URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Penny Can
  HTML https://pennycan.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: The Drive-In Theater 
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 17937--------------------------------------------------
       Alamo Drafthouse
       By: Mac Date: March 24, 2013, 11:05 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [glow=red,2,300]Alamo Drafthouse[/glow]
       We've posted some stuff about this place before under WTF. I
       think we need to kick it up a notch.
       [quote]I truly don't understand why people are compelled to look
       at their cell phones while watching a film in a theater. Isn't
       the point of going to the movies to remove yourself from the
       real world for two hours while you get caught up in a dark
       drama, hilarious comedy or kick-ass action movie? What's more,
       how can people be so inconsiderate, knowing that the brightness
       of their screen is distracting others from the entertainment
       that they paid to see? And do you really want to be responsible
       for Spider-Man killing James Franco's father? [/quote]
       [glow=red,2,300]DON'T TALK - JAMES FRANCO[/glow]
  HTML http://vimeo.com/61311581
       [quote]The Alamo Drafthouse has a long history of great
       anti-cell phone ads, and this one is just the latest. Remember
       this amazing one starring Patton Oswalt that came out a couple
       years ago?[/quote]
  HTML http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z98vawSOlK4
       #Post#: 18331--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Alamo Drafthouse
       By: Chiprocks1 Date: April 8, 2013, 5:34 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Damn, I'm just now finding this thread! Wth! Anyway, down with
       Cell Phones!!!!!
       #Post#: 19697--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Alamo Drafthouse
       By: Mac Date: June 4, 2013, 11:40 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote]Common movie theater etiquette says that texting or
       talking during a film is highly frowned upon. But ever since the
       Alamo DraftHouse released the PSA of a disgruntled customer
       being kicked out for that very action, actors and directors have
       come out and participated in making these “Stop Texting” PSAs.
       Lots of them have already gone viral, and now a new PSA from
       Before Midnight stars Ethan Hawke and Julie Deply could go viral
       as well.
       If you thought these two had chemistry for all three films, you
       should check out the chemistry they have for this simple, yet
       hilariously effective PSA from Alamo Drafthouse. And just for
       good measure, Deply cusses texters and talkers out in French.
       Don’t worry there are subtitles. Hit the jump to see the video.
       Directed by Richard Linklater, Before Midnight is out in
       theaters now. [/quote]
  HTML http://vimeo.com/67166636
       #Post#: 20376--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Alamo Drafthouse
       By: Mac Date: June 28, 2013, 12:05 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [glow=red,2,300]The Only Way to Solve Movie Theaters’ Talking
       and Texting Problem Is to Give In to It [/glow]
       [quote]Last weekend, David Edelstein had a bad time at the
       movies. The venerable New York film critic took to Vulture
       yesterday
  HTML http://www.vulture.com/2013/06/david-edelstein-on-texting-and-talking-at-movies.html<br
       />to share, in great detail and with palpable frustration, his
       run-in with a chattering couple at the BAMcinemaFest premiere
       screening of Mother of George. It didn’t go well! After the
       shushing, reprimands, and evil eyes of himself and other
       moviegoers went ignored, Edelstein “just lost it,” but found
       theater management unable or unwilling to do much of anything
       about the talkers. And he’s not just venting — he’s asking what
       we, as moviegoers, are actually supposed to do about those who
       view the experience as a location for casual conversations and
       smartphone use. And it’s a question worth considering.
       The topic doesn’t get written about in the film press all that
       often, for a very simple reason: most of us who write about film
       professionally are lucky enough to see movies in advance, and in
       optimal circumstances. Depending on the film, we’re invited to
       view movies in either intimate, cozy screening rooms or at
       larger venues, rented out for a one-time “all media screening.”
       As Edelstein and others have mentioned, the industry/media
       screening world isn’t entirely unblighted by the whispers of
       others and the light of phone screens — but it’s at least an
       environment where you’re presumed to be in the company of pros,
       and public shaming is met with the proper degree of
       embarrassment.
       It’s only when we see films outside of that hermetically sealed
       bubble that we realize how utterly out of control the
       chattering-and-tweeting brigade has gotten, and a horrified
       missive like Edelstein’s follows. But regular moviegoers are
       fighting this fight all the time; filmmakers are always waxing
       rhapsodic about the magic of the “moviegoing experience,” but
       they, too, are seeing films at premieres and private industry
       screenings. On the occasions when this movie lover’s had to miss
       a press screening, or wanted to revisit a particularly
       big-screen-worthy picture with my better half, it’s an alarming
       cacophony of talking, texting, tweeting, coming, and going. When
       we saw The Avengers in Times Square (on the second weekend,
       even), the third act’s on-screen chaos was nearly matched by
       that in front of it.
       As Edelstein says, there’s not much you can do. You can shush or
       glare, but you’ll get ignored or taunted. Ushers (do such a
       thing even exist anymore?) and other theater employees might
       wander in, but that’s about all you’ll get out of them. And the
       less considerate moviegoers among us don’t comprehend that
       they’re being rude, because they’re not there to see a movie and
       they’re not there to have an experience — they’re just there to
       have somewhere to go.
       It’s very easy to turn into Abe Simpson on this issue, spitting
       bile at the youngsters and their iTelephones and their
       hippity-hop music; lest we forget, talking at the movies is not
       a new phenomenon. But texting and tweeting and emailing are just
       as disruptive, and they are new(ish) — and the teeth-gritting
       tolerance of those habits has loosened standards about other
       disruptions as well.
