URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Renewable Revolution
  HTML https://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Fossil Fuel Folly
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 3285--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Fossil Fuels: Degraded Democracy and Profit Over Planet Poll
       ution
       By: AGelbert Date: June 11, 2015, 8:55 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [b]A Magical Mystery Tour of American Austerity Politics  [/b]
       Posted on Jun 10, 2015
       By Laura Gottesdiener, TomDispatch
       SNIPPET:
       [quote] That Marathon paid residents to evacuate their homes in
       this predominantly white section of town, while refusing to do
       the same in the predominantly African American 48217, which sits
       closer to the refinery, strikes neither Lockridge and Parker nor
       their neighbors as a coincidence.
  HTML http://www.freesmileys.org/smileys/smiley-devil12.gif[/quote]
  HTML http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/a_magical_mystery_tour_of_american_austerity_politics_20150610
  HTML http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/a_magical_mystery_tour_of_american_austerity_politics_20150610
       Agelbert NOTE: Corporate rule is Empathy Deficit behavior on
       STEROIDS.
       [img width=640
       height=380]
  HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-221014222208.png[/img]
       [quote]The dangerous American fascist is the man who wants to do
       in the United States in an American way what Hitler did in
       Germany in a Prussian way. The American fascist would prefer not
       to use violence. His method is to poison the channels of public
       information.
       With a fascist the problem is never how best to present the
       truth to the public but how best to use the news to deceive the
       public into giving the fascist and his group more money or more
       power.
       If we define an American fascist as one who in case of conflict
       puts money and power ahead of human beings, then there are
       undoubtedly several million fascists in the United States.
       There are probably several hundred thousand if we narrow the
       definition to include only those who in their search for money
       and power are ruthless and deceitful. [/quote]
  HTML http://newdeal.feri.org/wallace/haw23.htm
  HTML http://newdeal.feri.org/wallace/haw23.htm
       #Post#: 3577--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Fossil Fuels: Degraded Democracy and Profit Over Planet Poll
       ution
       By: AGelbert Date: August 7, 2015, 10:18 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Oil Spills Whose Fault are They Anyway?  ???
       Posted on June 13, 2015  by Timothy Jacobs
       
       By: Emily Williams
       “It’s not your fault.”
       In the movie Goodwill Hunting, Robin Williams repeats this line
       over and over to Matt Damon, helping him accept that the trauma
       he faced, in fact, wasn’t his fault.
       I can’t help that that mantra crosses my mind every time I’m
       confronted with anther exploding oil train or of a child
       diagnosed with cancer next to a power plant. “It’s not your
       fault.”
       Two weeks ago, a pipeline that was pumping crude oil from
       off-shore platforms to onshore facilities ruptured in Santa
       Barbara County, spilling over 100,000 gallons of crude oil onto
       the coastline and into the sea. The slick currently spans over
       10 miles of previously pristine coastline. The only silver
       lining is that the spill didn’t occur in a more populated area.
       Yet I am completely dependent on fossil fuels. A shameless
       alliance of government, big oil, and king coal has ensured that
       our infrastructure depends entirely upon coal, oil, and natural
       gas. These fuels heat our homes, power our cars, produce our
       plastics, and power the very computer I wrote this on.
       But just because we are currently reliant on something doesn’t
       mean we should continue to be. Our society used to rely on DDT
       to protect our crops from pests. Yet once it was proven how
       toxic the substance was, we banned it, turning to alternatives.
       We now know that fossil fuel extraction and combustion is more
       toxic to our communities and environment than DDT. When we turn
       on our fossil-fuel powered light, we cast an ugly shadow.
       At the other end of those power lines are horrendous human
       rights violations and irreversible environmental degradation.
       This spill is not an isolated incident. Exploding oil trains,
       oil spills, fracking-induced earthquakes, and coal slurry
       mud-slides have become a staple of nighttime news.
