DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
RateTheRef
HTML https://ratetheref.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: General Discussion
*****************************************************
#Post#: 45256--------------------------------------------------
David Coote. Chelsea v Newcastle
DIR By: Comeonref
Date: March 13, 2022, 11:10 am
---------------------------------------------------------
I don’t support either side. My post is really about the inept
performance of the referee. The whole 90 mins he just didn’t
seem interested. A non descript referee. His overall decision
making was poor throughout and he got the critical decisions
wrong. For me Havertz should have received a red card
endangering the safety of the player. He missed a clear penalty
for a double shirt pull on Murphy. As for VAR I will saying
nothing but I despair. To add insult to injury of course the
player who should not have been on the field scores the winner.
#Post#: 45258--------------------------------------------------
Re: David Coote. Chelsea v Newcastle
DIR By: Seagull
Date: March 13, 2022, 11:35 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Comeonref link ---
>
> I don’t support either side. My post is really about the inept
performance of the referee. The whole 90 mins he just didn’t
seem interested. A non descript referee. His overall decision
making was poor throughout and he got the critical decisions
wrong. For me Havertz should have received a red card
endangering the safety of the player. He missed a clear penalty
for a double shirt pull on Murphy. As for VAR I will saying
nothing but I despair. To add insult to injury of course the
player who should not have been on the field scores the winner.
>
--- End Quote ---
I didn't see the game so I'm not in a position to comment on
decisions but in response to a player who maybe shouldn't have
been on the field scoring the winner, I can only say "twas ever
thus". When I was active, I found that when adding time on for
time wasting, the guilty team would sometimes score a goal which
affected the outcome of the game. Oh, the irony/Sod's Law.
[emoji52]
#Post#: 45259--------------------------------------------------
Re: David Coote. Chelsea v Newcastle
DIR By: Deanspen
Date: March 13, 2022, 11:40 am
---------------------------------------------------------
I support neither side, but I am very surprised that the
Havertz challenge wasn’t deemed a red.
#Post#: 45260--------------------------------------------------
Re: David Coote. Chelsea v Newcastle
DIR By: Phil42
Date: March 13, 2022, 11:42 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Comeonref link ---
>
> I don’t support either side. My post is really about the inept
performance of the referee. The whole 90 mins he just didn’t
seem interested. A non descript referee. His overall decision
making was poor throughout and he got the critical decisions
wrong. For me Havertz should have received a red card
endangering the safety of the player. He missed a clear penalty
for a double shirt pull on Murphy. As for VAR I will saying
nothing but I despair. To add insult to injury of course the
player who should not have been on the field scores the winner.
>
--- End Quote ---
"A non-descript referee". The perfect way to describe Coote (and
probably a few others - Bankes comes to mind). How on earth he
holds one of England's valuable FIFA badges is beyond me. I
can't wait for the day that there is an overhaul of the English
refs holding FIFA badges (Pawson another one) and those more
deserving are rewarded with one (Gillett). How many years before
this happens though is another question...
#Post#: 45261--------------------------------------------------
Re: David Coote. Chelsea v Newcastle
DIR By: Jake the Peg
Date: March 13, 2022, 11:49 am
---------------------------------------------------------
If the penalty incident had happened outside the box, would
Coote have blown for a free kick? Of course he would. Puts me
in mind of the blatant penalty Newcastle weren't given against
Man City when Edison wiped out Fraser. Everyone in the world
apart from the ref and Guardiola thought it was nailed on.
#Post#: 45263--------------------------------------------------
Re: David Coote. Chelsea v Newcastle
DIR By: d394829
Date: March 13, 2022, 12:05 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
It seems to me that David Coote is refereeing fifty or sixty
years too late from what I'm reading.
#Post#: 45267--------------------------------------------------
Re: David Coote. Chelsea v Newcastle
DIR By: Scally Bob
Date: March 13, 2022, 1:07 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I didn’t see this game so nothing to add about it but it’s
telling that you say he didn’t look interested. I saw him
referee Liverpool v Shrewsbury Town in the FA Cup earlier this
season and that was exactly what I thought. At the time I
wondered if he thought it was beneath him not having a tie
involving two Premier League sides.
#Post#: 45268--------------------------------------------------
Re: David Coote. Chelsea v Newcastle
DIR By: ajb95
Date: March 13, 2022, 1:14 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
How Coote has got to the level he has is one of the great,
recent refereeing mysteries. I saw him once in the FL and
thought he was bang average and I have seen him many times in
the PL and have never been convinced. Next to no player
relationship, very card happy and little control.
Clear red card and a clear penalty. Teams deserve better than
these poor officials in the middle and on VAR
#Post#: 45269--------------------------------------------------
Re: David Coote. Chelsea v Newcastle
DIR By: JCFC
Date: March 13, 2022, 1:29 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: ajb95 link ---
>
> Teams deserve better than these poor officials in the middle
and on VAR
>
--- End Quote ---
They would maybe deserve better if they cut out all the
simulation, false claiming, dissent et cetera and instead played
the game honestly.
If they did, the refereeing would immediately become much less
controversial - and yes, better.
#Post#: 45271--------------------------------------------------
Re: David Coote. Chelsea v Newcastle
DIR By: guest308
Date: March 13, 2022, 1:35 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
One of the poorest refereeing performances of the season by
arguably one of the poorest select group officials, never mind
though mike Riley will just say sorry and we all move on …….to
the next dreadful decision.
*****************************************************
Page 1 of 3
DIR Next Page