URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Renewable Revolution
  HTML https://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Who CAN you trust? 
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 4311--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Defending Wildlife
       By: AGelbert Date: January 10, 2016, 4:52 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=AGelbert link=topic=176.msg4310#msg4310
       date=1452461984]
       They pay almost nothing to send hundreds of thousands of
       livestock across our public lands sometimes obliterating the
       natural landscape as the livestock devour native grasses, pound
       the soil into dust, and wallow in and destroy streams and
       rivers.
       They also pay almost nothing to have the state and federal
       government exterminate native American wildlife on our public
       lands - wolves, coyotes, mountain lions, bears, even eagles -
       that sometimes prey on calves and lambs. The epitome of this
       extermination is the "aerial gunner men" hired by the U.S.
       Department of Agriculture to fly helicopters over our public
       lands and kill thousands of wolves and coyotes with shotgun
       blasts from the sky every year," says journalist Gary Wockner.
       Read our article, President Obama, Stop Leasing Our Federal
       Lands & Waters.
       Read how Teddy Roosevelt created the refuge:
       
       Website:
       www.onearth.org/earthwire/malheur-national-wildlife-refuge-theod
       ore-roosevelt
  HTML http://www.onearth.org/earthwire/malheur-national-wildlife-refuge-theodore-roosevelt
  HTML http://www.sustainablebusiness.com/index.cfm/go/news.display/id/26514
  HTML http://www.sustainablebusiness.com/index.cfm/go/news.display/id/26514
       The ranchers (at least the smaller, non-corporate types) don't
       support selling of the commons. It isn't in their interest at
       all. The fact that the land has been public all these years has
       been a great gift to them. Truthfully, their real sin is that
       they have been poor stewards of the land, and have overgrazed it
       ever since they were allowed on it. They have essentially been
       subsidized all these years, but that was why the whole thing was
       set up the way it was in the beginning, to make it possible for
       settlers to live in parts of the west where 160 acre homesteads
       were too small to support a family.
       So I have a hard time seeing this as their motivation. Now,
       perhaps this is some kind of trumped up scheme by the big
       money...the ones who have the kind of financing to actually buy
       big chunks of public land. That I could believe.
       The whole stand-off stinks to high heaven, frankly. Most of the
       militia types out there think it's a false flag operation
       designed to make it easier for the federal government to justify
       grabbing their guns.
  HTML https://westernrifleshooters.wordpress.com/2016/01/06/malheur-another-perspective/
  HTML https://westernrifleshooters.wordpress.com/2016/01/06/malheur-another-perspective/
       Eddie said,
       THAT is what you should DEFINITELY believe because THAT is what
       this is ALL about (see the toadies Rep. Rob Bishop R-UT, Senator
       Lisa Murkowski's R-AK, etc. et al of the PRIVATE rich Welfare
       Queen Vested Interests using the Federal Government to fleece
       we-the-people:  :evil4:).
       Of course. But the COVER for these types of scams always
       requires the use of Karl Rove's strategy number 3: Always accuse
       your opponent of doing what YOU are doing to hide the FACT that
       YOU are doing it. It's basic Machiavelli. ANYONE that uses this
       strategy is devoid of a moral compass. Nitzsche's Territorial
       Imperative REQUIRES that that you LACK a moral compass. And long
       before the Homestead Act, that has been our "justification" for
       land grabbing.
  HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-200714183337.bmp
       So now the REAL land grabbers ((see: PRIVATE rich Welfare Queen
       Vested Interests using the Federal Government to fleece
       we-the-people) behind this are deliberately propagandizing the
       militia types to look in the wrong direction for the motive.
  HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-200714191329.bmp
       See red herring. See distraction. See Bu ll sh it. See: Cui
       Bono?
  HTML http://www.pic4ever.com/images/acigar.gif
       If this massive land grab BY the rich, biosphere math
       challenged, private greedballs (who use dumbass ideologues in
       Oregon and bought and paid for politicians as stalking horses)
       is not stopped, we will soon see our lands totally overrun by
       profit over planet exploitation. As the article I posted made
       clear, we ALREADY have a huge problem with wanton exploitation
       for fossil fuels, mining and the extermination of wildlife that
       "gets in the way". The overgrazing by greedy ranchers will be
       the least of our problems.
       The solution to this problem requires that the American public
       understand who the BURGLAR really is and respond accordingly.
       A burglar breaks into a house and finds a parrot inside.
       “Kesha sees you,” says the Parrot.
       Burglar covers the bird’s cage with a towel.
       “Kesha is not a parrot, Kesha is a rottweiler,” says the Parrot.
