URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       RateTheRef
  HTML https://ratetheref.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: General Discussion
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 9379--------------------------------------------------
       Law 16: The Goal Kick
   DIR By: Scally Bob
       Date: July 27, 2019, 12:49 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       A newly-promoted friend went to the Level 3 Conference where he
       had to take a LOTG test. One of the questions was regarding a
       goal kick (I’m paraphrasing here) where an attacking player
       inside the penalty area when a goal kick is taken but not
       challenging for the ball and not looking in the direction of the
       ball suddenly either becomes aware that the ball is in play and
       challenges for it or it’s played and hits him but either way it
       goes into the goal. What do you give?
       Law 16 states: 
       until the ball is in play
       That’s not new, it was there last season. My mate said retake
       but was told he was wrong and the goal stands. I just can’t
       reconcile that and trying to sell that decision in a game isn’t
       likely to end well.
       Any opinions?
       #Post#: 9380--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Law 16: The Goal Kick
   DIR By: ASM
       Date: July 27, 2019, 1:45 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Law 16 also says:
       If, when a goal kick is taken, any opponents are inside the
       penalty area because they did not have time to leave, the
       referee allows play to continue
       So, in the situation you describe, the goal should stand.
       #Post#: 9381--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Law 16: The Goal Kick
   DIR By: Scally Bob
       Date: July 27, 2019, 3:18 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The Law says an attacker can’t be in the penalty area and also
       says if he/she hasn’t had time to leave he/she can. That’s
       ambiguous and open to interpretation and abuse.  Who decides if
       the attacker had time to leave? As we’re supposed to apply Law
       “in the spirit of the game” surely gaining an advantage by being
       inside the penalty area shouldn’t be acceptable.
       #Post#: 9383--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Law 16: The Goal Kick
   DIR By: nemesis
       Date: July 27, 2019, 4:18 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Scally Bob link ---
       >
       > The Law says an attacker can’t be in the penalty area and also
       says if he/she hasn’t had time to leave he/she can. That’s
       ambiguous and open to interpretation and abuse.  Who decides if
       the attacker had time to leave? As we’re supposed to apply Law
       “in the spirit of the game” surely gaining an advantage by being
       inside the penalty area shouldn’t be acceptable.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Agree.  If the Law says "must" rather than "should" surely you
       can't have a further bit of the Law that says "when it says must
       it really means not necessarily".
       Which idiots draft and approve such wordings ?
       #Post#: 9387--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Law 16: The Goal Kick
   DIR By: Readingfan
       Date: July 27, 2019, 5:31 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Isn't it just a bit like a free kick where opposing players are
       meant to be at least 10 yards away but if the kick is taken
       quickly and they happen to be closer than that and it hits them
       then play tends to be allowed to carry on.
       #Post#: 9393--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Law 16: The Goal Kick
   DIR By: Beancounter
       Date: July 27, 2019, 10:18 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The new law change is bizarre. The ball is in play when it is
       kicked and clearly moves. If an attacker challenges for the ball
       before it is in play it is retaken, presumably that split second
       prior to kicking it. Am I missing something? Obviously I don’t
       have the education of a School housemaster who approved such
       wording!
       #Post#: 9394--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Law 16: The Goal Kick
   DIR By: ARF
       Date: July 27, 2019, 11:15 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Scally Bob link ---
       > Who decides if the attacker had time to leave?
       --- End Quote ---
       You do, you're the referee  ;)
       --- Quote from: Scally Bob link ---
       > As we’re supposed to apply Law “in the spirit of the game”
       surely gaining an advantage by being inside the penalty area
       shouldn’t be acceptable.
       --- End Quote ---
       I would say that if the defending team takes the goal kick
       quickly and the attacker is still inside the area (as long as he
       isn't extracting the urine by taking ages to leave it) then
       that's on them for taking it quickly!
       #Post#: 9399--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Law 16: The Goal Kick
   DIR By: Ashington46
       Date: July 27, 2019, 1:22 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Don't worry about it, VAR can intervene and decide the outcome
       ----ooh----of course this would only be possible at the top
       level ---would it intervene anyway or ...............would it be
       down to the onfield officials to decide and no doubt get abuse
       from the many fans who have no idea that the Law has changed?
       I used to love football!
       #Post#: 9401--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Law 16: The Goal Kick
   DIR By: Scally Bob
       Date: July 27, 2019, 2:14 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       It might be my decision as to whether an attacker had time to
       leave the penalty area but what if the Observer disagrees?
       In none of the pre-season games I’ve done (all Contrib teams)
       has any team really changed the way they take goal kicks from
       last season so it hasn’t been an issue so far. It’s going to
       happen though.
       #Post#: 9404--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Law 16: The Goal Kick
   DIR By: Wollongong Ref
       Date: July 27, 2019, 6:02 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I would use the Duck Rule- if it looks like a duck and quacks
       like a duck it's a duck. People players and spectators are
       expecting a retake for the player being in the PA. give the
       retake of the goal kick.
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 5
   DIR Next Page