       And at risk of sounding like the Abe Simpson this is turning me
       (and all of us) into, it is a generational thing. Forgive the
       broad generalizations (there are exceptions, obviously), but
       moviegoers in their teens and 20s have grown up with a phone
       constantly in their hand, and the multitasking of watching TV
       and films at home while dividing attention between screens is a
       basic difference in the way media is consumed now. Simply put,
       whether or not you can tolerate that difference determines when
       and how you see movies. Older audiences have long since thrown
       in the towel; they wait out the increasingly collapsed
       theatrical-to-DVD/Blu-ray/VOD window, and watch it on their
       big-screen TV in the comfort of their living room, where any
       distractions are their own. What’s more, once you understand
       that the adult audience isn’t interested in going to see movies
       in theaters anymore, you start to understand why so many of the
       movies playing there are geared towards teenage boys.
       So, to Edelstein’s question: what do we do? As an adult
       moviegoer looking for an immersive movie-going experience, you
       find your own hacks: stay away from this theater, go to that
       one, hit morning shows a few weeks into a run, etc. Some
       theaters, like the Alamo Drafthouse, take movie talkers and
       texters seriously, but they’re few and far between. And it’s all
       but impossible to find a reliable and consistent solution.
       But maybe the first step is realizing that, in this increasingly
       niche-driven and personalized world, there’s no longer a “one
       size fits all” moviegoing experience. Some theaters have wised
       up to this: there are, for example, venues that will only admit
       viewers over 18 after a set time in the evening. This scenario
       involves the theater owner’s worst nightmare (turning away a
       moviegoer with cash in hand), but it could draw in adults who’ve
       given up on going out to the movies by promising an audience of
       like-minded individuals. On the other side of the divide, there
       has been much gnashing of teeth over industry types floating the
       notion of letting viewers tweet and email and Facebook away
       during some screenings. But y’know what? My beloved Sunshine
       Cinema in New York does a special “Rattle & Reel” morning show
       once a week where parents can bring their babies to the movies
       without worrying about offending anyone with their wailing. Not
       to say that I’m comparing moviegoers who can’t shut up or go two
       hours without picking up their phone to out-of-control shrieking
       babies, but… oh wait yes I am.
       Hold on, though. The anything-goes phone-friendly
       talk-amongst-yourselves screening (say, in the seven and eight
       ‘o’ clock hours) would be complemented by the converse: shows
       later in the evening with no-tolerance policies, for example. It
       might be impractical, and maybe the aforementioned adults-only
       screenings would have to do the job. But either way, it’s worth
       a try. People who objected to the “tweet seats” notion insisted
       that by allowing phone use (within certain parameters), we were
       letting the heathens win. To which I say this: have they been to
       the movies lately? Because that battle has been over for a long,
       long time.[/quote]
       #Post#: 20418--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Alamo Drafthouse
       By: Chiprocks1 Date: June 29, 2013, 9:49 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I think if anyone in a theater thinks its okay to text, chat or
       talk during a movie, then I think it's absolutely 'okay' for
       anyone that is annoyed by their behavior to position themselves
       right next to said offender and start talking as loud and
       obnoxious right the offender till they 'get the picture'. I'd
       actually applaud anyone that would do that. I'd even offer to
       buy them a drink afterwards as a 'thank you'.
       #Post#: 20423--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Alamo Drafthouse
       By: Mac Date: June 30, 2013, 6:40 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I'm worried about the cultural shift as bing the norm. We see
       this crap all the time with drivers.
       But I would think paying customers upset with this crap will
       slowly diminish in quietly doing nothing.
       And
       Your going to see a lot of folks just staying home. Theater
       owners better make a decision.
       I for the life of me can't imagine 'paying' to get into a
       theater, and not care what's on the screen... Instead text.
       Like I've been saying, short attention span with these folks.
       #Post#: 20426--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Alamo Drafthouse
       By: Chiprocks1 Date: June 30, 2013, 7:36 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [center] $50 tickets: Is this the end of Hollywood as we know
       it?
  HTML http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/news/steven-spielberg-and-george-lucas-warn-of-movie-industry-implosion-and-50-tickets-is-this-the-end-of-hollywood-as-we-know-it-8658179.html
       [/center]
       I just read a very interesting article yesterday about the idea
       of not just $50 tickets, but $100, $150, ect..... If texting
       doesn't keep people home, the new prices surely will. I can't
       remember which magazine it was that I read it in though. It was
       either the latest issue of Rolling Stone or Entertainment
       Weekly.
       #Post#: 20429--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Alamo Drafthouse
       By: Neumatic Date: June 30, 2013, 12:37 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       My teacher's very smart rebuttal to the whole implosion talk
  HTML http://gointothestory.blcklst.com/2013/06/holy-crap-the-sky-is-falling.html,<br
       />well worth a read, my friends.
       #Post#: 21537--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Alamo Drafthouse
       By: Mac Date: July 31, 2013, 12:12 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [glow=red,2,300]David Duchovny - PSA[/glow]
  HTML http://vimeo.com/68412734
       #Post#: 21538--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Alamo Drafthouse
       By: Mac Date: July 31, 2013, 12:12 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Walkers eat Talkers
  HTML http://vimeo.com/51347213
       *****************************************************
   DIR Next Page