DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
RateTheRef
HTML https://ratetheref.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: General Discussion
*****************************************************
#Post#: 60838--------------------------------------------------
Arsenal vs. Bournemouth, Christopher Kavanagh [VAR: Brooks]
DIR By: Mikael W
Date: March 4, 2023, 2:36 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Many incidents for Kavanagh today on his PL return. He could
have hoped for a quieter game back! Clips here:
18' - (Holding?)
HTML https://streamable.com/bfng5p
34' - (Handball?)
HTML https://streamable.com/esvr27
45' - (Kicking?)
HTML https://streamable.com/6z9pap
67' - (Pushing?)
HTML https://streamable.com/d87yy4
79' - (Handball?)
HTML https://streamable.com/lg4j1d
80' - (Handball?)
HTML https://streamable.com/kuv9n7
#Post#: 60840--------------------------------------------------
Re: Arsenal vs. Bournemouth, Christopher Kavanagh [VAR: Brooks]
DIR By: Alex04
Date: March 4, 2023, 2:48 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
34' handball should be a penalty. The kick on Tomiyasu is worse
than the one on Jesus when Arsenal played Liverpool and Michael
Oliver gave a penalty straight away.
#Post#: 60843--------------------------------------------------
Re: Arsenal vs. Bournemouth, Christopher Kavanagh [VAR: Brooks]
DIR By: tef
Date: March 4, 2023, 3:18 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I think potentially the clearest one is the kick through
Tomiyasu on 45’ although can’t be totally sure from the one
angle shown in that clip.
Of the handball ones i think the only one which had a really
strong case is the first one. The others are v close range and
arms seem tucked into body, so not for me.
Not the quiet match back behind the screen John Brooks might’ve
been looking for but at least no howlers or major controversy
#Post#: 60846--------------------------------------------------
Re: Arsenal vs. Bournemouth, Christopher Kavanagh [VAR: Brooks]
DIR By: bmb
Date: March 4, 2023, 5:06 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
5 penalty shouts if my memory serves and as an AFCB fan I feel
we possibly got away with 2 maybe even 3, one of the handballs -
the Phil Bill one, it's debatable if his hands can be considered
natural as he was protecting his face, albeit they were close to
his body & the Mepham one was very close to the defining line
and his arm was out, it could be argued due to him jumping but I
certainly breathed a sigh of relief when the VAR check was over
on that one, also the kick through. Very busy day for Brooks in
the bunker at Stockley Park.
Thought Kav was excellent. Might seem strange with so many
incidents and 2 possibly 3 that could easily have gone a
different way but I don't think he could have made different
calls on any of them in real time, 3 of the handballs the arms
were close in on the body, the one that wasn't was more shoulder
than arm and the kick he was looking at head height because that
is where play was and I'd say the feet were obscured in any
event.
He wore blue so that's brownie points. As for the +6TAO - if
Smudger hadn't decided to go down for no reason for 43 seconds
then another minute wouldn't have been added on so it's on him.
A first in the PL a goal scored in the first 9 seconds and the
last 9 seconds!
#Post#: 60853--------------------------------------------------
Re: Arsenal vs. Bournemouth, Christopher Kavanagh [VAR: Brooks]
DIR By: Ref95
Date: March 5, 2023, 5:18 am
---------------------------------------------------------
For me, all decisions are just about correct, Arsenal seemed to
get very desperate (understandably so) towards the end and
appealed for everything so well done to Kav!
Having said that, if he had given any of them, I wouldn’t expect
them to be overturned.
Arsenal can probably count themself unlucky not to have at least
one of them go their way, but they certainly can’t say the
referee got the calls wrong.
#Post#: 60873--------------------------------------------------
Re: Arsenal vs. Bournemouth, Christopher Kavanagh [VAR: Brooks]
DIR By: MCPridz
Date: March 5, 2023, 11:08 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Not being biased here and Kav had a decent game but I think bar
the Billing handball that would of been harsh as he literally
headed it on to Billings arm from less than a yard away, the
rest should of been given especially the Mepham one and the foul
on Tomi the rest are debatable but on another day could of been
given
#Post#: 60874--------------------------------------------------
Re: Arsenal vs. Bournemouth, Christopher Kavanagh [VAR: Brooks]
DIR By: JCFC
Date: March 5, 2023, 11:16 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Triple wince!
#Post#: 61014--------------------------------------------------
Re: Arsenal vs. Bournemouth, Christopher Kavanagh [VAR: Brooks]
DIR By: Seagull
Date: March 7, 2023, 7:56 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Multiple offences of "entering the field of play without the
permission of the Referee" I presume?
HTML https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/64865319
#Post#: 61017--------------------------------------------------
Re: Arsenal vs. Bournemouth, Christopher Kavanagh [VAR: Brooks]
DIR By: MCPridz
Date: March 7, 2023, 8:21 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Seagull link ---
>
> Multiple offences of "entering the field of play without the
permission of the Referee" I presume?
>
>
HTML https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/64865319
>
--- End Quote ---
And probably how a kid got on the touchline
*****************************************************
Page 1 of 1