URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Renewable Revolution
  HTML https://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Who CAN you trust? 
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 14187--------------------------------------------------
       What 🦅 Pelosi ✨ is up to with Thursday’s
       impeachment vote
   DIR By: AGelbert
       Date: October 30, 2019, 4:26 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Washington Post
       Oct. 29, 2019 at 9:00 a.m. EDT
       [center]What 🦅 Pelosi ✨ is up to with Thursday’s
       impeachment vote[/center]
       SNIPPET:
       Pelosi continued, “This week, we will bring a resolution to the
       Floor that affirms the ongoing, existing investigation that is
       currently being conducted by our committees as part of this
       impeachment inquiry, including all requests for documents,
       subpoenas for records and testimony, and any other investigative
       steps previously taken or to be taken as part of this
       investigation.” She adds that this will set out the procedure
       “for hearings that are open to the American people, authorizes
       the disclosure of deposition transcripts, outlines procedures to
       transfer evidence to the Judiciary Committee as it considers
       potential articles of impeachment, and sets forth due process
       rights for the President and his Counsel.”
  HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-210614221847.gif<br
       />She says, “We are taking this step to eliminate any doubt as
       to
       whether the Trump Administration may withhold documents, prevent
       witness testimony, disregard duly authorized subpoenas, or
       continue obstructing the House of Representatives.”
       So why bring this up now, especially after a court held in
       Democrats’ favor? One possibility is that in preparing an
       article of impeachment on obstruction of Congress, Pelosi does
       not want to leave a crack open whereby &#129408; Trump’s
  HTML http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/2/3-080419191019.png<br
       />lawyers would say, well, he had a good-faith belief the
       impeachment process was not officially underway.
       Constitutional scholar Laurence Tribe &#128077; approves of
       Pelosi’s move. “This resolution makes perfect sense now that the
       House leadership has wisely decided to forgo further judicial
       jockeying and to move expeditiously to public hearings,” he
       argues. “Calling the Trump
  HTML http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-130418203402.gif<br
       />administration’s bluff this way will make it clear that the
       continued stonewalling of the administration — and of those
       current and former officials who use the administration’s gag
       order as an excuse for seeking what amount to advisory judicial
       opinions on whether to comply with congressional subpoenas — is
       just a stalling tactic, not a good-faith effort to resolve
       conflicting obligations when confronted with a subpoena from
       Congress and a directive from the White House to defy that
       subpoena.”
       Tribe also underscores that the resolution does not “authorize”
       impeachment but instead “affirms” it is underway. He says, “By
       taking that course, the speaker smartly avoids conceding that
       there was any infirmity in the inquiry prior to this
       authorization vote.”
       Full article
  HTML https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/10/29/what-pelosi-is-up-with-thursdays-impeachment-vote/<br
       />
  HTML http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/1/3-120818184310-1635923.gif<br
       />
       #Post#: 14193--------------------------------------------------
       The &#128121; conservative movement's utter and complete lack of
       shame. 
   DIR By: AGelbert
       Date: October 30, 2019, 7:13 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [move]After the call, Vindman attempted to add key details of
       the call to the official transcript, but was rebuffed by the
  HTML http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/styles/renewablerevolution/files/809_84688966.jpeg<br
       />White House, which tried to hide the very existence of the
       call
       on a top-secret computer server (despite the fact that,
       according to Trump on Twitter, the call was “perfect”).[/move]
       [center]Not Even &#129408; Trump's
  HTML http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-130418203402.gif<br
       />Smear Machine Can Invalidate Vindman's Testimony[/center]
       WILLIAM RIVERS PITT, TRUTHOUT
       Conservatives have proven themselves perfectly willing to slag
       military veterans when it has suited their purposes. Alexander
       Vindman's testimony on Tuesday was extraordinarily damaging to
       Trump, yet when Trump and his network news defenders revved up
       the smear machine, elected Republicans refused to toe the line.
       Doing so did not suit their purposes. The power of unrestrained
       shamelessness may have finally found its limits.
