DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
RateTheRef
HTML https://ratetheref.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: General Discussion
*****************************************************
#Post#: 52802--------------------------------------------------
Watford v Sunderland John Busby
DIR By: Joecphillips
Date: September 17, 2022, 9:49 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Clear penalty missed, none of the ball brings the man down
HTML https://streamable.com/xlkn1o
#Post#: 52811--------------------------------------------------
Re: Watford v Sunderland
DIR By: robbieg
Date: September 17, 2022, 2:07 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
BBC have the referee as Bobby Madley.
That is definitely not him.
#Post#: 52812--------------------------------------------------
Re: Watford v Sunderland
DIR By: TVOS
Date: September 17, 2022, 2:29 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: robbieg link ---
>
> BBC have the referee as Bobby Madley.
>
>
> That is definitely not him.
>
--- End Quote ---
John Busby
#Post#: 52814--------------------------------------------------
Re: Watford v Sunderland
DIR By: Acme Thunderer
Date: September 17, 2022, 2:47 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
It would be useful if the referee could be listed under the
'subject heading'.
#Post#: 52815--------------------------------------------------
Re: Watford v Sunderland
DIR By: yfc54
Date: September 17, 2022, 2:48 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
It was a penalty all day, all night, every day of the year and
even the Watford commentary team agreed
#Post#: 52879--------------------------------------------------
Re: Watford v Sunderland John Busby
DIR By: rustyref
Date: September 19, 2022, 3:27 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Absolutely no chance. He has felt contact on his back and
thrown himself to the floor.
#Post#: 52896--------------------------------------------------
Re: Watford v Sunderland John Busby
DIR By: Joecphillips
Date: September 20, 2022, 1:33 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: rustyref link ---
>
> Absolutely no chance. He has felt contact on his back and
thrown himself to the floor.
>
--- End Quote ---
That contact being the foul, contact to the back of his leg and
then a push in the back.
#Post#: 52901--------------------------------------------------
Re: Watford v Sunderland John Busby
DIR By: Joecphillips
Date: September 21, 2022, 6:23 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: charlieboy link ---
>
> [quote author=Joecphillips link=topic=3987.msg52896#msg52896
date=1663698791]
> [quote author=rustyref link=topic=3987.msg52879#msg52879
date=1663619244]
> Absolutely no chance. He has felt contact on his back and
thrown himself to the floor.
>
--- End Quote ---
That contact being the foul, contact to the back of his leg and
then a push in the back.
[/quote]
The red and white tints have clearly blinded your view. That is
the clearest case of simulation I have seen the referees only
mistake was not to caution .
[/quote]As has been stated the Watford commentators also stated
how blatant a penalty it is, have their red and white tints also
blinded their view?
#Post#: 52902--------------------------------------------------
Re: Watford v Sunderland John Busby
DIR By: yfc54
Date: September 21, 2022, 7:04 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Clear penalty. No tints of any colour required.
#Post#: 52904--------------------------------------------------
Re: Watford v Sunderland John Busby
DIR By: Ashington46
Date: September 21, 2022, 9:48 am
---------------------------------------------------------
I am intrigued because two posters state that it was a clear
penalty, however, the officials obviously didn't think so and
here we are 4 days later discussing an obvious non-event as far
as officialdom is concerned.
*****************************************************
Page 1 of 2
DIR Next Page