       [center][img
       width=100]
  HTML http://pm1.narvii.com/5869/6a64193d6770c3afd17406c78686c0eda32ded1c_hq.jpg[/img][/center][/quote]
       [quote author=Eddie link=topic=559.msg94968#msg94968
       date=1452463192]
       Yes, I think you have it right. It's the same old story about
       exploiting the commons, extracting the resources, and passing
       the costs back to the public. It's about timber and it's about
       uranium. It's about water and who gets it.
       [/quote]
       Yep. And the foundation of all this biosphere math challenged
       behavior is an absence of a moral compass. [img
       width=60]
  HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-041115022304.png[/img]
       In the light (or prehaps darkness  :() of witnessing the
       thorough disappearance of ethical behavior in American society
       (back in the second half of the 19th century, engineers who
       designed railroad bridges would kill themselves if a bridge
       failed with a passenger filled train on it - now they claim
       "sabotage" and "poor government maintenance" while they lobby
       for another bridge building contract...), it is proper to resort
       to humor as a survival mechanism.
       For the no good Attackers of the rich job creators/fossil fuel
       industry saviors of our civilization, Socialist, Eco-Leftist
       whackos like me (who talk too much   ;D):
       Congratulations! You won a free year long placement on a no-fly
       list.
       Good for me! I get to lower my carbon footprint some more! - We
       Eco-Leftists always find [s]silver[/s] compost linings in piles
       of poop.
  HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-200714191258.bmp<br
       />
       Do you want coffee with cognac or without?
       – Without.
       – Without cognac?
       – Without coffee.
       For medicinal purpose only. I'm a Christian, ya know!
  HTML http://www.pic4ever.com/images/2.gif
       Now for more general humor...
       Ahmed, why is your wife walking in front of you? Did you forget
       that according to the Quran, a wife has to always walk behind
       her husband?
       – Darling, I know what Quran says. But when they wrote it, they
       had not invented anti-personnel mines, yet.
       Well yeah, some Arabs read Machiavelli too!
       You have 300 Facebook friends. 80 of them come to your wedding.
       10 show up for your birthday. When you have a problem, you have
       two friends: your parents.
       And then your parents die. But your mother-in-law doesn't.
       My mother-in-law is an angel.
       – Lucky you… My mother-in-law is still alive.
       #Post#: 4315--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Defending Wildlife
       By: AGelbert Date: January 11, 2016, 2:00 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=agelbert link=topic=559.msg94999#msg94999
       date=1452482945]
       [quote author=roamer link=topic=559.msg94994#msg94994
       date=1452476610]
       And what if this fed land grab operation is in part to procure
       control over silver and rare earth metals needed for the solar
       revolution AG?
       [/quote]
       It's a PRIVATIZATION land grab, not a fed land grab. The toadies
       are actually getting the Federal Government to PAY the States to
       take it, only to turn around and SELL IT to resource
       exploitation corporations.
  HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-200714183337.bmp
       Roamer, that is an interesting possibility. I expect you, as an
       allegedly objective, responsible, open minded individual to now
       research silver mining (silver is found with gold at a ratio of
       about 16 to one so they get gold from them too) and rare earths
       mining in the world in general, and the USA in particular.
       I expect you to provide a list of the carcinogenic and otherwise
       toxic chemicals involved (there are LOTS of them besides
       arsenic) in the process of mining for and refining precious and
       rare earth metals. Furthermore, I expect you to provide the
       proportional distribution of the product in the various
       industries in the correct percentages and proportions,
       particularly how much of the total mining output goes
       (eventually) to Renewable Energy Technologies.
       I expect you to compare their use for Renewable Technologies
       with their use for the polluting industries. But don't stop
       there. Copper, for example, is a rather important part of
       manufacturing electric motors. So you could make a case against
       copper being mined for Renewable Energy powered electric motors
       too.
       Of course you would have to subtract all the copper used for
       electric motors on oil rigs and fossil fuel powered modes of
       transportation like cars, planes ships, submarines, etc. And
       don't forget to look into how the fossil fuel industry uses rare
       earths and silver in their machinery and infrastructure too.
       They do, you know.  8)
       Otherwise, you might be mistaken for someone who is trying to
       distract people from the routine profit over planet exploitation
       of the fossil fuel industry, which they certainly DO have a
       track record of DOING on public lands.
       So, if you think I am opposed to the privatization of public
       lands ONLY because the big money fossil fuelers want to exploit
       them for profit while they exterminate any wildlife that gets in
       the way, I beg to differ. I do not give a tinker's damn whether
       there is a mother lode of rare earths on public land or a giant
       copper or silver find in that, or any other wildlife refuge. I
       want it LEFT ALONE and managed by responsible biologists, not
       greedy, empathy deficit disordered opportunists. In fact, I
       suspect you feel exactly the same way. Howevah, ConocoPhillips,
       the reputed first oil corporation off the blocks to take
       advantage of the elimination of the export ban (they also just
       closed all operations in Russia - a coincidence, of course
  HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-200714191329.bmp)<br
       />may see newly privatized lands to be Fracked as a "business
       opportunity".  :P
       By the way, the fastest growing job in the USA is Wind Turbine
       Technician. It pays pretty good and you are well qualified for
       it.