       Read the Article &#8594;
  HTML https://truthout.org/articles/not-even-trumps-smear-machine-can-invalidate-vindmans-testimony/?eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=5e04de6a-c5dc-4517-b01f-c582912aea4b
       #Post#: 14195--------------------------------------------------
       Parnas Associations Range From &#129421; Russian Mob To
       &#129408; Trump Legal Team
   DIR By: AGelbert
       Date: October 30, 2019, 10:12 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [center]Parnas Associations Range From &#129421; Russian Mob To
       &#129408;Trump
  HTML http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-130418203402.gif<br
       />Legal Team[/center]
       Rachel Maddow | MSNBC
       274,816 views•Oct 29, 2019
       [center]
  HTML https://youtu.be/jj7XMw_Ag2Q[/center]
       MSNBC
       2.08M subscribers
       Rachel Maddow looks at the criminal and questionable
       associations of Lev Parnas even before he was arrested this
       month, and wonders at the peculiar relationship Parnas has with
       Donald Trump, Rudy Giuliani, and Dmytro Firtash, an oligarch
       linked to Russian organized crime. Aired on 10/29/19.
       » Subscribe to MSNBC:
  HTML http://on.msnbc.com/SubscribeTomsnbc
       MSNBC delivers breaking news, in-depth analysis of politics
       headlines, as well as commentary and informed perspectives. Find
       video clips and segments from The Rachel Maddow Show, Morning
       Joe, Meet the Press Daily, The Beat with Ari Melber, Deadline:
       White House with Nicolle Wallace, Hardball, All In, Last Word,
       11th Hour, and more.
       Connect with MSNBC Online
       Visit msnbc.com:
  HTML http://on.msnbc.com/Readmsnbc
       Subscribe to MSNBC Newsletter:
  HTML http://MSNBC.com/NewslettersYouTube
       Find MSNBC on Facebook:
  HTML http://on.msnbc.com/Likemsnbc
       Follow MSNBC on Twitter:
  HTML http://on.msnbc.com/Followmsnbc
       Follow MSNBC on Instagram:
  HTML http://on.msnbc.com/Instamsnbc
       Parnas Associations Range From Russian Mob To Trump Legal Team |
       Rachel Maddow | MSNBC
       Category News & Politics
       #Post#: 14196--------------------------------------------------
       Impeachment Witness Says Transcript Of Trump-Zelenskiy Call Was
       Not Complete
   DIR By: AGelbert
       Date: October 30, 2019, 10:32 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [center]Impeachment Witness Says Transcript Of &#129408;
       Trump-Zelenskiy Call Was Not Complete[/center]
       The Last Word | MSNBC
       387,898 views•Oct 29, 2019
       [center]
  HTML https://youtu.be/LreiRLs2ZWs[/center]
       MSNBC
       2.08M subscribers
       Army Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman told the impeachment
       investigating committees that the White House transcript of a
       July call between President Trump and Ukraine's president
       omitted crucial words and phrases, and that his attempts to
       restore them failed. Lawrence O’Donnell discusses with Rep. Sean
       Patrick Maloney, Ned Price, and Evan McMullin. Aired on
       10/29/19.
       » Subscribe to MSNBC:
  HTML http://on.msnbc.com/SubscribeTomsnbc
       MSNBC delivers breaking news, in-depth analysis of politics
       headlines, as well as commentary and informed perspectives. Find
       video clips and segments from The Rachel Maddow Show, Morning
       Joe, Meet the Press Daily, The Beat with Ari Melber, Deadline:
       White House with Nicolle Wallace, Hardball, All In, Last Word,
       11th Hour, and more.
