URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Renewable Revolution
  HTML https://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: General Discussion
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 4522--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Science
       By: AGelbert Date: February 17, 2016, 3:19 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [center]25 Scientific Facts That Will Blow Your Mind[/center]
       [center]
  HTML https://youtu.be/Vta-S-iSP9A[/center]
       The one that flabbergasted me was the statement that the human
       body puts out more heat per unit volume than the sun.
  HTML http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-TzWpwHzCvCI/T_sBEnhCCpI/AAAAAAAAME8/IsLpuU8HYxc/s1600/nooo-way-smiley.gif<br
       />I find that hard to believe. I am sure that they used Hess's l
       aw
       to come up with that.
  HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-200714183312.bmp
       Hess's law is a brute force INDIRECT measurement of heat (i.e.
       enthalpy=energy) of formation of chemical compounds that ignores
       magnetic forces, nuclear physics forces AND biological enzyme
       heat reduction in chemical reactions.
       I've gone round and round with my wife the chemist on this (and
       RE at the diner too!).
  HTML http://www.pic4ever.com/images/3ztzsjm.gif
       My point is that the enzymes reshape the substrate temporarily,
       thereby making it a DIFFERENT chemical compound energywise with
       the same elements in number and mass. This enzyme massaged
       chemical compound has BOTH a lower energy of activation AND a
       lower amount of OVERALL heat released THROUGHOUT the reaction
       when the reaction on it takes place.
       Hess's law looks at chemical bonds as having a FIXED amount of
       energy needed to break them (exothermic) or make them
       (endothermic). This assumption is valid in non-living chemical
       processes. I claim that it is NOT valid in living processes.
       I claim that enzymes, otherwise known as catalysts, REDUCE the
       total energy output of a biological chemical reaction, even
       though the enzyme itself is not changed. This flies in the face
       of accepted thermodynamics and the Law of Conservation of
       Energy. So, I have a very difficult time convincing chemists
       that I have a valid argument.  :(
       Nevertheless, as the above video points out, the cause of
       gravity (which is, like magnetism, a form of attraction of
       masses) is not well understood. No scientist will claim that
       your refrigerator magnet uses any energy to remain sticking to
       your refrigerator against the forces of gravity.
       But the same scientist must admit that it will take energy for
       you to pull it off.  ;D
       My hypothesis is supported by science in regard to the mechanism
       that enzymes (biological catalysts far more complex than the
       industrial catalysts our crude heat, beat and treat industrial
       processes rely on [/I]) [size=12pt]use to lower the energy of
       activation to start a chemical reaction.
       But, the second part of my hypothesis, which states that [i]the
       enzyme, due to the magnetic distortion it forces on a chemical
       compound substrate WITHOUT any measurable release of energy,
       lowers the overall  enthalpy=heat=energy, NOT just the
       activation enthalpy=heat=energy of said chemical reaction,
       PARTICULARLY in exothermic (energy release instead of energy
       absorbing) chemical reactions, is rejected because it gives
       Hess's Law a huge headache. That "headache" is that it appears
       to violate the "law" of conservation of energy.  ;D
       So, go ahead, pull that magnet off the refrigerator and tell me
       you used the same amount of energy to put it there as to pull it
       off.
  HTML http://www.desismileys.com/smileys/desismileys_2932.gif
       So, go ahead, tell me an industrial catalyst on exactly the same
       chemical compound found in the human body, according to Hess's
       Law, releases exactly the same amount of energy when a
       biological enzyme acts on it to produce exactly the same
       products as the industrial catalyst does.
  HTML http://www.desismileys.com/smileys/desismileys_2932.gif
       Hess's Law is the basis of virtually all the assumptions on
       thermodynamics that science has today. It is very useful because
       of the difficulty of measuring the energy released by some
       chemical reactions.
       [center][img
       width=440]
  HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-020216004023.png[/img][/center]
       But if what goes on inside us was as Hess's Law of enthalpy of
       formation DICTATES, we would exceed the outer temperature
       boundary required by homeostasis and die. There is no
       homeostasis on the sun. Homeostasis is sine qua non to life. We
       do not overheat because enzymes apparently get around the law of
       conservation of energy by some mechanism that we do not
       understand. I am not saying that they ACUALLY violate the law of
       conservation of energy. I am saying that the law of conservation
       of energy is improperly accounted for in Hess's "Law".
       You may assume that I am all wet. But someday, science will
       admit that enzymes, due to extremely complex magnetic
       arrangements in their design, save far more energy during their
       existence as biological chemical reaction mediators than was
       used by the human body to manufacture them.
