DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       RateTheRef
  HTML https://ratetheref.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: General Discussion
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 54951--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Manchester City v Brentford- Peter Bankes (VAR: David Coote)
   DIR By: Leggy
       Date: November 13, 2022, 7:17 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Mikael W link ---
       >
       > [quote author=TVOS link=topic=4164.msg54910#msg54910
       date=1668275629]
       > [quote author=Mikael W link=topic=4164.msg54899#msg54899
       date=1668265050]
       > Detecting Cancelo's dive was very good because Bankes used
       pure intuition (or to say it another way - he guessed) to get
       the decision correct - he was caught too far right and not in a
       good position to assess the incident. Good call. Many, many KMIs
       which will/would need a detailed look back on but overall I saw
       a very competent but only modestly able referee (no real
       advantages for him in personality, movement, decision-taking
       etc) referee today - PGMOL made the right decision to hook
       Bankes from the FIFA list, his prospects internationally would
       be quite limited.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       How do you know he guessed?
       [/quote]
       Well I don't know, and it was obviously an "educated guess"
       rather than a 'stab in the dark', but it is pretty obvious that
       he took this decision from 'experience' rather than excellent
       perception/positioning. You can see that he is craining his next
       to look through a number of players, and then his first reaction
       is not to blow up for a dive, but instead to run left, and then
       he 'works out' that probably it was simulation so signals a
       defensive freekick and gives the yellow card. Bankes had two
       oppotunities to run left to get the perfect 'insight angle' into
       the penalty area incident, declined both, and was fortunate that
       a 'corridor' opened up through the Brentford players so he could
       get a half-decent view.
       However, any discussion like that should be in the 'developing
       for the future' heading is all is part conjecture, as he got the
       decision right.
       (@Adam - this was a good/very good decision; an "excellent"
       decision would be to caution Foden too for blatant mobbing :)).
       EDIT: see this image, the black square is where the referee
       ought to have been positioned.
  HTML https://imgur.com/a/brdS1Ms
       [/quote]
       Another referee struggling because they did not take a wider
       patrol path.  He would have had a clearer view had he been 10
       yards wider - even if that would have meant being 10 yards
       further away.
       Edited to fix quote thingamajigga, bmb
       #Post#: 54954--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Manchester City v Brentford- Peter Bankes (VAR: David Coote)
   DIR By: Ref Fan
       Date: November 13, 2022, 8:04 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       A wider position may have given Bankes a clearer view in terms
       of less players to obstruct it, but I suspect as it happened he
       had a better angle to judge whether or not there was any
       contact.  Apart from a City player who I felt should have been
       cautioned, I thought it was a solid performance from Mr Bankes.
       *****************************************************
       Page 2 of 2
   DIR Previous Page