       [center][img
       width=300]
  HTML http://agriculture.csi.edu/images/wind/windEnergy2.jpg[/img][/center]
       [center]Where's Roamer? ???[/center]
       I can give you a link to a recent news item on it if you like.
       You can still get in on the "ground floor", so to speak.
  HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-200714191456.bmp[/quote]
       [quote author=roamer link=topic=559.msg95000#msg95000
       date=1452484355]
       AG, Well I was spouting idle chatter on that one, I think Eddie
       is closer to the mark though there are talks of massive solar
       farms looking for a home on west coast public land.
       I agree with you too on the research that needs to be done to
       present an objective picture of cost benefit of solar PV.  Maybe
       I'll find time to dig into a bit.  But im not in need of
       convincing that the future is solar.
       All for it and with the Sauds and presumably parasitic war
       mongering deep state throwing their weight behind their
       geological mother lode I'm far less inclined to think anything
       good can come of waiting to bite the bullet and transition.
       So I think you and I can agree on one point, its now solar or
       bust for the world.
       [/quote]
       [img
       width=20]
  HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-080515182559.png[/img]<br
       />
  HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-200714191456.bmphttp://www.pic4ever.com/images/128fs318181.gif<br
       />I would only add the caveat that solar is just one of the
       several Renewable Energy Technologies needed to replace the
       fossil fuel hegemony.   8)
       [center][img
       width=640]
  HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-110116142210.png[/img][/center]
       [center]
  HTML http://thesolutionsproject.org/[/center]
       #Post#: 5026--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Defending Wildlife
       By: AGelbert Date: May 2, 2016, 5:52 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=RE link=topic=5081.msg102697#msg102697
       date=1462146934]
       Personally, I think a better choice would have been to carve the
       Tusks into Elephant Sculptures and distribute them to Musueums
       around the world to demonstrate the problem.  This solution just
       adds CO[sub]2[/sub] to the atmosphere.
       RE
       [center]
  HTML https://youtu.be/hVa8A_nUyDI[/center]
       [/quote]
       True.
       But I would prefer the tusks be stored in prisons. Every person
       convicted of participating at some level of the poaching to
       selling and owning ivory should be required to carry 50 pounds
       of tusk around for the duration of their sentence.
  HTML http://www.smiley-lol.com/smiley/exagerent/police/boulet.gif
       
  HTML http://www.desismileys.com/smileys/desismileys_6869.gif
       #Post#: 5050--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Defending Wildlife
       By: AGelbert Date: May 5, 2016, 7:34 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [center][img
       width=640]
  HTML http://cdn1.arkive.org/media/43/4335726C-67BE-4ED0-817C-A8163ABE4F5C/Presentation.Large/Young-coyote-cubs-playing.jpg[/img][/center]
       [center]Coyote pups (they now have a better chance to survive)
       [img
       width=20]
  HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-080515182559.png[/img][/center]
       [center]Killing Halted:
  HTML http://www.freesmileys.org/emoticons/tuzki-bunnys/tuzki-bunny-emoticon-052.gif<br
       />California County Suspends Wildlife Services Contract[/center]
       A settlement agreement stemming from a lawsuit by the Center and
       allies means that California's Mendocino County will suspend its
       contract with a federal wildlife-killing agency while a full
       environmental review is conducted.
       The U.S. Department of Agriculture's Wildlife Services kills
       hundreds of coyotes, mountain lions, bears, bobcats and other
       wildlife in Mendocino County every year. The Center and allies
       twice sued the county for failing to comply with the California
       Environmental Quality Act in approving its contract with the
       program. Under the terms of the settlement, Mendocino County
       must evaluate the merits of a nonlethal predator-control program
       and prepare an "environmental impact report" if it decides to
       enter into a contract with Wildlife Services in the future.
       This may finally begin to curb widespread killing by this rogue
       program, which wiped out more than 47,000 animals in California
       in 2014.
       Read more in our press release:
  HTML http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/news/press_releases/2016/wildlife-services-04-26-2016.html
       #Post#: 5085--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Defending Wildlife
       By: AGelbert Date: May 12, 2016, 5:12 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [center]  [img
       width=640]
  HTML http://johnmuirproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/CenterForBiologicalDiversity.png[/img][/center]
       [center]65,000 Acres Won for Oregon Spotted Frogs
  HTML http://www.pic4ever.com/images/treeswing.gif[/center]
       [center][img
       width=640]
  HTML http://mediad.publicbroadcasting.net/p/ksor/files/201312/oregonspottedfrog.jpg[/img][/center]
       [center]Oregon spotted frog[/center]
       The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service this week protected 65,038
       acres and 20 river miles of "critical habitat" for Oregon
       spotted frogs in Oregon and Washington. In response to a
       petition and lawsuit from the Center, these frogs were declared
       threatened under the Endangered Species Act in 2014 -- but not
       until they'd spent 23 years languishing on a waiting list for
       protection. The once-plentiful creatures have now disappeared
       from 90 percent of their range.
