URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       RateTheRef
  HTML https://ratetheref.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: General Discussion
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 38945--------------------------------------------------
       Craig Pawson : Arsenal vs Aston Villa 
   DIR By: dave26
       Date: October 22, 2021, 2:58 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Oh dear imo a poor first half by Pawson books Watkins within the
       opening 90 seconds a couple of arsenal players  could easily
       have been carded but no sanction from Pawson the arsenal penalty
       on the stroke of half time I’m not fully convinced is there
       sufficient contact for a penalty ? Is it a clear and obvious
       error ? Not for me   MPawson just doesn’t look as confident as
       he has done for the past few months
       #Post#: 38946--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Craig Pawson : Arsenal vs Aston Villa 
   DIR By: TheThingFromLewes
       Date: October 22, 2021, 3:01 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I thought the penalty decision was terrible…. Lacazette was
       already falling over before the contact and I certainly wouldn’t
       have called it a clear and obvious error.
       Even Pawson clearly mouthed “played the ball” which Targett did.
       The problem is that as soon as Oliver calls Pawson to the
       monitor it’s going to be given. 🙄
       #Post#: 38947--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Craig Pawson : Arsenal vs Aston Villa 
   DIR By: carrowman
       Date: October 22, 2021, 3:06 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: TheThingFromLewes link ---
       >
       > I thought the penalty decision was terrible…. Lacazette was
       already falling over before the contact and I certainly wouldn’t
       have called it a clear and obvious error.
       >
       > Even Pawson clearly mouthed “played the ball” which Targett
       did.
       >
       >
       > The problem is that as soon as Oliver calls Pawson to the
       monitor it’s going to be given. 🙄
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       I agree, but if Oliver says it's a penalty can't see many of his
       colleagues would overrule him. Makes me even more worried about
       tomorrow lunchtime :)
       #Post#: 38948--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Craig Pawson : Arsenal vs Aston Villa 
   DIR By: dave26
       Date: October 22, 2021, 3:11 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Like me and TTFL say it wasn’t s clear and obvious error so VAR
       Michael Oliver shouldn’t have got involved
       #Post#: 38949--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Craig Pawson : Arsenal vs Aston Villa 
   DIR By: Guidedog
       Date: October 22, 2021, 3:12 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Have I misrecalled the law or should play not finish when the
       kicker kicks the ball for the second time ?
       #Post#: 38950--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Craig Pawson : Arsenal vs Aston Villa 
   DIR By: Scally Bob
       Date: October 22, 2021, 3:50 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Guidedog link ---
       >
       > Have I misrecalled the law or should play not finish when the
       kicker kicks the ball for the second time ?
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       I thought a penalty kick could be taken after time us up but I
       never thought further time for a second bite of the cherry could
       be added on. I know with a kicks from the penalty mark shoot
       outs the kick is completed when the referee decides and in such
       a case the follow-up wouldn’t be allowed. Surely the same
       principle applies when time is up?
       #Post#: 38951--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Craig Pawson : Arsenal vs Aston Villa 
   DIR By: GingerReferee
       Date: October 22, 2021, 4:04 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       For me, yes an arsenal fan, Pawson had an alright game. I missed
       the first 3 minutes, so missed the Watkins booking so can't
       comment. I thought it was a penalty real time but lacazette
       throwing himself to the the floor didn't help. Yes Matt Targett
       gets the ball but he goes through the man to do so, so I think
       Michael Oliver is correct to send Pawson to look at it. I think
       he missed a couple of yellow cards but all the ones he did give
       were correct
       #Post#: 38952--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Craig Pawson : Arsenal vs Aston Villa 
   DIR By: Claretman
       Date: October 22, 2021, 5:07 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Guidedog link ---
       >
       > Have I misrecalled the law or should play not finish when the
       kicker kicks the ball for the second time ?
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Here is a quote from ifab.
       Quote:
       Additional time is allowed for a penalty kick to be taken and
       completed at the end of each half of the match or extra time.
       When additional time is allowed, the penalty kick is completed
       when, after the kick has been taken, the ball stops moving, goes
       out of play, is played by any player (including the kicker)
       other than the defending goalkeeper, or the referee stops play
       for an offence by the kicker or the kicker’s team. If a
       defending team player (including the goalkeeper) commits an
       offence and the penalty is missed/saved, the penalty is retaken.
