URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       RateTheRef
  HTML https://ratetheref.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: General Discussion
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 9455--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Law 16: The Goal Kick
   DIR By: bmb
       Date: July 29, 2019, 12:27 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Beancounter link ---
       >
       > And just to confuse things further!
  HTML https://twitter.com/jackcook95/status/1155598855276306433?s=21
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Surely the ref was wrong there. That just has to be
       circumventing the LOTG.  Does that not constitute flicking up a
       deadball?
       #Post#: 9456--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Law 16: The Goal Kick
   DIR By: Ashington46
       Date: July 29, 2019, 1:11 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: bmb link ---
       >
       > [quote author=Beancounter link=topic=896.msg9453#msg9453
       date=1564419655]
       > And just to confuse things further!
  HTML https://twitter.com/jackcook95/status/1155598855276306433?s=21
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Surely the ref was wrong there. That just has to be
       circumventing the LOTG.  Does that not constitute flicking up a
       deadball?
       [/quote]
       Nothing wrong with it at all as far as the Law goes. You can
       flick a ball when taking a free kick and presumably a goal kick
       is no different. The player himself didn't flick the ball up in
       order to head it which is against TLOG so I can't see anything
       illegal although it can be argued that it is against the spirit
       of the game, however, the Lawmakers in their wisdom have created
       another situation which all of us interpret differently.
       I'm pleased that I have retired from all aspects of the game
       apart from being a spectator!
       #Post#: 9461--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Law 16: The Goal Kick
   DIR By: Readingfan
       Date: July 29, 2019, 1:36 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Ashington46 link ---
       >
       > [quote author=bmb link=topic=896.msg9455#msg9455
       date=1564421225]
       > [quote author=Beancounter link=topic=896.msg9453#msg9453
       date=1564419655]
       > And just to confuse things further!
  HTML https://twitter.com/jackcook95/status/1155598855276306433?s=21
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Surely the ref was wrong there. That just has to be
       circumventing the LOTG.  Does that not constitute flicking up a
       deadball?
       [/quote]
       Nothing wrong with it at all as far as the Law goes. You can
       flick a ball when taking a free kick and presumably a goal kick
       is no different. The player himself didn't flick the ball up in
       order to head it which is against TLOG so I can't see anything
       illegal although it can be argued that it is against the spirit
       of the game, however, the Lawmakers in their wisdom have created
       another situation which all of us interpret differently.
       I'm pleased that I have retired from all aspects of the game
       apart from being a spectator!
       [/quote]
       I would regard that as circumventing the laws, otherwise a team
       could just constantly do that all match or have the goalkeeper
       throw the ball against a defender's head and back.
       If it was penalised, I don't know which player would be
       cautioned though?
       #Post#: 9469--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Law 16: The Goal Kick
   DIR By: Ashington46
       Date: July 29, 2019, 2:44 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Readingfan link ---
       >
       > [quote author=Ashington46 link=topic=896.msg9456#msg9456
       date=1564423864]
       > [quote author=bmb link=topic=896.msg9455#msg9455
       date=1564421225]
       > [quote author=Beancounter link=topic=896.msg9453#msg9453
       date=1564419655]
       > And just to confuse things further!
  HTML https://twitter.com/jackcook95/status/1155598855276306433?s=21
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Surely the ref was wrong there. That just has to be
       circumventing the LOTG.  Does that not constitute flicking up a
       deadball?
       [/quote]
       Nothing wrong with it at all as far as the Law goes. You can
       flick a ball when taking a free kick and presumably a goal kick
       is no different. The player himself didn't flick the ball up in
       order to head it which is against TLOG so I can't see anything
       illegal although it can be argued that it is against the spirit
       of the game, however, the Lawmakers in their wisdom have created
       another situation which all of us interpret differently.
       I'm pleased that I have retired from all aspects of the game
       apart from being a spectator!
       [/quote]
       I would regard that as circumventing the laws, otherwise a team
       could just constantly do that all match or have the goalkeeper
       throw the ball against a defender's head and back.
       If it was penalised, I don't know which player would be
       cautioned though?
       [/quote]
       Nothing in the Laws to say that this is an illegal procedure
       ---they obviously never thought it out when they made the
       unnecessary change.
