URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Renewable Revolution
  HTML https://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Geopolitics
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 2004--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Key Historical Events ...THAT YOU MAY HAVE NEVER HEARD OF 
       By: AGelbert Date: October 8, 2014, 9:07 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Than you, Surly.  ;D
       #Post#: 2051--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Key Historical Events ...THAT YOU MAY HAVE NEVER HEARD OF 
       By: AGelbert Date: October 18, 2014, 9:02 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [font=times new roman]Thomas Hobbes, The English Works of Thomas
       Hobbes, vol. 6 (Dialogue, Behemoth, Rhetoric) [1839] [/font]
       [font=times new roman]
       A DIALOGUE between A PHILOSOPHER & A STUDENT of THE COMMON LAWS
       OF ENGLAND.
       A DIALOGUE of THE COMMON LAW. [/font]
       SNIPPET:
  HTML http://www.pic4ever.com/images/301.gif
       [size=12pt][font=times new roman]P.
       We have hitherto spoken of laws without considering anything of
       the nature and essence of a law; and now unless we define the
       word law, we can go no farther without ambiguity and fallacy,
       which will be but loss of time; whereas, on the contrary, the
       agreement upon our words will enlighten all we have to say
       hereafter.
       L.
       I do not remember the definition of law in any statute. [img
       width=80
       height=50]
  HTML http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_9HT4xZyDmh4/TOHhxzA0wLI/AAAAAAAAEUk/oeHDS2cfxWQ/s200/Smiley_Angel_Wings_Halo.jpg[/img]
       P. 😠
       I think so: for the statutes were made by authority, and not
       drawn from any other principles than the care of the safety of
       the people. Statutes are not philosophy, as is the common-law,
       and other disputable arts, but are commands or prohibitions,
       which ought to be obeyed, because assented to by submission made
       to the Conqueror here in England, and to whosoever had the
       sovereign power in other commonwealths; so that the positive
       laws of all places are statutes. The definition of law was
       therefore unnecessary for the makers of statutes, though very
       necessary to them whose work it is to teach the sense of the
       law.
       [25]
       L.
       There is an accurate definition of a law in Bracton, cited by
       Sir Edward Coke: Lex est sanctio justa, jubens honesta, et
       prohibens contraria.
       P.
       That is to say, law is a just statute, commanding those things
       which are honest, and forbidding the contrary. From whence it
       followeth, that in all cases it must be the honesty or
       dishonesty that makes the command a law; whereas you know that
       but for the law we could not, as saith St. Paul, have known what
       is sin. Therefore this definition is no ground at all for any
       farther discourse of law. Besides, you know the rule of honest
       and dishonest refers to honour, and that it is justice only, and
       injustice, that the law respecteth. But that which I most except
       against in this definition, is, that it supposes that a statute
       made by the sovereign power of a nation may be unjust. There may
       indeed in a statute-law, made by men, be found iniquity, but not
       injustice.  ;)
       L.
       This is somewhat subtile.  ;D  I pray deal plainly. What is the
       difference between injustice and iniquity?
       P.
       I pray you tell me first, what is the difference between a court
       of justice, and a court of equity?
  HTML http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/1/3-210818163123-16662165.gif
       L.
       A court of justice is that which hath cognizance of such causes
       as are to be ended by the positive laws of the land; and a court
       of equity is that, to which belong such causes as are to be
       determined by equity; that is to say, by the law of reason.
       P.
       You see then that the difference between [26]injustice and
       iniquity is this; that injustice is the transgression of a
       statute-law, 😉  and iniquity the transgression of the
       law of reason 👍.  But perhaps you mean by common-law,
       not the law itself, but the manner of proceeding in the law, as
       to matter of fact, by twelve men, freeholders; though those
       twelve men are no court of equity, nor of justice, because they
       determine not what is just or unjust, but only whether it be
       done or not done; and their judgment is nothing else but a
       confirmation of that which is properly the judgment of the
       witnesses. For to speak exactly, there cannot possibly be any
       judge of fact besides the witnesses.
       L.
       How would you have a law defined?
       P.
       Thus; a law is the command of him or them that have the
       sovereign power, given to those that be his or their subjects,
       declaring publicly and plainly what every of them may do, and
       what they must forbear to do.
       L.
       Seeing all judges in all courts ought to judge according to
       equity, which is the law of reason, a distinct court of equity
       seemeth to me to be unnecessary,  and but a burthen to the
       people, since common-law and equity are the same law.
       [color=blue] P.
       It were so indeed, if judges could not err; but since they may
       err, and that the King is not bound to any other law but that of
       equity, it belongs to him alone to give remedy to them that, by
       the ignorance or corruption of a judge, shall suffer damage.
