URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       RateTheRef
  HTML https://ratetheref.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: General Discussion
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 7492--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Mr Attwell Leeds v Villa
   DIR By: Hendo
       Date: May 2, 2019, 11:38 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I see the 2 match ban has been imposed but that Leeds requested
       consideration of some form of leniency in view of the
       circumstances and the magnanimous gesture from their manager in
       letting Villa equalise. Whilst the 2nd is undeniable and I
       applaud them fully for what they did it’s a bit of a nerve
       asking for special consideration for Bamford. Regardless of what
       happened he deliberately conned the ref and that is cheating.
       Full stop.
       #Post#: 7493--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Mr Attwell Leeds v Villa
   DIR By: TheThingFromLewes
       Date: May 2, 2019, 12:06 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: bmb link ---
       >
       > [quote author=Whistleblower link=topic=752.msg7471#msg7471
       date=1556733305]
       > Some referees have a natural authority about their person
       which imposes itself in difficult situations. Attwell, in my
       view, doesn't. He is indeed a solid referee who, in the main,
       does a decent job. His misfortune was to be have been lauded,
       while very young and by some very influential people in the
       game, into a star-quality potential which his ability has never
       merited. He is not culpable for this but I fear his reputation
       still suffers because of the perceived ( and I believe, actual )
       favouritism he was shown. After his demotion I think he deserves
       great credit for working his way back to being where he should
       be, a middle order SG1 referee.
       >
       > Michael Oliver was correctly seen as having potential to be
       world class and was given proper time to develop. He has been
       the more fortunate therefore and occupies a place on the UEFA
       Elite List which I do not think Attwell ever could or indeed
       should achieve.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Michael Oliver benefitted from the Ivory Towers learning their
       mistakes with how they wrongly pushed Stuart Attwell too far too
       soon. As such he has developed into the excellent referee that
       he is today and I believe we've not seen his best yet because he
       is still developing.  When Stuart Attwell was pushed too far too
       soon he had shown wonderful ability and talent as a youngster,
       in that respect it was understandable to a degree that he was
       being hailed as the next best thing because of the promise he
       was showing. The powers that be completely destroyed that in
       him, imo. I have wondered before now what sort of a referee he
       would have developed into had he been allowed to develop with
       the same support and time that Michael Oliver has had. Stuart
       didn't get the right support, he got put on a pedestal and left
       there to flounder and we all know how very wrong it went for him
       because of that.  Amazing mental strength on his part to come
       back from that and to develop into the more often than not
       decent young ref he is today. Sadly he will never reach the full
       potential that he showed so much promise for early on, I think
       the mental scars probably run too deep.  There is always going
       to be that fear at the back of his mind somewhere that it will
       all go spectacularly wrong again it's human nature. Maybe he is
       trying so hard to stay in the background and not be noticed,
       because he gets noticed for any errors big or small or even just
       perceived errors more than his colleagues, that he ends up
       projecting himself as being very timid?
       [/quote]
       And who was meant to be mentoring Attwell?
       #Post#: 7496--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Mr Attwell Leeds v Villa
   DIR By: bmb
       Date: May 2, 2019, 3:36 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: TheThingFromLewes link ---
       >
       > [quote author=bmb link=topic=752.msg7474#msg7474
       date=1556735684]
       > [quote author=Whistleblower link=topic=752.msg7471#msg7471
       date=1556733305]
       > Some referees have a natural authority about their person
       which imposes itself in difficult situations. Attwell, in my
       view, doesn't. He is indeed a solid referee who, in the main,
       does a decent job. His misfortune was to be have been lauded,
       while very young and by some very influential people in the
       game, into a star-quality potential which his ability has never
       merited. He is not culpable for this but I fear his reputation
       still suffers because of the perceived ( and I believe, actual )
       favouritism he was shown. After his demotion I think he deserves
       great credit for working his way back to being where he should
       be, a middle order SG1 referee.
       >
       > Michael Oliver was correctly seen as having potential to be
       world class and was given proper time to develop. He has been
       the more fortunate therefore and occupies a place on the UEFA
       Elite List which I do not think Attwell ever could or indeed
       should achieve.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Michael Oliver benefitted from the Ivory Towers learning their
       mistakes with how they wrongly pushed Stuart Attwell too far too
       soon. As such he has developed into the excellent referee that
       he is today and I believe we've not seen his best yet because he
       is still developing.  When Stuart Attwell was pushed too far too
       soon he had shown wonderful ability and talent as a youngster,
       in that respect it was understandable to a degree that he was
       being hailed as the next best thing because of the promise he
       was showing. The powers that be completely destroyed that in
       him, imo. I have wondered before now what sort of a referee he
       would have developed into had he been allowed to develop with
       the same support and time that Michael Oliver has had. Stuart
       didn't get the right support, he got put on a pedestal and left
       there to flounder and we all know how very wrong it went for him
       because of that.  Amazing mental strength on his part to come
       back from that and to develop into the more often than not
       decent young ref he is today. Sadly he will never reach the full
       potential that he showed so much promise for early on, I think
       the mental scars probably run too deep.  There is always going
       to be that fear at the back of his mind somewhere that it will
       all go spectacularly wrong again it's human nature. Maybe he is
       trying so hard to stay in the background and not be noticed,
       because he gets noticed for any errors big or small or even just
       perceived errors more than his colleagues, that he ends up
       projecting himself as being very timid?
       [/quote]
       And who was meant to be mentoring Attwell?
       [/quote]
       Wiley
       *****************************************************
       Page 5 of 5
   DIR Previous Page