       Oregon spotted frogs -- one of the few frogs that call to each
       other under water -- need clean water and stable flows for
       egg-laying, tadpole development and adult overwintering. They're
       threatened by wetlands loss, poor river management, reduced
       water quality, drought and invasive species.
       "This habitat protection is good news for Oregon spotted frogs
       and for future generations, because we can't save endangered
       species without protecting their homes," said the Center's
       Tierra Curry. "Amphibians have been on the planet for millions
       of years, and when they start dying off it's a wake-up call that
       we need to take better care of our resources."
  HTML http://www.pic4ever.com/images/icare.gif
       [img
       width=100]
  HTML http://www.pic4ever.com/images/earthhug.gif[/img]
       Get more from KTVZ.
  HTML http://www.ktvz.com/news/feds-finalize-critical-spotted-frog-habitat-in-nw/39464934
       #Post#: 5086--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Defending Wildlife
       By: AGelbert Date: May 12, 2016, 5:30 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [center]  [img
       width=340]
  HTML http://johnmuirproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/CenterForBiologicalDiversity.png[/img]
       [/center]
       [center]
       Myth-busting Study: Wolf Killing Spurs Wolf Poaching
       :([/center]
       [center]
       [img
       width=640]
  HTML http://zpk.mob
       i/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Wolves-HD-Free-Live-Wallpaper.png[/
       img][/center]
       [center]Alert wolves[/center]
       Wolf managers, listen up: A study published this week finds that
       thinning wolf populations actually decreases public tolerance
       for wolves and leads to more poaching.
  HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-200714183337.bmp
       The analysis of wolf populations in Wisconsin and Michigan, by
       scientists Adrian Treves and Guillaume Chapron, undermines
       assertions by government officials and opponents of wolf
       protection that culling wolves is necessary to mollify the
       segment of the human population that might otherwise poach the
       animals. In fact the study -- involving 18 years of data --
       found that when wolf culling was allowed, poaching increased as
       well; when wolves were protected from culling, poaching
       decreased.
       "This important study should trigger more humane, science-based
       management of wolves," said the Center's Michael Robinson. "One
       of the best things governments can do to cut poaching is to send
       the message that wolves have a high public value and deserve to
       be treated accordingly."
       Read more in our  press release
  HTML http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/news/press_releases/2016/wolf-05-11-2016.html<br
       />and check out this  cool video
  HTML http://www.theverge.com/2016/5/10/11645954/wolf-hunt-movie-minnesota-michigan-wisconsin-conservationexplaining<br
       />the study using Playmobil figures.  [img width=75
       height=50]
  HTML http://www.pic4ever.com/images/reading.gif[/img]
       
       #Post#: 5117--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Defending Wildlife
       By: AGelbert Date: May 19, 2016, 2:25 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [center][img
       width=640]
  HTML http://media.charlesleifer.com/blog/photos/walrus-lurker.jpg[/img][/center]
       [center]10 Things to Know about the Walrus[/center]
       Posted On May 19, 2016 by Guest Blogger
       This blog was written by Roger Di Silvestro, a field
       correspondent for Ocean Conservancy.  [img
       width=100]
  HTML http://www.bativert.ma/images/image3.jpg[/img]
       When you think of walruses, you may picture their tusks—the huge
       pinniped’s most familiar characteristic. But there is so much
       more to these “elephants of the sea”! Here are some less-obvious
       facts about these ice-dwelling creatures.
       1. Biologists classify the walrus as a carnivore, or meat eater,
       which puts the animal in the same broad category as wolves,
       foxes and lions.
       2. The polar bear, weighing as much as 1,200 pounds, is often
       touted as North America’s largest terrestrial carnivore. But
       it’s a mere wisp compared to the ocean-going male walrus, which
       can tip the scales in excess of 3,700 pounds.
       3. Walruses depend on sea ice, and spend much of the summer on
       flows from which they dive into relatively shallow waters in
       search of food. In winter, the walruses go to shore and feed in
       near-shore waters. They communicate with grunting and roaring
       sounds.
       [center][img
       width=640]
  HTML https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/ce/Noaa-walrus22.jpg[/img][/center]
       4. Despite their size and their ability to stay underwater for
       up to half an hour, walruses are not deep divers—they usually
       feed at depths of less than 300 feet.
