URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Penny Can
  HTML https://pennycan.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Music
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 29172--------------------------------------------------
        Motley Crue Urge Action in Support of Indie Labels
   DIR By: Mac
       Date: June 26, 2014, 7:49 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Well this doesn't sit well with me. No I love what Nikki Sixx is
       doing. I'm not liking what Youtube is doing...
       [glow=red,2,300]Motley Crue Urge Action in Support of Indie
       Labels[/glow]
       --- Quote ---
       > A digital rights standoff between YouTube and independent
       labels has attracted the attention of Motley Crue‘s Nikki Sixx,
       who’s urging the band’s fans to pay attention to a conflict that
       could have a major and lasting impact on online music discovery.
       >
       > Sixx posted his plea on the band’s Facebook page, writing,
       “Red Alert: Motley Crue was on an indie label (that we started)
       and later signed to a major after they saw what we already knew
       about ourselves.Eventually we took our masters (and power) back
       and have been indie ever since….Please read below…You need to
       read the WHOLE thing……….Bands and labels need a level playing
       field…..Please comment intelligently…THIS IS AN IMPORTANT TIME
       IN MUSIC.”
       >
       > That post pointed fans to a New York Times article that
       explains the battle brewing between YouTube and a faction of
       indie labels who are reluctant to sign new licensing terms they
       see as unfavorable — and now reportedly run the risk of having
       their videos (and their attendant ad revenue) blocked in
       retaliation. As far as some onlookers are concerned, the fact
       that any company has enough muscle to play this kind of hardball
       with artists online is a problem — and a repudiation of the
       web’s initial promise of openness.
       >
       > Alison Wenham, chief executive of the Worldwide Independent
       Network, drew a provocative human rights analogy, telling the
       Times, “In the growth of the Internet, what was to be a utopian
       leveling of the playing field, a democratization for all, what
       is actually happening is a form of cultural apartheid.” Wenham
       also blasted the deal in a separate interview with the paper,
       calling it “not a fair way to do business” and accusing YouTube
       of “[seeking] to injure and punish innocent labels and musicians
       — and their innocent fans — in order to pursue its ambitions.”
       >
       > In spite of the outcry, YouTube tells the NYT it’s come to
       terms with “95 percent” of its label partners, which is
       corporate code for “this is happening whether you like it or
       not.” As the Times points out, this type of scorched-earth war
       between distributors and content creators is a clear byproduct
       of consolidation — and as anyone who’s witnessed Amazon’s
       willingness to fight with book publishers and film studios
       understands, we’ll probably only be seeing more of these
       showdowns in the future.
       --- End Quote ---
       #Post#: 29173--------------------------------------------------
       Re:  Motley Crue Urge Action in Support of Indie Labels
   DIR By: Chiprocks1
       Date: June 26, 2014, 8:06 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Interesting read and one that I will be following closely.
       Thanks for the post Mac. Ya know, on a similar path, Amazon is
       basically doing the same thing right now with a Publisher that
       they are trying to get signed to them as an Exclusive and so far
       the publisher hasn't budge. In retaliation to them, any and all
       books under the imprint have been banned from their site. This
       is where Stephen Colbert comes in his publisher promotes his
       books. He is waging a war against Amazon by choosing to sell and
       promote any and all books from his publisher on his own Colbert
       Report website. 100% of all the books sold go to the writers. In
       a nutshell, different medium, same sh*t.
       #Post#: 29174--------------------------------------------------
       Re:  Motley Crue Urge Action in Support of Indie Labels
   DIR By: Mac
       Date: June 26, 2014, 8:38 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Right, I thought you posted that video?
       Big Business is starting to tick me off. I hate, literally hate
       censorship, which this is a form of.
       #Post#: 29175--------------------------------------------------
       Re:  Motley Crue Urge Action in Support of Indie Labels
   DIR By: Chiprocks1
       Date: June 26, 2014, 8:51 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I don't think I posted a video on Colbert / Book segment. But
       it's a very eye opening piece. And yes, what they are doing is
       in fact censorship. Think about what Amazon is doing. It's akin
       to book burning in a way if you look at it a bit closer, which
       is kind of ironic given that it's about book publishers. They
       may not actually be burning books, but by restricting access to
       books, it's the same damn thing. I'm surprised that Colbert
       never made the connection. I guess that's what he has me for.
       Now if he'd only pay me, I can start buying stuff.  ;D
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 1