URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       RateTheRef
  HTML https://ratetheref.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: General Discussion
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 82976--------------------------------------------------
       Crystal Palace v Man Utd - David Coote
   DIR By: TA_Ref
       Date: September 21, 2024, 12:56 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Opinions on the Martinez two footed stamp? (admittedly on the
       ball). Thought it was a red in real time. I know there’s no
       contact but does it not come under serious foul play?
       #Post#: 82978--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Crystal Palace v Man Utd - David Coote
   DIR By: Pm2
       Date: September 21, 2024, 1:12 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I think whatever onfield decision is given with this will
       stand.good to see coote booking Henderson for dissent
       #Post#: 82981--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Crystal Palace v Man Utd - David Coote
   DIR By: Ref25
       Date: September 21, 2024, 1:30 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       It’s 100% a red card and I’m surprised there is no on field
       review.
       That ‘challenge’ has no place on a football field. A two footed
       jump down into the ball from directly above is not a genuine
       challenge for the ball. It clearly uses excessive force and
       endangers the safety of the opponent. The player does not have
       to make contact or succeed in injuring the opponent for it to be
       a red card.
       Has shades of a challenge last season in the Arsenal v Newcastle
       match (can’t remember who made the challenge) but a clear jump
       with excessive force towards the opponent and pure luck that the
       opponent wasn’t injured.
       #Post#: 82992--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Crystal Palace v Man Utd - David Coote
   DIR By: Original82
       Date: September 22, 2024, 1:24 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Not seen it, but PGMOL have said for years that if a challenge
       like that only touches the ball, then it's an automatic caution.
       If there is any contact with the player, then it is an automatic
       dismissal.
       #Post#: 82994--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Crystal Palace v Man Utd - David Coote
   DIR By: Hertsref123
       Date: September 22, 2024, 2:30 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Clear red for me, Coote seemed to have a good view of it, so not
       sure how he deemed otherwise. Another case of a SG1 official
       failing to recognise SFP.
       #Post#: 82997--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Crystal Palace v Man Utd - David Coote
   DIR By: Failed Ref
       Date: September 22, 2024, 3:21 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       And haven't PGMO issued statement to the effect that YC was
       correct because no contact was made with the player.
       Whatever opinion may be here, the referee got it right, VAR
       didn't need to get involved and didn't.
       I am uncomfortable about this as we are penalising the outcome
       rather than the player's action which is potentially dangerous
       but that is where we are. I saw something similar yesterday at
       Exeter v Tigers,  2 similar and dangerous actions by 2 players,
       force of impact determined the colour of the card. That is the
       outcome determines the card colour.
       #Post#: 83001--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Crystal Palace v Man Utd - David Coote
   DIR By: Marvin Grapevine
       Date: September 22, 2024, 5:19 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       If that's *not* a red card then the laws need to be changed so
       it is. It's indefensible IMO. Totally unnecessary and
       deliberate.
       I also think there was contact with the top of the Palace
       player's foot.
       #Post#: 83005--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Crystal Palace v Man Utd - David Coote
   DIR By: Lionator27
       Date: September 22, 2024, 6:04 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       This is the sort of challenge that the red card is there to use.
       It was not a mistimed lunge at the ball/player, it was a pure
       act of spiteful violence meeting the excessive force criteria
       (because he did not need to do it) and therefore should’ve been
       serious foul play and a dismissal.
       #Post#: 83017--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Crystal Palace v Man Utd - David Coote
   DIR By: Butch
       Date: September 22, 2024, 10:57 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Of course, Original82 is correct.
       Strange that nobody here has mentioned the penalty claim for
       handball, how (un)surprising.
       #Post#: 83046--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Crystal Palace v Man Utd - David Coote
   DIR By: Ref25
       Date: September 22, 2024, 3:30 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Failed Ref link ---
       >
       > And haven't PGMO issued statement to the effect that YC was
       correct because no contact was made with the player.
       > Whatever opinion may be here, the referee got it right, VAR
       didn't need to get involved and didn't.
       > …
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Please could you point to the PGMOL statement that says this?
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 1