       [center][img
       width=640]
  HTML http://s.ngm.com/2013/12/atlantic-walrus/img/atlantic-walrus-underwater-615.jpg[/img][/center]
       5. Walruses find much of their food by poking around on the
       ocean floor. When a walrus finds a tasty crab or clam buried in
       sand, it creates powerful suction with its mouth to vacuum it
       up. Walruses are not picky eaters—they feed mainly on mollusks,
       but will also eat worms, cephalopods, crustaceans and more. They
       even nosh on an occasional seal, though observations of walruses
       hunting their close relatives are rare.
       [center][img
       width=640]
  HTML http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/02280/two-swim-underwate_2280033k.jpg[/img][/center]
       6. Walruses are able to locate buried food thanks to the 400-700
       stiff bristles, or vibrissae, which grow on their muzzles. Like
       a cat’s whiskers, vibrissae are sensitive to touch, telling the
       walrus when it has come in contact with an appropriate food.
       Vibrissae can grow up to a foot long, but scraping against sand
       and rock usually keeps them shorter.
       [center][img
       width=640]
  HTML https://www.svsu.edu/~tkschult/moia/images/arctic-walrus-244x200.png[/img][/center]
       7. Adult walruses have few enemies, mostly due to their massive
       size and sharp tusks, which can grow to more than three feet
       long. Bears sometimes attack young walruses, as do orcas. A bear
       attack on a beached walrus herd can make the pinnipeds rush
       headlong for the safety of water, causing injuries to adult
       walruses in the general crush and making them vulnerable to bear
       attacks.
       8. The scientific name for the walrus genus is Odobenus, which
       is Greek for “tooth walker,” so-called because walruses
       sometimes use their tusks to haul themselves onto ice.
       9. The brownish, heavily seamed skin of the walrus is over 1.5
       inches thick and covers a layer of blubber that can get to 3.9
       inches thick.  The skin grows paler as the animals age, until
       the dark brown of the young fades to cinnamon in mature animals.
       The color depends partly on blood flow to the skin; when in cold
       water, blood flow to the skin reduces, so the skin of a pink
       walrus can turn nearly white.
       10. Walruses breed from January to March while winter is in full
       swing, and females give birth about 16 months later. A newborn
       calf can weigh 100 to 165 pounds and may stay with the mother
       for two years or more, though usually weaned after a year.
       [center][img
       width=640]
  HTML http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-xLUcue6fQHI/UNqX7dtqvGI/AAAAAAAAB2o/0mfrtZQLIVs/s1600/Ice+Walrus.jpg[/img][/center]
       The Ocean Conservancy is using science-based solutions to tackle
       the biggest threats to our ocean, including ones that threaten
       walruses and other wildlife. See how you can take action.
  HTML http://blog.oceanconservancy.org/2016/05/19/10-things-to-know-about-the-walrus/#more-12079
  HTML http://blog.oceanconservancy.org/2016/05/19/10-things-to-know-about-the-walrus/#more-12079
       [center][img
       width=640]
  HTML https://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2014/10/walrus-fuss.jpg?w=720[/img][/center]
       [center][img
       width=640]
  HTML https://curryja.files.wordpress.com/2015/12/slide13.png[/img][/center]
       [center][img
       width=640]
  HTML http://www-tc.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/assets/img/posters/walrus-speak-in.jpg[/img][/center]
       [center]No ice in shallow water off the continental shelf, [i]no
       Walruses. GET IT? [/i][/center]
       [center][img
       width=640]
  HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-171015015834.png[/img][/center]
       [move]Fossil Fuel Industry response to ALL THE ABOVE:[/move]
       [center] [img
       width=340]
  HTML http://img06.deviantart.net/bb6a/i/2011/120/f/6/corporate_pollution_by_jakejames-d3512u1.jpg[/img][/center]
       #Post#: 5279--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Defending Wildlife
       By: AGelbert Date: June 13, 2016, 8:17 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [move]The "We are very responsible, good and caring for
       wildlife" BULLSHIT from Kevin Shea, USDA Administrator, in a
       letter to Senator Sanders:[/move]
       [center][img
       width=640]
  HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-130616210522.png[/img][/center]
       THE TRUTH, as stated clearly since 2013:
       
       [center]
       Congress: Kill Wildlife Services’ Wildlife-Killing
       Budget[/center]
       By Ralph Maughan On August 9, 2013
       This is a guest editorial by Wendy Keefover, Director of the
       Carnivore Protection Program at WildEarth Guardians-
       The New York Times editors largely got it right when they
       recently editorialized critically about the cruel work of a
       little known program within the U.S. Department of Agriculture
       (USDA) that annually spends over $100 million to kill some four
       million animals each year.  But we believe the Times should have
       gone further with their recommendation:  abolish Wildlife
       Services altogether because it represents a huge waste of
       taxpayer funds, it harms wildlife communities and ecosystems,
       and uses indiscriminate, brutal methods to kill millions of
       wildlife and domestic animals each year.