       Coal alone is estimated to have over $300 billion[1]in external
       costs; that is $300 billion worth of costs that the companies
       force onto taxpayers and the environment. In three weeks this
       year, three oil trains derailed and exploded, and in the case of
       the West Virginia exploding train, the fire that engulfed 19
       rail cars burned for three days[2].
       Over 25 million Americans live within the “blast zone” along oil
       train routes[3]. But the fossil fuel assault has a global front
       as well—climate change. According to the Climate Vulnerability
       Monitor, already 400,000 people die per year as a result of
       climate change[4]. While this number is already too high, future
       generations can expect a much higher figure.
       These impacts are not evenly distributed to those who are the
       most responsible for emissions. Fossil fuel extraction and
       combustion occurs mostly in or near communities of low
       socio-economic status–primarily communities of color. These
       communities are plagued with elevated rates of asthma,
       cardiovascular illness, and cancer, and have very little
       political power to fight the infrastructure. However, on the few
       occasions when this happens next door to the companies’ CEOs,
       suddenly there is an uproar. When a company wanted to install a
       fracking water tower on the land of Rex Tillerson—the CEO of
       Exxon Mobil—he fought it. Turns out Rex is only interested in
       fracking in other peoples’ back yards.
       No matter our political inclinations, we all have to accept that
       these fuels are undermining the health, economy, and prosperity
       of our society.
       So what’s the solution? Contrary to popular belief, we have the
       alternatives to actually transition away from fossil fuels and
       power our economy. Improving energy efficiency in buildings can
       cut 10% of emissions on its own[5]. Solar and wind are not only
       technically viable alternative fuels, but also financially
       feasible[6]. Germany, a country that lies at the same latitude
       as Alaska, and is covered in clouds for the majority of the
       year, already gets 30% of its energy from renewable sources[7].
       It’s not our fault…entirely. The American public is being
       misled. While mainstream media debates are torn between the
       “skeptic” and scientist, alluding to the jury still being out,
       97% of all climate scientists are in consensus that climate
       change is happening, the risk is great, and humans are the cause
       of it. How can this be? As it turns out, the fossil fuel
       industry pays big time for media campaigns to spread doubt and
       green-wash their businesses.
       This “dark money” is extremely hard to trace, but what is known
       is that 140 fossil-fuel-financed foundations donated over $550
       million to climate change denial campaigns[8]. For a more
       specific look, BP invests heavily in their PR campaign to recast
       themselves as “Beyond Petroleum”, while the company only
       invested $9 billion over the last decade in renewable technology
       development, compared to the $341 billion they spent in the same
       period on unconventional methods, such as fracking[9]. Comparing
       those figures to the $257 billion that was invested globally in
       2011 in renewables, $9 is barely a drop in the ocean[10]. To top
       it all off, according to the IMF, the fossil fuel industry as a
       whole receives $10 million in subsidies per minute, accumulating
       to over $5 trillion annually.
       In 1961, the Soviet Union announced it would send a man to the
       moon. Flexing its national muscle, the United States in a mere
       eight years went from zero to moon landing. Back on Earth, in
       that very same year, an oil rig off the coast of Santa Barbara
       suffered a blow-out and spewed over 3 million gallons of oil
       into the channel.
       If the United States could so quickly develop the technology,
       political will, and finance to land a man on the moon, then we
       can transition to a low-carbon economy. This feat will require
       our society to rethink our priorities. We’ll need to stop
       subsidizing the industry that actively blocks alternatives and
       start holding the industry accountable. The Intergovernmental
       Panel on Climate Change stated in their most recent report that
       to truly tackle the issue of climate change, we need investment
       to spur the renewable energy revolution. We could invest that
       annual $5 trillion of subsidies to finance research on renewable
       energy technology, rather than empowering an industry whose
       business model continues to fight the transition to a low-carbon
       economy.
