DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
RateTheRef
HTML https://ratetheref.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: General Discussion
*****************************************************
#Post#: 22243--------------------------------------------------
Manchester City FC (ENG) - FC Porto (POR) | Referee: Andris
Treimanis (LVA)
DIR By: Microscopist
Date: October 22, 2020, 2:17 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Is Treimanis Lettish for Kettle by any chance?
#Post#: 22250--------------------------------------------------
Re: Manchester City FC (ENG) - FC Porto (POR) | Referee: Andris
Treimanis (LVA)
DIR By: Microscopist
Date: October 22, 2020, 4:10 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Aye, that'll be right, and NASA will be about to announce that
the Moon is made of green cheese.
#Post#: 22251--------------------------------------------------
Re: Manchester City FC (ENG) - FC Porto (POR) | Referee: Andris
Treimanis (LVA)
DIR By: Ref Fan
Date: October 22, 2020, 4:43 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I think we can take it Microscopist that you were not overly
impressed!
It seems my team fared rather better with Mr Lahoz. He (quite
rightly) let us have two goes at our penalty.
#Post#: 22252--------------------------------------------------
Re: Manchester City FC (ENG) - FC Porto (POR) | Referee: Andris
Treimanis (LVA)
DIR By: flipmode
Date: October 22, 2020, 5:55 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I would agree. It was certainly a tale of two halves for
Treimanis.
First half, his foul detection seemed off, to be polite, and he
cautioned Walker, Silva and Cancelo for fouls that were soft at
best, but let the same kind of challenges go unpunished by the
Porto players (Pepe, Corona, Sarrs).
I also wasn't convinced it was a penalty, and/or whether it
should have been a YC/RC for the contact from Gündogan on their
keeper.
Second half, was markedly improved imo. It felt like he'd been
talked to at HT by someone who said "just calm down" and that he
did. Had shades of a UEFA Referee who deserved to be there in
the second half, for sure.
#Post#: 22264--------------------------------------------------
Re: Manchester City FC (ENG) - FC Porto (POR) | Referee: Andris
Treimanis (LVA)
DIR By: Bakis
Date: October 23, 2020, 9:16 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Perhaps he was being careful to keep his distance from Corona
and Sarrs.
#Post#: 22288--------------------------------------------------
Re: Manchester City FC (ENG) - FC Porto (POR) | Referee: Andris
Treimanis (LVA)
DIR By: Microscopist
Date: October 24, 2020, 12:15 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I don't say this very often but after Wednesday's spectacle it
was a pleasure to see a balanced display from Anthony Taylor.
West Ham could well have had a penalty though it probably fell
within the ubiquitous "not a clear and obvious error" category
much beloved of VAR - I can think of one referee who wouldn't
have hesitated to give it. Rhodri (I think) should have had a
yellow card for a pull back where advantage was played.
Other than that I can think of a handful of free kicks which
seemed to me to have more to do with exaggerated reaction to
minimal contact than the severity of the challenge. Simulation
seems to be a part of the game now. Whether Taylor was more
perceptive than the Latvian or whether Porto - who appeared to
have been schooled in the dark arts by Lord Voldermort himself -
were simply more adept is a matter of opinion.
#Post#: 22293--------------------------------------------------
Re: Manchester City FC (ENG) - FC Porto (POR) | Referee: Andris
Treimanis (LVA)
DIR By: ajb95
Date: October 24, 2020, 2:06 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Microscopist link ---
>
> I don't say this very often but after Wednesday's spectacle it
was a pleasure to see a balanced display from Anthony Taylor.
West Ham could well have had a penalty though it probably fell
within the ubiquitous "not a clear and obvious error" category
much beloved of VAR - I can think of one referee who wouldn't
have hesitated to give it. Rhodri (I think) should have had a
yellow card for a pull back where advantage was played.