       Not surprisingly Kevin Shea, one of the USDA’s top
       administrators for the government’s war on wildlife reacted
       defensively and claimed the Times editors “misunderstood” the
       federal government’s animal-killing “program.” He argues that
       unless one lives in “Rural [sic] America or work(s) in
       agriculture” one just cannot comprehend[i] the need for the feds
       to kill “wolves, coyotes, bears that prey on livestock, as well
       as birds that can devour a field of sunflowers or a pen of
       farm-raised catfish in a morning.”[/I]
       [center]
       [img width=200
       height=100]
  HTML http://fc06.deviantart.net/fs71/f/2009/347/2/6/WTF_Smiley_face_by_IveWasHere.jpg[/img][/center]
       [I]But Shea’s notion of rural exceptionalism is fundamentally
       about the bottom line of agribusiness and is a complete
       dismissal of the [size=12pt]growing support for non-lethal
       coexistence[/i][/size].
       His arguments are out-of-step with Americans’ conservation
       values. In fact some rural producers readily use non-lethal
       methods to deter wildlife and prevent losses to their
       agricultural products. A few ranchers ride with their herds that
       graze on open range, or use barns or pens to protect lambing or
       calving mothers. Some farmers use scarecrows and electronic
       devices to scare off flocks of birds that might eat sunflower
       seeds or rice.
       Shea conveniently omitted facts about the enormous problems
       associated with this federal animal-killing program. Each year,
       Wildlife Services kills millions of animals, including animals
       that are federally listed as “endangered” or “threatened” with
       extinction under the Endangered Species Act. It also kills
       hundreds of common species each year from meadowlarks, to
       beavers, to American kestrels. Wildlife Services slays hundreds
       of domestic pets, and occasionally and ironically the very
       cattle, sheep, or deer they are working to protect.
       While Shea claims that: “we target just those animals causing
       the damage.” Nothing could be further from the truth. Wildlife
       Services uses a veritable arsenal that includes a variety of
       indiscriminate deadly poisons; cable neck snares; dynamite,
       steel-jawed, and leg-hold traps. None of these things target the
       individual animals that have caused agricultural damage. And
       neither can the federal snipers who shoot wolves, bears,
       coyotes, and ravens from helicopters and airplanes. They just
       shoot the animals they see.
       Shea also forgot to mention the brutality that characterizes
       some Wildlife Services employees. Recently, one federal trapper
       was criticized for apparently siccing his dogs on trapped
       coyotes. The trapper then apparently took photos and posted them
       to his Facebook page.
       In another recent incident, a government trapper, who was
       working for his wife with his supervisor’s approval, set up
       leg-hold traps in his own yard. He captured his neighbor’s dog
       who was left in traps for hours. The dog sustained permanent
       damage to her body. The trapper has been charged in Arizona for
       felony animal abuse and recently left his employment.
       Wildlife Services wastes enormous resources in its bid to kill
       America’s most majestic native carnivores such as wolves,
       coyotes, bears, and cougars. What makes no sense is that only a
       miniscule number of livestock actually die from predation – less
       than a quarter of one percent of the cattle inventory according
       to USDA figures. Most cattle and sheep succumb to illness,
       disease, and birthing problems, according to the USDA’s own
       data, killing wolves and other native species creates enormous
       ecosystem problems, and disrupts the social structures in these
       animal communities.
       Finally, Mr. Shea failed to tell his readers that tax dollars
       largely pay for all this killing. Wildlife Services receives
       funds from taxpayers at every level of government – from
       municipalities, to states, and from the federal treasury as
       well.
       Worse, Wildlife Services operates under a veil of secrecy, often
       failing to account for its actions. Wildlife Services is
       notorious for its failures to respond to Freedom of Information
       Act requests. It won’t tell the public how much it spends on
       what it does, although a peek at some of its record keeping from
       its databases indicates a culture of precise record keeping.
       Wildlife Services has even evaded requests from Congress for its
       budget records.
       Wildlife Services has been around in various guises since the
       late 19th Century with its primary mission to exterminate our
       nation’s wildlife so as to benefit those in agribusiness. Times
       have changed. Sadly Wildlife Service has not.  It’s time for
       Wildlife Services to go. It’s out of step with Americans’ values
       toward wildlife and wildlands conservation.
       With ingenuity and persistence, producers can choose to co-exist
       with wildlife rather than killing – because the amount of
       killing is expensive, harmful, misguided, and wholly
       unnecessary. In an era of economic uncertainty, it’s time to
       kill Wildlife Services’ budget so as to spare our nation’s
       wildlife and pets.
