URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       RateTheRef
  HTML https://ratetheref.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: General Discussion
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 6453--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Craig Pawson Cardiff vs Chelsea
   DIR By: Footyfan
       Date: April 2, 2019, 5:44 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       If he goes out in a blaze of glory it will be the best bit of tv
       all season.
       #Post#: 6454--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Craig Pawson Cardiff vs Chelsea
   DIR By: Tim Wills
       Date: April 2, 2019, 7:54 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I am believer that decisions do tend to even themselves out
       although it can be hard to take at the time. York City's most
       recent spell in League Two came courtesy of an inept assistant
       in their Wembley Play-Off Final (not flagging our winner for
       offside) but a few seasons earlier, we lost at the semi-final
       stage thanks largely to the incompetence of the referee.
       However I also believe that Neil Warnock does have a point in
       regards to current crop of officials because basically you have
       only 5 decent referees in Atkinson, Dean, Marriner, Oliver and
       Taylor operating in the Premiership. As it is, you need 20
       referees (4th official duties) every weekend and the quality in
       depth simply isn't there at the moment. Yes you can fill a few
       holes with Friend, Moss, Probert and Pawson (perhaps this Sunday
       wasn't his finest hour) but then you've got the likes of Atwell,
       East, Hooper and Mason who quite frankly shouldn't be anywhere
       near a Premiership match.
       Maybe it is time to replace Mike Riley which might encourage
       Mark Clattenburg to return. Throw in a pair of Ed Shreeren
       tickets and I reckon you've got a deal.
       
       #Post#: 6466--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Craig Pawson Cardiff vs Chelsea
   DIR By: Kopref
       Date: April 3, 2019, 9:33 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       It cannot be denied that Mark was a very good referee but just
       like many of the best footballers it doesn't automatically
       follow he would be a great coach or manager. How did he do in
       the middle east on that score, I genuinly don't know and am not
       being sarcastic. Has he any previous experience that would lead
       you to think he has the qualities required to head up and manage
       an organisation. When you look at how well a company or a team
       are managed rarely does it come down to just one person. Would
       he make a good number two or is he too much of a maverick ? It
       is one thing being a good critic and being able to highlight
       where the shortcomings are it is entirely different when you are
       charged with doing it . You only have to listen to Hacket
       spewing  his words of wisdom and saying just how much is wrong
       and compare that with what he actually did when in office.
       #Post#: 6467--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Craig Pawson Cardiff vs Chelsea
   DIR By: Readingfan
       Date: April 3, 2019, 9:51 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Tim Wills link ---
       >
       > I am believer that decisions do tend to even themselves out
       although it can be hard to take at the time. York City's most
       recent spell in League Two came courtesy of an inept assistant
       in their Wembley Play-Off Final (not flagging our winner for
       offside) but a few seasons earlier, we lost at the semi-final
       stage thanks largely to the incompetence of the referee.
       >
       > However I also believe that Neil Warnock does have a point in
       regards to current crop of officials because basically you have
       only 5 decent referees in Atkinson, Dean, Marriner, Oliver and
       Taylor operating in the Premiership. As it is, you need 20
       referees (4th official duties) every weekend and the quality in
       depth simply isn't there at the moment. Yes you can fill a few
       holes with Friend, Moss, Probert and Pawson (perhaps this Sunday
       wasn't his finest hour) but then you've got the likes of Atwell,
       East, Hooper and Mason who quite frankly shouldn't be anywhere
       near a Premiership match.
       >
       > Maybe it is time to replace Mike Riley which might encourage
       Mark Clattenburg to return. Throw in a pair of Ed Shreeren
       tickets and I reckon you've got a deal.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       I think that Neil Warnock's suggestion that the officials are
       the worst in Europe was certainly an exaggeration but Henry
       Winter's observation that these are the worst set of top-flight
       English referees for a generation is perhaps worth exploring
       more. We shouldn't be too rose-tinted about the past because
       mistakes have always been made but I do think the overall depth
       now is weaker than at previous times.