       How can you justifiably penalise this action? The ball is in
       play when the keeper kicks the ball and is then headed back to
       him --- all quite legal.
       Remember that football is a simple game with Laws which are easy
       to understand and to implement.
       #Post#: 9472--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Law 16: The Goal Kick
   DIR By: guest18
       Date: July 29, 2019, 4:26 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Ashington46 link ---
       >
       > [quote author=Readingfan link=topic=896.msg9461#msg9461
       date=1564425371]
       > [quote author=Ashington46 link=topic=896.msg9456#msg9456
       date=1564423864]
       > [quote author=bmb link=topic=896.msg9455#msg9455
       date=1564421225]
       > [quote author=Beancounter link=topic=896.msg9453#msg9453
       date=1564419655]
       > And just to confuse things further!
  HTML https://twitter.com/jackcook95/status/1155598855276306433?s=21
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Surely the ref was wrong there. That just has to be
       circumventing the LOTG.  Does that not constitute flicking up a
       deadball?
       [/quote]
       Nothing wrong with it at all as far as the Law goes. You can
       flick a ball when taking a free kick and presumably a goal kick
       is no different. The player himself didn't flick the ball up in
       order to head it which is against TLOG so I can't see anything
       illegal although it can be argued that it is against the spirit
       of the game, however, the Lawmakers in their wisdom have created
       another situation which all of us interpret differently.
       I'm pleased that I have retired from all aspects of the game
       apart from being a spectator!
       [/quote]
       I would regard that as circumventing the laws, otherwise a team
       could just constantly do that all match or have the goalkeeper
       throw the ball against a defender's head and back.
       If it was penalised, I don't know which player would be
       cautioned though?
       [/quote]
       Nothing in the Laws to say that this is an illegal procedure
       ---they obviously never thought it out when they made the
       unnecessary change.
       How can you justifiably penalise this action? The ball is in
       play when the keeper kicks the ball and is then headed back to
       him --- all quite legal.
       Remember that football is a simple game with Laws which are easy
       to understand and to implement.
       [/quote]
       Correct!
       Law 13 specifically allows for a direct free kick to be taken by
       lifting the ball with a foot or both feet simultaneously.
       Accordingly, why would the same not apply to indirect free kicks
       or goal kicks?
       #Post#: 9473--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Law 16: The Goal Kick
   DIR By: Readingfan
       Date: July 29, 2019, 4:32 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: doowe link ---
       >
       > [quote author=Ashington46 link=topic=896.msg9469#msg9469
       date=1564429491]
       > [quote author=Readingfan link=topic=896.msg9461#msg9461
       date=1564425371]
       > [quote author=Ashington46 link=topic=896.msg9456#msg9456
       date=1564423864]
       > [quote author=bmb link=topic=896.msg9455#msg9455
       date=1564421225]
       > [quote author=Beancounter link=topic=896.msg9453#msg9453
       date=1564419655]
       > And just to confuse things further!
  HTML https://twitter.com/jackcook95/status/1155598855276306433?s=21
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Surely the ref was wrong there. That just has to be
       circumventing the LOTG.  Does that not constitute flicking up a
       deadball?
       [/quote]
       Nothing wrong with it at all as far as the Law goes. You can
       flick a ball when taking a free kick and presumably a goal kick
       is no different. The player himself didn't flick the ball up in
       order to head it which is against TLOG so I can't see anything
       illegal although it can be argued that it is against the spirit
       of the game, however, the Lawmakers in their wisdom have created
       another situation which all of us interpret differently.
       I'm pleased that I have retired from all aspects of the game
       apart from being a spectator!
       [/quote]
       I would regard that as circumventing the laws, otherwise a team
       could just constantly do that all match or have the goalkeeper
       throw the ball against a defender's head and back.
       If it was penalised, I don't know which player would be
       cautioned though?
       [/quote]
       Nothing in the Laws to say that this is an illegal procedure
       ---they obviously never thought it out when they made the
       unnecessary change.
       How can you justifiably penalise this action? The ball is in
       play when the keeper kicks the ball and is then headed back to
       him --- all quite legal.
       Remember that football is a simple game with Laws which are easy
       to understand and to implement.
       [/quote]
       Correct!
       Law 13 specifically allows for a direct free kick to be taken by
       lifting the ball with a foot or both feet simultaneously.
