DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
Pro Wrestling is taking over Internet.
HTML https://pwitoyt.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Wrestling
*****************************************************
#Post#: 1627--------------------------------------------------
Would reducing the amount of WWE PPVs be a good or bad idea?
By: MetaMario Date: December 30, 2010, 3:03 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Feel free to explain.
I'd say it would be a good idea to have at least 6-8 PPVs per
year, because it would help build up feuds and hype IMO.
#Post#: 1628--------------------------------------------------
Re: Would reducing the amount of WWE PPVs be a good or bad idea?
By: TheHigherPower Date: December 30, 2010, 3:27 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=MetaMario link=topic=301.msg1627#msg1627
date=1293743016]
Feel free to explain.
I'd say it would be a good idea to have at least 6-8 PPVs per
year, because it would help build up feuds and hype IMO.
[/quote]imo bad idea, they should go back to raw/smackdown only
ppvs cause then more people from that brand are on the ppv, thus
keeping them involved in the programme, all the build up/hype
should be done on the brand show and with a ppv one month and
not the next it should have enough time to built up a completely
new feud
#Post#: 1630--------------------------------------------------
Re: Would reducing the amount of WWE PPVs be a good or bad idea?
By: Iforgotmy1staccount Date: December 30, 2010, 7:35 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
get rid of some of the gimmick ones cause those make the matches
not as exciting, and bring back brand only ppvs so some
midcarders can get pushed better.
#Post#: 1632--------------------------------------------------
Re: Would reducing the amount of WWE PPVs be a good or bad idea?
By: MrUndertakerHBKfan Date: December 30, 2010, 11:49 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Bad idea for buisness cause they make too much money off of all
the PPV buyrates and the DVDs for the PPVs. Good idea for the
feuds and build-ups. But I don't buy any PPVs except for the
Royal Rumble and Wrestlemania so I don't really care lol.
#Post#: 1669--------------------------------------------------
Re: Would reducing the amount of WWE PPVs be a good or bad idea?
By: Jmarksmd Date: December 31, 2010, 1:53 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
It would a good idea and IMO it's long over due. They should
simply go back to 12 PPVs a year and get rid of the gimmick
PPVs. WWE wants people to buy the PPVs? Then they need to give
people a reason to actually want to buy the event. Rushed feuds,
shitty cards, horrible build up, shitty booking for said PPV,
and a crazy ass price (for the Standar Def. feed alone) = me not
payin for that shit.
#Post#: 1670--------------------------------------------------
Re: Would reducing the amount of WWE PPVs be a good or bad idea?
By: ph3nom08 Date: December 31, 2010, 1:56 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=Jmarksmd link=topic=301.msg1669#msg1669
date=1293825224]
me not payin for that shit.
[/quote]
Lmfao Agreed on all that buddy.
#Post#: 1733--------------------------------------------------
Re: Would reducing the amount of WWE PPVs be a good or bad idea?
By: CirtceleJosh Date: January 2, 2011, 4:47 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I dont see the need for reducing the amount of PPVs. I think
they should instead bring back the brand exclusive ppvs. 5 Cross
Branded PPVs a year. Royal Rumble, Mania, SummerSlam, Survivor
Series and King Of The Ring.
*****************************************************