       [center] [img
       width=140]
  HTML http://www.quotesdata.com/Giordano_Bruno_quotes.jpg[/img][/center]
       [quote][font=times new roman][size=12pt]"All that was great in
       the past was ridiculed, condemned, combatted, suppressed, only
       to emerge all the more triumphantly from the struggle."  Nikola
       Tesla.[/font][/size][/quote]
       #Post#: 5294--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Science
       By: AGelbert Date: June 17, 2016, 2:36 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [center]Unknown alien rock found in Swedish quarry[/center]
       June 14, 2016
       [center][img
       width=640]
  HTML http://cdn.phys.org/newman/gfx/news/hires/2016/576026dbb06c6.jpg[/img][/center]
       [center]All fossil meteorites found are so called L-chondrites
       that originate from the asteroid that broke up, but now a single
       fossil meteorite has been found that is of a kind not known
       among the more than 50,000 documented meteorites that have
       fallen on Earth in recent times. This may be the first
       documented example of an extinct meteorite, i.e. a type of
       meteorite that does no longer fall on Earth because its parent
       body was consumed in collisions. Credit: Birger
       Schmitz.[/center]
       A morsel of never-before-seen alien rock has been dug up in a
       limestone quarry in Sweden, where it had lain deeply buried for
       about 470 million years, scientists said Tuesday.
       
       The biscuit-sized remains are unlike any other meteorite found
       on Earth to date, and may shed light on the history and
       formation of our Solar System, they reported in the journal
       Nature Communications.
       Dubbed Oest 65, it is thought to be a splinter of a
       potato-shaped rock some 20-30 kilometres (12-19 miles) wide,
       which had smashed into another much larger body, sprinkling our
       adolescent planet with debris.
       Previously, remnants of only one of the two rocks had been
       found, in the form of meteorites called chondrites.
       But now scientists believe they have unearthed a piece of the
       second space orb, boosting the theory of a major smash-up
       between two galactic travelers.
       It is thought that the breakup of the bigger chondrite body,
       about 100-150 km across, had yielded a major cluster of rocky
       debris in the asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter.
       The resultant flux of extraterrestrial material, some of which
       rained down on Earth, coincided with a massive expansion of
       invertebrate ocean life at a time our planet's landmass was
       largely fused together into a supercontinent called Gondwana.
       [quote]
       "The single meteorite that we now found... is of a type that we
       do not know of from today's world," study co-author Birger
       Schmitz of Lund University in Sweden told AFP.[/quote]
       Along with about 100 chondrite pieces discovered to date, the
       new alien fragment had sunk to the floor of an ocean covering
       parts of what today is a limestone quarry in southern Sweden.
       [center][img
       width=640]
  HTML http://cdn.phys.org/newman/gfx/news/hires/2016/576026e81d3da.jpg[/img][/center]
       [center]In marine limestone that formed on the sea-floor 470
       million years ago more than 100 fossil meteorites have been
       found in the Thorsberg quarry, southern Sweden. The many
       meteorites attest to one of the most violent events in the solar
       system the past 3 billion years, when a hundred kilometer large
       asteroid broke up from a collision in the asteroid belt. Credit:
       Birger Schmitz. [/center]
       'Extinct' space rock? ???
       "The object contains very high concentrations (compared to Earth
       materials), of elements such as iridium, which is very rare on
       Earth," Schmitz explained by email.
       "The meteorite also contains high concentrations of rare
       isotopes of the element Neon"—and in different proportions than
       in chondrites.
       The team measured telltale signs of cosmic radiation in the
       meteorite to determine how long it had flown around in space
       before crashing to Earth.
       "Our meteorite fell 470 million years ago," said Schmitz—more or
       less the same period as the chondrite fragments.
       The mysterious morsel "may be a fragment of the impactor that
       broke up the (chondrite) parent body," concluded the study.
       [center][img
       width=640]
  HTML http://cdn.phys.org/newman/gfx/news/hires/2016/newtypeofmet.jpg[/img][/center]
       [center]A meteorite discovered in a Swedish quarry is unique and
       distinct from other meteorites. It appears to be a relic of a
       massive collision in the asteroid belt 470 million years ago
       that send debris raining to Earth during the Ordovician Period.
       In this image, the black 'fossil' meteorite is preserved in
       slate from the quarry. Credit: Qing-zhu Yin, UC Davis [/center]
       The extraterrestrial lander may be the first documented example
       of an "extinct meteorite"—so called because it's parent body had
       been entirely consumed by space collisions, meaning no more
       fragments can fall to Earth today.