       It’s not our fault. We haven’t been given the opportunity to own
       our own power, to choose our own energy provider, or to be
       represented by a politician who hasn’t been bought out. [b]But
       it will be our fault if we remain comfortably blind to the mass
       profiting from what can only be called institutionalized
       insanity.
       [/b]
       References
       [1]External Costs of Energy
       [2]
  HTML http://insideclimatenews.org/news/20141208/video-boom-north-americas-explosive-oil-rail-problem
       [3]
  HTML http://explosive-crude-by-rail.org/
       [4]
  HTML http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/09/27/climate-change-kills-400-000-a-year-new-report-reveals.html
       [5]
  HTML http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2012/jun/08/energy-efficiency-carbon-savings
       [6]
  HTML http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-age-of-wind-and-solar-is-closer-than-you-think/
       [7]
  HTML http://www.ise.fraunhofer.de/de
       [8]
  HTML https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/dark-money-funds-climate-change-denial-effort/
       [9]
  HTML http://www.bloomberg.com/bw/articles/2012-05-10/big-oils-big-in-biofuels
       [10]
  HTML http://fs-unep-centre.org/publications/global-trends-renewable-energy-investment-2012
  HTML http://www.sustainabilitycoalition.org/oil-spills-whose-fault-are-they-anyway/
       #Post#: 3583--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Fossil Fuels: Degraded Democracy and Profit Over Planet Poll
       ution
       By: AGelbert Date: August 8, 2015, 5:33 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote]“They did everything they were supposed to do. They
       followed the rules,” Graham said in an interview. “They went
       through all the proper procedures.”
       But after their celebrations on the night of Nov. 4, 2014,
       Denton residents woke up to the reality of Texas politics: the
       oil and gas industry had filed lawsuits against the measure and
       state lawmakers promptly announced they would overturn the
       democratically passed ban in Denton and ensure no other
       jurisdiction would pursue similar restrictions.
       [/quote]
       [center]
       [img width=100
       height=080]
  HTML http://images.sodahead.com/polls/000370273/polls_Smiley_Angry_256x256_3451_356175_answer_4_xlarge.png[/img][/center]
       ‘Don’t Frack With Denton’
  HTML http://ecowatch.com/2015/08/03/dont-frack-with-denton/
       #Post#: 3594--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Fossil Fuels: Degraded Democracy and Profit Over Planet Poll
       ution
       By: AGelbert Date: August 11, 2015, 2:37 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       10 Years Later: Fracking and the Halliburton Loophole
  HTML http://www.pic4ever.com/images/acigar.gif
       
       Wenonah Hauter | August 11, 2015 1:04 pm
       This past Saturday, marked a notable 10th anniversary. But it
       was certainly nothing to celebrate. Ten years ago, President
       George W. Bush signed the Energy Policy Act of 2005. The giant
       energy bill included massive giveaways for the fossil fuel,
       nuclear and ethanol industries and provided only token
       incentives for renewables and improved energy efficiency. But
       the most infamous piece of the law was what is now commonly
       known as the “Halliburton Loophole,” an egregious regulatory
       exemption that ushered in the disastrous era of widespread oil
       and gas fracking that currently grips our nation.
       [quote]
       Fracking—the extreme oil and gas extraction method that involves
       blasting millions of gallons of water mixed with toxic chemicals
       underground at enormous pressures to break apart subterranean
       rock—has exploded in the last decade. More than 270,000 wells
       have been fracked in 25 states throughout the nation. More than
       10 million Americans live within a mile of a fracking site. This
       means that 10 million Americans—and truly many more—have been
       placed directly in harm’s way. Hundreds of peer-reviewed studies
       have connected fracking to serious human health effects,
       including cancer, asthma and birth defects.[/quote]
       For this we can thank the Energy Policy Act of 2005, the law
       that holds the Halliburton Loophole. Named after Dick Cheney and
       the notorious corporation he led before becoming vice president,
       the law (championed by Cheney and disgraced Enron founder
       Kenneth Lay, among others) [b]explicitly exempted fracking
       operations from key provisions of the Safe Drinking Water Act.