       Connect with MSNBC Online
       Visit msnbc.com:
  HTML http://on.msnbc.com/Readmsnbc
       Subscribe to MSNBC Newsletter:
  HTML http://MSNBC.com/NewslettersYouTube
       Find MSNBC on Facebook:
  HTML http://on.msnbc.com/Likemsnbc
       Follow MSNBC on Twitter:
  HTML http://on.msnbc.com/Followmsnbc
       Follow MSNBC on Instagram:
  HTML http://on.msnbc.com/Instamsnbc
       Impeachment Witness Says Transcript Of Trump-Zelenskiy Call Was
       Not Complete | The Last Word | MSNBC
       Category News & Politics
       #Post#: 14198--------------------------------------------------
       Rachel Maddow just hit on something crucial
   DIR By: AGelbert
       Date: October 30, 2019, 11:49 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [center]Rachel Maddow just hit on something crucial[/center]
       Bill Palmer | 10:49 pm EDT October 29, 2019
       Palmer Report » Analysis
       Facebook ShareTwitter ShareEmail this articlePrint Article
       The relationship between Rudy Giuliani and his Ukraine
       co-conspirators Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman is so strange and
       surreal in so many ways, everyone involved is still trying to
       get to the bottom of it. Last week Palmer Report pointed out
       that everyone involved – us included – was wrong when it came to
       one of the initial presumptions. Tonight, Rachel Maddow just hit
       on the same thing.
       When Parnas and Fruman were arrested, we all just assumed that
       they were Rudy Giuliani’s underlings. After all, he’s a major
       political figure and the personal attorney to the President of
       the United States, and they were just two unknowns who appeared
       to be the ones doing the dirty work. They were the henchmen and
       Rudy was the boss, right? Except the money trail says the
       opposite.
       Rudy Giuliani has admitted that he was paid half a million
       dollars by Lev Parnas’ company Fraud Guarantee. Bosses are not
       generally on the payrolls of their underlings. This strongly
       suggested that Rudy was actually working for Parnas. When you
       throw in the fact that Parnas is in turn working for Kremlin
       oligarch Dmitry Firtash, it seems to point to Vladimir Putin and
       his people funding the entire Trump-Ukraine plot, and Rudy just
       being a cog in the machine.
       Rachel Maddow pointed out all of this on the air tonight, and
       made a point of asking who was working for whom when it came to
       Rudy Giuliani and his henchmen. It’s important that this
       question be given the proper attention, not just because the
       answer can properly frame Rudy’s role in this international
       criminal plot, but also because the money trail could expose
       that the [b]Kremlin has been behind this entire Trump-Ukraine
       plot all along[/b].
  HTML https://www.palmerreport.com/analysis/rachel-maddow-just-something-crucial/22487/
       #Post#: 14202--------------------------------------------------
       &quot;The only reason given was that the order came at the
       direction of the &#129408; President.&quot;
   DIR By: AGelbert
       Date: October 31, 2019, 11:49 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [move]Another impeachment witness just dropped a ton of bricks
       on Donald
  HTML http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/1/3-250718205808.gif<br
       />Trump today[/move]
       Daniel Cotter | 1:45 pm EDT October 30, 2019
       Palmer Report » Analysis
       Donald Trump has continued to talk about the “transcript” that
       has been released of his Ukraine phone call, and the Cult 45 and
       GOP feckless leadership continues to march to that tune.
       However, with each additional witness that comes forward and
       provides an opening statement and testimony, the reality is
       confirmed – Trump engaged in an illegal quid pro quo, and the
       “transcript” he released is not anywhere near the full story of
       what transpired.
       The latest person to come forward in the Ukraine investigation
       that likely will soon find Trump in the Senate, being tried on
       numerous articles of impeachment, is &#129413; Catherine Croft.
       She worked for the National Security Council on Ukraine issues
       for the State Department and is set to testify before the House
       committee today. Her opening statement includes the following:
       In July 2017, as the Trump Administration was considering
       overturning the ban on providing Ukraine defensive weapons, I
       was asked to join the National Security Council Staff at the
       White House. As the Director covering Ukraine, I staffed the
       President’s December 2017 decision to provide Ukraine with
       Javelin anti-tank missile systems. I also staffed his September
       2017 meeting with then- President Poroshenko on the margins of
       the UN General Assembly. Throughout both, I heard—directly and
       indirectly—President Trump describe Ukraine as a corrupt
       country.
       During my time at the NSC, I received multiple calls from
       lobbyist &#128520; Robert Livingston, who told me that
       Ambassador Yovanovitch should be fired. He characterized
       Ambassador Yovanovitch as an ‘Obama holdover’ and associated
       with George Soros. It was not clear to me at the time—or now—at
       whose direction or at whose expense Mr. Livingston was seeking
       the removal of Ambassador Yovanovitch.
