URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       RateTheRef
  HTML https://ratetheref.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: General Discussion
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 94226--------------------------------------------------
       Darren England : Chelsea vs Crystal Palace 
   DIR By: dave26
       Date: August 17, 2025, 8:39 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       In my opinion until two years ago I thought Darren was a
       excellent referee with player management being one of his
       strengths , I think the Liverpool vs Tottenham debacle ( where
       England as VAR was hot topic of that match ) since he returned
       to the fold ( I applaud him for being strong and bouncing back )
       but I think he has come back with a manufactured robotic style
       this was also evident last season he gives Yellow cards nearly
       all the time he’s card happy and seems to have lost his
       management ability
       As for the Eze disallowed free kick I think it was very harsh
       but would welcome others opinions
       #Post#: 94228--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Darren England : Chelsea vs Crystal Palace 
   DIR By: TA_Ref
       Date: August 17, 2025, 8:48 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       For the Eze disallowed goal,
       - The 1m law (from a defensive wall) is quite clearly in the law
       book
       - James Bell spotted this and correctly called Darren England
       over to check himself
       - The correct decision was reached and the explanation to the
       crowd was done perfectly by Darren England
       A very good process (imo)
       And James Bell is an excellent VAR
       #Post#: 94229--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Darren England : Chelsea vs Crystal Palace 
   DIR By: tef
       Date: August 17, 2025, 8:51 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       A great scenario for having the referee mic’d up to explain. Is
       that the first time VAR has been used to penalise that
       particular offence?
       #Post#: 94231--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Darren England : Chelsea vs Crystal Palace 
   DIR By: rustyref
       Date: August 17, 2025, 8:59 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       It can only be disallowed.  Was Guehi within 1m of the Chelsea
       wall, clearly he was and therefore it is very much a black and
       white decision.
       #Post#: 94232--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Darren England : Chelsea vs Crystal Palace 
   DIR By: tomchappell19
       Date: August 17, 2025, 9:00 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       In law that’s the correct decision. Chris Sutton on the Sky
       commentary saying ‘some things in football don’t feel right and
       that doesn’t feel right’ is vexatious and a complete disregard
       for the LOTG.
       Great spot from Bell and as already stated, seemingly a good
       process. My only thought, is that a clear and obvious error or
       VAR re-refereeing the game for something that was missed on
       field from a set-piece?
       #Post#: 94236--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Darren England : Chelsea vs Crystal Palace 
   DIR By: Scally Bob
       Date: August 17, 2025, 10:37 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: tomchappell19 link ---
       >
       > In law that’s the correct decision. Chris Sutton on the Sky
       commentary saying ‘some things in football don’t feel right and
       that doesn’t feel right’ is vexatious and a complete disregard
       for the LOTG.
       >
       > Great spot from Bell and as already stated, seemingly a good
       process. My only thought, is that a clear and obvious error or
       VAR re-refereeing the game for something that was missed on
       field from a set-piece?
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       This is why I and others are constantly told by grassroots
       players (Steps 4, 5 and 6 in my case) daft stuff that they
       repeat from these “experts”. The BBC Football Website calls this
       correct interpretation of Law 13 a “little-known rule”.  Where
       to begin with that?
       #Post#: 94243--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Darren England : Chelsea vs Crystal Palace 
   DIR By: ChippenhamCherry
       Date: August 17, 2025, 12:17 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The Crystal Palace disallowed goal is very similar to a goal
       Chelsea scored against Bournemouth last season where Cucurella
       was too close to the wall and VAR didn't intervene. Dale Johnson
       said at the time he'd confirmed with IFAB when the law was
       brought in that this particular law was not in VAR's remit. I
       thought that seemed silly as the VAR protocol allows VAR to get
       involved in offences leading up to a goal, which this surely is.
       So I also emailed IFAB to confirm and got this response:
       "This is not a matter for the VAR as the protocol does not
       permit involvement in the taking of restarts except in major Law
       error incidents such as a goal being scored directly from a
       throw-in or indirect free kick."
       If VAR wasn't allowed to get involved last season, why are they
       this season? Has the protocol changed or has someone got it
       wrong either this time or last time?
       #Post#: 94247--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Darren England : Chelsea vs Crystal Palace 
   DIR By: Leggy
       Date: August 17, 2025, 12:55 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Scally Bob link ---
       >
       > [quote author=tomchappell19 link=topic=7150.msg94232#msg94232
       date=1755439213]
       > In law that’s the correct decision. Chris Sutton on the Sky
       commentary saying ‘some things in football don’t feel right and
       that doesn’t feel right’ is vexatious and a complete disregard
       for the LOTG.
       >
       > Great spot from Bell and as already stated, seemingly a good
       process. My only thought, is that a clear and obvious error or
       VAR re-refereeing the game for something that was missed on
       field from a set-piece?
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       This is why I and others are constantly told by grassroots
       players (Steps 4, 5 and 6 in my case) daft stuff that they
       repeat from these “experts”. The BBC Football Website calls this
       correct interpretation of Law 13 a “little-known rule”.  Where
       to begin with that?
       [/quote]
       Most of the "rules" (sic) are little known to the uneducated.
       #Post#: 94249--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Darren England : Chelsea vs Crystal Palace 
   DIR By: rustyref
       Date: August 17, 2025, 1:23 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: ChippenhamCherry link ---
       >
       > The Crystal Palace disallowed goal is very similar to a goal
       Chelsea scored against Bournemouth last season where Cucurella
       was too close to the wall and VAR didn't intervene. Dale Johnson
       said at the time he'd confirmed with IFAB when the law was
       brought in that this particular law was not in VAR's remit. I
       thought that seemed silly as the VAR protocol allows VAR to get
       involved in offences leading up to a goal, which this surely is.
       So I also emailed IFAB to confirm and got this response:
       >
       > "This is not a matter for the VAR as the protocol does not
       permit involvement in the taking of restarts except in major Law
       error incidents such as a goal being scored directly from a
       throw-in or indirect free kick."
       >
       > If VAR wasn't allowed to get involved last season, why are
       they this season? Has the protocol changed or has someone got it
       wrong either this time or last time?
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       I can only assume they misunderstood your question.  The only
       restriction in the VAR protocol in relating to restarts is this
       ...
       The Laws of the Game do not allow restart decisions (corner
       kicks, throw-ins  etc.) to be changed once play has restarted,
       so they cannot be reviewed
       That means if the officials have given a corner when it should
       have been a goal kick and a goal is scored from it VAR cannot
       get involved.
       It also lists this as a category for which VAR are permitted to
       get involved in ...
       attacking team offence in the build-up to or scoring of the
       goal (handball, foul, offside etc.)
       Guehi was a member of the attacking team, clearly committed an
       office, and a goal was scored.  Therefore it absolutely matches
       that permitted involvement criteria.
       #Post#: 94250--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Darren England : Chelsea vs Crystal Palace 
   DIR By: TheThingFromLewes
       Date: August 17, 2025, 1:25 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The less I have to listen to the drivel Sutton spews out the
       better.
       As for the purple kit… 🙄😂
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 3
   DIR Next Page