       Accordingly, why would the same not apply to indirect free kicks
       or goal kicks?
       [/quote]
       I don't think the debate is whether a free kick taker is allowed
       to flick the ball up in general - more whether in this
       particular context it circumvents the backpass law.
       #Post#: 9477--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Law 16: The Goal Kick
   DIR By: bmb
       Date: July 29, 2019, 10:56 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       According to this tweet IFAB have confirmed it was lawful within
       the current LOTG:
  HTML https://twitter.com/CollinasErben/status/1155956142922534920
       #Post#: 9484--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Law 16: The Goal Kick
   DIR By: nemesis
       Date: July 30, 2019, 6:53 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: bmb link ---
       >
       > According to this tweet IFAB have confirmed it was lawful
       within the current LOTG:
  HTML https://twitter.com/CollinasErben/status/1155956142922534920
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Well, hopefully referees will be particularly diligent in
       ensuring the keeper releases the ball within 6 seconds of
       catching it otherwise a change designed to speed up the game
       will slow it down.
       Of course it could still be a time-wasting practice if it is
       headed down just in front of the keeper who doesn't pick it up
       straight away.
       Clearly a Law change that's not been fully thought through -
       who'd have thought it ?
       #Post#: 9486--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Law 16: The Goal Kick
   DIR By: Readingfan
       Date: July 30, 2019, 7:10 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: nemesis link ---
       >
       > [quote author=bmb link=topic=896.msg9477#msg9477
       date=1564459010]
       > According to this tweet IFAB have confirmed it was lawful
       within the current LOTG:
  HTML https://twitter.com/CollinasErben/status/1155956142922534920
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Well, hopefully referees will be particularly diligent in
       ensuring the keeper releases the ball within 6 seconds of
       catching it otherwise a change designed to speed up the game
       will slow it down.
       Of course it could still be a time-wasting practice if it is
       headed down just in front of the keeper who doesn't pick it up
       straight away.
       Clearly a Law change that's not been fully thought through -
       who'd have thought it ?
       [/quote]
       Every time the goalkeeper has the ball in his hands he might as
       well just throw it to a team-mate to head it back to him!
       If this isn't amended to outlaw it, how long will it be until
       goal kicks are just kicked from the keeper's hands as a matter
       of course?
       #Post#: 9489--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Law 16: The Goal Kick
   DIR By: Ashington46
       Date: July 30, 2019, 7:35 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Readingfan link ---
       >
       > [quote author=nemesis link=topic=896.msg9484#msg9484
       date=1564487628]
       > [quote author=bmb link=topic=896.msg9477#msg9477
       date=1564459010]
       > According to this tweet IFAB have confirmed it was lawful
       within the current LOTG:
  HTML https://twitter.com/CollinasErben/status/1155956142922534920
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Well, hopefully referees will be particularly diligent in
       ensuring the keeper releases the ball within 6 seconds of
       catching it otherwise a change designed to speed up the game
       will slow it down.
       Of course it could still be a time-wasting practice if it is
       headed down just in front of the keeper who doesn't pick it up
       straight away.
       Clearly a Law change that's not been fully thought through -
       who'd have thought it ?
       [/quote]
       Every time the goalkeeper has the ball in his hands he might as
       well just throw it to a team-mate to head it back to him!
       If this isn't amended to outlaw it, how long will it be until
       goal kicks are just kicked from the keeper's hands as a matter
       of course?
       [/quote]
       That would not surprise me in the least. You have to rememebr
       that ALL these Law changes are made in order to make the game
       more attractive to watch.
       Personally it has made me decide, after 68 years' involvement as
       a fan, player, coach, manager, official and League
       administrator, that this coming season will be my last because
       the game has lost its attraction.
       For the past 53 years I have travelled a round trip from between
       240 and 560 miles in order to watch home games of my team. With
       the introduction of VAR and the Law changes I can't see the
       point of travelling these distances when the outcome of a game
       could well be decided by someone sat over 100 miles away looking
       at a screen and being surrounded by fans who are totally
       confused about TLOG.
       I sincerely hope that someone, somewhere will sort out the mess
       and push the game back on course, however, I doubt it.
       *****************************************************
       Page 4 of 5
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page