       On July 18, I participated in a sub-Policy Coordination
       Committee video conference where an OMB representative reported
       that the White House Chief of Staff, &#128520; Mick Mulvaney,
       had placed an informal hold on security assistance to Ukraine.
       The only reason given was that the order came at the direction
       of the
  HTML http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/1/3-250718205808.gif<br
       />President. I had heard about the hold before that date, but do
       not remember the specific date.
       She was not on the call, but we have further information that
       Trump placed a hold on aid to Ukraine and that a lobbyist was
       contacting her to fire Yovanovitch. It’s another connection in
       the efforts Trump made to deal with Ukraine in a manner that
       looks more and more likely to have been a trade.
  HTML https://www.palmerreport.com/analysis/another-impeachment-witness-just-dropped-a-ton-of-bricks-on-donald-trump-today/22494/
       [center]
  HTML https://miro.medium.com/max/1400/1*I6Vxx3F-rZsiNjxTFoSxew.jpeg[/center]
       #Post#: 14204--------------------------------------------------
       &#128373;&#65039; JOHN BOLTON, YOU’RE UP
   DIR By: AGelbert
       Date: October 31, 2019, 12:26 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [center]&#128373;&#65039; JOHN BOLTON, YOU’RE UP[/center]
       Bill Palmer | 4:43 pm EDT October 30, 2019
       Palmer Report » Analysis
       When John Bolton’s longtime sidekick Charles Kupperman asked the
       courts to rule on whether he should comply with a House subpoena
       to testify in the impeachment inquiry, or comply with a Trump
       White House order not to appear, Palmer Report explained that it
       appeared Bolton was pulling the strings. The Kupperman ruling
       will effectively “force” Bolton to testify as well, meaning
       Bolton can maintain credibility with the far-right by saying
       that he had no choice but to testify against Trump and take him
       down.
       In any case, we’re about to find out if that’s what John Bolton
       is really up to, because House Democrats just asked him to come
       in and testify next week. Conveniently enough, this allows just
       enough time for the Kupperman court ruling to play out before
       Bolton is supposed to show up. Oh, and did we mention that
       Bolton is using the same attorney who’s handling Kupperman’s
       court case?
       So where does this get us? If John Bolton’s master plan really
       is to get the courts to order him to testify in the House
       impeachment inquiry, and he does show up and fully cooperate, he
       should end up being – by far – the most useful witness to date.
       Not only can he corroborate what his former underlings like
       Fiona Hill and Colonel Vindman have said, Bolton has also spent
       plenty of time in close quarters with Trump, and can provide far
       deeper insight into whatever Trump has said about his Ukraine
       scandal motives.
       In addition, everyone knows that John Bolton is a far-right
       warmonger who hates the Democrats as much as the Democrats hate
       him. There’s no way Donald Trump and his allies can paint Bolton
       as being part of some kind of partisan liberal conspiracy
       against Trump. You can expect Bolton to try to use his testimony
       to set up huge sales for his upcoming tell-all book, but that’s
       neither here nor there. All that matters is if Bolton is willing
       to give the kind of testimony that’ll take &#129408; Trump down.
       [center]
  HTML http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/1/3-020818221632-1610966.gif[/center]
  HTML https://www.palmerreport.com/analysis/john-bolton-youre-up/22505/
       [center]
  HTML https://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/2/3-011019180735.jpeg[/center]
       #Post#: 14205--------------------------------------------------
       Re: &#127775; IMPEACHMENT SCORE &#127776;
   DIR By: AGelbert
       Date: October 31, 2019, 12:53 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [center]
  HTML http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/1/3-250718205137.gif<br
       />Rudy Giuliani goes completely berserk after Trump nominee
       sells
       him out to Congress[/center]
       Bill Palmer | 8:10 pm EDT October 30, 2019
       Palmer Report » Analysis
       Earlier today Palmer Report brought you the story of how
  HTML http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/1/3-250718205808.gif<br
       />Donald Trump’s plan to take a key impeachment witness out of
       the
       equation had apparently backfired on him
  HTML https://www.palmerreport.com/analysis/hate-deputy-secretary-of-state-said-donald-trump/22510/.<br
       />He nominated Deputy Secretary of State John Sullivan to be a
       U.S. Ambassador, in an attempt at getting him out of the country
       and preventing him from testifying about the Ukraine scandal.