       Unquote:
       Unsure if this is the same if a penalty is awarded after a var
       check, when the referee has blown the final whistle for the
       half.
       It did seem strange at the time, had pawson blown for half time
       before going to the screen?, if he hadnt then i guess he would
       add the remaining time on from when the kick was taken, hence
       the rebound score being allowed and the restart taken.
       If he had blown for half time the law would suggest the half
       time whistle should be blown when the goalkeeper made the save
       or latest when the attacker hit the rebound and thus no goal
       allowed.
       Tbh as a villa supporter i have to say villa were by far the
       worst of the three teams on the field and were lucky
       Not to have lost by a higher margin.
       I did find that the referee seemed a little random and slightly
       inconsistent with his production of yellow cards, especially
       when fouls were committed by the team in red, sometimes things
       go for you and sometimes they dont.
       With regards to the penalty decision, i personally didnt think
       there was a clear and obvious error, but our top fifa ref as var
       did so we will have to accept that. As is often said read
       tomorrows paper.
       Whilst humans are officiating and are var operators we will
       always have differing opinions and inconsistencies.
       Well played the arsenal.
       #Post#: 38954--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Craig Pawson : Arsenal vs Aston Villa 
   DIR By: Whistleblower
       Date: October 23, 2021, 2:51 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Claretman link ---
       >
       > [quote author=Guidedog link=topic=2982.msg38949#msg38949
       date=1634933556]
       > Have I misrecalled the law or should play not finish when the
       kicker kicks the ball for the second time ?
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Here is a quote from ifab.
       Quote:
       Additional time is allowed for a penalty kick to be taken and
       completed at the end of each half of the match or extra time.
       When additional time is allowed, the penalty kick is completed
       when, after the kick has been taken, the ball stops moving, goes
       out of play, is played by any player (including the kicker)
       other than the defending goalkeeper, or the referee stops play
       for an offence by the kicker or the kicker’s team. If a
       defending team player (including the goalkeeper) commits an
       offence and the penalty is missed/saved, the penalty is retaken.
       Unquote:
       Unsure if this is the same if a penalty is awarded after a var
       check, when the referee has blown the final whistle for the
       half.
       It did seem strange at the time, had pawson blown for half time
       before going to the screen?, if he hadnt then i guess he would
       add the remaining time on from when the kick was taken, hence
       the rebound score being allowed and the restart taken.
       If he had blown for half time the law would suggest the half
       time whistle should be blown when the goalkeeper made the save
       or latest when the attacker hit the rebound and thus no goal
       allowed.
       Tbh as a villa supporter i have to say villa were by far the
       worst of the three teams on the field and were lucky
       Not to have lost by a higher margin.
       I did find that the referee seemed a little random and slightly
       inconsistent with his production of yellow cards, especially
       when fouls were committed by the team in red, sometimes things
       go for you and sometimes they dont.
       With regards to the penalty decision, i personally didnt think
       there was a clear and obvious error, but our top fifa ref as var
       did so we will have to accept that. As is often said read
       tomorrows paper.
       Whilst humans are officiating and are var operators we will
       always have differing opinions and inconsistencies.
       Well played the arsenal.
       [/quote]
       May I commend  you Claretman for a model of a reasoned,
       objective and fair minded post. I didn't see the match so can't
       comment on its incidents but you as a supporter of the losing
       team, set exactly the right tone. Extremely heartening to read.
       Thank you.
       #Post#: 38955--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Craig Pawson : Arsenal vs Aston Villa 
   DIR By: Mikael W
       Date: October 23, 2021, 4:10 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: TheThingFromLewes link ---
       >
       > I thought the penalty decision was terrible…. Lacazette was
       already falling over before the contact and I certainly wouldn’t
       have called it a clear and obvious error.
       >
       > Even Pawson clearly mouthed “played the ball” which Targett
       did.
       >
       > The problem is that as soon as Oliver calls Pawson to the
       monitor it’s going to be given. 🙄
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Agree - Lacazette is actually late to the duel, and deliberately
       puts his leg across Targett's in order to block the latter's
       kick, and ensure he gets kicked himself.
       It is actually more of a defensive freekick, than a penalty, to
       be honest. It's a shame that because the incident 'looks' clear
       from a rudimentary perspective, that Oliver felt that he could
       not not intervene, if you get what I'm trying to say.
       Clip is below:
  HTML https://streamable.com/qrko3m
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 3
   DIR Next Page