DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
RateTheRef
HTML https://ratetheref.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: General Discussion
*****************************************************
#Post#: 51003--------------------------------------------------
Wayne Cartmel, Dorking v. Chesterfield 06.08.22
DIR By: Seagull
Date: August 11, 2022, 7:00 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Who would YOU caution? No.6 or No.3 and why?
HTML https://fanbanter.co.uk/you-cant-have-referees-making-mistakes-like-that-chesterfield-to-appeal-defenders-ban/?fbclid=IwAR3wWLigmyohjzTkpITryz-gp2z9Bla4syJyWxNji9XTXa67Sng-CGT3oI8
#Post#: 51005--------------------------------------------------
Re: Wayne Cartmel, Dorking v. Chesterfield 06.08.22
DIR By: lincs22
Date: August 11, 2022, 7:35 am
---------------------------------------------------------
A simple decision - No 6. slow to retrieve the ball, then
rolling down the line. Defo - delay of game....
#Post#: 51012--------------------------------------------------
Re: Wayne Cartmel, Dorking v. Chesterfield 06.08.22
DIR By: Seagull
Date: August 11, 2022, 11:23 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: lincs22 link ---
>
> A simple decision - No 6. slow to retrieve the ball, then
rolling down the line. Defo - delay of game....
>
--- End Quote ---
Looks like several of us are all agreed that no.6 should have
been cautioned rather than no.3. A mistake by Mr. Cartmel I
would say. Just proves that all Refs are human! [emoji1]
#Post#: 51013--------------------------------------------------
Re: Wayne Cartmel, Dorking v. Chesterfield 06.08.22
DIR By: RCG
Date: August 11, 2022, 11:43 am
---------------------------------------------------------
And then dissent 4 arguing his player couldnt be sent off
😆😆😆😆😆😆
#Post#: 51014--------------------------------------------------
Re: Wayne Cartmel, Dorking v. Chesterfield 06.08.22
DIR By: guest308
Date: August 11, 2022, 11:50 am
---------------------------------------------------------
I think Paul cook who I’m not a fan of has a fair point here ,
referees at this level can’t be making that sort f mistake,
human yes but just not concentrating properly, and if he really
thought he cautioned the right player then he doesn’t deserve to
referee that level, period!
#Post#: 51029--------------------------------------------------
Re: Wayne Cartmel, Dorking v. Chesterfield 06.08.22
DIR By: Wollongong Ref
Date: August 12, 2022, 2:50 am
---------------------------------------------------------
The player who was sent for timewasting really didn't do
anything wrong, it was his mate. A poor decision especially for
a second YC.
The send off of the keeper had terrible mechanics about it. I
would say that the AR was tipped him off, and if that is the
case it is poor from the referee as that part of the field is
really his. I would say and I realise I only say a 6 min clip
but that the referee lacked presence and authority. THis referee
can add a lot to his game.
#Post#: 51035--------------------------------------------------
Re: Wayne Cartmel, Dorking v. Chesterfield 06.08.22
DIR By: Seagull
Date: August 12, 2022, 3:50 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Wollongong Ref link ---
>
> The player who was sent for timewasting really didn't do
anything wrong, it was his mate. A poor decision especially for
a second YC.
> The send off of the keeper had terrible mechanics about it. I
would say that the AR was tipped him off, and if that is the
case it is poor from the referee as that part of the field is
really his. I would say and I realise I only say a 6 min clip
but that the referee lacked presence and authority. THis referee
can add a lot to his game.
>
--- End Quote ---
I agree re the second YC situation. Wrong player cautioned. Re
the GK red card, to be fair to Mr. Cartmel, I suspect he
followed the ball and play up field so could be forgiven for not
seeing what the GK did. Perfectly acceptable for the AR to draw
his attention to misconduct. That forms part of his duties as an
AR.
#Post#: 51038--------------------------------------------------
Re: Wayne Cartmel, Dorking v. Chesterfield 06.08.22
DIR By: Rosstheref
Date: August 12, 2022, 3:57 am
---------------------------------------------------------
I think the other player who was slow the rolled the ball away
should have been cautioned. I wonder if he knew the other player
was already on a Caution and if he did realise then he wouldn't
have done it? Just a lapse in concentration but I'm sure he'll
learn from it, with this being his first season at this level.
#Post#: 51041--------------------------------------------------
Re: Wayne Cartmel, Dorking v. Chesterfield 06.08.22
DIR By: Ref Watcher
Date: August 12, 2022, 5:06 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Seagull link ---
>
> [quote author=lincs22 link=topic=3879.msg51005#msg51005
date=1660221312]
> A simple decision - No 6. slow to retrieve the ball, then
rolling down the line. Defo - delay of game....
>
--- End Quote ---
Looks like several of us are all agreed that no.6 should have
been cautioned rather than no.3. A mistake by Mr. Cartmel I
would say. Just proves that all Refs are human! [emoji1]
[/quote]
It doesn't prove that ALL refs are human; just this one. ;)
#Post#: 51077--------------------------------------------------
Re: Wayne Cartmel, Dorking v. Chesterfield 06.08.22
DIR By: guest308
Date: August 13, 2022, 8:14 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Second yellow card and subsequent one match suspension has quite
rightly been rescinded. On grounds of mistaken identity….. hmmm
yeah right.
*****************************************************
Page 1 of 2
DIR Next Page