URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Religious Convictions
  HTML https://religiousconvictions.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Poppy's
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 1249--------------------------------------------------
       Re: BBC2 - Sex and the church.
       By: Piper Date: April 19, 2015, 12:16 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote]Kerry:  You do not know what a fallen woman is?  Come
       now.[/quote]
       [font=trebuchet ms]Yes, I know what people mean when they speak
       of a "fallen woman," but I suppose I object to the terminology.
       All of mankind is "fallen."  I've never liked to see labels
       stamped on anyone, and such a label suggests no hope for a woman
       to ever rise above her ill fate.  Perhaps, in the eyes of
       people, there was no hope; a woman was 'ruined' in many ways
       back then.  But, I prefer to see that, in God's eyes, anyone can
       rise and better themselves.  Certainly, Rahab is an
       example.[/font]
       [quote] Kerry:  You can preach about such things all you want;
       but the reality is still there.  [/quote]
       [font=trebuchet ms]I never mean to "preach."  I am hardly
       qualified as a preacher.  I only mean to share what is currently
       my POV.[/font]
       [quote]Kerry:  If a woman was known  not to be  a virgin, it
       reduced her prospects of marriage considerably.    Once her
       reputation was damaged, the odds were stacked against
       her.[/quote]
       [font=trebuchet ms]Yes, I understand that.
       As for marriage, if we understand the implications of Jesus
       calling His church His "bride" and Himself the "bridegroom",
       certainly we can see why marriage is to be taken seriously, and
       why the Church came to see marriage as a Sacrament initiated by
       Christ.[/font]
       #Post#: 1250--------------------------------------------------
       Re: BBC2 - Sex and the church.
       By: Piper Date: April 19, 2015, 12:40 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote]Poppy:  The Roman church was founded by Emperor
       Constantine when he believed the Christian God had helped him
       win an important battle.  Following on from that more and more
       was added to the teachings of Jesus.[/quote]
       [font=trebuchet ms]I've already explained why things are "added
       on" to guide the faithful.  Jesus is not here, on earth, to
       speak directly to us.  Thus, in Catholic belief, to obey the
       Church is to obey Jesus.  The Church was/is invested with the
       power of the Holy Spirit by Jesus, Himself. To understand this,
       one must study and understand "binding and  loosing", the power
       given to the apostles by Jesus, and what it meant in historical
       context.  This is not to say that individuals are not guided by
       the Spirit, as well, in matters pertaining specifically and
       personally to them.
       As to who founded the Church, a short video that, in all
       fairness, deserves attention:[/font]
       [center]
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oqLBeCmyaKY&list=PLSp30xPag6ez5FDB9IIYES4SCHWvf9iqm[/center]
       #Post#: 1251--------------------------------------------------
       Re: BBC2 - Sex and the church.
       By: Kerry Date: April 19, 2015, 1:14 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Piper link=topic=140.msg1249#msg1249
       date=1429463771]
       [font=trebuchet ms]Yes, I know what people mean when they speak
       of a "fallen woman," but I suppose I object to the terminology.
       All of mankind is "fallen."  I've never liked to see labels
       stamped on anyone, and such a label suggests no hope for a woman
       to ever rise above her ill fate.  Perhaps, in the eyes of
       people, there was no hope; a woman was 'ruined' in many ways
       back then.  But, I prefer to see that, in God's eyes, anyone can
       rise and better themselves.  Certainly, Rahab is an
       example.[/font][/quote]It's just a word.  I've had friends of
       both sexes who had been "sex workers".    I'd rather have them
       as friends than the people who paid them for sex.   I think I
       could tell stories some here would find hard to believe.
       [quote][font=trebuchet ms]I never mean to "preach."  I am hardly
       qualified as a preacher.  I only mean to share what is currently
       my POV.[/font][/quote]I did not mean "you" to mean you
       personally.  I meant it generically.   Take how Muslims preach
       about the virginity of women.   Now of course, that leads to gay
       experimentation.  They deny it, but it's a fact.  I had a
       Palestinian admit it once.  He said back in Palestine where
       girls were closely guarded,  boys would often experiment; but he
       said here in America we can have sex with women so why would we
       do things with guys?    The Muslims can also preach all day
       about their sexual code; but the outrageous rapes in England are
       one result of that culture.   An 11 year old girl was raped.
       Meanwhile the cultural climate there is to be politically
       correct, and few want to say there is a problem with Muslims or
       with people from other countries who have different cultural
       values.   If anyone is "preaching," perhaps it's the BBC who
       wants to portray themselves and their listeners as sophisticated
       and advanced.   Is that true?   I think I'd rather live in  a
       city with a brothel than a city where school girls weren't safe
       walking on the streets and where the government turned a blind
       eye.
       Are the people in Florida really any better than the medieval
       people who thought brothels were bad but not as bad as rape?
       We saw hundreds of people standing around while a girl was raped
       while either drunk or on drugs.   Are we any better than the
       people of the past?   I don't think so.   We live in an
       imperfect world; and my assumption is there will always be
       people who have sex outside of marriage.  It seems reasonable to
       me that government should try to minimize the damage done to
       people.  I'd rather see legal brothels where women received
       regular check ups and also where they were not in danger of
       their lives or under the thumb of pimps or criminal gangs.  I'd
       rather have it legal than have it underground and so lucrative
       that people engage in sex trafficking sometimes holding women
       and children against their will.