       Trump appeared to forget that such a nomination would actually
       force John Sullivan to testify to the Senate during the
       confirmation process, which would mean he would definitely face
       questions from Senate Democrats about the Ukraine scandal. Sure
       enough, Sullivan sold Trump out today by acknowledging under
       oath that it’s wrong for the president to ask a foreign nation
       to investigate his political rivals. Sullivan also sold out
  HTML http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/1/3-250718205137.gif<br
       />Rudy Giuliani, and let’s just say that Rudy isn’t taking it
       well. He tweeted this bizarre meltdown attacking Sullivan:
       The Amb. nominee doesn’t know what he’s talking about and
       shouldn’t be incorrectly speculating. This is an orchestrated
       attempt to harass and hinder me in my role as Donald Trump’s
       attorney. All of the information I obtained came from interviews
       conducted as private defense counsel to POTUS, to defend him
       against false allegations. I began obtaining this information
       while Mueller was still investigating his witch hunt and a full
       5 months before Biden even announced his run for Pres. It won’t
       work!
       This is all gibberish, of course. But it means that Donald Trump
       and Rudy Giuliani are now so backed into a corner, Rudy is being
       forced to publicly accuse Trump’s own nominee of being part of
       an orchestrated conspiracy against him. Also, Rudy just
       confessed that he’s been criminally conspiring with Trump in the
       Ukraine scandal for nearly a year now – far longer than
       previously known.
  HTML https://www.palmerreport.com/analysis/rudy-giuliani-nominee-trump-sell/22513/
       #Post#: 14206--------------------------------------------------
       Who’s going to be the one to tell Donald Trump?
   DIR By: AGelbert
       Date: October 31, 2019, 1:03 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [center]
  HTML https://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/2/3-011019182105.gif[/center]
       [center]Who’s going to be the one to tell &#129408; Donald
       Trump?[/center]
       Robert Harrington | 10:20 pm EDT October 30, 2019
       Palmer Report » Analysis
       Facebook ShareTwitter ShareEmail this articlePrint Article
       It was 5pm on Wednesday, August seventh 1974, in the Oval
       Office. The smallest number that could possibly be termed a
       “delegation,” three, composed of House Republican Leader John
       Jacob Rhodes, Senate Republican Leader Hugh Scott, and, front
       and center, Republican Senator Barry Goldwater, sat before
       Richard Nixon and told him they didn’t have enough votes. Two
       days before, a devastating revelation, the last straw perhaps,
       had come in the form of a tape of Nixon talking to his chief of
       staff, mere days after the break-in. In it Nixon suggests that
       the CIA should falsely claim that national security was involved
       in the Watergate matter. Nixon’s hope at the time would be that
       the CIA would therefore tell the FBI they had to terminate their
       investigation.
       The implication was clear: it was unequivocal obstruction of
       justice. The &#128024; Republican delegation was there to tell
       Nixon they couldn’t save him. The vote in the House would go
       forward to impeach, and they had, at most, 18 votes in the
       Senate still loyal to Nixon, but not enough to prevent
       conviction and expulsion from office. Sitting behind Woodrow
       Wilson’s desk, Nixon leaned back, sighed, and told them, “I’ve
       got a very difficult decision to make.”
       At what precise point between then and the next day Nixon
       decided to resign is lost to history. But it’s clear that the
       decision came on the heels of, and at the suggestion by, his
       allies in Congress. The result, of course, is now history. Nixon
       was on Marine One and gone by Friday.
       It is unlikely such a delegation could be mounted today,
       particularly a delegation of those Republican members of
       Congress who remain loyal to Donald Trump. And they are legion.
       One must suppose, with good reason, that the Trump we see in
       public is not far from the one his minions must tolerate in
       private – disingenuous, overbearing, incapable of listening to
       advice, particularly when the advice is cautionary and less than
       flattering. The image of a Donald Trump sitting quietly and
       enduring unflattering advice is difficult to conjure.
