DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
RateTheRef
HTML https://ratetheref.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: General Discussion
*****************************************************
#Post#: 61524--------------------------------------------------
A M LAHOZ (VAR: M IRRATI): ARSENAL V SPORTING LISBON
DIR By: Adam
Date: March 16, 2023, 3:02 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
This should be an interesting game from the refs point of view.
Wouldn't have said that these 2 are the best combo based on
their own individual shenanigans but let's see.
Being fair he's been the Lahoz of old in the first half. Great
performance so far.
Great 90'. Just needs to keep it up for another 30'. Lovely
advantage for the Lisbon goal.
#Post#: 61535--------------------------------------------------
Re: A M LAHOZ (VAR: M IRRATI): ARSENAL V SPORTING LISBON
DIR By: bg9
Date: March 16, 2023, 5:17 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
However good Lahoz has been I absolutely hate the way he
conducts himself by emphatically telling players to get up which
I feel is sometimes quite aggressive
I know many of you here will probably disagree
#Post#: 61536--------------------------------------------------
Re: A M LAHOZ (VAR: M IRRATI): ARSENAL V SPORTING LISBON
DIR By: jacksamuel21
Date: March 16, 2023, 5:56 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Crazy tackle and an absolutely correct second yellow. Lahoz is
crazy the way he deals with it. I am certainly not a fan of
Lahoz and his antics.
Arsenal staff and players clearly don’t know the laws with
Holding not being part of the penalties due to the RC
#Post#: 61537--------------------------------------------------
Re: A M LAHOZ (VAR: M IRRATI): ARSENAL V SPORTING LISBON
DIR By: MCPridz
Date: March 16, 2023, 6:02 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Thought Lahoz was ok, unfortunately for us the 3 penalties that
we would have got all of our players were offside in the build
up and all the correct decisions, but the thing that got me and
I didn't know this was that we had to lose a penalty taker for
the shootout because sporting went down to ten men, didn't know
that was a thing just thought it would role back around if it
got that far but It didn't bu also think it is slightly unfair
because why should we lose a penalty taker because the
opposition had a player sent off
#Post#: 61539--------------------------------------------------
Re: A M LAHOZ (VAR: M IRRATI): ARSENAL V SPORTING LISBON
DIR By: TillysDad
Date: March 16, 2023, 6:14 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
What it actually means is your weakest player doesn’t need to
take a penalty
#Post#: 61540--------------------------------------------------
Re: A M LAHOZ (VAR: M IRRATI): ARSENAL V SPORTING LISBON
DIR By: Claretman
Date: March 16, 2023, 6:17 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: MCPridz link ---
>
> Thought Lahoz was ok, unfortunately for us the 3 penalties
that we would have got all of our players were offside in the
build up and all the correct decisions, but the thing that got
me and I didn't know this was that we had to lose a penalty
taker for the shootout because sporting went down to ten men,
didn't know that was a thing just thought it would role back
around if it got that far but It didn't bu also think it is
slightly unfair because why should we lose a penalty taker
because the opposition had a player sent off
>
--- End Quote ---
It should be an advantage to lose a penalty taker in such a case
as you can nominate the person you least think will score, you
still get the same amount of kicks but you rest your worst
kicker.
Thought Lahoz had a pretty good game, only major query was
playing advantage when the sporting player received a second
yellow resulting in a red and another sporting player then
committed a foul for which he received a yellow too.
Unfortunately for Martinelli football has a habit of kicking you
in the teeth.
#Post#: 61542--------------------------------------------------
Re: A M LAHOZ (VAR: M IRRATI): ARSENAL V SPORTING LISBON
DIR By: rustyref
Date: March 16, 2023, 6:24 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
That was the sort of game that Lahoz is really good at.
Entertaining end to end game, he had minimal need to get
involved, and the players clearly like him. The dangerous side
of Lahoz, when things get heated, just started to creep in
during stoppage time and he started to deploy his crazed
approach of racing between situations getting overly emotional.
