URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       RateTheRef
  HTML https://ratetheref.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: General Discussion
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 53161--------------------------------------------------
       Crystal Palace vs. Chelsea, Christopher Kavanagh [VAR: Attwell]
   DIR By: Mikael W
       Date: October 1, 2022, 5:02 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       SPA or DOGSO?
  HTML https://streamja.com/lePXg
       #Post#: 53162--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Crystal Palace vs. Chelsea, Christopher Kavanagh [VAR:
       Attwell]
   DIR By: jacksamuel21
       Date: October 1, 2022, 5:04 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       DOGSO for me
       #Post#: 53164--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Crystal Palace vs. Chelsea, Christopher Kavanagh [VAR:
       Attwell]
   DIR By: TheThingFromLewes
       Date: October 1, 2022, 5:19 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       So the premier league returns and we are talking about the
       incompetence of VAR and the on field officials once again.
       It’s a clear DOGSO because had Silva not played the ball with
       his hand the Palace player was through on goal with no covering
       defender in sight. It has to be a red.
       I cannot fathom how VAR has accepted the yellow card.
       Even sending Kavanagh to the monitor would have been the
       absolute minimum, but a FIFA official should have really dealt
       with it on the field.
       #Post#: 53165--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Crystal Palace vs. Chelsea, Christopher Kavanagh [VAR:
       Attwell]
   DIR By: Gorgeous George
       Date: October 1, 2022, 5:21 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Am I being daft or is the safest decision to give the defensive
       free kick for Ayew barging into Silva?
       #Post#: 53167--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Crystal Palace vs. Chelsea, Christopher Kavanagh [VAR:
       Attwell]
   DIR By: jacksamuel21
       Date: October 1, 2022, 5:23 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: TheThingFromLewes link ---
       >
       > So the premier league returns and we are talking about the
       incompetence of VAR and the on field officials once again.
       >
       > It’s a clear DOGSO because had Silva not played the ball with
       his hand the Palace player was through on goal with no covering
       defender in sight. It has to be a red.
       >
       > I cannot fathom how VAR has accepted the yellow card.
       >
       > Even sending Kavanagh to the monitor would have been the
       absolute minimum, but a FIFA official should have really dealt
       with it on the field.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       This incident reminds me so much of Bowen and Konsa incident in
       Aston Villa vs West Ham with Chris Kavanagh the referee (Stuart
       Attwell the VAR that day as well) with the yellow then upgraded
       to red.
       Stuart Attwell really should have intervened.
       #Post#: 53168--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Crystal Palace vs. Chelsea, Christopher Kavanagh [VAR:
       Attwell]
   DIR By: jacksamuel21
       Date: October 1, 2022, 5:24 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Gorgeous George link ---
       >
       > Am I being daft or is the safest decision to give the
       defensive free kick for Ayew barging into Silva?
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Would have been so so soft
       #Post#: 53169--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Crystal Palace vs. Chelsea, Christopher Kavanagh [VAR:
       Attwell]
   DIR By: USRef10
       Date: October 1, 2022, 5:42 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Not DOGSO for me because of distance from goal and direction of
       the ball.  Ayu still 35yds from goal and would’ve played towards
       the touch line to get past Silva.  And not clear on goal with
       Chilwell central and retreating towards goal.
       DOGSO very harsh from that distance.
       #Post#: 53170--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Crystal Palace vs. Chelsea, Christopher Kavanagh [VAR:
       Attwell]
   DIR By: tef
       Date: October 1, 2022, 6:09 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I’m more leaning towards SPA than DOGSO but it’s very tight.
       It’s the kind of cynical deliberate action that deserves to be
       red but obviously it has to fit with what’s in Law. Not sure I
       could be 100% sure Ayew is doing all of controlling it, then
       moving goal bound whilst outpacing the already retreating
       defenders, and then getting a shot away.
       I think the optimal outcome would’ve been to invite Kavanagh to
       have a look for himself and confirm what he thought he saw, but
       that’s obviously not the PGMOL protocol. .
       #Post#: 53171--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Crystal Palace vs. Chelsea, Christopher Kavanagh [VAR:
       Attwell]
   DIR By: jacksamuel21
       Date: October 1, 2022, 6:18 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       It’s certainly one that if if it’s given as a red onfield it’s
       not overturned
       #Post#: 53173--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Crystal Palace vs. Chelsea, Christopher Kavanagh [VAR:
       Attwell]
   DIR By: bmb
       Date: October 1, 2022, 9:16 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: USRef10 link ---
       >
       > Not DOGSO for me because of distance from goal and direction
       of the ball.  Ayu still 35yds from goal and would’ve played
       towards the touch line to get past Silva.  And not clear on goal
       with Chilwell central and retreating towards goal.
       >
       > DOGSO very harsh from that distance.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Agreed
       distance between the offence and the goal - too far out
       general direction of the play - he was running more towards the
       touchline not towards goal
       likelihood of keeping or gaining control of the ball - possible
       location and number of defenders - other defenders on their way
       back who would have been in position by the time he reached
       closer to goal
       Does not tick the boxes for DOGSO but does for SPA so yellow
       card & free kick correct by the ref & VAR on the possible red
       card review. Correct call by Kavanagh & Attwell.
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 3
   DIR Next Page