DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
RateTheRef
HTML https://ratetheref.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: General Discussion
*****************************************************
#Post#: 90135--------------------------------------------------
Re: Would ex-pros make better referees?
DIR By: Failed Ref
Date: March 28, 2025, 4:39 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Dangerous ground talking to players. You have to be seen
treating both sides equally. By all means say thank you, but
that should be about it other than to explain decisions.
Rugby is a complex game and so refereeing is slightly different.
Nevertheless, the same principle applies. One team's front row
may be messing about in the scrum, but the referee will speak to
both front rows so not to be seen to be coaching or treating one
side differently. It does surprise me that rugby referees talk
slightly more these days as the general rule and guidance was to
keep quiet. If the ball is not out at a ruck, players find out
by handling the ball and whether then the whistle goes! But
sometimes help is required because the fans don't want to see
repeated penalties. Dickson is an example of an ex player doing
well but initially he was very poor at the highest level.
Football cannot give the same leeway to up and coming referee.
Clattenburg came unstuck when he suggested Lalana was not the
player he once knew. There were so many views on that "friendly"
interaction which is why regerees should say less. Less is more
imho.
#Post#: 90138--------------------------------------------------
Re: Would ex-pros make better referees?
DIR By: RCG
Date: March 28, 2025, 8:29 am
---------------------------------------------------------
I did find names on shirts useful as you could address people as
"Mr so and so" or listen out for a nick name - only because
people will respond quicker to the use of their own names rather
than "player" or "number 36"
That said it was more after the fact or doing a telling off on
the hoof rather than "coaching"
I did use "good tackle" etc to convey I had seen a tackle and
was happy to play on (maybe with VAR I would have had to adapt)
I remember watching George Courtney do a lower league match and
within 2 minutes he seemed to know all the first names and was
happy to use them
Howard Webb was a talker but more in establishing credibility
(seen it, keep going, nothing there, Tommy don't do owt stupid
etc)
*****************************************************
Page 2 of 2
DIR Previous Page