  HTML http://www.freesmileys.org/smileys/smiley-devil19.gif
       These
       exemptions from one of America’s most fundamental environmental
       protection laws provided the oil and gas industry the immunity
       it required to develop a highly polluting process on a grand
       national scale.
  HTML http://www.freesmileys.org/smileys/smiley-devil12.gif
       One of the most troubling repercussions is how fracking
       companies hide the contents of their toxic water and chemical
       solutions pumped into the ground. Contamination of underground
       drinking water sources from fracking fluids is a glaring threat
       to public health and safety. Yet even doctors responding to
       fracking-related health complaints can’t access data on what
       particular chemicals their patients may have been exposed to.
       But the Halliburton Loophole wasn’t the only fracking enabler in
       the Energy Policy Act. The act granted the Federal Energy
       Regulatory Commission (FERC) sweeping new authority to supersede
       state and local decision-making with regard to the citing of
       fracked gas pipelines and infrastructure. It also shifted to
       FERC industry oversight and compliance responsibility for the
       National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, another key law. This
       was akin to putting the fox in charge of the hen house.
       As it stands, FERC is entirely unaccountable to public will. It
       is unaccountable to Congress and even the White House.
       Commissioners are appointed to five-year terms and can do as
       they please. Until a law reigning in FERC is passed, the
       commission will continue to act as a rubber-stamp for the fossil
       fuel industry.
       Additionally, the Energy Policy Act repealed an important
       anti-monopoly law, the Public Utility Holding Company Act of
       1935 (PUHCA). PUHCA safeguarded consumers from the overreach of
       the oil and gas industry and banks that did business with those
       companies. It prevented the formation of giant state and
       regional energy cartels that could manipulate energy costs,
       engage in profiteering and exert undue influence over political
       debate. The Energy Policy Act transferred most of this oversight
       to FERC. Since then, the largest American energy companies have
       grown significantly more powerful and spent almost a billion
       dollars on federal lobbying, according to OpenSecrets.org.
       The 10th anniversary of the Energy Policy Act is indeed a sad
       occasion, but it provides us with a ripe opportunity to
       reexamine our nation’s disastrous policy of doubling-down on
       fossil fuels over the last decade, thanks to the extreme process
       of fracking. For the sake of countless Americans who are
       currently suffering health effects caused by fracking and the
       countless more who will suffer in the future, we must
       immediately curtail our dependence on oil and gas and turn
       decisively toward a truly clean, renewable energy future.
  HTML http://ecowatch.com/2015/08/11/halliburton-loophole-fracking/
       Agelbert NOTE: As those of you that still possess  a modicum of
       reading comprehension will understand, the fossil fuel industry
       has ALWAYS been involved in DEGRADING OUR DEMOCRACY while they
       REFUSE to admit they are degrading the biosphere along the way.
       A portion of the American populace, that doesn't want to face
       that fascist reality, continues to rationalize our "need" for
       this fossil fuel burning planetary plague with BALONEY about
       civilization, high energy density or, for those Empathy Deficit
       Disordered quislings that work for the planet polluters, having
       to pay for student loans or put food on the table.
       Human society has always had Empathy Deficit Disordered people
       totally devoid of foresight. But only with the advent of the
       Industrial Revolution did these cause and effect challenged
       greedballs succeed in running our society. The fossil fuel
       industry actually believes it has a "you need us" gun to our
       heads. They've got power and they've got a gun. Although they
       are too blind, too greedy or just too stupid to see it, that gun
       has already gone off in their faces, as well as ours.
       Let us hope that those of us that are still sane prevail.
