URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       RateTheRef
  HTML https://ratetheref.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: General Discussion
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 77978--------------------------------------------------
       Re: West Ham vs Wolves Tony - Tony Harrington (VAR - Tim
       Robinson)
   DIR By: Mikael W
       Date: April 8, 2024, 3:31 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: adcr85 link ---
       >
       > My Tuppence on this. Firstly I think the decision overall is
       correct.
       >
       > My main point, why is the striker there? Partially one for a
       flick on/rebound, but mostly to put off the keper. He is there
       to distract/confuse the keeper, makes contact with him whilst
       the ball is in the air. Now the fact that at the exact moment
       the ball is headed the striker is not in full/complete line of
       sight of the goalkeeper is a bit immaterial. He's still in
       peripheral vision, he still won't be able to dive forward, he's
       definitely in his personal space, so as I say for me - offside.
       >
       > For those in the media/on here who said the goalkeeper could
       move  - he shouldn't have to - he presumably decides not to have
       players on the post so that he can have the goalarea for
       himself, he shouldn't have to move because someone who is
       offside, simple as for me
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Completely agree, the big point for me is that the striker is
       deliberately standing there to put the keeper off, it isn't like
       he got 'caught up there by accident'.
       To add: the questions 'is VAR intervening to disallow goals like
       this is really good for the game?' and 'was the final decision
       correct?' lead to different answers, imo. Calls like this aren't
       especially new, either, there was one early on in the Manchester
       CL final of 2003 which was judged as correct by UEFA at the
       time.
       I can appreciate frustrations but many of the Wolves public
       statements after the game have not been made in good faith.
       #Post#: 77984--------------------------------------------------
       Re: West Ham wolves Tony Harrington(tim Robinson var)
   DIR By: bruntyboy
       Date: April 8, 2024, 6:42 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Elliot Abrahamsson link ---
       >
       > [quote author=bruntyboy link=topic=5870.msg77861#msg77861
       date=1712445130]
       > [quote author=Elliot Abrahamsson
       link=topic=5870.msg77828#msg77828 date=1712425475]
       > [quote author=Adam link=topic=5870.msg77826#msg77826
       date=1712424853]
       > [quote author=Pm2 link=topic=5870.msg77821#msg77821
       date=1712422578]
       > What do we think of the offside decision at the end.to me it
       looks like wolves might see another apology off Howard Webb
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       They deserve one. Absolutely scandalous decision, as quoted per
       Gary Oniell. Shambolic. Robinson and Harrington should be
       subjected to at least 1 week off completely. It shows a complete
       lack of understanding of football all around. Moyes says its
       dreadful, ONiell says its woeful, Fabianski says its wrong.
       Therefore it's a horrific call.
       [/quote]
       That's not how it works though, is it? Standing in front of a
       keeper in an offside position like that has for as long as I can
       remember nearly always been called offside, which it also is by
       the letter of the law. I can't even phantom Howard Webb giving
       them anything close to an apology for this one. I do absolutely
       understand that Wolves are frustated, I would likely also be if
       I was in their situation, but we have to look at what the rule
       says and how it's been applied constantly for years, and
       therefore offside is absolutely the correct call in this
       situation
       [/quote]
       I'll give you one which wasn't given. Arsenal v Manchester
       United last season.
       [/quote]
       Which decision are you thinking about? I just watched all the
       goals from these two games, and I can't find anything that is
       even remotely similar to this
       [/quote]
       Sorry it was the previous season with the Xhaka goal.
       #Post#: 78022--------------------------------------------------
       Re: West Ham vs Wolves Tony - Tony Harrington (VAR - Tim
       Robinson)
   DIR By: ryan80
       Date: April 9, 2024, 3:49 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The fact that Harrington has been appointed on Saturday to
       Bournemouth v Man Utd suggests that he has the full support of
       Webb for the decisions on Saturday.
       #Post#: 78163--------------------------------------------------
       Re: West Ham vs Wolves Tony - Tony Harrington (VAR - Tim
       Robinson)
   DIR By: Seagull
       Date: April 12, 2024, 9:47 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Disallowing Wolves' late goal against West Ham was correct, the
       KMI Panel has ruled. Gary O'Neil has been charged with
       misconduct by the F.A.
  HTML https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/68796858
       #Post#: 78164--------------------------------------------------
       Re: West Ham vs Wolves Tony - Tony Harrington (VAR - Tim
       Robinson)
   DIR By: RefGod
       Date: April 12, 2024, 10:10 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Harrington dominated the PGMOL Premier League clips this week
       across different fixtures but it was made clear that the line of
       sight incident is a routine offside and wasn't presented as
       remotely controversial.
       #Post#: 78168--------------------------------------------------
       Re: West Ham vs Wolves Tony - Tony Harrington (VAR - Tim
       Robinson)
   DIR By: bmb
       Date: April 12, 2024, 12:09 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Seagull link ---
       >
       > Disallowing Wolves' late goal against West Ham was correct,
       the KMI Panel has ruled. Gary O'Neil has been charged with
       misconduct by the F.A.
       >
       >
  HTML https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/68796858
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Having been charged he is still coming out with utter rubbish
       like "It's still deemed by the officials to be correct which
       concerns me“
       Seriously!! He should be more concerned about his complete lack
       of knowledge and understanding of the LOTG.
       I’d suggest a punishment of a touch line ban until he has passed
       a LOTG test.
       *****************************************************
       Page 3 of 3
   DIR Previous Page