DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
RateTheRef
HTML https://ratetheref.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: General Discussion
*****************************************************
#Post#: 67153--------------------------------------------------
S Atwell - Man Utd V Nottm Forest
DIR By: Jevontheref
Date: August 27, 2023, 2:53 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Anyone seen the penalty given?
Not for me
#Post#: 67154--------------------------------------------------
Re: S Atwell - Man Utd V Nottm Forest
DIR By: dave26
Date: August 27, 2023, 2:58 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Soft and harsh but not wrong VAR must have decided there was
sufficient contact do I agree ?probably not but I thought
Rashford didn’t make a big thing out of it he got straight back
to his feet.
#Post#: 67157--------------------------------------------------
Re: S Atwell - Man Utd V Nottm Forest
DIR By: Joecphillips
Date: August 27, 2023, 3:47 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Don't think it was a red card ball wasn't under control and
there's a covering defender and the keeper has a good chance of
claiming it he is coming for it then stops as the player goes
down
#Post#: 67160--------------------------------------------------
Re: S Atwell - Man Utd V Nottm Forest
DIR By: ajb95
Date: August 27, 2023, 3:53 am
---------------------------------------------------------
As MOTD highlights showed Rashford knee was clipped by Danilo’s
leg causing him to lose balance. A clear foul. Soft maybe but
clear.
Red card I also think is correct, he is actually fouling
fernandes before the final contact, which hampers his movement.
Without this fernandes has a clear shot on goal with the keeper
on the edge of the box. Another good decision. Quick clear and
decisive so well done to Attwell!
#Post#: 67170--------------------------------------------------
Re: S Atwell - Man Utd V Nottm Forest
DIR By: Ref Fan
Date: August 27, 2023, 5:29 am
---------------------------------------------------------
I thought part of the controversy about the RC was whether
Fernandes had a tug of his opponent's shirt first. If that
wasn't seen nor deemed sufficient by VAR to warrant an OFR, then
the RC was correct imo.
The penalty was not wrong as others have said but it was harsh.
I couldn't help thinking about the hefty barge by Paqueta
against Brighton, which Anthony Taylor waved away, presumably as
a fair shoulder charge. Even if it was shoulder to shoulder,
and replays cast some doubt on that as it appeared more the side
of the back, how heavy does a barge have to be to require a
penalty to be awarded? That was certainly enough to knock the
attacker off his feet.
#Post#: 67178--------------------------------------------------
Re: S Atwell - Man Utd V Nottm Forest
DIR By: RCG
Date: August 27, 2023, 7:21 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Well he certainly ensured he hit the floor with both arms
outstretched in front and a bit of a jump!!
#Post#: 67179--------------------------------------------------
Re: S Atwell - Man Utd V Nottm Forest
DIR By: Hendo
Date: August 27, 2023, 7:25 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Ref Fan link ---
>
> I thought part of the controversy about the RC was whether
Fernandes had a tug of his opponent's shirt first. If that
wasn't seen nor deemed sufficient by VAR to warrant an OFR, then
the RC was correct imo.
>
> The penalty was not wrong as others have said but it was
harsh. I couldn't help thinking about the hefty barge by
Paqueta against Brighton, which Anthony Taylor waved away,
presumably as a fair shoulder charge. Even if it was shoulder
to shoulder, and replays cast some doubt on that as it appeared
more the side of the back, how heavy does a barge have to be to
require a penalty to be awarded? That was certainly enough to
knock the attacker off his feet.
>
--- End Quote ---
Depends who and where. If you are a Wolves player at Old
Trafford and the goalkeeper barges into you it’s not a penalty,
even though Webb, Moss and Co apologise and Hooper and his team
are banned for a week.
#Post#: 67185--------------------------------------------------
Re: S Atwell - Man Utd V Nottm Forest
DIR By: ajb95
Date: August 27, 2023, 9:16 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Hendo link ---
>
> [quote author=Ref Fan link=topic=5144.msg67170#msg67170
date=1693132151]
> I thought part of the controversy about the RC was whether
Fernandes had a tug of his opponent's shirt first. If that
wasn't seen nor deemed sufficient by VAR to warrant an OFR, then
the RC was correct imo.
>
> The penalty was not wrong as others have said but it was
harsh. I couldn't help thinking about the hefty barge by
Paqueta against Brighton, which Anthony Taylor waved away,
presumably as a fair shoulder charge. Even if it was shoulder
to shoulder, and replays cast some doubt on that as it appeared
more the side of the back, how heavy does a barge have to be to
require a penalty to be awarded? That was certainly enough to
knock the attacker off his feet.
>
--- End Quote ---
Depends who and where. If you are a Wolves player at Old
Trafford and the goalkeeper barges into you it’s not a penalty,
even though Webb, Moss and Co apologise and Hooper and his team
are banned for a week.
[/quote]
Where was your comment on the stonewall handball that Man United
were denied last week at Tottenham, a key decision at 0-0. Sre
are you just an anti-United hater?
#Post#: 67187--------------------------------------------------
Re: S Atwell - Man Utd V Nottm Forest
DIR By: guest308
Date: August 27, 2023, 10:00 am
---------------------------------------------------------
This is NOT the forum for partisan fan arguing thank you,
please stick to discussing the referees decisions in a
constructive manner or else moderated posts will have to follow
so we can check before they go live . You have been warned
thanks.
#Post#: 67201--------------------------------------------------
Re: S Atwell - Man Utd V Nottm Forest
DIR By: TheThingFromLewes
Date: August 27, 2023, 10:55 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: charlieboy link ---
>
> This is NOT the forum for partisan fan arguing thank you,
please stick to discussing the referees decisions in a
constructive manner or else moderated posts will have to follow
so we can check before they go live . You have been warned
thanks.
>
--- End Quote ---
We certainly don’t want bmb to get her whip out to dish out some
punishment do we! 😂😂😂
*****************************************************
Page 1 of 2
DIR Next Page