DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
RateTheRef
HTML https://ratetheref.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: General Discussion
*****************************************************
#Post#: 89821--------------------------------------------------
Re: J BROOKS - Liverpool v Newcastle (EFL)
DIR By: olliebcafc
Date: March 16, 2025, 2:00 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: rustyref link ---
>
> [quote author=olliebcafc link=topic=6829.msg89806#msg89806
date=1742147940]
> 2 Newcastle players ordered off at the same time following
injuries - error in law there from Brooks and team. Otherwise so
far so good
>
--- End Quote ---
That isn't right, they only don't have to go off following
treatment if they collided with each other. These were two
completely separate injuries.
[/quote]
You are right! I take that back. An error from me rather than
Brooks then🤣
#Post#: 89822--------------------------------------------------
Re: J BROOKS - Liverpool v Newcastle (EFL)
DIR By: Joecphillips
Date: March 16, 2025, 2:05 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Charlieboy link ---
>
> [quote author=Lionator27 link=topic=6829.msg89817#msg89817
date=1742151195]
> Quite frankly if that’s the most controversial thing to happen
then you know it’s been a good day at the office
>
--- End Quote ---
I think it's only controversial because it is a disliked rival
team ,to a neutral it's not even a discussion. I think Mr
brooks and all team ref had an excellent game .
[/quote]
See i anticipated the route you'd take, that is given as hand
ball anywhere else on the pitch. I've seen plenty of discussion
elsewhere, maybe it's the dedication to protect the badge why
others here are protecting a fellow referee?
#Post#: 89824--------------------------------------------------
Re: J BROOKS - Liverpool v Newcastle (EFL)
DIR By: Charlieboy
Date: March 16, 2025, 2:11 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Joecphillips link ---
>
> [quote author=Charlieboy link=topic=6829.msg89819#msg89819
date=1742151462]
> [quote author=Lionator27 link=topic=6829.msg89817#msg89817
date=1742151195]
> Quite frankly if that’s the most controversial thing to happen
then you know it’s been a good day at the office
>
--- End Quote ---
I think it's only controversial because it is a disliked rival
team ,to a neutral it's not even a discussion. I think Mr
brooks and all team ref had an excellent game .
[/quote]
See i anticipated the route you'd take, that is given as hand
ball anywhere else on the pitch. I've seen plenty of discussion
elsewhere, maybe it's the dedication to protect the badge why
others here are protecting a fellow referee?
[/quote]
Nothing or nobody to protect, non event that as I said before
was obvious to any neutral.
#Post#: 89825--------------------------------------------------
Re: J BROOKS - Liverpool v Newcastle (EFL)
DIR By: Adam
Date: March 16, 2025, 2:18 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Joecphillips link ---
>
> [quote author=Lionator27 link=topic=6829.msg89817#msg89817
date=1742151195]
> Quite frankly if that’s the most controversial thing to happen
then you know it’s been a good day at the office
>
--- End Quote ---
2 kmi's wrong on the pitch isn't a good day
[/quote]
Correction: Newcastle winning for a Sunderland supporter is not
a good day*
#Post#: 89826--------------------------------------------------
Re: J BROOKS - Liverpool v Newcastle (EFL)
DIR By: Charlieboy
Date: March 16, 2025, 2:21 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Adam link ---
>
> [quote author=Joecphillips link=topic=6829.msg89818#msg89818
date=1742151424]
> [quote author=Lionator27 link=topic=6829.msg89817#msg89817
date=1742151195]
> Quite frankly if that’s the most controversial thing to happen
then you know it’s been a good day at the office
>
--- End Quote ---
2 kmi's wrong on the pitch isn't a good day
[/quote]
Correction: Newcastle winning for a Sunderland supporter is not
a good day*
[/quote]
Really ? I hadn’t thought of that , I’m sure the poster did not
allow that to cloud their judgement.
#Post#: 89827--------------------------------------------------
Re: J BROOKS - Liverpool v Newcastle (EFL)
DIR By: Joecphillips
Date: March 16, 2025, 2:36 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Charlieboy link ---
>
> [quote author=Joecphillips link=topic=6829.msg89822#msg89822
date=1742151946]
> [quote author=Charlieboy link=topic=6829.msg89819#msg89819
date=1742151462]
> [quote author=Lionator27 link=topic=6829.msg89817#msg89817
date=1742151195]
> Quite frankly if that’s the most controversial thing to happen
then you know it’s been a good day at the office
>
--- End Quote ---
I think it's only controversial because it is a disliked rival
team ,to a neutral it's not even a discussion. I think Mr
brooks and all team ref had an excellent game .