       Personally I think that Michael Oliver, Mike Dean and Martin
       Atkinson (in roughly that order) have been the standout referees
       this season - two of those are obviously much nearer the end of
       their careers than the beginning.
       Anthony Taylor and Andre Marriner undoubtedly have ability as
       referees but I think have both have been a bit too inconsistent
       this season - some very good performances indeed but also too
       many that haven't been up to the standard they can deliver.
       The puzzling fact for me is identifying the issue beyond those
       you have mentioned. I actually think that Craig Pawson, Paul
       Tierney, Chris Kavanagh and David Coote have all developed
       (quite) well since being promoted to the Premier League,
       relative to the reasonable expectation to have from them.
       Equally, I think that Kevin Friend and Jon Moss have both had
       above-average seasons relative to their usual level.
       I think that Roger East, Lee Mason and Simon Hooper are the
       three weakest referees. I certainly think it's time that East
       and Mason stopped being active referees on the SG. It's Hooper's
       first season so I guess I would persist him with for one more
       year but expect to see a significant improvement to remain at
       this level.
       Perhaps part of the issue is there are too many middling issues
       that can do a steady job but little more. I think that Rob Jones
       and Andy Madley being promoted to the Premier League would be a
       boost to the quality level (certainly when they have had time to
       adapt) but as discussed before there also seems to be a shortage
       in quality in SG2 which means there are not a flood of referees
       there you could necessarily have high expectations of being a
       success.
       I don't know precisely who is 'responsible' for this situation,
       if indeed others agree that it is problematic. Would better
       coaching make a significant difference? Are there issues with
       identifying suitable talent at the lower levels early enough? Is
       there a problem with attracting or retaining enough referees of
       a sufficient quality? I'm not sure there is an easy answer and I
       have no idea what the difficult answer is!
       It does seem to me, as a closing remark, that SG referees are
       now often less likely to actively make a big decision. 10 or so
       years ago I think you were more likely to get harsh or erratic
       red cards or penalty awards but it at least felt that there was
       a group of strong officials who were willing to make decisions.
       It sometimes seems now that SG referees adopt to much of a
       low-profile style which can be great when a game is flowing but
       often leads to them failing to step up when required or penalise
       SFP challenges. This is one of the reasons why I rate Mike Dean
       so highly because it feels he is not afraid to make a big
       decision - this sometimes results in a harsh red card (e.g. the
       West Ham V Man Utd game a few years ago) but generally he is a
       strong and accurate decision maker and actually seems to have
       his own style rather than being a clone of others.
       #Post#: 6470--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Craig Pawson Cardiff vs Chelsea
   DIR By: Failed Ref
       Date: April 3, 2019, 11:01 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       How can you compare footballers of the past with the current
       players? You cannot. Likewise how can you compare the standards
       of yesterday with those of today? What is the benchmark? What is
       the quantifiable standard by which you can compare them? They
       are not there. Refereeing today is so march harder in a world
       where authority is questioned (witness again another pupil
       escorted out of class threatening another pupil and teacher).
       Factor in camera's everywhere, instant media coverage, cheating
       such as diving and pulling and that everyone has an opinion
       regardless of their qualifications, the job is far harder than
       it has ever been. At best you can compare referees of the
       current generation but that is all - the rest is subjective and
       newspaper column filling.
       #Post#: 6471--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Craig Pawson Cardiff vs Chelsea
   DIR By: Readingfan
       Date: April 3, 2019, 11:26 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Failed Ref link ---
       >
       > How can you compare footballers of the past with the current
       players? You cannot. Likewise how can you compare the standards
       of yesterday with those of today? What is the benchmark? What is
       the quantifiable standard by which you can compare them? They
       are not there. Refereeing today is so march harder in a world
       where authority is questioned (witness again another pupil
       escorted out of class threatening another pupil and teacher).
