URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       RateTheRef
  HTML https://ratetheref.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: General Discussion
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 91431--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Peter Bankes - Bournemouth vs Man Utd
   DIR By: ARF
       Date: April 30, 2025, 5:00 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Seagull link ---
       >
       > I see today that Francisco Evanilson's red card has been
       rescinded on appeal. I make no comment on that or the original
       decision. However, if a sending off is overturned on appeal, can
       it not be reduced to a caution (if deemed appropriate) in some
       cases or is it always an "all or nothing" situation? If the
       latter, it seems unfair to me that the foul play (a tackle in
       this case) goes totally unpunished.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       It can't be downgraded to a caution as officially it remains on
       the player's record as a dismissal - it's just the suspension
       that is withdrawn.
       #Post#: 91432--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Peter Bankes - Bournemouth vs Man Utd
   DIR By: Jim_AFCB
       Date: April 30, 2025, 5:05 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: ARF link ---
       >
       > [quote author=Seagull link=topic=6938.msg91430#msg91430
       date=1746004481]
       > I see today that Francisco Evanilson's red card has been
       rescinded on appeal. I make no comment on that or the original
       decision. However, if a sending off is overturned on appeal, can
       it not be reduced to a caution (if deemed appropriate) in some
       cases or is it always an "all or nothing" situation? If the
       latter, it seems unfair to me that the foul play (a tackle in
       this case) goes totally unpunished.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       It can't be downgraded to a caution as officially it remains on
       the player's record as a dismissal - it's just the suspension
       that is withdrawn.
       [/quote]
       Is that right?
       So if the red is overturned, but he gets another red later in
       the season, he would get an additional game ban for it being the
       2nd dismissal of the season? or not?
       #Post#: 91433--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Peter Bankes - Bournemouth vs Man Utd
   DIR By: Seagull
       Date: April 30, 2025, 5:27 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: ARF link ---
       >
       > [quote author=Seagull link=topic=6938.msg91430#msg91430
       date=1746004481]
       > I see today that Francisco Evanilson's red card has been
       rescinded on appeal. I make no comment on that or the original
       decision. However, if a sending off is overturned on appeal, can
       it not be reduced to a caution (if deemed appropriate) in some
       cases or is it always an "all or nothing" situation? If the
       latter, it seems unfair to me that the foul play (a tackle in
       this case) goes totally unpunished.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       It can't be downgraded to a caution as officially it remains on
       the player's record as a dismissal - it's just the suspension
       that is withdrawn.
       [/quote]
       Thank you. I've learned something. The sending off is deemed
       sufficient punishment, in other words.
       #Post#: 91436--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Peter Bankes - Bournemouth vs Man Utd
   DIR By: ARF
       Date: April 30, 2025, 6:57 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Jim_AFCB link ---
       >
       > [quote author=ARF link=topic=6938.msg91431#msg91431
       date=1746007255]
       > [quote author=Seagull link=topic=6938.msg91430#msg91430
       date=1746004481]
       > I see today that Francisco Evanilson's red card has been
       rescinded on appeal. I make no comment on that or the original
       decision. However, if a sending off is overturned on appeal, can
       it not be reduced to a caution (if deemed appropriate) in some
       cases or is it always an "all or nothing" situation? If the
       latter, it seems unfair to me that the foul play (a tackle in
       this case) goes totally unpunished.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       It can't be downgraded to a caution as officially it remains on
       the player's record as a dismissal - it's just the suspension
       that is withdrawn.
       [/quote]
       Is that right?
       So if the red is overturned, but he gets another red later in
       the season, he would get an additional game ban for it being the
       2nd dismissal of the season? or not?
       [/quote]
       I don't think he would get the additional match anymore - it
       used to be the case, however the FA disciplinary regulations now
       explicitly state that for Step 5 and below a successful wrongful
       dismissal doesn't count towards the totting up process. There is
       some ambiguity though, as the regulations for Step 4 and above
       don't actually say whether it counts or not.
       #Post#: 91440--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Peter Bankes - Bournemouth vs Man Utd
   DIR By: TheThingFromLewes
       Date: April 30, 2025, 9:55 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       To summarise… all very messy and unnecessary. Had common sense
       prevailed in the first instance it would have saved a lot of
       time and hassle.
       #Post#: 91450--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Peter Bankes - Bournemouth vs Man Utd
   DIR By: rustyref
       Date: May 1, 2025, 2:32 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Jim_AFCB link ---
       >
       > [quote author=ARF link=topic=6938.msg91431#msg91431
       date=1746007255]
       > [quote author=Seagull link=topic=6938.msg91430#msg91430
       date=1746004481]
       > I see today that Francisco Evanilson's red card has been
       rescinded on appeal. I make no comment on that or the original
       decision. However, if a sending off is overturned on appeal, can
       it not be reduced to a caution (if deemed appropriate) in some
       cases or is it always an "all or nothing" situation? If the
       latter, it seems unfair to me that the foul play (a tackle in
       this case) goes totally unpunished.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       It can't be downgraded to a caution as officially it remains on
       the player's record as a dismissal - it's just the suspension
       that is withdrawn.
       [/quote]
       Is that right?
       [/quote]
       Yes, the reason as I understand it is IFAB and FIFA don't really
       "allow" appeals, and in many countries if you are sent off you
       just have to suck it up no matter how wrong it was.  The FA work
       around it by removing the suspension but leaving it as a red
       card.
       As for the decision, I don't think VAR should have got involved
       given the high bar this season.  But anyone saying it can't be
       SFP just because he slipped are I'm afraid just wrong, there is
       absolutely nothing in law that supports that viewpoint.
       #Post#: 91463--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Peter Bankes - Bournemouth vs Man Utd
   DIR By: Leggy
       Date: May 1, 2025, 10:30 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: TheThingFromLewes link ---
       >
       > To summarise… all very messy and unnecessary. Had common sense
       prevailed in the first instance it would have saved a lot of
       time and hassle.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Common sense was surgically removed from the game some time ago.
       It is only a matter of opinion and now there have been three
       entities offering their opinion:  The on-field referee, the VAR
       and whoever comprised the appeal panel.  My opinion remains
       unchanged and the emphasis on "the slip" is being overplayed;
       but others disagree and that is fine.
       #Post#: 91503--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Peter Bankes - Bournemouth vs Man Utd
   DIR By: Microscopist
       Date: May 3, 2025, 3:34 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML https://twitter.com/i/status/1918408580107039135
       Not a foul, apparently.
       #Post#: 92001--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Peter Bankes - Bournemouth vs Man Utd
   DIR By: Matt1234
       Date: May 13, 2025, 1:33 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       AVAR was Natalie Aspinall
       #Post#: 92005--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Peter Bankes - Bournemouth vs Man Utd
   DIR By: Pm2
       Date: May 13, 2025, 2:41 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Brooks did way too much talking there and like the previous
       poster said it’s hard to believe both of them thought it was
       intentional to lunge in with 2 feet.
       Brooks one of our top refs but not great on var(like Oliver?)
       *****************************************************
       Page 5 of 6
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page