       Chondrites still drop to our planet every now and then.
       The findings mean that today's meteorites—on which scientists
       base much of their assumptions about our Solar System's
       formation—are not fully representative of what is, and once was,
       out there.
       "Apparently, there is potential to reconstruct important aspects
       of solar-system history by looking down on Earth sediments, in
       addition to looking up at the skies," wrote the study authors.
       Explore further: Meteorite minerals hint at earth extinctions,
       climate change
       More information: A new type of solar-system material recovered
       from Ordovician marine limestone, Nature Communications,
       nature.com/articles/doi:10.1038/ncomms11851
       Journal reference: Nature Communications search and more info
       website
       
  HTML http://phys.org/news/2016-06-unknown-alien-swedish-quarry.html#jCp
       #Post#: 5428--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Science
       By: AGelbert Date: July 9, 2016, 12:25 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [center]Massive 'Lava Lamp' Blobs Deep Inside Earth Have
       Scientists Puzzled[/center]
       By Greg Uyeno, Staff Writer |  July 5, 2016 10:17am ET
       [center][img
       width=640]
  HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-090716012342.jpeg[/img][/center]
       Full story:  [img width=75
       height=50]
  HTML http://www.pic4ever.com/images/reading.gif[/img]
       
  HTML http://www.livescience.com/55285-mysterious-blobs-in-earths-mantle.html
       #Post#: 5861--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Science
       By: AGelbert Date: November 7, 2016, 7:24 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [center][img
       width=640]
  HTML http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-071116200617.png[/img][/center]
       [center]
  HTML http://www.pic4ever.com/images/128fs318181.gif
       
  HTML http://www.desismileys.com/smileys/desismileys_0293.gif[/center]
       [center]
  HTML https://youtu.be/Cn8TGtBrGb8[/center]
       #Post#: 5863--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Science
       By: AGelbert Date: November 8, 2016, 1:48 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=AGelbert link=topic=145.msg5861#msg5861
       date=1478568285]
       [center][img
       width=640]
  HTML http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-071116200617.png[/img][/center]
       
       [center]
  HTML https://youtu.be/Cn8TGtBrGb8[/center]
       [/quote]
       [quote author=RE link=topic=559.msg115346#msg115346
       date=1478568798]
       Evidence of God is all around us.  It's about time "science"
       found it.
       RE
       [/quote]
       [img width=100
       height=60]
  HTML http://cliparts.co/cliparts/Big/Egq/BigEgqBMT.png[/img]<br
       />
  HTML http://www.pic4ever.com/images/128fs318181.gif
       #Post#: 5897--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Science
       By: AGelbert Date: November 13, 2016, 1:24 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [center]Illuminate Lightbulbs Wirelessly: DIY Slayer
       Exciter[/center]
       by tanner_tech in wireless
       Circuits Contest 2016
       Have you ever wanted to be able to control the powers of
       wireless electricity?
  HTML http://www.pic4ever.com/images/128fs318181.gif
       Have you ever
       wanted to build something that can light CFL bulbs from your
       hand?
  HTML http://www.pic4ever.com/images/128fs318181.gif
       If so, then this is the perfect instructable for you. In this
       instructable, I will show you how to build a device called a
       slayer exciter. The video below will accompany this instructable
       with a visual demonstration of how it works.
       Lets get started!
       Step 1: How it Works  8)
       A slayer exciter is basically an oscillator that has a frequency
       based on the LC tank circuit formed by the secondary coil and
       the parasitic capacitance of the top load. So now to how this
       circuit works.
       First, when power is applied to the circuit, the current flows
       into the base of the transistor, turning it on. When the
       transistor turns on, it lets power flow through the primary
       coil. This induces a current into the secondary coil, which
       flows into the base of the transistor, turning it off.
       When the transistor turns off, the magnetic field collapses
       letting current flow back into the base of the transistor from
       the resistor. This cycle repeats many times a second.
       Think of this circuit as a swing, if you push somebody an a
       swing, they will swing forward and backwards and oscillate.
  HTML http://www.pic4ever.com/images/treeswing.gif
       Every time you push the swing, it oscillates, but you have to
       push it at the right time, or it will lose energy.
       The circuit functions like the person pushing the swing. The
       transistor "pushes" the secondary coil with a magnetic field at
       the exact right time. This circuit oscillates at about 398
       kilocycles.
       The constantly expanding and collapsing field creates a powerful
       RF field around the exciter. This causes the electrons in the
       CFL to bounce around and strike the phosphors in the glass,
       lighting the bulb. It creates high voltage because of the turn
       ratio of the primary to secondary coil. Now to actually building
       the slayer exciter.