  HTML http://www.thewildlifenews.com/2013/08/09/congress-kill-wildlife-services-wildlife-killing-budget/
       #Post#: 5280--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Defending Wildlife
       By: AGelbert Date: June 13, 2016, 8:36 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [center][img
       width=640]
  HTML http://missteenottawa.com/files/2014/07/ifaw-logo.jpg[/img][/center]
       [center]WATCH: amazing move of four forest elephants in Cote
       d'Ivoire[/center]
       [center]
  HTML https://youtu.be/lGyUqGT1dsU[/center]
  HTML http://www.ifaw.org/united-states/news/watch-amazing-move-four-forest-elephants-cote-divoire
       #Post#: 5281--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Defending Wildlife
       By: AGelbert Date: June 13, 2016, 8:57 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [img
       width=640]
  HTML http://missteenottawa.com/files/2014/07/ifaw-logo.jpg[/img]
       [move]Amur tiger release - Cinderella leaps to freedom in Far
       East Russia![/move]
       Update: We’re thrilled to report that, not only is Zolushka
       thriving in her new home, but in December 2015 she became the
       first rehabilitated and released Amur tiger to give birth in the
       wild. Below, experience the dramatic release that initiated this
       remarkable success story.PHOTO: © BASTAK
       [center]
  HTML https://youtu.be/WA90FGaIXJ8[/center]
       I should consider myself truly lucky because I took part in
       Cinderella’s release to the wild.
       Cinderella is an Amur tiger.
  HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-301014181553.gif<br
       />She was orphaned in the winter of 2012, and we were helping to
       raise her at the rehabilitation facility in Alekseyevka village,
       near Vladivostok in Far East Russia.
       From June 2012, I was checking on Cinderella virtually every
       day: what does she eat, what does she like, how does she
       sleep…and all other details of her life.
       For example, Cinderella loves to bathe. Usually after a good
       meal – a hog or a rabbit – she climbs into a stream that runs
       through her enclosure and lies in water happily.
       When Cinderella was found, she was exhausted and frostbitten.
       Very often tiger cubs like her suffer frostbite on their tails.
       Cinderella's tail was affected too, so the very tip, about 5 to
       7 centimeters, had to be amputated. This is the tip that tigers
       so characteristically curve up.
       We are a little worried that the amputation might inhibit her
       communication with other tigers, but in general it should not be
       a problem in her life in the wild.
       Many other organizations besides the International Fund for
       Animal Welfare (IFAW) have been involved in rescuing Cinderella:
       Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution at the Russian
       Academy of Sciences, Phoenix Fund, Inspection Tiger, and WCS.
       Members of all these organizations came together to  release
       Cinderella's back to the wild.
       While living in the rehabilitation center, Cinderella has
       learned two most important skills: to hunt and to avoid human
       beings. Both are innate, but her time spent in rehabilitation
       gave her an opportunity to develop them, and Cinderella rather
       excels at both.
       Whether Cinderella was ready for release, was decided by many of
       the world’s Amur tiger experts. After long discussions, the date
       for the release was set on May 9th. Nobody was intentionally
       setting it on Victory Day; it was just a nice coincidence.
       A lot of people gathered at the rehabilitation facility on May
       8th but were kept at a safe distance as Cinderella has
       intentionally been exposed to practically no contact with
       humans. All animals are examined and tested before being
       released; also a satellite collar had to be fit, so Cinderella
       had to be immobilized.
       That was not so easy: Cinderella's enclosure is large, and she
       is very good at hiding and as soon as she heard and smelled the
       presence of humans she found a good spot to lay low and remain
       still. Only a handful of people approached the enclosure.
       Two ‘shooters’ waited with their dart guns, a number of people
       surveyed the scene remotely on video fed by surveillance
       cameras, and the rest of us were  asked to wait one kilometer
       away from the facility to avoid needlessly stressing Cinderella
       too much.
       Around an hour and a half later, Cinderella was removed from the
       enclosure she called home for a year. Immediately after, blood
       was taken and other tests and measurements were performed,
       including measurements of her tail. Then she was fitted a
       satellite collar.
       During remote observations at the rehabilitation facility
       Cinderella looked as if she weighed more than 100 kilos (which
       was quite impressive), but her actual weight at the time of
       transport showed 94 kilos. It’s true that TV adds a few kilos!
       Our girl actually was quite slim. I couldn’t help but feeling
       Cinderella’s fur while she was asleep and was surprised by how
       warm she was, feeling her body heat as I passed my hand over her
       hide.
       The team then moved her into a transportation cage. The whole
       testing and measuring procedure took less than half an hour.
       We started off from the facility about 1 p.m. Our party was
       riding in four vehicles; one of them towed a trailer with
       Cinderella.
       During the first hour on the road our princess-to-be was waking
       up and recovering from anesthesia. We were watching her through
       breathing holes drilled in her cage. You put your eye to a
       peep-hole, and see a tiger looking straight at you… Ughhh…
       scary!