[/quote]
See i anticipated the route you'd take, that is given as hand
ball anywhere else on the pitch. I've seen plenty of discussion
elsewhere, maybe it's the dedication to protect the badge why
others here are protecting a fellow referee?
[/quote]
Nothing or nobody to protect, non event that as I said before
was obvious to any neutral.
[/quote]
At no point have I said it was a good day for me, combined with
how sunderland played yesterday terrible, don't really see how
good a day today has been is relevant but that's fine, how's
your day been?
I think it's pretty undeniable that not every kmi was correct on
the pitch.
#Post#: 89828--------------------------------------------------
Re: J BROOKS - Liverpool v Newcastle (EFL)
DIR By: Leggy
Date: March 16, 2025, 2:36 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Joecphillips link ---
>
> [quote author=TheThingFromLewes
link=topic=6829.msg89803#msg89803 date=1742146412]
> [quote author=Joecphillips link=topic=6829.msg89802#msg89802
date=1742146035]
> Might be called biased here but to me that was a hand ball
offence, travelled a distance and the arm is very outstretched
>
--- End Quote ---
No chance of a spot kick there… definite momentum and arms
naturally trying to slow down his run.
[/quote]
If it is natural why is it just one player slowing his run with
has arms raised?
[/quote]
"Natural" does not mean they identical. My natural walking pace
(as a postman) will be very different from the walking pace of a
funeral director.
#Post#: 89829--------------------------------------------------
Re: J BROOKS - Liverpool v Newcastle (EFL)
DIR By: TA_Ref
Date: March 16, 2025, 2:38 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Charlieboy link ---
>
> [quote author=Adam link=topic=6829.msg89825#msg89825
date=1742152691]
> [quote author=Joecphillips link=topic=6829.msg89818#msg89818
date=1742151424]
> [quote author=Lionator27 link=topic=6829.msg89817#msg89817
date=1742151195]
> Quite frankly if that’s the most controversial thing to happen
then you know it’s been a good day at the office
>
--- End Quote ---
2 kmi's wrong on the pitch isn't a good day
[/quote]
Correction: Newcastle winning for a Sunderland supporter is not
a good day*
[/quote]
Really ? I hadn’t thought of that , I’m sure the poster did not
allow that to cloud their judgement.
[/quote]
Come on guys, this isn’t what the forum is about. If that’s his
opinion and he can justify it then fair enough, we can hit agree
or disagree and then give our reasons why. We’re not here to
bash others because he supports the rival of another team. We
may think people’s opinions are wrong but we aren’t critical of
them as people.
As for John Brooks, a really solid afternoon from him. A
performance that I would say is typical Brooks. Authoritative
and fair. Doesn’t engage in too much conversation but still has
the respect of the players. Some minor things, Joelinton really
should have been punished for an almost clothesline pull on
Elliott. Then one or two free kicks where on a replay, the
defender got the ball but none of this detracts from a good
performance. I imagine Nick Greenhalgh will be disappointed with
the ruling out of the Liverpool goal but that’s what VAR is for,
to correct factual errors such as that.
I think all the officials can be pleased with their afternoon’s
work. Well done 👏
#Post#: 89830--------------------------------------------------
Re: J BROOKS - Liverpool v Newcastle (EFL)
DIR By: rustyref
Date: March 16, 2025, 2:51 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Joecphillips link ---
>
> [quote author=Charlieboy link=topic=6829.msg89819#msg89819
date=1742151462]
> [quote author=Lionator27 link=topic=6829.msg89817#msg89817
date=1742151195]
> Quite frankly if that’s the most controversial thing to happen
then you know it’s been a good day at the office
>
--- End Quote ---
I think it's only controversial because it is a disliked rival
team ,to a neutral it's not even a discussion. I think Mr
brooks and all team ref had an excellent game .
[/quote]
See i anticipated the route you'd take, that is given as hand
ball anywhere else on the pitch. I've seen plenty of discussion
elsewhere, maybe it's the dedication to protect the badge why
others here are protecting a fellow referee?
[/quote]
You really need to give the red and white blinkers a rest. Even
Carragher, probably the most biased of Liverpool fan, said it
wasn't a penalty.
It absolutely will not go down as an incorrect KMD, the arm was
in an acceptable position for the particular action being
performed.
#Post#: 89832--------------------------------------------------
Re: J BROOKS - Liverpool v Newcastle (EFL)
DIR By: ajb95
Date: March 16, 2025, 3:30 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Apart from not cautioning joelinton for a horrible bit of
thuggery in injury time brooks was faultless
*****************************************************
Page 3 of 4
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page