       Factor in camera's everywhere, instant media coverage, cheating
       such as diving and pulling and that everyone has an opinion
       regardless of their qualifications, the job is far harder than
       it has ever been. At best you can compare referees of the
       current generation but that is all - the rest is subjective and
       newspaper column filling.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       I would certainly agree that it is subjective but then that is
       true of many things. Suggesting that refereeing is harder now is
       a subjective view in itself and makes a comparison with
       refereeing of the past.
       I would tend to agree that there are probably more challenges
       facing referees now (although they also have more technological
       aid and so on than previous generations).
       In my opinion, there was a greater depth to the group of Premier
       League referees in the past - but I don't think that is an issue
       in itself. The more pertinent point is how the current group can
       be improved and whether there are changes required to the system
       to help improve the situation.
       #Post#: 6484--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Craig Pawson Cardiff vs Chelsea
   DIR By: reflector
       Date: April 3, 2019, 5:41 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       An interesting debate and one which I hope Is taking place
       within the higher echelons of football including the FA, Premier
       League and PGMOL.  Readingfan asks if better coaching would
       help.  The answer surely ought to be "yes" but referees at the
       top level have probably never had more coaching, management,
       scrutiny, training facilities, endless meetings as well, of
       course  time to prepare and distractions through not having to
       have other jobs and receiving decent pay and rewards from
       refereeing.  The sort of things which the likes  of Jack Taylor,
       George Courtney and Joe Worrall probably never even dreamed of.
       Yet, despite all of these aids to improve standards, there is
       still apparently a consensus that the present SG1 (not to
       mention SG2) as a group is just not good enough.  I am afraid I
       don't  have the answer but I have seen in other walks of life
       where performance can suffer where there is poor management and
       where perhaps people are subjected to too much scrutiny,
       appraisals and interference from their superiors, rather than
       too little.  Whether that's  the case here, I don't  know but
       certainly full time referees don't  seem to be the solution that
       many of us had expected or hoped.
       #Post#: 6488--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Craig Pawson Cardiff vs Chelsea
   DIR By: Whistleblower
       Date: April 4, 2019, 3:00 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Really interesting debate above. RTR at its best I think. Thank
       you to the contributors for their thoughtful analysis. It is
       difficult to compare generations of referees. What you can see
       across the years are those officials who possess a great
       authority about them and their decision making and those who
       possess much less.
       Refereeing in the top flight is much harder nowadays; I think
       the endemic cheating is a major factor and the scrutiny is
       intense which itself makes glaring highlights of errors which in
       the past would have been confined to a far smaller audience.
       The resources which modern referees have are so much greater
       than those which were enjoyed by Jack Taylor, George Courtney
       and Joe Worrall et al  but I do not think the resources can
       compensate for the added pressures and forensic dissection of
       every decision.
       #Post#: 6543--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Craig Pawson Cardiff vs Chelsea
   DIR By: Tim Wills
       Date: April 4, 2019, 1:19 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Ironically one of the biggest problems of the SG group (well at
       least SG1) is that they are now all professional referees. I
       know of 2 officials who would have been excellent in the
       Premiership but quit refereeing because they already decent jobs
       and didn't want to be made to choose between their outside
       career and refereeing. One continued as an assistant in Premier
       League (for a while) but the other became completely
       disillusioned and sadly packed the whole thing in.
       #Post#: 6545--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Craig Pawson Cardiff vs Chelsea
   DIR By: bmb
       Date: April 4, 2019, 1:40 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Tim Wills link ---
       >
       > Ironically one of the biggest problems of the SG group (well
       at least SG1) is that they are now all professional referees. I
       know of 2 officials who would have been excellent in the
       Premiership but quit refereeing because they already decent jobs
       and didn't want to be made to choose between their outside
       career and refereeing. One continued as an assistant in Premier
       League (for a while) but the other became completely
       disillusioned and sadly packed the whole thing in.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Very much the category Dean Whitesone seems to fall into.
       Excellent referee but has put his outside career first,
       understandably & as such simply cannot progress higher up the
       ladder. It's a shame.
       *****************************************************
       Page 4 of 6
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page