       Video below and further instructions at link:  [img width=75
       height=50]
  HTML http://www.pic4ever.com/images/reading.gif[/img]
       [center]
  HTML https://youtu.be/TuAy-GA2yhw[/center]
  HTML http://www.instructables.com/id/Illuminate-Lightbulbs-Wirelessly-DIY-Slayer-Excite/
       Agelbert NOTE: Always remember that electrical current is never
       induced by a magnetic field, be it electro-magnetic or naturally
       magnetic. The electrons in a conductor of electricity move only
       when a magnetic field it is subjected to  collapses. So, you
       have rebuild the magnetic field and allow it to collapse
       repeatedly to keep the current flowing to light a CFL bulb, LED
       and/or, with some fancy circuitry, to  run an electric (OF
       COURSE!  ;D)  motor. At present, sending the current through
       wires requires less energy than wirelessly, except in some very
       limited applications.
       #Post#: 5962--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Science
       By: AGelbert Date: November 25, 2016, 8:33 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [center][img
       width=340]
  HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-031014195733.jpeg[/img][/center]
       [center]
  HTML https://youtu.be/4VrcO6JaMrM[/center]
       [center]
  HTML https://youtu.be/4ToUaU4vPks[/center]
       [center][font=times new roman]Fibonacci Sequence Documentary -
       Golden Section Explained[/font][/center]
       #Post#: 6003--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Science
       By: AGelbert Date: December 5, 2016, 4:22 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [center]
  HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-301014182902.gif<br
       />Water inside carbon nanotubes turns solid at boiling
       temperatures, MIT researchers discover[/center]
       By Shawn Knight on Dec 3, 2016, 11:00 AM
       
       mit, carbon nanotubes, freeze, water, ice, h2o
       It’s common knowledge that water freezes at zero degrees Celsius
       (32 degrees Fahrenheit) and boils at 100 degrees Celsius (212
       degrees Fahrenheit) in normal conditions. When confined within a
       carbon nanotube, however, all bets are off.
       While conducting an experiment that involved trying to send
       electric currents through water inside of carbon nanotubes, a
       team of chemical engineers led by Professor Michael Strano at
       the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) noticed some
       unexpected behavior.
       It’s been known for a while now that when water is confined in
       very small spaces, its freezing and boiling points can drop by
       as much as 10 degrees Celsius. What the team at MIT observed,
       however, was quite the opposite.
  HTML http://www.coh2.org/images/Smileys/huhsign.gif
       Inside tiny carbon nanotubes, they witnessed water solidifying
       at a minimum temperature of 105 degrees Celsius – well above its
       normal boiling point.
       The diameter of the nanotubes played a significant role in the
       water’s behavior. The difference between tubes measuring 1.05
       nanometers and 1.06 nanometers across changed the freezing
       temperature by tens of degrees.
       Equally as puzzling is the fact that water could even enter
       nanotubes at all as they’ve long been thought to be hydrophobic.
       Agelbert NOTE: "Hydrophobic" means water "hating". Your raincoat
       is usually coated with a hydrophobic substance. Wax is
       hydrophobic. "Hydrophilic" is water "loving". The way the water
       curves up on the edge of a glass is evidence that glass is
       hydrophilic. Water (H2O), of course is attracted to itself
       (water molecules inside tree capillaries can be stretched 25
       atmospheres and still attract each other as long as the
       capillary is not exposed to the outer atmosphere. That is how
       water moves from tree roots to the leaves.
       More research will be needed but Strano thinks the discovery
       could lead to the creation of “ice wires,” or efficient highways
       to transport protons as water is around 10 times better at
       conducting protons compared to standard conductive material.
  HTML http://www.techspot.com/news/67267-water-inside-carbon-nanotubes-turns-solid-boiling-temperatures.html
       Agelbert NOTE: Some good comments that might explain this
       strange property of carbon nanotube enclosed H2O:
       captaincranky TechSpot Addict
       "My immediate thought was, if this occurs with water..what other
       changes could occur? Relooking at cold fusion where speculation
       was the molecular space might have allowed nuclear interaction.
       Other speculation whenever I find that roll of Reynolds.
       Well, I think "freezes" might be misapplied terminology."
       I'm going to take a wild, uneducated guess here, and postulate
       the water isn't "frozen" per se. Given the 3 elements in the
       mix, carbon, hydrogen, & oxygen, the scale at which this is
       happening, and the amount of molecular activity brought on by
       applied heat, the water is likely "mimicking" or "masquerading"
       as, a carbohydrate.
