URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       RateTheRef
  HTML https://ratetheref.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: General Discussion
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 102006--------------------------------------------------
       Juventus vs Galatasaray - João Pinheiro POR (VAR - Tomasz
       Kwiatkowski POL)
   DIR By: aaa
       Date: February 26, 2026, 2:02 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cj32yy0vn3xo
       I'm still trying to process all the decisions made here.  The
       collision was accidental but from a yellow to straight red is
       strange indeed!
       #Post#: 102007--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Juventus vs Galatasaray - João Pinheiro POR (VAR - Tomasz
       Kwiatkowski POL)
   DIR By: Acme Thunderer
       Date: February 26, 2026, 2:57 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: aaa link ---
       >
       >
  HTML https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cj32yy0vn3xo
       >
       > I'm still trying to process all the decisions made here.  The
       collision was accidental but from a yellow to straight red is
       strange indeed!
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Presumably, the VAR must have sent the referee to the monitor to
       consider a straight red card instead of a second yellow. A
       shocking decision in my view. Eyes were on the ball and, on
       landing, the contact with the opponent's leg was purely
       accidental. Where else was he supposed to land? I hope some
       action is taken.
       #Post#: 102011--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Juventus vs Galatasaray - João Pinheiro POR (VAR - Tomasz
       Kwiatkowski POL)
   DIR By: TA_Ref
       Date: February 26, 2026, 4:10 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I think most people in the football world would say it’s a
       terrible decision. As a certain Mr Neville would say “There’s a
       smell of the game…”. I don’t like this decision either but when
       you consider it objectively there is some sort of reasoning
       behind it.
       Firstly, the point of contact - it’s up on the back of the ankle
       on the Achilles area
       Secondly, excessive force(?) - obviously there’s no intent and
       completely accidental but the Juventus player has jumped high
       off the ground to win the ball so when he comes back down to the
       ground, he’s coming down with force. Rather than land on the
       ground, he lands on the Gala players ankle/achilles which is
       seriously going to hurt. The weight/force coming down from a
       jump is quite large and that has to be a consideration.
       As I said, I seriously don’t like the decision but I can kind of
       see the reasoning. An onfield decision of Yellow Card I could
       accept but to be a straight red feels rather harsh.
       #Post#: 102013--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Juventus vs Galatasaray - João Pinheiro POR (VAR - Tomasz
       Kwiatkowski POL)
   DIR By: El Referee
       Date: February 26, 2026, 4:55 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Absolutely bonkers decision. A 2nd yellow is one thing, but to
       then upgrade it to red is beyond belief.
       Point of contact is Achilles, yes. But that’s just as much in
       the ‘fouled’ player as it is Kelly. Kelly’s leg doesn’t move in
       an unusual way to suggest any malice. He is literally just
       landing after going up for a header.
       #Post#: 102020--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Juventus vs Galatasaray - João Pinheiro POR (VAR - Tomasz
       Kwiatkowski POL)
   DIR By: nemesis
       Date: February 26, 2026, 7:52 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: TA_Ref link ---
       >
       > I think most people in the football world would say it’s a
       terrible decision. As a certain Mr Neville would say “There’s a
       smell of the game…”. I don’t like this decision either but when
       you consider it objectively there is some sort of reasoning
       behind it.
       >
       > Firstly, the point of contact - it’s up on the back of the
       ankle on the Achilles area
       >
       > Secondly, excessive force(?) - obviously there’s no intent and
       completely accidental but the Juventus player has jumped high
       off the ground to win the ball so when he comes back down to the
       ground, he’s coming down with force. Rather than land on the
       ground, he lands on the Gala players ankle/achilles which is
       seriously going to hurt. The weight/force coming down from a
       jump is quite large and that has to be a consideration.
       >
       > As I said, I seriously don’t like the decision but I can kind
       of see the reasoning. An onfield decision of Yellow Card I could
       accept but to be a straight red feels rather harsh.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Excessive force from jumping too high?
       The games gone!  Running too fast or kicking the ball too hard
       will be next!
       #Post#: 102021--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Juventus vs Galatasaray - João Pinheiro POR (VAR - Tomasz
       Kwiatkowski POL)
   DIR By: TA_Ref
       Date: February 26, 2026, 8:14 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: nemesis link ---
       >
       > [quote author=TA_Ref link=topic=7756.msg102011#msg102011
       date=1772100642]
       > I think most people in the football world would say it’s a
       terrible decision. As a certain Mr Neville would say “There’s a
       smell of the game…”. I don’t like this decision either but when
       you consider it objectively there is some sort of reasoning
       behind it.
       >
       > Firstly, the point of contact - it’s up on the back of the
       ankle on the Achilles area
       >
       > Secondly, excessive force(?) - obviously there’s no intent and
       completely accidental but the Juventus player has jumped high
       off the ground to win the ball so when he comes back down to the
       ground, he’s coming down with force. Rather than land on the
       ground, he lands on the Gala players ankle/achilles which is
       seriously going to hurt. The weight/force coming down from a
       jump is quite large and that has to be a consideration.
       >
       > As I said, I seriously don’t like the decision but I can kind
       of see the reasoning. An onfield decision of Yellow Card I could
       accept but to be a straight red feels rather harsh.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Excessive force from jumping too high?
       The games gone!  Running too fast or kicking the ball too hard
       will be next!
       [/quote]
       I was trying to be logical. I said I didn’t like the decision.
       Anyway, I don’t think you’d like it if a player landed on your
       Achilles from jumping high. The force from that could cause
       really serious injury.
