URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       RateTheRef
  HTML https://ratetheref.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: General Discussion
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 30332--------------------------------------------------
       C KAVANAGH - West Ham v Chelsea 
   DIR By: TheThingFromLewes
       Date: April 24, 2021, 1:09 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Another game ruined by the incompetence of Big Brother, and
       Kavanagh (who could have not issued the red and said no issue)
       to send off Balbuena.
       If that’s a red card for the follow through we might as well
       pack up and go home.
       #Post#: 30334--------------------------------------------------
       Re: C KAVANAGH - West Ham v Chelsea 
   DIR By: PhiltheRef
       Date: April 24, 2021, 1:11 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Woeful and abject.
       How is he supposed to stop his foot?
       #Post#: 30335--------------------------------------------------
       Re: C KAVANAGH - West Ham v Chelsea 
   DIR By: Carter
       Date: April 24, 2021, 1:11 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Agree, what is meant to do after kicking a ball.
       #Post#: 30336--------------------------------------------------
       Re: C KAVANAGH - West Ham v Chelsea 
   DIR By: sastley
       Date: April 24, 2021, 1:19 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       My initial thought on watching the game was Utter Rubbish on the
       red card. Absolutely no intent. Not only is tackling being
       outlawed, kicking the ball is. Anybody who understands football
       knows when you kick a ball you have to follow through, sheer
       physics. The very good game has been spoilt by a shocking
       decision. I hope the card is successfully appealed and somebody
       gives Chris Kavanagh and Peter Bankes some sound advice on the
       game. Very poor.
       #Post#: 30337--------------------------------------------------
       Re: C KAVANAGH - West Ham v Chelsea 
   DIR By: Ref Fan
       Date: April 24, 2021, 1:33 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I'm just not so sure about no intent.  My initial reaction on
       seeing the replay was that there was a sort of extended and
       unnecessary second movement with the foot turned up and studs
       showing.  It didn't come as a complete surprise when VAR
       recommended Kavanagh to look at the monitor. If he took the view
       that the follow through was excessive and endangered an
       opponent, I can see a case for a RC.
       Fully expect to be in a minority of one and advised to visit
       Specsavers.  My only plea is age!
       Just to clarify. I'm not suggesting a RC was 100% correct, but I
       don't think the incident was as clear cut as posters so far have
       stated, and there's certainly a doubt in my mind as to whether
       the West Ham player was entirely innocent.
       #Post#: 30338--------------------------------------------------
       Re: C KAVANAGH - West Ham v Chelsea 
   DIR By: Ashington46
       Date: April 24, 2021, 1:42 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       New instructions to be given by managers to players will have to
       be along the lines of 'don't kick the ball whatever you do
       because you may also kick an opponent'  Instructions to be
       issued before the start of the game so that nobdy kicks the ball
       to kick off, half tiime will arrive with 5 players from each
       side having been cautioned for time wasting because the
       officials couldn't persuade anyone to kick off. They will of
       course add on 10 minutes to complete the half.
       Teams will come out for the second half and follow the same
       procedure, another 5 players from each side cautioned etc.,etc.
       End of game with no players injured, no VAR involvement, and the
       pundits will pontificate for a further half hour on what may
       have happened.
       Sorry guys, however, this is the way that the game is going and
       I still haven't worked out what they are trying to achieve with
       the use of VAR and the instructions to officials. Answers of a
       postage stamp please.
       #Post#: 30341--------------------------------------------------
       Re: C KAVANAGH - West Ham v Chelsea 
   DIR By: Affy_Moose
       Date: April 24, 2021, 1:56 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I’m going to go against the grain here and side with the
       officials. The level and force of the follow through is totally
       unnecessary and a clear example of excessive force which
       endangers his opponent’s safety.
       Regardless of individual opinion on intent, the UEFA directives
       on this type of incident have been rather clear in the last few
       years.
       #Post#: 30342--------------------------------------------------
       Re: C KAVANAGH - West Ham v Chelsea 
   DIR By: DublinRef
       Date: April 24, 2021, 2:19 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Affy_Moose link ---
       >
       > I’m going to go against the grain here and side with the
       officials. The level and force of the follow through is totally
       unnecessary and a clear example of excessive force which
       endangers his opponent’s safety.
       >
       > Regardless of individual opinion on intent, the UEFA
       directives on this type of incident have been rather clear in
       the last few years.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       I agree Affy. Totally correct call in law and current
       interpretation imo. I don’t necessarily  like the laws and the
       current application but I think Chris Kavanagh did his job
       correctly under the current guidelines.
       As you say UEFA RAPs have incidents like this in them and when
       the contact point is as high as in this incident then I believe
       a RC is usually advised.
       #Post#: 30343--------------------------------------------------
       Re: C KAVANAGH - West Ham v Chelsea 
   DIR By: guest42
       Date: April 24, 2021, 2:25 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       If that’s a red card - then I’m off to referee at the Euros…
       #Post#: 30344--------------------------------------------------
       Re: C KAVANAGH - West Ham v Chelsea 
   DIR By: highfieldlatic
       Date: April 24, 2021, 3:02 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The Subbuteo Euros?
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 6
   DIR Next Page