       What sets Donald Trump apart from his predecessors is his
       inability to learn, to grow into the job. We know that the
       Mueller investigation was a nightmare for him. No sooner had it
       ended with a shameful presentation of flaccid understatement and
       dry, intellectualized equivocation on the part of Mueller,
       Trump, instead of accepting a kind of victory for an answer,
       returned the very next day to colluding with a foreign power to
       win the next election. The 674 day Mueller ordeal had taught him
       absolutely nothing. Instead it confirmed in him what he
       suspected all along: that Donald Trump is above the law. He even
       managed to find a lawyer who will say as much.
       It should come as no surprise to us that a man who never reads
       likewise never listens. The delegation that told Nixon the home
       truth of his coming impeachment and conviction was smaller than
       it could have been. Nixon’s then chief of staff, Alexander Haig,
       kept it deliberately small because he wanted to avoid the
       appearance of a breach of the balance of power between the
       legislative and executive branch of government. The notion that
       anyone at all in the Republican Congress would dare confront
       Trump in a similar way is both a testimony to the hold Trump has
       on them and a demonstration of the sad absence of courage in the
       Republican Party today.
       So, when the time comes, who bells the cat? I see no likely
       candidates. The succession of obfuscating Republican talking
       points – the whistleblower is disloyal, he or she has “hearsay
       evidence,” he or she was counseled by Adam Schiff, the process
       is being conducted in secret in a basement, the witnesses are
       unpatriotic traitors – shifts almost daily and is parroted
       endlessly across the GOP. Is there no one who will rid us of
       this turbulent presidency?
  HTML http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/1/3-210818163123-16662165.gif
  HTML https://www.palmerreport.com/analysis/whos-going-to-be-the-one-to-tell-donald-trump/22495/
       #Post#: 14207--------------------------------------------------
       Re: &#127775; IMPEACHMENT SCORE &#127776;
   DIR By: AGelbert
       Date: October 31, 2019, 1:23 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [center]&#129408; Trump White House official goes out with a
       bang  ;D[/center]
       Bill Palmer | 12:14 am EDT October 31, 2019
       Palmer Report » Analysis
       With each passing day, the downfall of Donald Trump begins to
       more closely resemble a movie script. We’ve had a respected
       military official testify to Congress that he witnessed the
       President committing crimes, in a scene straight out of a Jack
       Ryan movie. We’ve seen a key witness who has a twin brother who
       is also a key witness. How many more movie moments are coming?
       If you’ve been waiting for someone to resign from Donald Trump’s
       White House on their way into testifying against Donald Trump,
       well, actually that’s already happened twice, with Kurt Volker
       and Michael McKinley. But now it’s happening again, this time in
       more high profile fashion.
       National Security Council official Tim Morrison is set to
       testify against Donald Trump to the House impeachment inquiry on
       Thursday. That could make things awkward for Morrison when he
       shows up for work at the White House on Friday after his
       testimony, except he won’t be showing up for work ever again.
       According to NPR, Morrison straight up resigned on his way out
       of work on Wednesday.
       NPR says that Tim Morrison was planning to eventually leave the
       job anyway. But it raises the question of just how many people
       are going to end up resigning from the Trump White House during
       the course of this scandal. Come to think of it, by the time
       this is over, there may not be a [img
       width=100]
  HTML https://evilasshole.files.wordpress.com/2017/01/trumpopus.jpg?w=640[/img]<br
       />Trump White House anyway.
  HTML http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-221017161839.png
  HTML https://www.palmerreport.com/analysis/resigns-testifies-white-house-offficial-donald-trump/22518/
       --- Quote ---
       > Julie Frein
       > I have a sign that says "I am already disturbed, Please come
       in".  ;D
       >
       > Maybe I should gift it to
  HTML http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/2/3-231218145827.png<br
       />Trump?
  HTML http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/1/3-210818163123-16601910.gif
       --- End Quote ---
       [center]
  HTML https://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/2/3-191019170902.png[/center]
       *****************************************************
       Page 14 of 30
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page