed with the defense and
dismissed the case on Feb. 3, 2015. Which is complete bullsh it.
The Marshall Islands may lack nuclear arms, but it certainly has
the moral authority to call out the nations who signed the NPT
when they aren’t playing by the rules they agreed to.
Full article:
HTML https://medium.com/war-is-boring/the-marshall-islands-tried-to-keep-the-world-s-nuclear-powers-honest-de24b4966616
*****************************************************
DIR Next Page