       #Post#: 3661--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Fossil Fuels: Degraded Democracy and Profit Over Planet Poll
       ution
       By: AGelbert Date: August 26, 2015, 6:11 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Truth from Thom Hartmann
       [quote]A business can operate at a profit, a break-even, or a
       loss. If the business is a sole proprietorship or a partnership
       (owned by one or a few people) and it loses more money than its
       assets are worth, the owners and the investors are personally
       responsible for the debts, which may exceed the amount they
       originally invested. A small-business owner could put up $10,000
       of her own money to start a company, have it fail with $50,000
       in debts, and be personally responsible for paying off that debt
       out of her own pocket.
       But let's say you invest $10,000 in a limited-liability
       corporation, and the corporation runs up $50,000 in debts and
       then defaults on those debts. You would lose only your initial
       $10,000 investment. The remaining $40,000 wouldn't be your
       concern because the amount of your investment is the "limit of
       your liability," even if the corporation goes bankrupt, defaults
       in any other way, or causes millions of dollars in damage to the
       environment or even the deaths of people.
       Who foots the bill? The creditors-the people to whom the
       corporation owes money-or the community that was devastated. The
       company took the goods or services from them, didn't pay, and
       leaves them with the bill, exactly as if you had put in a week's
       work and not gotten paid for it. Or it wreaks havoc and death
       and then simply shuts down, as so many asbestos companies have
       done recently.[/quote]
       "Unequal Protection: How Corporations Became People."
  HTML http://www.thomhartmann.com/blog/2015/08/unequal-protection-how-corporations-became-people#sthash.ZPDSKCaR.dpuf
       #Post#: 3873--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Fossil Fuels: Degraded Democracy and Profit Over Planet Poll
       ution
       By: AGelbert Date: September 22, 2015, 8:18 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [center][img width=640
       height=390]
  HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-220915211154.png[/img][/center]
       [center]
       Sign Now: Prosecute Exxon For Deliberate Climate Denial[/center]
       Prosecute Exxon: Newly revealed documents show that Exxon’s own
       scientists were aware of and studying the dangerous impacts of
       greenhouse gases in the 1970s and 1980s -- until Exxon’s
       leadership decided to shut down the research and promote climate
       denial instead, in order to protect the company’s unfathomably
       large profits.
       The United States Department of Justice has the power to
       prosecute Exxon’s deliberate deception under the Racketeer
       Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act - just as the
       DOJ did to the tobacco industry for knowingly lying about the
       dangers of cigarette smoking.
       Source: "Exxon: The Road Not Taken," InsideClimate News.
       Tell U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch:
       Launch a RICO prosecution of Exxon and its fellow fossil-fuel
       companies for deliberate and malicious climate deception.
  HTML http://www.climatehawksvote.com/prosecute_exxon
       [quote]The headline says it all: “Exxon's Own Research Confirmed
       Fossil Fuels' Role in Global Warming Decades Ago.”
       The Pulitzer-winning InsideClimate News is running a blockbuster
       series with incontrovertible evidence -- pulled from Exxon’s own
       archives -- that the oil giant’s top executives were warned of
       possible catastrophe from greenhouse pollution, then led efforts
       to block solutions.  Documents show that Exxon’s own scientists
       were aware of and studying the dangerous impacts of greenhouse
       gases in the 1970s and 1980s -- until Exxon’s leadership decided
       to shut down the research and promote climate denial instead, in
       order to protect the company’s unfathomably large profits.
       We’ve known for years that the oil industry finances the
       climate-denial network of politicians, think tanks, and
       right-wing media in order to protect their gargantuan profits,
       but now we have sufficient evidence of deliberate deceit to make
       a federal investigation happen.
       Tell the DOJ: Prosecute Exxon's deliberate climate denial.
       The United States Department of Justice has the power to
       prosecute Exxon’s deliberate deception under the Racketeer
       Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act - just as DOJ
       sued the tobacco industry for knowingly lying about the dangers
       of cigarette smoking.
       Even before these smoking-gun documents were released, climate
       hawks have been making calls for a RICO investigation of
       fossil-fueled climate denial:
       •Three weeks ago, a group of top climate scientists called for
       an investigation, saying, “it is imperative that these misdeeds
       be stopped as soon as possible so that America and the world can
       get on with the critically important business of finding
       effective ways to restabilize the Earth's climate, before even
       more lasting damage is done.”
