URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       RateTheRef
  HTML https://ratetheref.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: General Discussion
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 95748--------------------------------------------------
       Aston Villa v Fulham - Andy Madley
   DIR By: Joecphillips
       Date: September 28, 2025, 8:24 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Another great decision by a referee to book a player for diving.
       #Post#: 95749--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Aston Villa v Fulham - Andy Madley
   DIR By: TheThingFromLewes
       Date: September 28, 2025, 8:26 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Josh King needs to learn to stop diving like that. Two cards in
       two games for simulation.
       VAR has been busy so far, definitely not a penalty for the King
       challenge, and the handball against Cash would be very harsh
       indeed.
       An excellent quick flag by Taylor early doors as well.
       #Post#: 95754--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Aston Villa v Fulham - Andy Madley
   DIR By: Craven
       Date: September 28, 2025, 9:02 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: TheThingFromLewes link ---
       >
       > Josh King needs to learn to stop diving like that. Two cards
       in two games for simulation.
       >
       > VAR has been busy so far, definitely not a penalty for the
       King challenge, and the handball against Cash would be very
       harsh indeed.
       >
       > An excellent quick flag by Taylor early doors as well.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       It is certainly not a dive TTFL. Very very harsh to say that
       about King. It’s a blatant foul. Shocking from Madley to book
       him.
       #Post#: 95755--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Aston Villa v Fulham - Andy Madley
   DIR By: Charlieboy
       Date: September 28, 2025, 9:07 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Joecphillips link ---
       >
       > Another great decision by a referee to book a player for
       diving.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Dreadful decision by the referee imo , clear contact by the
       keeper on his leg even if you think it's not a penalty that is
       no way on earth a dive . I keep reading about players and
       coaches not understanding the laws and often that is right but
       here we see clear evidence of officials not understanding
       football.  It is my opinion that if you are going to caution for
       simulation you are calling said player a cheat , if you're going
       to do that you must be absolutely right . This isn't even close.
       #Post#: 95757--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Aston Villa v Fulham - Andy Madley
   DIR By: TA_Ref
       Date: September 28, 2025, 9:20 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I agree with the last two posters (charlieboy and craven) on the
       topic that It’s certainly not a dive as there is clear contact
       on the feet.
       However, this incident is the type of situation that I hate
       because an attacker can knock the ball away from the keeper and
       continue to run forward into the goalkeeper without trying to go
       for the ball and more often than not wins a penalty.
       This is exactly what happens here. Josh King gets there first
       but he doesn’t change his movement to go and play the ball. He
       continues to run into Martinez who’s trying to spread himself to
       save the ball. The goalkeepers intention is not to trip him,
       it’s to make himself big and save the ball. I don’t believe it’s
       a penalty but it’s certainly not simulation.
       #Post#: 95758--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Aston Villa v Fulham - Andy Madley
   DIR By: Joecphillips
       Date: September 28, 2025, 9:20 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Charlieboy link ---
       >
       > [quote author=Joecphillips link=topic=7266.msg95748#msg95748
       date=1759065879]
       > Another great decision by a referee to book a player for
       diving.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Dreadful decision by the referee imo , clear contact by the
       keeper on his leg even if you think it's not a penalty that is
       no way on earth a dive . I keep reading about players and
       coaches not understanding the laws and often that is right but
       here we see clear evidence of officials not understanding
       football.  It is my opinion that if you are going to caution for
       simulation you are calling said player a cheat , if you're going
       to do that you must be absolutely right . This isn't even close.
       [/quote]
       Of course there's contact he has dove into him
       #Post#: 95759--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Aston Villa v Fulham - Andy Madley
   DIR By: DublinRef
       Date: September 28, 2025, 9:28 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       There is clear contact - after he’s has dived. He’s well on his
       way down before there is contact - simulation first then contact
       with the goal keeper. Correct call by Madley in my opinion.
       I would respectfully disagree with Charlieboy about simulation
       requiring referees to have an extra degree of certainty before
       being penalised. I think that’s part of the reason players do it
       so often. It’s just another law, not a condemnation of a player,
       if a referee identifies simulation, he/she should take
       appropriate action. They should not be worried for one moment
       about a player being labeled a cheat. If the referee is wrong,
       one of the 20+ cameras will quickly tell us anyway.
       #Post#: 95760--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Aston Villa v Fulham - Andy Madley
   DIR By: Charlieboy
       Date: September 28, 2025, 9:31 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: DublinRef link ---
       >
       > There is clear contact - after he’s has dived. He’s well on
       his way down before there is contact - simulation first then
       contact with the goal keeper. Correct call by Madley in my
       opinion.
       >
       > I would respectfully disagree with Charlieboy about simulation
       requiring referees to have an extra degree of certainty before
       being penalised. I think that’s part of the reason players do it
       so often. It’s just another law, not a condemnation of a player,
       if a referee identifies simulation, he/she should take
       appropriate action. They should not be worried for one moment
       about a player being labeled a cheat. If the referee is wrong,
       one of the 20+ cameras will quickly tell us anyway.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       I will agree to disagree,  that's what forums are about.
       #Post#: 95762--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Aston Villa v Fulham - Andy Madley
   DIR By: TheThingFromLewes
       Date: September 28, 2025, 9:56 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Missed a clear yellow when Buendia pulled back Bassey right in
       front of the assistant too.
       Thought Castagne was also lucky not to be carded for his
       challenge on McGinn.
       A bit of a mixed bag from Madley this afternoon..
       #Post#: 95763--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Aston Villa v Fulham - Andy Madley
   DIR By: Ref Madness
       Date: September 28, 2025, 10:09 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Not the sort of game Madley would have been looking for.
       Extremely difficult to officiate, and Fulham will feel aggrieved
       at 2 tight calls going against them.  50-50 both for me.  But a
       better day for Madley in his general handling I thought, so fair
       play to him for that at least after his nightmare week.
       Would others agree?
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 2
   DIR Next Page