URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       RateTheRef
  HTML https://ratetheref.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: General Discussion
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 42331--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Anthony Taylor Chelsea V Liverpool
   DIR By: Whistleblower
       Date: January 3, 2022, 9:51 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: PhiltheRef link ---
       >
       > Irrespective of the parties involved surely it is very
       dangerous to go down the "he has previous" line.
       > Assess every incident on it's individual merits we are told
       and he did.
       > As stated elsewhere there was dialogue involving 4O AR and VAR
       with a unanimous concensus that YC was appropriate
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Do we know it was unanimous? Unless we hear a taped recording of
       the conversation between the participants surely all we can know
       is that Taylor decided the correct sanction was a caution and
       not a sending off. If all the participants were indeed of a
       unanimous opinion then in my unequivocal view, they were
       unanimously wrong. An opinion shared by Henry Winter writing in
       today's Times and the pundits on Match of the Day. Our opinion
       though doesn't count materially, only Anthony Taylor's does and
       whilst acknowledging his undoubted status, I am 100% convinced
       in my own mind that his decision was wrong.
       It's an interesting point about the " he has previous" argument.
       I have heard many senior referees say that a good knowledge of
       players and their  behaviours is invaluable in officiating and
       drawing distinctions. I don't know if Taylor subscribes to this
       view or not. Of course each incident must be judged on its
       apparent merits but previous knowledge of previous conducts can,
       I think, be legitimately employed in making a correct
       interpretation of what has been seen.
       #Post#: 42332--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Anthony Taylor Chelsea V Liverpool
   DIR By: rustyref
       Date: January 3, 2022, 10:16 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: PhiltheRef link ---
       >
       > Because it was a huge decision for him to make so early in the
       game and he was keen to get opinions. Atkinson would have been
       able to see the coverage of the incident I believe
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       The 4th official absolutely cannot use any pitchside video even
       if they have line of sight of one.  Also VAR protocol does not
       allow the referee and VAR to discuss the incident prior to
       making a decision, rather VAR can only become involved after a
       decision has been made.  So in this case it could only be after
       Mane was shown the yellow card.
       #Post#: 42335--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Anthony Taylor Chelsea V Liverpool
   DIR By: Hertsref123
       Date: January 3, 2022, 11:19 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: PhiltheRef link ---
       >
       > Irrespective of the parties involved surely it is very
       dangerous to go down the "he has previous" line.
       > Assess every incident on it's individual merits we are told
       and he did.
       > As stated elsewhere there was dialogue involving 4O AR and VAR
       with a unanimous concensus that YC was appropriate
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Point taken, but even just judging on individual merits, it
       still meets the threshold for a red card Imo.
       #Post#: 42341--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Anthony Taylor Chelsea V Liverpool
   DIR By: PhiltheRef
       Date: January 3, 2022, 1:50 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       But they do
       #Post#: 42342--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Anthony Taylor Chelsea V Liverpool
   DIR By: rustyref
       Date: January 3, 2022, 2:07 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: PhiltheRef link ---
       >
       > But they do
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Well they should be pulled up on it then as it isn't allowed and
       they aren't using VAR as it is supposed to be used.  Which
       probably explains why it is such a shambles in this country even
       though it works fine elsewhere.
       #Post#: 42360--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Anthony Taylor Chelsea V Liverpool
   DIR By: PhiltheRef
       Date: January 4, 2022, 3:35 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       No argument from me with that
       #Post#: 42362--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Anthony Taylor Chelsea V Liverpool
   DIR By: Readingfan
       Date: January 4, 2022, 3:59 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: PhiltheRef link ---
       >
       > No argument from me with that
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       The broadcasters can hear what the VAR is saying so I doubt they
       would be involved too much in the discussion before a decision
       is made.
       I think the suggestion PL VAR was very different from elsewhere
       a few years ago was valid but I'm less sure now.
       (I'm just surprised no one has suggested it was cruel to send
       Taylor, not to mention Atkinson and England, all the way down to
       London on a Bank Holiday weekend !  :wink )
       #Post#: 42388--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Anthony Taylor Chelsea V Liverpool
   DIR By: PhiltheRef
       Date: January 4, 2022, 9:23 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Well given the volume of opprobrium received when last I
       commented, I decided that discretion trumped valour and kept my
       cake hole shut 😉😉
       *****************************************************
       Page 3 of 3
   DIR Previous Page