#Post#: 61544--------------------------------------------------
Re: A M LAHOZ (VAR: M IRRATI): ARSENAL V SPORTING LISBON
DIR By: MCPridz
Date: March 16, 2023, 6:31 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Claretman link ---
>
> [quote author=MCPridz link=topic=4686.msg61537#msg61537
date=1679007776]
> Thought Lahoz was ok, unfortunately for us the 3 penalties
that we would have got all of our players were offside in the
build up and all the correct decisions, but the thing that got
me and I didn't know this was that we had to lose a penalty
taker for the shootout because sporting went down to ten men,
didn't know that was a thing just thought it would role back
around if it got that far but It didn't bu also think it is
slightly unfair because why should we lose a penalty taker
because the opposition had a player sent off
>
--- End Quote ---
It should be an advantage to lose a penalty taker in such a case
as you can nominate the person you least think will score, you
still get the same amount of kicks but you rest your worst
kicker.
Thought Lahoz had a pretty good game, only major query was
playing advantage when the sporting player received a second
yellow resulting in a red and another sporting player then
committed a foul for which he received a yellow too.
Unfortunately for Martinelli football has a habit of kicking you
in the teeth.
[/quote]
Yeah Sporting deserved it we ere poor in spells, did think Lahoz
did let a few things go but he was better than I thought he was
going to be and feared the worse, but going back to the
penalties situation, I think it would of been a advantage even
to have our worse taker because if it got that far which it
didn't there GK would of been stepping up against one of our
outfield players giving us an advantage, but like I said didn't
get that far anyway and sporting deserved it, just wish Ramsdale
had stayed on his line, or our players stayed onside, would of
rather had lost in 90 than play 120 and lose on pens with a
crucial league game coming up at weekend
#Post#: 61546--------------------------------------------------
Re: A M LAHOZ (VAR: M IRRATI): ARSENAL V SPORTING LISBON
DIR By: Claretman
Date: March 16, 2023, 8:53 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: MCPridz link ---
>
> [quote author=Claretman link=topic=4686.msg61540#msg61540
date=1679008624]
> [quote author=MCPridz link=topic=4686.msg61537#msg61537
date=1679007776]
> Thought Lahoz was ok, unfortunately for us the 3 penalties
that we would have got all of our players were offside in the
build up and all the correct decisions, but the thing that got
me and I didn't know this was that we had to lose a penalty
taker for the shootout because sporting went down to ten men,
didn't know that was a thing just thought it would role back
around if it got that far but It didn't bu also think it is
slightly unfair because why should we lose a penalty taker
because the opposition had a player sent off
>
--- End Quote ---
It should be an advantage to lose a penalty taker in such a case
as you can nominate the person you least think will score, you
still get the same amount of kicks but you rest your worst
kicker.
Thought Lahoz had a pretty good game, only major query was
playing advantage when the sporting player received a second
yellow resulting in a red and another sporting player then
committed a foul for which he received a yellow too.
Unfortunately for Martinelli football has a habit of kicking you
in the teeth.
[/quote]
Yeah Sporting deserved it we ere poor in spells, did think Lahoz
did let a few things go but he was better than I thought he was
going to be and feared the worse, but going back to the
penalties situation, I think it would of been a advantage even
to have our worse taker because if it got that far which it
didn't there GK would of been stepping up against one of our
outfield players giving us an advantage, but like I said didn't
get that far anyway and sporting deserved it, just wish Ramsdale
had stayed on his line, or our players stayed onside, would of
rather had lost in 90 than play 120 and lose on pens with a
crucial league game coming up at weekend
[/quote]
Some goalkeepers take penalties well and some let their keeper
take them during the 90 mins, not many admittedly but alec
stepney comes to mind for one.
#Post#: 61548--------------------------------------------------
Re: A M LAHOZ (VAR: M IRRATI): ARSENAL V SPORTING LISBON
DIR By: bmb
Date: March 16, 2023, 10:15 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: MCPridz link ---
>
> Thought Lahoz was ok, unfortunately for us the 3 penalties
that we would have got all of our players were offside in the
build up and all the correct decisions, but the thing that got
me and I didn't know this was that we had to lose a penalty
taker for the shootout because sporting went down to ten men,
didn't know that was a thing just thought it would role back
around if it got that far but It didn't bu also think it is
slightly unfair because why should we lose a penalty taker
because the opposition had a player sent off
>
--- End Quote ---
Because that is what the LOTG say has to happen.
Law 10.3:
If at the end of the match and before or during the kicks one
team has a greater number of players than its opponents, it must
reduce its numbers to the same number as its opponents and the
referee must be informed of the name and number of each player
excluded. Any excluded player is not eligible to take part in
the kicks
*****************************************************
Page 1 of 3
DIR Next Page