       The weather was rather cool near Vladivostok, but as we started
       driving it grew warmer, and then just plain hot. We were
       stopping often to check on Cinderella. It’s quite complicated to
       pour water into the transport crate, so we put two five-liter
       blocks of ice in there to keep her cool.
       Afraid that it would not be enough, we showered Cinderella by
       pouring water through the holes… what other way was there?...
       now imagine that here you are lying down, and suddenly cold
       water starts raining on you… Well, that was exactly what
       Cinderella thought too, and she expressed her thoughts loud and
       clear.
       We took the hint. No more showers.
       We can only imagine what Cinderella went through on the road. It
       was a very long and exhausting car drive. However,
       transportation by helicopter proved to be impossibly expensive.
       We were going to Bastak Nature Reserve. It is about 1000
       kilometers from Vladivostok, near Birobidzhan. It started
       raining in the evening, and the temperature fell: that was the
       welcome we got as we approached Cinderella’s release site at
       Bastak Nature Reserve.
       Tigers used to live in the area, but eventually people killed
       them all, and there were no tiger sightings there for many
       years. However, starting with 2006, one male tiger's presence is
       recorded there on a regular basis, and he is still sighted
       today. So we have far-reaching plans for Cinderella.
       At 11 a.m. on May 9th we came to a place where we were met by a
       massive off-road vehicle that closely resembles a tank without a
       turret. No other vehicle would be able to travel across the
       reserve terrain.
       The cage was uploaded on the tank, and we too climbed up on it.
       Never before have I travelled on such a thing! It’s a very
       powerful machine, there is only one downside – you have to duck
       all the time so as not to be hit by tree branches. I failed to
       do that once and got a good punch from a thick bough, which was
       less than nice.
       Finally we reached the place of release. It was selected in the
       very center of the reserve, where no one ever goes, and even
       rangers only visit on rare occasions. That is, they patrol this
       territory's perimeter looking for signs of human presence, and
       if there are none, they do not go inside this core area. This is
       where we brought Cinderella.
       The cage was taken down and placed in a way that gave Cinderella
       a good clearing to jump out and run for cover. We thought that
       she would run straight ahead so the video cameras were set to a
       side.
       Not surprisingly nobody volunteered to open the cage directly,
       so a block and tackle system was arranged to lift the cage door
       from the distance. Everything was set up, and placed, everyone
       was put inside the tank since a tiger's behavior in such
       situations is unpredictable.
       The rope was pulled, but the door wasn’t opening. The structure
       was then readjusted, everybody was growing nervous, time was
       passing, and all the cameras that were set up and recording were
       burning battery life. Of course Cinderella could hear everything
       and she was nervous too.
       The rope was pulled again, and again it wasn’t working. Then
       they started redoing the entire block and tackle system. By now
       our cameramen were seriously worried about losing the whole
       thing and Cinderella was less than pleased by all the action
       around her cage.
       Everybody got back inside the tank, took their 'positions', and
       finally the door slid open!
       Then everything was over in a split second. We heard a roar, and
       for an instant I saw Cinderella leaping out of the cage right
       away and, contrary to our expectations, disappearing immediately
       from our sight, making a sharp right turn.
       I was totally enraptured by that moment, so fluid and graceful
       she was. That was amazing. Cinderella leaped over one of the
       cameras, ran a bit to the side, stopped and looked back at us. I
       thought that for the first time in my life I see a tiger in the
       wild. And that this was perhaps the last time I would ever see a
       tiger in our taiga.
       At that moment the man who was holding the door open (and the
       door was heavy) faltered perhaps, and the door closed back with
       a deafening bang. Cinderella startled and – disappeared. That
       is, she made a couple more leaps and sort of dissolved among the
       trees. It’s amazing how the bright orange and black stripes make
       the tiger invisible in taiga.
       You know that she is there and can see us, but we cannot see
       her. It was a strange feeling, on one side a great joy because
       our Cinderella was free and back home, and on the other hand a
       realization that you do not want to cross her path again in the
       future.
       That was it.
       Today, we already received satellite data showing that
       Cinderella is moving across the reserve territory, so we know
       for certain that she is alive.
       Let me say again that all of this became possible only thanks to
       the joint efforts of many people from a number of organizations:
       Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution at the Russian
       Academy of Sciences, Inspection Tiger, WCS, Phoenix Fund, and
       IFAW. But more importantly, this was possible thanks to your
       contribution. A million thank-you’s to IFAW’s generous
       supporters for saving Cinderella and giving Amur tigers a new
       hope for their survival.
       --AF
       For more information about our efforts to protect tigers, visit
       our project page.
       Anna Filippova
  HTML http://www.pic4ever.com/images/19.gif
       is an
       International Fund for Animal Welfare campaigner working in the
       IFAW Russia office.
  HTML http://www.ifaw.org/united-states/news/watch-amur-tiger-release-cinderella-leaps-freedom-far-east-russia
       *****************************************************
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page