URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Platos Kave
  HTML https://platoskave.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: General Discussion
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 7719--------------------------------------------------
       Accepting what is
   DIR By: Crystal
       Date: February 27, 2026, 10:18 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Yesterday I came across a podcast that were talking about
       “accepting what is”. They share my same sentiments. It is a door
       closer. Humanity can never progress unless people stop accepting
       what is. Finally I found  another source that agrees with me.
       Phew what a relief. Ha ha.
       #Post#: 7721--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Accepting what is
   DIR By: biisuto
       Date: February 27, 2026, 8:41 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hi Crystal, please break it down for me. What makes it a ‘door
       closer’ for you? I can’t help thinking we have only a
       communication problem here on this point and not a philosophical
       or ethical disagreement.
       …Or (fresh thought, that just occurred to me) has the Marxist
       penchant for misappropriating well known terms seeped into the
       discourse and salted the metaphysical earth…? And is it now
       insisting on a newly ‘fixed’ meaning for what ‘acceptance’ must
       irrevocably mean…?
       #Post#: 7722--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Accepting what is
   DIR By: Crystal
       Date: February 28, 2026, 11:14 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The closest I can come to any words around this, is we keep
       “doing the same things we have always done” by accepting what
       is, nothing can change and the full potential can never be
       realized or even explored. Hence why wars constantly repeat.
       People seem to accept that is the way humanity “is”. Is that
       true? By accepting that certain people in so called "public
       health" consider themselves the authority on what constitutes
       health, is that true?  Yet billions lined up for the latest jab.
       I question that “accepting what is” isn’t just another installed
       program. A door closer because it doesn’t allow for anything
       other.
       #Post#: 7723--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Accepting what is
   DIR By: Plato
       Date: March 5, 2026, 8:08 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Seems to me that every other animal on the planet is accepting
       of what is and they seem to get along fine, humans on the other
       hand have to "fix" everything and in the "fixing" tend to
       destroy everything.
       Societies will never embrace acceptance of what is, only
       individuals can do that. The human horse is so far out of the
       barn so to speak... we are not going back to hunter-gatherer
       societies anytime soon (whose societies were closer to the
       acceptance of the "what is" principal than we will ever be IMHO)
       Walt Whitman gets at it with this:
       By Walt Whitman
       from Song of Myself
       I think I could turn and live with animals,
       they are so placid and self-contain'd,
       I stand and look at them long and long.
       They do not sweat and whine about their condition,
       They do not lie awake in the dark and weep for their sins,
       They do not make me sick discussing their duty to God,
       Not one is dissatisfied, not one is demented with the mania of
       owning things,
       Not one kneels to another, nor to his kind that lived thousands
       of years ago,
       Not one is respectable or unhappy over the whole earth.
       Not one b!tches and moans for years and years about some
       government asking them to get vaccinated.  (:D my addition)
       So they show their relations to me and I accept them,
       They bring me tokens of myself, they evince them plainly in
       their possession.
       I wonder where they get those tokens,
       Did I pass that way huge times ago and negligently drop them?
       What I am getting at when I advise myself to live in acceptance
       of what is, is a movement back to a simpler "huge times ago" to
       regain my "tokens", just for me and my well being, nothing to do
       with society; that train is on a crash course to nowhere and I'm
       not interested in that, other than being an observer of life as
       it flows around this
       So to me it's personal, accepting what is, and it works so well
       that I have no need of anything else. For you and your
       collective idea for humanity, I see why you find it unworkable,
       but I also see that you don't bring forth a solution either?
       could it be that there isn't a solution to the human problem
       other than singularly waking up to what works for the animals?
       Hmmm.
       #Post#: 7724--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Accepting what is
   DIR By: biisuto
       Date: March 7, 2026, 12:18 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Crystal link ---
       >
       > The closest I can come to any words around this, is we keep
       “doing the same things we have always done” by accepting what
       is, nothing can change and the full potential can never be
       realized or even explored. Hence why wars constantly repeat.
       People seem to accept that is the way humanity “is”. Is that
       true? By accepting that certain people in so called "public
       health" consider themselves the authority on what constitutes
       health, is that true?  Yet billions lined up for the latest jab.
