URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       RateTheRef
  HTML https://ratetheref.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: General Discussion
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 100685--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Farai Hallam - Manchester City v Wolves 
   DIR By: UmpireIan49
       Date: January 24, 2026, 5:30 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I must say, fair play to the debutant referee for sticking with
       his original call of no penalty.
       We don’t see too much of this sticking with the original call as
       the referees like to go with the flow as it were. As for the
       decision - yes the arm was out, but the ball hit the back of the
       arm. That can hardly be construed as deliberate.
       And then quelle surprise - Guardiola shows his usual arrogance
       and lack of grace especially where officials are concerned, as
       Whistleblower commented, Farai Hallam must have done a good job
       if Pep got the hump.
       Not sure what the VAR and his second in command were thinking
       with the OFR but kudos to Hallam who is getting plenty of praise
       from the pundits on Match of the Day to my evident pleasure and
       surprise.
       We will see more of Farai Hallam in the Prem before the season
       is out, he certainly has a lot of promise.
       #Post#: 100686--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Farai Hallam - Manchester City v Wolves 
   DIR By: Boz
       Date: January 24, 2026, 7:05 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       At first glance, it looked like a handball from my viewpoint at
       the game. Mr Hallam was obviously closer to the action and
       having seen the incident again on screen, would agree with his
       no penalty verdict. While understanding the rationale for not
       replaying 'contentious' incidents on the big screen during
       matches, it would have been informative here.
       Hadn't seen Mr Hallam in action previously during his rise up
       the refereeing ladder. It seemed an encouraging PL debut, played
       a couple of good advantages and while there were a couple of
       times he let things go, which arguably merited a free-kick, kept
       control of the game
       #Post#: 100691--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Farai Hallam - Manchester City v Wolves 
   DIR By: Failed Ref
       Date: January 25, 2026, 4:26 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Sadly the Sunday Times describes the penalty incident in rather
       uncomplementary terms emphasising the comments of the City
       manager. Farcical was the word used to describe events which is
       perhaps arguable given the time it took to reach a final
       decision, I.e. stick with the on field decision. Hallam was a
       professional player, was his view influenced by his background?
       #Post#: 100697--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Farai Hallam - Manchester City v Wolves 
   DIR By: Leggy
       Date: January 25, 2026, 7:14 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Firslty, I think this is very much a "referee's call" and I
       wonder if the two "experienced" VARs felt the need to help out
       their "inexperienced" colleague more than the need to make the
       right call?
       Secondly, the referee is getting a lot of kudos for sticking
       with his onfield decision and not taking the VAR view.  Whilst
       this may be correct, I also wonder how many of those praising
       him are doing so because they are anti-VAR in gerneral and/or
       just want to see more VAR interventions overturned?  Their
       comments / prasie are less about this specific decision and more
       about VAR in its wider use?
       #Post#: 100699--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Farai Hallam - Manchester City v Wolves 
   DIR By: Failed Ref
       Date: January 25, 2026, 7:26 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Andy Davies on ESPN who appears to have replaced Dale Johnson
       believes that it was a correct intervention by VAR. Davies was a
       premier league official and apparently worked on var.
       #Post#: 100701--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Farai Hallam - Manchester City v Wolves 
   DIR By: Claretman
       Date: January 25, 2026, 9:03 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Failed Ref link ---
       >
       > Andy Davies on ESPN who appears to have replaced Dale Johnson
       believes that it was a correct intervention by VAR. Davies was a
       premier league official and apparently worked on var.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Not the ‘ Andy Davies ‘ who wasnt too popular in this forum ?
       #Post#: 100803--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Farai Hallam - Manchester City v Wolves 
   DIR By: Microscopist
       Date: January 26, 2026, 1:00 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML https://x.com/propsMCFC/status/2015413140805021830?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E2015413140805021830%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=
       Apart from the penalty there were a couple of other odd
       decisions.  The clip above shows a corner where Donnarumma seems
       to have comfortably kept the ball in play.  Both the commentary
       on the City webpage and City fans at the match agree that this
       decision was given by the referee (some 25 yards away) and there
       was no flag by the Assistant referee.  (Edited)
       The other was a discretionary choice, but one that I have rarely
       seen.  Doku was fouled, a regular occurrence, firstly as he was
       moving forward he was forcibly pushed in the back causing him to
       fall forward and then as he fell a boot was planted on his
       ankle.  A yellow card was issued and Doku was treated on the
       pitch.  He was then sent to the sidelines and not allowed to
       return to the field immediately.  Now the treatment was on the
       long side and I know referees have discretion on this matter,
       but in the circumstances I would regard that as a harsh
       decision.
       #Post#: 100807--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Farai Hallam - Manchester City v Wolves 
   DIR By: El Referee
       Date: January 26, 2026, 1:20 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Microscopist link ---
       >
       >
  HTML https://x.com/propsMCFC/status/2015413140805021830?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E2015413140805021830%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=
       >
       > Apart from the penalty there were a couple of other odd
       decisions.  The clip above shows a corner where Donnarumma seems
       to have comfortably kept the ball in play.  Both the commentary
       on the City webpage and City fans at the match agree that this
       decision was given by the referee (some 25 yards away) and there
       was no flag by the Assistant referee.  Should have gone to
       Specsavers?
       >
       > The other was a discretionary choice, but one that I have
       rarely seen.  Doku was fouled, a regular occurrence, firstly as
       he was moving forward he was forcibly pushed in the back causing
       him to fall forward and then as he fell a boot was planted on
       his ankle.  A yellow card was issued and Doku was treated on the
       pitch.  He was then sent to the sidelines and not allowed to
       return to the field immediately.  Now the treatment was on the
       long side and I know referees have discretion on this matter,
       but in the circumstances I would regard that as a harsh
       decision.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Certainly doesn’t look like it has gone out. But it’s hard to
       comment on who gives it based on that footage.
       Whether Doku can stay on the pitch is down to whether the
       treatment was completed by the time the cautioning process was
       completed. Based on what you’re saying, it wasn’t. So it was
       correct that Doku went off.
       #Post#: 100831--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Farai Hallam - Manchester City v Wolves 
   DIR By: Whistleblower
       Date: January 27, 2026, 6:16 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       In a long article in today's Times Martin Samuel is very
       complimentary about Farai Hallam and very uncomplimentary about
       Darren England. " England was messing up Premier League matches
       when Hallam hadn't even been promoted to the Championship " The
       article concludes, writing of Hallam, " Bravo that man, bravo.
       Let's hope he hasn't killed his career ".
       *****************************************************
       Page 2 of 2
   DIR Previous Page