       #Post#: 102024--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Juventus vs Galatasaray - João Pinheiro POR (VAR - Tomasz
       Kwiatkowski POL)
   DIR By: Affy_Moose
       Date: February 26, 2026, 9:45 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: El Referee link ---
       >
       > Absolutely bonkers decision. A 2nd yellow is one thing, but to
       then upgrade it to red is beyond belief.
       >
       > Point of contact is Achilles, yes. But that’s just as much in
       the ‘fouled’ player as it is Kelly. Kelly’s leg doesn’t move in
       an unusual way to suggest any malice. He is literally just
       landing after going up for a header.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Kelly's leg does move in an unexpected way.
       I didn't watch this live, so caught up today on the furore.  The
       way it is being described is not what occurred.  Kelly initially
       jumps in a straight line, and then extends his right leg in an
       unexpected way - coming down heavily on the opponent's leg.
       The way it is being described makes it seem like a straight jump
       up and down, which it wasn't.
       Now - if you're giving yellow, then it's wrong.  If we're
       considering it as a sanctionable foul then it isn't yellow -
       it's red.  It's well above disregarding safety - it's observably
       endangering safety.
       It's an interesting debate to be had, but it's certainly not the
       vanilla decision some are making it out to be.
       Most debate online seems to be missing how VAR operates however.
       UEFA - and other FAs - expect wrong second yellows (missed
       reds) to be reviewed on the pitch and corrected.  It matters for
       the periods of the ban.
       The same would also be true of a wrong straight red, that can
       and should be corrected to a 'correct' 2YC.  I appreciate fans
       don't love that (as they get excited about the prospect of a
       reprieve only to still lose their player).
       The way to fix that would presumably to make the VAR message and
       purpose for review more clear (i.e. VAR review - potential
       upgrade of 2YC to RC; or potential downgrade of RC to 2YC).
       #Post#: 102025--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Juventus vs Galatasaray - João Pinheiro POR (VAR - Tomasz
       Kwiatkowski POL)
   DIR By: Ashington46
       Date: February 26, 2026, 10:27 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       HIs opponent makes no attempt to jump for the ball, however,
       once Kelly is in the air, the opponent gives him a slight push
       which meansthat Kelly is off balance and can't avois the leg
       movement because he wants to make a safe landing.
       Every time you are contesting a ball in the air, all you need is
       a thumb in your back and it knocks you off balance, something I
       learned many years ago from Jim Langley when he was manager at
       Hillingdon Borough. It was a ploy I also used and it was very
       rarely spotted by any official.
       Kelly actually received the push to his midriff and his landing
       was always going to be off balance, at no time did he look at
       his opponent, his eyes remained on the ball.
       It could be argued that his opponent, by not jumping for the
       ball and pushing his opponent whilst he was in the air, was
       reckless and causing a danger to his opponent.
       Of course, the easy answer to all of this would be to ban
       heading of the ball and this situation would never arise.
       I agree with Nemesis ---the game really has gone at the 'elite'
       level.
       #Post#: 102028--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Juventus vs Galatasaray - João Pinheiro POR (VAR - Tomasz
       Kwiatkowski POL)
   DIR By: Leggy
       Date: February 26, 2026, 11:04 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "Every time you are contesting a ball in the air, all you need
       is a thumb in your back and it knocks you off balance".
       Off topic, but this makes the case for disallowing the Spurs
       goal in the NLD last Sunday very well.
       #Post#: 102030--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Juventus vs Galatasaray - João Pinheiro POR (VAR - Tomasz
       Kwiatkowski POL)
   DIR By: El Referee
       Date: February 26, 2026, 11:40 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Affy_Moose link ---
       >
       > [quote author=El Referee link=topic=7756.msg102013#msg102013
       date=1772103334]
       > Absolutely bonkers decision. A 2nd yellow is one thing, but to
       then upgrade it to red is beyond belief.
       >
       > Point of contact is Achilles, yes. But that’s just as much in
       the ‘fouled’ player as it is Kelly. Kelly’s leg doesn’t move in
       an unusual way to suggest any malice. He is literally just
       landing after going up for a header.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Kelly's leg does move in an unexpected way.
       I didn't watch this live, so caught up today on the furore.  The
       way it is being described is not what occurred.  Kelly initially
       jumps in a straight line, and then extends his right leg in an
       unexpected way - coming down heavily on the opponent's leg.
       The way it is being described makes it seem like a straight jump
       up and down, which it wasn't.
       Now - if you're giving yellow, then it's wrong.  If we're
       considering it as a sanctionable foul then it isn't yellow -
       it's red.  It's well above disregarding safety - it's observably
       endangering safety.
       It's an interesting debate to be had, but it's certainly not the
       vanilla decision some are making it out to be.
       Most debate online seems to be missing how VAR operates however.
       UEFA - and other FAs - expect wrong second yellows (missed
       reds) to be reviewed on the pitch and corrected.  It matters for
       the periods of the ban.
       The same would also be true of a wrong straight red, that can
       and should be corrected to a 'correct' 2YC.  I appreciate fans
       don't love that (as they get excited about the prospect of a
       reprieve only to still lose their player).
       The way to fix that would presumably to make the VAR message and
       purpose for review more clear (i.e. VAR review - potential
       upgrade of 2YC to RC; or potential downgrade of RC to 2YC).
       [/quote]
       He gets knocked off balance whilst he’s in the air, so he had to
       adjust his legs to make sure he lands safely without breaking
       his ankles. Jump up in the air, ask someone to push you and see
       if you can stick a perfect pencil landing……
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 3
   DIR Next Page