       I question that “accepting what is” isn’t just another installed
       program. A door closer because it doesn’t allow for anything
       other.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       The world is. The only 'problems' in the entire known universe
       exist inside the human mind. None are manifested in the external
       world. The external world also exists inside the human mind -
       albeit as cartoonishly simplistic models - and it is upon those
       inward projections, these inner maps, that we overlay the issues
       - including the 'shoulds' and 'shouldn'ts' of morality and
       ethics that so many have a hard time grappling with.
       This difficulty arises because what I am (we are) in truth
       contains all of the above. Those who see problems believe they
       are human, interacting with their human models and calling that
       'reality'.
       And all who cannot pry their eyes from the models are what we
       call "sleepers".
       And their resistance to opening their eyes to what lies beyond
       their models - opening their eyes to what is - generates
       conflict between cognitively bounded belief systems, because no
       system offers a complete picture and those gaps and dark places
       induce fear (fear is also the seed of the belief systems, the
       compulsive need to explain and reduce in order to understand).
       And conflict between sleeping believers is ironically what leads
       to consensual reality, as these systems hammer at and bend and
       twist each other into forms that eventually become more
       universally compatible but ultimately only mental models...
       think how Christianity appropriated pagan symbols to bring
       others into the fold.
       This ebb and flow of conflict happens because what all belief
       systems have in common is:
       internal logic.
       They can all be understood only from within - even if they are
       logically flawed, mystical and emotional elements that prop up
       and cement together the fuzzy bits of what are basically
       unsustainable mental models.
       Unsustainable because no hypothesis or belief system can
       adequately capture what is going on in reality.
       I read recently that the efforts to build an accurate neuronal
       map of a mouse's brain would take more capacity than the already
       staggering entirety of the world's existing digital storage.
       What does that suggest about our ultimate ability to adequately
       capture reality and reduce it to some
       mental/conceptual/digitally reproducible model...?
       Logic is an entirely mental construct, not an attribute of the
       universe.
       Reality doesn't make intellectually discernible 'sense'. This is
       why it defies all necessarily reductionist modelling.
       Reality is the ocean in a drop of water, whereas the model is a
       drop of water in a vast, endless ocean.
       Just when you think you have it down, you will inevitably bang
       your nose, skin your knee and lose an eye to what lies behind
       whatever model you've dreamed up to explain reality.
       Carbon is not a problem.
       Hate is not a problem.
       Conflict is not a problem.
       Government is not a problem.
       Pronouns are not a problem.
       Donald Trump is not a problem.
       Fascist oppression and unelected supranational bodies is not a
       problem.
       Christianity, Islam and Judaism is not a problem.
       Immigration and the cost of housing on Gen-whatever is not a
       problem.
       Reality has no problems.
       So if you cannot appreciate that - first and foremost - your
       view of the world is a tiny, 1D, moralistic pinhole view of
       something infinitely vast and incomprehensible, then it is no
       wonder you find it challenging to 'accept' things as they are.
       And non-acceptance of what-is, is the basis for ensuring that
       nothing will ever change in that, because it is axiomatic that
       what you resist persists.
       #Post#: 7727--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Accepting what is
   DIR By: j(
       Date: March 10, 2026, 12:43 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       ...
       #Post#: 7728--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Accepting what is
   DIR By: Plato
       Date: March 10, 2026, 12:46 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: j( link ---
       >
       > ...
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Solid.
       #Post#: 7729--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Accepting what is
   DIR By: j(
       Date: March 10, 2026, 12:50 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       At least I feel something you non talking non interactive
       critical piece of shit
  HTML https://music.youtube.com/watch?v=JEmFKU2FstA&si=QKQ8Fg82Ia1sCEfe
       #Post#: 7730--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Accepting what is
   DIR By: Plato
       Date: March 10, 2026, 12:53 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: j( link ---
       >
       > At least I feel something you non talking non interactive
       critical piece of ****
       >
       >
  HTML https://music.youtube.com/watch?v=JEmFKU2FstA&si=QKQ8Fg82Ia1sCEfe
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Uh, ok, off to sleep, nice chat.
       #Post#: 7731--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Accepting what is
   DIR By: j(
       Date: March 10, 2026, 12:55 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Yeah let me know whatever you wanna talk about sleepy
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 15
   DIR Next Page