       •Months earlier, climate hawk Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI),
       a former state Attorney General, called for a RICO investigation
       of Big Oil, saying, “I don’t know whether the fossil fuel
       industry and its allies engaged in the same kind of racketeering
       activity as the tobacco industry. We don’t have enough
       information to make that conclusion. Perhaps it’s all smoke and
       no fire. But there’s an awful lot of smoke.”
       Thanks to the reporters at InsideClimate News, now we have
       smoking-gun documents found in public archives. And there’s
       certain to be more. It’s up to us to demand the U.S. government
       immediately launch an investigation that will lead to
       prosecution of Exxon’s deliberate and deadly climate denial.
       Please add your voice to tell U.S. Attorney General Loretta
       Lynch:
       “Launch a RICO prosecution of Exxon and its fellow fossil-fuel
       companies for deliberate and malicious climate deception.”
       Your fellow climate hawk,
       Brad Johnson
       Climate Hawks Vote Political Director
       References:
       “Exxon's Own Research Confirmed Fossil Fuels' Role in Global
       Warming Decades Ago,” InsideClimate News, September 16, 2015
  HTML http://insideclimatenews.org/news/15092015/Exxons-own-research-confirmed-fossil-fuels-role-in-global-warming
       Climate scientists’ letter to President Obama, Attorney General
       Lynch, and OSTP Director Holdren, September 1, 2015
  HTML http://www.iges.org/letter/LetterPresidentAG.pdf
       “The fossil-fuel industry’s campaign to mislead the American
       people,” Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, Washington Post, May 29, 2015
  HTML https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-fossil-fuel-industrys-campaign-to-mislead-the-american-people/2015/05/29/04a2c448-0574-11e5-8bda-c7b4e9a8f7ac_story.html
       [/quote]
       #Post#: 3875--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Fossil Fuels: Degraded Democracy and Profit Over Planet Poll
       ution
       By: AGelbert Date: September 23, 2015, 1:28 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [center]Two Powerful Studies Expose Manipulation Of Climate
       “Debate” [/center]
       September 17th, 2015 by Sandy Dechert
       Two extensive studies released yesterday (September 16, 2015)
       reveal a long-term betrayal of the truth about climate by major
       US business identities. Make-believe corporate “persons” have
       knowingly undermined the health, safety, and even short-term
       survival of real humans and other living things.
       One of the studies explores the metamorphosis of ExxonMobil to
       “the dark side” over the past 40 years.
       The other implicates almost half of the world’s 100 largest
       companies, including Procter & Gam ble and Duke Energy, in
       obstructing climate change legislation.
       [center]
       [img width=100
       height=080]
  HTML http://images.sodahead.com/polls/000370273/polls_Smiley_Angry_256x256_3451_356175_answer_4_xlarge.png[/img][/center]
       Full, must read, article:
  HTML http://cleantechnica.com/2015/09/17/two-powerful-studies-expose-manipulation-climate-debate/
       #Post#: 3976--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Fossil Fuels: Degraded Democracy and Profit Over Planet Poll
       ution
       By: AGelbert Date: October 10, 2015, 11:32 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       10/07/2015 01:15 PM
       
       BP Settles for $20.8 Billion For Gulf Spill, Mostly A Tax
       Deduction
  HTML http://www.pic4ever.com/images/acigar.gif
       
  HTML http://www.freesmileys.org/smileys/smiley-devil12.gif
       SustainableBusiness.com News
       Five years after BP's tragic Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the
       Gulf,  the US  Department of Justice (DOJ) settled out of court
       for $20.8 billion to resolve all charges related to natural
       resource damage and restoration.