       L.
       By your definition of a law, the King’s proclamation under the
       Great Seal of England is a [27]law; for it is a command, and
       public, and of the sovereign to his subjects.
       P.
  HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-200714191258.bmp<br
       />
       Why not, if he think it necessary for the good of his subjects?
       For this is a maxim at the common-law alleged by Sir Edward Coke
       himself, (i Inst. sect. 306), Quando lex aliquid concedit,
       concedere videtur et id per quod devenitur ad illud. And you
       know out of the same author, that divers Kings of England have
       often, to the petitions in Parliament which they granted,
       annexed such exceptions as these, unless there be necessity,
       saving our regality; which I think should be always understood,
       though they be not expressed; and are understood so by common
       lawyers, who agree that the King may recall any grant wherein he
       was deceived.
       L.
       Again, whereas you make it of the essence of a law to be
       publicly and plainly declared to the people, I see no necessity
       for that.  ;)
  HTML http://www.websmileys.com/sm/aliens/hae51.gif
       Are
       not all subjects bound to take notice of all acts of Parliament,
       when no act can pass without their consent? [img width=80
       height=40]
  HTML http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_9HT4xZyDmh4/TOHhxzA0wLI/AAAAAAAAEUk/oeHDS2cfxWQ/s200/Smiley_Angel_Wings_Halo.jpg[/img]
       P. If you had said that no act could pass without their
       knowledge, then indeed they had been bound to take notice of
       them; but none can have knowledge of them but the members of the
       houses of Parliament; therefore the rest of the people are
       excused.
  HTML http://www.pic4ever.com/images/128fs318181.gif
       Or else
       the knights of the shire should be bound to furnish people with
       a sufficient number of copies, at the people’s charge, of the
       acts of Parliament, at their return into the country; that every
       man may resort to them, and by themselves, or friends, take
       notice of what they are obliged to. For otherwise it were
       impossible they should be [28]obeyed: and that no man is bound
       to do a thing impossible, is one of Sir Edward Coke’s maxims at
       the common-law.  [/font][/quote]
       Agelbert NOTE: Notice how the philosopher is cleverly taking the
       Lawyer to task for attempting to assume that, just because
       Parliament knows about a law it passed, the PEOPLE therefore
       KNOW about it too ([i]and must obey it because they "know" about
       it. LOL!). You are WITNESSING the birth of the elite
       establishment through sophistic rhetoric. :o  :P
       Despite the fact that the philosopher appears elitist by giving
       the King the "divine right to rule" prerogative, he is simply
       using CFS to smell an elite rat in the group of fine folks
       populating Parliament (and the Courts) in pretense of "ensuring
       justice for the people".
  HTML http://www.pic4ever.com/images/mocantina.gif
       THIS is HOW it all started; a slow, steady elite SCAM to
       "represent" us but keep the lion's share of power and privilege
       for THEM after they had taken it away from the King through
       clever arguments about "representative" democracy.
  HTML http://www.u.arizona.edu/~patricia/cute-collection/smileys/lying-smiley.gif<br
       /> It worked!  :evil4:[/i]
       [i]Here's the MONEY QUOTE that immediately follows in the
       paragraph above from the philosopher. :emthup:  I humbly
       apologize for breaking it into two parts. I just had to throw my
       two shillings in.
  HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-200714191258.bmp<br
       />[/i]
       [quote][font=times new roman]P. (continued from above) I know
       that most of the statutes are printed; [color=red]but it does
       not appear that every man is bound to buy the book of statutes,
       nor to search for them at Westminster or at the Tower, nor to
       understand the language wherein they are for the most part
       written.  [img width=40
       height=40]
  HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-051113192052.png[/img]<br
       />[/font][/quote]
       
  HTML http://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/770
  HTML http://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/770
       #Post#: 2052--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Key Historical Events ...THAT YOU MAY HAVE NEVER HEARD OF 
       By: AGelbert Date: October 19, 2014, 12:29 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SMKnH2BlkBA&feature=player_embedded<br
       />
       Hitler's AMERICAN business partners EVEN AFTER THE WAR STARTED!
       Standard Oil was INSTRUMENTAL in providing petroleum products
       without which the NAZIs would NOT have been able to carry out
       the Blitzkrieg!
       And an Opel factory in Germany OWNED BY GM and bombed to rubble
       by American bombers in 1944 was a LOSS for General Motors that
       the USA REIMBURSED with the money of WE-the-PEOPLE to the tune
       of 32 million dollars!
       IBM was THERE too, big time. Their machines helped count slave
       labor and targeted Jews!
       And wait until you read about Henry Ford!
  HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-200714191329.bmp<br
       />
  HTML http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/images/nazi4_113098ap.jpg
       Henry Ford being awarded THIS medal!  :o
  HTML http://www.warrelics.eu/forum/attachments/orders-decorations-third-reich/113774d1276441144-grosskreuz-des-deutschen-adlerordens-grand-cross-order-german-eagle-w-o-swords-mm-900-21-a-dsc00324.jpg
  HTML http://mindcontrolblackassassins.files.wordpress.com/2013/06/obamawallstreet.gif
       NOW, notice the following Propaganda film. Notice that Krupp
       industries is blamed, correctly, for many NAZI horrors by the
       British while not one word is said about Standard Oil or any
       other allied WAR PROFITEER that played both sides before, during
       and after the war.[img width=210
       height=180]
  HTML http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-Bzb-1rVB8pc/UfXxBekcYVI/AAAAAAAAEm4/hXUkGCzFIPg/s1600/giveafuckometer-gif.gif[/img]
       Fast forward to 2014, it seems the German people did learn the
       lessons the British (and the U.S., of course) sought to teach
       them. But WE did not.
       The proof is the training of police officers in Germany post
       war. It states in the video that police officers are to be
       taught that they are the servants of the public, not the other
       way around. They learned it. We forgot. Gott mitt uns!  >:(  :(
       :P
  HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-200714183404.bmp
  HTML http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8XG-nbM3BE&feature=player_embedded<br
       />
       We are the fascists now.
  HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-200714183404.bmp<br
       />God will NOT help fascists. You have seen what He does to
       Fascist regimes. Fasten your seat belt.
       #Post#: 2054--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Key Historical Events ...THAT YOU MAY HAVE NEVER HEARD OF 
       By: AGelbert Date: October 19, 2014, 5:34 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uDI_Els-myo&feature=player_embedded
       Hitler's Mercedes
       #Post#: 2055--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Key Historical Events ...THAT YOU MAY HAVE NEVER HEARD OF 
       By: AGelbert Date: October 19, 2014, 6:40 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dj9ENqq-lIg&feature=player_embedded<br
       />
       Soviet Top Secret Operation (Operation Myth) revealed.
       #Post#: 2067--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Key Historical Events ...THAT YOU MAY HAVE NEVER HEARD OF 
       By: AGelbert Date: October 21, 2014, 6:51 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [center]
  HTML http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RgcdRCWEt4Q&feature=player_embedded<br
       />[/center]
       [b]MANY hidden nuggets of history.  :o[/b]
       Did you know that FDR wanted to green the Sahara desert
  HTML http://www.coh2.org/images/Smileys/huhsign.gif
       and had a real
       world plan to do it but Churchill could not STAND the idea of
       ANY country in Africa (along with India!) being independent of
       British "interests" ("free" trade tyranny)?  :o
       Churchill JUSTIFIED this predatory outlook by referring to the
       RACIST DARWINIAN concept, now totally debunked, of "superior"
       races ruling over "inferior" ones. LOL!
       Churchill raged about how EMPIRE is what made the British GREAT
       and NOTHING must be allowed to interfere with the British
       EMPIRE. FDR proceed clean his clock verbally. FDR had many
       excellent post war plans. Wall Street had OTHER plans...
       The Democratic party managed to replace FDR's GOOD Vice
       President Henry Wallace, the one who would have implemented
       FDR's policies,  with Truman.
  HTML http://www.pic4ever.com/images/2z6in9g.gif
       And so we went down
       the British RAT HOLE towards "free" trade fascism. along with
       the TOTALLY unnecessary cold war.   [img
       width=50]
  HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-311013201604.png[/img]
       
       A foiled assassination attempt BY THE BRITISH the day of
       Lincoln's first inauguration.
       Why "free trade" is a British invention to keep countries poor
       and backward. Nothing has changed.
       A planned Bering Straight railroad bridge between Russia and the
       USA, a north to south railway all the way from Alaska to the
       southern tip of South America and other huge railroad projects
       (Western Europe to India) threatened British sea power control
       of resources in countries all over the world [img
       width=30]
  HTML http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/2/3-231218145827.png[/img]<br
       />so they sabotaged the plans. McKinley, a Lincoln admirer and
       enemy of "free trade" Predatory Capitalism was killed for
       actively supporting this rail expansion.  >:(
       Teddy Roosevelt was a WORSHIPPER of all things British (you will
       learn exactly why!  :o). With him all those great railroad plans
       ere deep sixed and SHIP commerce (see British "interests" ;))
       got a HUGE boost with the Panama (a country INVENTED by Teddy
       for that specific purpose!) canal.  ;D)
       Woodrow Wilson was an AVID supporter of the Klu Klux Klan.  >:(
       You remember "bring DEMOCRACY to Europe" Wilson, don't you? ;D
       My how things have changed...
