URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       RateTheRef
  HTML https://ratetheref.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: General Discussion
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 79999--------------------------------------------------
       Comprehensive  review of Premier League referees and VARs from
       ESPN
   DIR By: Readingfan
       Date: May 23, 2024, 12:13 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       This article from Dale Johnson is the most comprehensive data
       review I've ever come across at the end of a Premier League
       season -
  HTML https://www.espn.com/soccer/insider/story/_/id/40150227/every-premier-league-var-error-ranking-winners-losers-referee-stats-2023-24?_nocache<br
       />
       It lists all the 31 VAR errors recorded by the Premier League's
       KMI panel across the season.
       It also makes reference to other errors recorded against each
       referee which weren't deemed relevant for VAR intervention -
       e.g. not clear and obvious or a 2nd yellow card.
       It also breaks down errors made by each VAR.
       Simon Hooper, John Brooks and impressively Sam Barrott seem to
       come out especially well as on-field referees. Anthony Taylor
       and Michael Oliver probably a bit under par. Craig Pawson and
       Stuart Attwell disappointing for their experience (you can see
       from this why Attwell didn't get Cup final! - doesn't seem his
       best season on-field or as VAR.) and bad figures for Michael
       Salsbury and Tony Harrington as referees. The likes of David
       Coote and Paul Tierney maybe do better on the pitch than some
       would expect according to these figures.
       In contrast, Salsbury seems to do very well as VAR (apart from
       on opening weekend of season!) Credit to him for that. Brooks
       also performs well as VAR. But Tierney and Attwell seemingly not
       so good.
       It might take you a while to go through it but I think it's
       definitely an article worth exploring and lots to discuss!
       #Post#: 80000--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Comprehensive  review of Premier League referees and VARs
       from ESPN
   DIR By: Pm2
       Date: May 23, 2024, 3:05 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       First of all, it’s unbelievable that Sam barrott has 15 games as
       an sg2.secondly only 2 interventions in 15 game is
       excellent.next season I could see him getting a few big games!
       #Post#: 80001--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Comprehensive  review of Premier League referees and VARs
       from ESPN
   DIR By: GingerReferee
       Date: May 23, 2024, 5:23 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Pm2 link ---
       >
       > First of all, it’s unbelievable that Sam barrott has 15 games
       as an sg2.secondly only 2 interventions in 15 game is
       excellent.next season I could see him getting a few big games!
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Some refs struggle to reach double figures in their first season
       after being promoted let alone in their trial season but Sam has
       been outstanding this season and fully deserves all the
       appointments.
       #Post#: 80003--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Comprehensive  review of Premier League referees and VARs
       from ESPN
   DIR By: Beacon
       Date: May 24, 2024, 2:38 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I think the danger with the article is that the sample sizes are
       too low. A sample size of 10 for Harrington with 5 VAR
       interventions is statistically too low to make any valid
       inference.
       #Post#: 80006--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Comprehensive  review of Premier League referees and VARs
       from ESPN
   DIR By: AndyF
       Date: May 24, 2024, 4:39 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Very interesting stuff, thanks for posting.
       The data doesn't take into account whether the on field referee
       has made a 'wrong decision' e.g. given yellow instead of red Vs
       having their view of an incident blocked
       #Post#: 80008--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Comprehensive  review of Premier League referees and VARs
       from ESPN
   DIR By: Ref Fan
       Date: May 24, 2024, 5:18 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Many thanks for posting Readingfan.
       As the last date ion the listed incidents was 15 May, do we
       assume it does not include the final matches on the 19th,
       bearing in mind there were several controversial incidents and
       decisions? It would have been interesting to know the Panel's
       verdict on the "foul" on Sterling in the Chelsea v Bournemouth
       game, and perhaps more so, the decision of Oliver to stick with
       no "handball" by Jesus when summoned to the monitor.
       Incidentally, I did wonder what the protocol would be if Oliver
       told VAR he didn't see any contact with the arm from his view. A
       missed incident.  Would Attwell, knowing it was a subjective
       decision, send Oliver to the screen anyway to make his decision,
       or do we assume that Attwell believed it to be handball and
       Oliver did overrule that opinion?
       #Post#: 80108--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Comprehensive  review of Premier League referees and VARs
       from ESPN
   DIR By: Readingfan
       Date: May 28, 2024, 10:00 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I'd presume it would include the final day as it would seem a
       bit odd to do a season review and not wait a few days if
       necessary to cover the final weekend.
       I presume the stats for number of games etc include final day
       and I'm sure there was one part which said 'There were X rounds
       of 38 where no errors were found to be made by VAR'.
       Do we know if Howard Webb's doing a final show with Owen to
       round off the season or is he on his holidays?
       #Post#: 80156--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Comprehensive  review of Premier League referees and VARs
       from ESPN
   DIR By: flipmode
       Date: May 31, 2024, 1:00 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I made a coffee, put myself in a Teams meeting on my own for an
       hour and thoroughly lost myself in this article today. As a
       nerd/data guy this spoke to my soul.
       Thanks so much for posting, [member=51]Readingfan[/member]
       I also echo the comment from [member=968]Pm2[/member] re Sam
       Barrot. I've not seen too much of him this season, but what I
       have I've been extremely impressed with his absent style and how
       he just blends into the background with minimal fuss. Would love
       for him to get some high profile games and continue this
       trajectory he's on.
       #Post#: 80210--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Comprehensive  review of Premier League referees and VARs
       from ESPN
   DIR By: Marvin Grapevine
       Date: June 3, 2024, 8:43 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The article needs to be seen as a pure PR piece, because that's
       what it is.
       For the most recent decision in my mind, there is absolutely no
       mention of the Semenyo foul on Sterling being an error. And any
       piece that doesn't conclude that as an error is clearly
       pointless.
       #Post#: 80216--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Comprehensive  review of Premier League referees and VARs
       from ESPN
   DIR By: Readingfan
       Date: June 4, 2024, 4:03 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Marvin Grapevine link ---
       >
       > The article needs to be seen as a pure PR piece, because
       that's what it is.
       >
       > For the most recent decision in my mind, there is absolutely
       no mention of the Semenyo foul on Sterling being an error. And
       any piece that doesn't conclude that as an error is clearly
       pointless.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       The article is quite clear on the data it is presenting and is
       very thorough in laying it out.
       Of course you can disagree with some of the panel's judgements
       if you wish but knowing exactly which errors have been recorded
       as VAR mistakes helps us to do that in a way we couldn't
       otherwise.
       I don't think the article would work if it also started saying
       'I thought the Chelsea V Bournemouth game also featured an error
       so I'm going to put that into the list too' as you'd just end up
       with blurred lines between the two.
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 2
   DIR Next Page