       Before you get excited about the big charge, realize that most
       of it is being paid by taxpayers because ... BP can deduct $15.3
       billion as a tax deduction!  According to the IRS, it's an
       "ordinary cost of doing business." Just $5.5 billion is
       explicitly not deductible as a penalty under the Clean Water
       Act, notes US Public Interest Research Group (PIRG).  [img
       width=200
       height=100]
  HTML http://fc06.deviantart.net/fs71/f/2009/347/2/6/WTF_Smiley_face_by_IveWasHere.jpg[/img]
       The settlement also allows BP to claim $5.35 billion as a tax
       windfall, nearly offsetting the cost of the Clean Water Act
       penalty, says PIRG. Adding further insult, BP gets to spread the
       payments over 18 years.
       [quote]"This not only sends the wrong message, but it also hurts
       taxpayers by forcing us to shoulder the burden of BP's tax
       windfall in the form of higher taxes, cuts to public programs,
       and more national debt," explains Michelle Surka at PIRG. DOJ
       could have specified non-deductibility as part of the
       settlement, but it did not.  :evil4: [/quote]
       [center]
       [img width=640
       height=460]
  HTML http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2014/images/map_080414_deadzone.jpg[/img][/center]
       [center]Dead Zone in the Gulf, 2014 [img width=50
       height=50]
  HTML http://www.freesmileys.org/emoticons/emoticon-object-015.gif[/img]<br
       /> [img width=50
       height=050]
  HTML http://images.sodahead.com/polls/000370273/polls_Smiley_Angry_256x256_3451_356175_answer_4_xlarge.png[/img][/center]
       [quote] "This resolution is strong and fitting," says Attorney
       General Loretta Lynch. "BP is receiving the punishment it
       deserves while also providing critical compensation to the
       damage to the Gulf region." The settlement - which must be
       approved by a federal court - is the largest ever in the US with
       a corporation.  [/quote]
       [center] [img width=440
       height=320]
  HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-111214174727.png[/img][/center]
       BP has already written off the $32 billion it spent for cleanup
       after the spill, with a tax windfall of $10 billion. The only
       charge DOJ specified as non-deductible is the $4.5 billion
       criminal settlement for the deaths of 11 oil rig workers and for
       misleading shareholders on how much oil it spilled. The company
       also agreed to $5.9 billion in settlements with the five Gulf
       states.
       DOJ's case is separate from the class-action settlement between
       BP and the businesses and individuals affected by the spill. The
       company has tried hard to get away with paying it, taking it all
       the way to the Supreme Court - which denied BP's appeal in July.
       
       The Obama administration announced that $8.8 billion of the
       settlement will go into a Gulf Restoration Fund. $5 billion of
       it will be used to repair Louisiana's coastal wetlands. The rest
       will restore habitats and water quality. Hundreds of miles of
       shoreline was damaged and more than a million birds and other
       wildlife died, according to environmental groups.
       "Every penny of this BP settlement ought to be going to
       recovering these badly damaged Gulf ecosystems, and BP ought to
       be paying a fine that really hurts, rather than an amount that
       will barely affect its balance sheet," says Miyoko Sakash ita of
       the Center for Biological Diversity. "Worse yet, the Obama
       administration has yet to implement significant reforms to make
       sure this never happens again."
       Recent studies show ongoing harm from the spill, such as severe
       lung injuries that killed dolphins, near-record lows of Kemp's
       Ridley sea turtle nesting, chemical dispersants still impacting
       corals and a "bathtub ring" of oil still on the seafloor.
       For 2014, BP reported $44.3 billion in profits. Meanwhile, while
       it releases reports on climate change and calls for a carbon
       tax,
       [center]
  HTML http://40.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lwx7wy0tIK1qd9a66o1_500.jpg[/center]
       BP tops the list of companies obstructing Europe's action on
       climate change. It has strongly opposed even slightly higher
       prices for the EU's cap-and-trade program, and it is behind the
       weaker-than-expected renewable energy and efficiency goals in
       its climate pledge.