       Learn how The British started WWI by intrigue. Learn how all
       these monarchs were related with each other, giving opportunity
       for the British to divide and conquer. Learn how the goal of the
       British was to destabilize many countries through war and
       impoverish them in order to avoid a more unified world economy
       not controlled by British "free trade" tyranny through their
       mastery of the seas.
       The British were losing the world property chess game, so the
       went all out to knock over the chess board. It worked. :(
       In fact, the British ensured the conditions after WWI were so
       ONEROUS on the Germans that they, for all practical purposes,
       were setting up another convenient (for the [img
       width=50]
  HTML http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-130418203402.gif[/img]<br
       />British) WAR. [img
       width=70]
  HTML https://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-120716190938.png[/img]
       Hear Franklin Roosevelt, when first nominated to the Presidency,
       describe Tickle Down Economics (1:14:00) as Tory Economics LONG
       before you heard it during the Reagan Baloney years. Learn how
       FDR defeated an attempt by the elite in HIS OWN PARTY to scuttle
       FDR's chances at the nomination through skullduggery, wedge
       politics and propaganda. They wanted to get a Wall Street
       PRO-Fascsit in power. FDR figured it out and was able to counter
       this intrigue.
  HTML http://www.runemasterstudios.com/graemlins/images/2thumbs.gif
       But the New Deal is DEAD now and it seems Wall Street Fascist
       "free trade" tyranny is the destructive force behind our war
       making and country destroying policies on behalf of the
       oligarchs. [i]WE are the "British" ruthless  war profiteering,
       human misery ensuring "free trade"  empire now.[/i]   >:(  :(
       :P
  HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-200714183404.bmp
       #Post#: 2068--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Key Historical Events ...THAT YOU MAY HAVE NEVER HEARD OF 
       By: AGelbert Date: October 21, 2014, 9:06 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FDR 2 minute Video on Trickle Down "Economics" (in 1932!  :o).
  HTML http://viewrz.com/video/fdr-on-trickle-down-economics
       #Post#: 2070--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Key Historical Events ...THAT YOU MAY HAVE NEVER HEARD OF 
       By: AGelbert Date: October 22, 2014, 1:48 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The Japanese DID NOT surrender in WWII because the genocidal
       atomic bombs were dropped!
       [img width=500
       height=300]
  HTML http://media.tumblr.com/c6492e4b47cfdbd50e74d285fde3c53e/tumblr_inline_mm3g4yCaZc1qz4rgp.gif[/img]
       It was the destruction of their forces in Manchuria by the
       Russians (who entered the war at that time) that convinced them.
       The rationale was that the Russians would kill the Emperor AND
       his family but the Americans wouldn't. General Curtis Lemay had
       been fire bombing Japanese cities for almost a YEAR. Destruction
       of entire cities and their populations had not caused the
       Japanese to surrender. What you have been taught about the
       atomic bombs "ending the war
  HTML http://www.desismileys.com/smileys/desismileys_2932.gif
       and
       saving American lives
  HTML http://www.desismileys.com/smileys/desismileys_2932.gif
       "  is
       pro-nuclear (genocidal) welfare queen  propaganda.  >:(  Details
       in the video.
  HTML http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vVLYyvpIex4&feature=player_embedded<br
       />
       If Henry Wallace had been President instead of Truman, the
       following predatory Capitalist, War Profiteering, profit over
       planet PIGGERY would NOT have taken place.  Renewable energy,
       instead of being a tiny green sliver of token lip service, would
       be over HALF of the pie chart. Numerous wars would have been
       avoided. The planet would be healthier and the biosphere less
       trashed and hopelessly compromised than it is now. Thousands of
       species would not have gone extinct. We would be championing
       LIFE instead of aiding a few conscience free corporate villains
       to make fortunes from POLLUTION and DEATH.  >:(
       #Post#: 2072--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Key Historical Events ...THAT YOU MAY HAVE NEVER HEARD OF 
       By: AGelbert Date: October 22, 2014, 9:09 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Za5WUumtL1I&feature=player_embedded<br
       />
       The coup that replaced Wallace with Truman.
       #Post#: 2073--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Key Historical Events ...THAT YOU MAY HAVE NEVER HEARD OF 
       By: AGelbert Date: October 22, 2014, 9:26 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [img width=640
       height=380]
  HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-221014222208.png[/img]
  HTML http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=75lNjOGkxAQ&feature=player_embedded<br
       />
       Meet Henry Wallace's grandson and learn what would have been if
       Henry Wallace had been President.
       *****************************************************
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page