       Skypickle
       The diameter of the nanotube is only 5 water molecules across.
       But these researchers
  HTML https://www.mpg.de/6362003/water-ice-crystal
       Say that you need at least 275 molecules to form an ice crystal.
       So the 'solid' phase of water cannot occur in the confined space
       of a nanotube. Rather a different 'boundary ' phase of
       carbon-water forms
       
       browne5061
       It is probably the hydrophobic nature of the CNTs that forces
       the solidification. As you increase the energy of the particles,
       they find themselves bound inside of the CNT and unable to
       leave. This would likely significantly increase the number of
       collisions between H2O molecules, giving the appearance of being
       a solid, without needing as many molecules as is normally
       required to form an Ice crystal as Skypickle points out.
       Still, I wonder why they were putting water inside of CNTs in
       the first place. The common conception is they are hydrophobic,
       plus CNTs already display ballistic conductance of both
       electrical and thermal energy. I find it hard to believe that
       anyone would go 'yeah, lets add thermally *capacitive* material
       (water) to increase thermal *conductivity.*' I think they were
       trying for something else entirely, which they aren't ready to
       publically talk about yet. My guess would a new kind of thermal
       heat sink, with both high conductivity from the CNTs and high
       capacitance from the H2O - and this would explain why they
       brought it up to such high temperatures in the first place,
       since CNTs don't heat up readily when an electric current is
       applied.
       wiyosaya
       My thoughts are that the size of the nanotube is somehow forcing
       the molecules of water to align in a fashion where they do not
       move - thus giving the appearance of a crystallized set of
       molecules.
       Yynxs
       Somewhere in non-available memory was some reading on crystal
       forming temperatures of water with additives such as salt and
       something to do with 'absolutely pure' water having different
       bonding reactions than just distilled water. I'm wondering if
       the size of the nanotubes creates an 'absolutely pure' water
       condition and whether that affects 'hydrophobic' as used to
       describe the carbon molecules. I know when I don't know so I'm
       sending this article to a friend 'Saint Jack' to see if he knows
       anything.
       #Post#: 6058--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Science
       By: AGelbert Date: December 12, 2016, 1:37 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [center]Elusive Planet Nine causes sun’s curious tilt,
       scientists say[/center]
       SNIPPET (with videos)  8):
       [center]
  HTML https://youtu.be/h72tABvkLAo[/center]
       Why Planet Nine has such an unusual orbit is the next question –
       well after the main question, of course: where is it? But as for
       the tilt, Batygin suggests that the planet may have been kicked
       out of the gas giants' neighborhood by Jupiter, or may have been
       pulled by other stellar bodies in the solar system's distant
       past.
       Regardless, for now the new research adds fuel to the excitement
       as the team and their colleagues continue their search for signs
       of Planet Nine. See more about this elusive giant in the video
       below.
  HTML http://dl3.glitter-graphics.net/pub/465/465823jzy0y15obs.gif
       [center]
  HTML https://youtu.be/6poHQ2h00ZA[/center]
  HTML http://www.treehugger.com/natural-sciences/elusive-planet-nine-causes-suns-curious-tilt-scientists-say.html
       MORE detailed info:
       [center]
  HTML https://youtu.be/eutrzvicjMs[/center]
       #Post#: 6096--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Science
       By: AGelbert Date: December 18, 2016, 4:37 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Agelbert NOTE: This is a fascinating documentary sowing the
       trials and tribulations of the scientific team that designed,
       built and tested, over and over again, the instruments for the
       measurements of the atmosphere and the surface of Titan, the
       largest of Saturn's moons, that is ACTUALLY LARGER THAN VENUS!
       :o  ;D  This is an excellent example of how to objectively
       arrive at the BEST design by actually applying the scientific
       method. [img width=25
       height=30]
  HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-080515182559.png[/img]
       [center]
  HTML https://youtu.be/uE5POhMnN78[/center]
       [quote]Published on Nov 29, 2016
       It's a voyage of exploration like no other - to Titan, Saturn's
       largest moon and thought to resemble our own early Earth. For a
       small team of British scientists this would be the culmination
       of a lifetime's endeavour - the flight alone, some 2 billion
       miles, would take a full seven years. This is the story of the
       space probe they built, the sacrifices they made and their hopes
       for the landing. Would their ambitions survive the descent into
       the unknown on Titan's surface?
  HTML http://www.pic4ever.com/images/www_MyEmoticons_com__smokelots.gif[/quote]
       *****************************************************
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page