       Read more:
       
       Website:
  HTML http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/sep/21/bp-tops-the-list-of-firms-obstructing-climate-action-in-europe
  HTML http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/sep/21/bp-tops-the-list-of-firms-obstructing-climate-action-in-europe
  HTML http://www.sustainablebusiness.com/index.cfm/go/news.display/id/26427
  HTML http://www.sustainablebusiness.com/index.cfm/go/news.display/id/26427
       #Post#: 4001--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Fossil Fuels: Degraded Democracy and Profit Over Planet Poll
       ution
       By: AGelbert Date: October 15, 2015, 6:18 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       U.S., Alaska end quest for damages against Exxon over 1989 spill
       WASHINGTON, Oct 15 (Reuters) - U.S. and Alaskan authorities have
       ended their efforts  [img width=40
       height=40]
  HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-280515145049.png[/img]<br
       /> [img width=40
       height=40]
  HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-051113192052.png[/img]<br
       />to seek additional damages from Exxon Mobil Corp over the 1989
       Exxon Valdez oil spill and the subsequent settlement, the
       Department of Justice said on Thursday.
       The department said in a statement that it is "bringing to a
       close the federal and state judicial actions" against the
       company and opting not to recover more damages under the
       reopener provision of the 1991 settlement following the spill.
       Alaska Attorney General Craig Richards said in the statement
       that although officials were not pursuing the additional
       damages, authorities will consider alternatives for dealing with
       lingering oil sites.
       [center][img width=300
       height=260]
  HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-111214174727.png[/img][/center]
       
       (Reporting by Susan Heavey; Editing by Bill Trott)
  HTML http://finance.yahoo.com/news/u-alaska-end-quest-damages-124008651.html
       Agelbert NOTE: ALL the details on how LEGALESE (not to be
       confused with the term, "legalized"
  HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-200714191329.bmp)<br
       />was used by Empathy Deficit Disordered Lawyers who WORKED (and
       who continue to this day to "WORK")  THE SYSTEM to absolve
       Exxonmobil of full accountability for this ECOCIDE  HERE.
  HTML http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/fossil-fuel-folly/fossil-fuels-degraded-democracy-and-profit-over-planet-pollution/msg2123/#msg2123
       The DETAILS of the "AWARD"
  HTML http://www.freesmileys.org/smileys/smiley-devil19.gif
       HERE.
  HTML http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/fossil-fuel-folly/fossil-fuels-degraded-democracy-and-profit-over-planet-pollution/msg2122/#msg2122
       Prosecute Exxon For Deliberate Climate Denial
  HTML http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/fossil-fuel-folly/fossil-fuels-degraded-democracy-and-profit-over-planet-pollution/msg3873/#msg3873
       [move][I][font=impact]The Fossil Fuelers   DID THE Climate
       Trashing, human health depleteing CRIME,[COLOR=BROWN]   but
       since they have ALWAYS BEEN liars and conscience free crooks,
       they are trying to AVOID [/color]  DOING THE TIME or     PAYING
       THE FINE!     Don't let them get away with it! Pass it on!
  HTML http://www.pic4ever.com/images/176.gif[/font][/I][/move]
       #Post#: 4006--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Fossil Fuels: Degraded Democracy and Profit Over Planet Poll
       ution
       By: AGelbert Date: October 15, 2015, 9:04 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [center]
  HTML https://youtu.be/dtF-4JvSh8o[/center]
       [center]See Exxon officials LIE through their TEETH! [/center]
       [center]WATCH the first use of "oil dispersing" CRAP long before
       it was used in the 2011 BP rig explosion and spill. To these
       CRIMINALS, EVERYTHING is a "business opportunity".
  HTML http://www.pic4ever.com/images/acigar.gif<br
       />
  HTML http://www.pic4ever.com/images/2z6in9g.gif
       
  HTML http://www.freesmileys.org/smileys/smiley-devil12.gif[/center]
       *****************************************************
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page