> Other than that I can think of a handful of free kicks which
seemed to me to have more to do with exaggerated reaction to
minimal contact than the severity of the challenge. Simulation
seems to be a part of the game now. Whether Taylor was more
perceptive than the Latvian or whether Porto - who appeared to
have been schooled in the dark arts by Lord Voldermort himself -
were simply more adept is a matter of opinion.
>
--- End Quote ---
If you play advantage for a foul that would be classed as
stopping a promising attack, you cannot go back and caution the
player - new rule for this season!
#Post#: 22300--------------------------------------------------
Re: Manchester City FC (ENG) - FC Porto (POR) | Referee: Andris
Treimanis (LVA)
DIR By: Ref Fan
Date: October 24, 2020, 2:51 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
If that's the case, I've learnt something, although I'm not sure
I understand the logic.
That could be interesting if it would be a 2nd YC. Does the
referee play advantage, thus avoiding the player being sent off,
or stop play irrespective of an advantage knowing, or even
because, it means a RC?
Edit: Or is that similar to as it was previously in effect in
that referees were advised not to play advantage and go back to
issue a RC?
#Post#: 22312--------------------------------------------------
Re: Manchester City FC (ENG) - FC Porto (POR) | Referee: Andris
Treimanis (LVA)
DIR By: Leggy
Date: October 25, 2020, 5:50 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: ajb95 link ---
>
> [quote author=Microscopist link=topic=1868.msg22288#msg22288
date=1603559724]
> I don't say this very often but after Wednesday's spectacle it
was a pleasure to see a balanced display from Anthony Taylor.
West Ham could well have had a penalty though it probably fell
within the ubiquitous "not a clear and obvious error" category
much beloved of VAR - I can think of one referee who wouldn't
have hesitated to give it. Rhodri (I think) should have had a
yellow card for a pull back where advantage was played.
> Other than that I can think of a handful of free kicks which
seemed to me to have more to do with exaggerated reaction to
minimal contact than the severity of the challenge. Simulation
seems to be a part of the game now. Whether Taylor was more
perceptive than the Latvian or whether Porto - who appeared to
have been schooled in the dark arts by Lord Voldermort himself -
were simply more adept is a matter of opinion.
>
--- End Quote ---
If you play advantage for a foul that would be classed as
stopping a promising attack, you cannot go back and caution the
player - new rule for this season!
[/quote]
If that's true its a nonsense. Correction - another nonsense.
#Post#: 22313--------------------------------------------------
Re: Manchester City FC (ENG) - FC Porto (POR) | Referee: Andris
Treimanis (LVA)
DIR By: JCFC
Date: October 25, 2020, 5:59 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Leggy link ---
>
> [quote author=ajb95 link=topic=1868.msg22293#msg22293
date=1603566388]
> [quote author=Microscopist link=topic=1868.msg22288#msg22288
date=1603559724]
> I don't say this very often but after Wednesday's spectacle it
was a pleasure to see a balanced display from Anthony Taylor.
West Ham could well have had a penalty though it probably fell
within the ubiquitous "not a clear and obvious error" category
much beloved of VAR - I can think of one referee who wouldn't
have hesitated to give it. Rhodri (I think) should have had a
yellow card for a pull back where advantage was played.
> Other than that I can think of a handful of free kicks which
seemed to me to have more to do with exaggerated reaction to
minimal contact than the severity of the challenge. Simulation
seems to be a part of the game now. Whether Taylor was more
perceptive than the Latvian or whether Porto - who appeared to
have been schooled in the dark arts by Lord Voldermort himself -
were simply more adept is a matter of opinion.
>
--- End Quote ---
If you play advantage for a foul that would be classed as
stopping a promising attack, you cannot go back and caution the
player - new rule for this season!
[/quote]
If that's true its a nonsense. Correction - another nonsense.
[/quote]
Ah, but isn't it good to see that the powers that be
successfully identified which of the game's many problems most
urgently needed addressing?
*****************************************************
Page 1 of 2
DIR Next Page