DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
RateTheRef
HTML https://ratetheref.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: General Discussion
*****************************************************
#Post#: 42822--------------------------------------------------
A MARRINER - Tottenham v Chelsea EFL
DIR By: TheThingFromLewes
Date: January 12, 2022, 2:30 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
VAR correct to overrule the penalty call. I actually think
Ledger on the far side said penalty as Marriner wouldn’t have
been able to see it.
I am surprised however that Rudiger avoided any punishment for
the foul.
It wasn’t DOGSO for a red, however definitely a yellow card
should have been issued.
#Post#: 42824--------------------------------------------------
Re: A MARRINER - Tottenham v Chelsea
DIR By: TheThingFromLewes
Date: January 12, 2022, 3:00 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Definitely not a penalty when Moura was fouled by Kepa. VAR
correct to override for the second time.
#Post#: 42825--------------------------------------------------
Re: A MARRINER - Tottenham v Chelsea
DIR By: Irishref1985
Date: January 12, 2022, 3:10 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
And VAR intervening for a third time to rule out a Harry Kane
goal for offside.. 10/10 for Mike Dean and Mark Scholes so
far.....
#Post#: 42826--------------------------------------------------
Re: A MARRINER - Tottenham v Chelsea
DIR By: tef
Date: January 12, 2022, 3:12 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Perfect example tonight of the benefits of VAR when it’s used
well . Two penalty howlers and now the Spurs offside.
A bit of sympathy with Marriner for the first pen as AR2 clearly
was the one who called it, but the second one was just poor.
#Post#: 42829--------------------------------------------------
Re: A MARRINER - Tottenham v Chelsea
DIR By: bruntyboy
Date: January 12, 2022, 3:39 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: TheThingFromLewes link ---
>
> Definitely not a penalty when Moura was fouled by Kepa. VAR
correct to override for the second time.
>
--- End Quote ---
I haven't seen the incident but if he was "fouled by Kepa" then
why wouldn't it be a penalty? Or are you saying he wasn't fouled
by Kepa?
#Post#: 42830--------------------------------------------------
Re: A MARRINER - Tottenham v Chelsea
DIR By: TheThingFromLewes
Date: January 12, 2022, 3:51 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: bruntyboy link ---
>
> [quote author=TheThingFromLewes
link=topic=3280.msg42824#msg42824 date=1642021252]
> Definitely not a penalty when Moura was fouled by Kepa. VAR
correct to override for the second time.
>
--- End Quote ---
I haven't seen the incident but if he was "fouled by Kepa" then
why wouldn't it be a penalty? Or are you saying he wasn't fouled
by Kepa?
[/quote]
Well spotted. I should have written “tackled”.
#Post#: 42831--------------------------------------------------
Re: A MARRINER - Tottenham v Chelsea
DIR By: dave26
Date: January 12, 2022, 3:52 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: bruntyboy link ---
>
> [quote author=TheThingFromLewes
link=topic=3280.msg42824#msg42824 date=1642021252]
> Definitely not a penalty when Moura was fouled by Kepa. VAR
correct to override for the second time.
>
--- End Quote ---
I haven't seen the incident but if he was "fouled by Kepa" then
why wouldn't it be a penalty? Or are you saying he wasn't fouled
by Kepa?
[/quote]
There definately wasn’t a foul by Kepa , he took the ball
cleanly , Marriner would have been better to let play develop
and send the penalty appeal to VAR
#Post#: 42832--------------------------------------------------
Re: A MARRINER - Tottenham v Chelsea
DIR By: Readingfan
Date: January 12, 2022, 4:09 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
A good job there was VAR involved it seems - otherwise Tottenham
might have scored 3 goals and levelled the tie!
#Post#: 42833--------------------------------------------------
Re: A MARRINER - Tottenham v Chelsea
DIR By: Claretman
Date: January 12, 2022, 4:14 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Not Andre’s best night tonight, pretty sure he went with Ledger
for the first one.
Unusual for Andre to have given penalties and to have them over
turned, it normally has to be stonewall for him to give one.
At least bmb will be pleased he was wearing black and not that
ghastly unmentionable colour.
Well done to the card shark in var, hope is as good on sat late
afternoon as i fear he may be needed.
#Post#: 42846--------------------------------------------------
Re: A MARRINER - Tottenham v Chelsea
DIR By: Ref Watcher
Date: January 13, 2022, 4:10 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: dave26 link ---
>
> [quote author=bruntyboy link=topic=3280.msg42829#msg42829
date=1642023582]
> [quote author=TheThingFromLewes
link=topic=3280.msg42824#msg42824 date=1642021252]
> Definitely not a penalty when Moura was fouled by Kepa. VAR
correct to override for the second time.
>
--- End Quote ---
I haven't seen the incident but if he was "fouled by Kepa" then
why wouldn't it be a penalty? Or are you saying he wasn't fouled
by Kepa?
[/quote]
There definately wasn’t a foul by Kepa , he took the ball
cleanly , Marriner would have been better to let play develop
and send the penalty appeal to VAR
[/quote]
I know they allow play to develop for VAR to check later when
there is an offside "just in case" but surely they are not
supposed to do that when a foul is involved. That seems like a
recipe for all sorts of retribution to take place.
*****************************************************
Page 1 of 3
DIR Next Page