       [quote]As for marriage, if we understand the implications of
       Jesus calling His church His "bride" and Himself the
       "bridegroom", certainly we can see why marriage is to be taken
       seriously, and why the Church came to see marriage as a
       Sacrament initiated by Christ.[/quote]I don't follow the logic.
       That would mean people weren't married in the Old Testament.
       #Post#: 1255--------------------------------------------------
       Re: BBC2 - Sex and the church.
       By: Piper Date: April 19, 2015, 2:29 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [font=trebuchet ms]Kerry, I checked the box in my account
       profile saying I don't want words censored, but it seems they
       still are.  Any ideas how I can stop that?[/font]
       [quote]Kerry:  We live in an imperfect world; and my assumption
       is there will always be people who have sex outside of marriage.
       It seems reasonable to me that government should try to
       minimize the damage done to people.  I'd rather see legal
       brothels where women received regular check ups and also where
       they were not in danger of their lives or under the thumb of
       pimps or criminal gangs.  I'd rather have it legal than have it
       underground and so lucrative that people engage in sex
       trafficking sometimes holding women and children against their
       will.  [/quote]
       [font=trebuchet ms]I do understand your reasoning, I think.
       It's a choosing of the  lesser of two evils.  Similar thought
       might be the allowing of abortion clinics because women will get
       abortions anyway, so government should make it legally safe for
       them to do so.
       But certainly the Church can not condone these things.  So, you
       are speaking of separation of church and state?
       Yet, in God's eyes, would it be right for a nation to legalize
       sin? How would God then look upon that nation?[/font]
       * * *
       [quote][font=trebuchet ms]Piper:  As for marriage, if we
       understand the implications of Jesus calling His church His
       "bride" and Himself the "bridegroom", certainly we can see why
       marriage is to be taken seriously, and why the Church came to
       see marriage as a Sacrament initiated by Christ.[/font][/quote]
       [quote]Kerry:  I don't follow the logic. That would mean people
       weren't married in the Old Testament.
       [/quote]
       [font=trebuchet ms]I don't understand what you mean.
       I found this, which perhaps will explain more clearly what I was
       trying to express, from the POV of the Catholic Church:[/font]
       [quote][font=times new roman]In a sacramental marriage, God's
       love becomes present to the spouses in their total union. When
       the Catholic Church teaches that marriage between two baptized
       persons is a sacrament, it is saying that the couple's
       relationship expresses in a unique way the unbreakable bond of
       love between Christ and his people.[/font][/quote]
       #Post#: 1256--------------------------------------------------
       Re: BBC2 - Sex and the church.
       By: Kerry Date: April 19, 2015, 3:07 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Piper link=topic=140.msg1255#msg1255
       date=1429471779]
       [font=trebuchet ms]Kerry, I checked the box in my account
       profile saying I don't want words censored, but it seems they
       still are.  Any ideas how I can stop that?[/font][/quote]
       I checked the same option and  words are still censored.   I
       know some words are censored because advertisers won't run ads
       on sites with certain words.  Then there are words the
       administrator adds.  My guess is the first category of words
       will remain censored but the second won't.  If I have time,
       maybe I'll experiment.
       [quote][font=trebuchet ms]I do understand your reasoning, I
       think.  It's a choosing of the  lesser of two evils.  Similar
       thought might be the allowing of abortion clinics because women
       will get abortions anyway, so government should make it legally
       safe for them to do so.
       But certainly the Church can not condone these things.  So, you
       are speaking of separation of church and state?
       Yet, in God's eyes, would it be right for a nation to legalize
       sin? How would God then look upon that nation?[/font][/quote]As
       I see it, the problem with abortion laws has always been that
       people failed to make convincing secular arguments against it.
       They chose to make it religious.   I think I could argue against
       abortion based solely on secular grounds.   I think most
       arguments for and against abortion are intellectually dishonest.
       
       What any religion teaches is not relevant to me when it comes to
       making laws.  I object to Muslims passing laws based on their
       religion in countries where they are in the majority.   As a
       Christian, I don't think they have the right to do that.
       Following the Golden Rule, I don't think I as a Christian have
       the right to impose my religion on others.
       If something is morally wrong,  we should be able to see the
       harm it does.   If something is a sin,  we are failing to love
       either God or our fellow man.   Religion covers the first;
       governments should exist to prevent us from committing unloving
       acts towards others.
       [quote]I don't understand what you mean. [/quote]I understand
       the comparison between human marriage and the relationship of
       Jesus with the Church.  What I don't understand is the statement
       that marriage was instituted by Jesus.  Weren't people married
       before Jesus was born?   Surely.  So how can we say it is a
       sacrament established by Jesus?    The same holds for baptism.
       Weren't people baptized before Jesus' time?  So how can we say
       it was established by Jesus?
       [quote]I found this, which perhaps will explain more clearly
       what I was trying to express, from the POV of the Catholic
       Church:
       [quote]In a sacramental marriage, God's love becomes present to
       the spouses in their total union. When the Catholic Church
       teaches that marriage between two baptized persons is a
       sacrament, it is saying that the couple's relationship expresses
       in a unique way the unbreakable bond of love between Christ and
       his people.[/quote]
       [/quote]That statement confuses me since from what I've read,
       it's not exactly what the Catholic Church teaches.  If a
       Catholic marries someone (baptized or not, Catholic or not)
       outside the Catholic Church,  it's not recognized as a
       legitimate marriage.
  HTML http://www.americancatholic.org/Messenger/Feb2004/Feature2.asp
       *****************************************************
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page