URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Penny Can
  HTML https://pennycan.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: The Drive-In Theater 
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 17690--------------------------------------------------
       Five Simple Rules to Fix the Found-Footage Genre
       By: Mac Date: March 15, 2013, 6:18 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [glow=blue,2,300]Five Simple Rules to Fix the Found-Footage
       Genre[/glow]
  HTML http://images.fandango.com/MDCsite/images/featured/201303/Fixing-found-footage.png
       [quote] Every few years, we seem to decide that the
       found-footage genre is dead and every few years, it continues to
       surprise us with its resilience. The phenomenon that began with
       The Blair Witch Project back in 1999 has had its various ups and
       downs in the past decade or so, but it keeps on keeping on,
       spurred by the occasional great movie (the hidden gem that is
       The Conspiracy) and devalued by frequent cash-ins (The Devil
       Inside, anyone?). But it's not going anywhere. After all, genre
       legends like Edgar Allan Poe and H.P. Lovecraft used to write
       stories in the form of "discovered" journals and documents,
       proof that this seemingly young genre isn't actually young at
       all.
       Found footage may be wounded, chronically sick, even, but it's
       not dying. It's here to stay. However, it certainly could use a
       little maintenance. Inspired by the opening of The Last Exorcism
       Part II (which, to be fair, seems to have abandoned the
       found-footage nature of the first film altogether), it's time to
       lay down some rules for the found-footage genre -- if you want
       to make one, you've got follow this five steps.
       
       Figure Out How Many Cameras You Have and Stick to It
       Considering that this is a genre based entirely on the idea that
       the film you're watching was shot by the (probably now deceased)
       characters on-screen, you'd think that the first thing the
       filmmakers would figure out is how many cameras are involved and
       who is operating them. But many films seem to fail at this. Too
       many. Take the otherwise pretty terrific The Last Exorcism, for
       instance. Despite the fact that film clearly establishes a
       potential film crew of three people max (two of whom always tend
       to be on camera), the movie's editing frequently cheats, cutting
       into close-ups that could never be captured under the
       circumstances of the scene or switching between a half dozen
       different angles covering the same event. When shot properly,
       found-footage movies bring a great sense of reality to
       completely unreal premises -- cheating like this shatters that
       reality completely.
       Why Are the Characters Even Filming This?
       More than the number of cameras, this is a question that has
       plagued the found-footage genre for years. If the characters are
       facing mortal danger, why don't they just drop the camera and
       run? There's a pretty great gag in the early moments of REC 3:
       Genesis where the character shooting the footage tells the
       survivors of a horrible supernatural attack that he's filming
       because "the world has to see what happened here"... and someone
       else promptly knocks the camera out of his hand, signaling the
       film's shift from found footage to a traditional horror film. If
       a film is going to go the found-footage route, it needs some
       kind of foundation for why the characters will hold onto their
       cameras and, if not that, why the footage should exist.
       The first Paranormal Activity film gets away with this because
       the stationary cameras positioned all over the house capture
       horrifying moments that would have otherwise made a character
       drop a camera in terror (although the later sequels go more
       handheld and suffer some pretty major "Drop the camera and run,
       you moron!" moments). A particularly smart found-footage movie
       will not only have a solid reason for the characters to keep
       filming, but actually have a reason for why you're viewing the
       footage of these doomed souls in the first place (see: The
       Conspiracy).
       
       Don't Be Afraid to Experiment
       Practically every found-footage movie coming out these days
       seems to be about demonic possession and it's starting to get
       old. The Paranormal Activity series, The Last Exorcism, The
       Devil Inside and countless other direct-to-DVD pieces of junk
       have wrung the concept dry. It's time to move on! There are
       countless other playgrounds to experiment in with found footage!
       Look at the wonderful Norwegian film Trollhunter, which uses
       found footage to craft a genuinely fun adventure romp with just
       enough scares to please those who go to found footage
       exclusively looking for horror. If you want to get higher
       profile, look at Cloverfield, a found-footage take on the
       giant-monster movie that's so audacious and clever that you can
       easily forgive it's frequent breaking of the "Why Are the
       Characters Even Filming This?" rule. Festival favorite King
       Kelly took found footage in its sharpest left turn yet by
       telling a story about "YouTube generation" teens shot entirely
       on cell phone cameras. Heck, Chronicle is a found-footage
       superhero movie that actually works! It's time: let's separate
       the horror genre from found-footage genre. With so many
       possibilities out there, the two have no right to be seemingly
       linked at the waist.
       Remember That You're Making an Actual Movie
       Your found-footage movie may be a re-creation of a loose and
       amateurishly shot ragtag video, but have some self-respect and
       make sure it's a professionally made re-creation of a loose and
       amateurishly shot ragtag video! There is no reason for a
       found-footage movie to not function like an actual movie! All of
       usual rules apply: you need great characters, an interesting
       conflict and a beginning, a middle and an end (more on endings
       in a moment). Too many found-footage filmmakers misunderstand
       the slow, quietly intense pacing of Paranormal Activity and The
       Blair Witch Project and spend the first half of their movies
       BS-ing around and doing absolutely nothing interesting, thinking
       that they're building suspense when all they're doing is wasting
       time.
       At the same time, found-footage movies rarely take the time to
       build interesting characters, often mistaking "realistic" (i.e.,
       unrealistic) improvisational chatter for character development.
       When a found-footage film actually takes the time to create
       three-dimensional characters and tell a proper story, the
       results can be astounding, with the faux-documentary style
       lending everything a sheen of true-to-life realism (see: Patrick
       Fabian's truly remarkable work in The Last Exorcism). Found
       footage has become the refuge for lazy filmmaking and lazy
       filmmakers who think that it's a style that will simply be
       easier and cheaper to make, not a creative choice. We can be
       better than that, people.
       Do Yourself a Favor and Have an Ending
       You know how virtually every found-footage movie ever ends with
       something horrible jumping out at and/or surrounding our
       cameraman before the image cuts to black? Yeah, that's old hat
       now. Let's think up a new way to end these things, okay? How
       about something that helps the audience not feel like they've
       been robbed of a third act.[/quote]
       #Post#: 17697--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Five Simple Rules to Fix the Found-Footage Genre
       By: Chiprocks1 Date: March 15, 2013, 7:23 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       All valid points. But you didn't include Step 6: Stop
       Found-Footage Genre, Once and for all. Please.
       #Post#: 17700--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Five Simple Rules to Fix the Found-Footage Genre
       By: Mac Date: March 15, 2013, 7:37 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Yea, unfortunately, it's not going away  :'(
       #Post#: 17806--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Five Simple Rules to Fix the Found-Footage Genre
       By: Neumatic Date: March 18, 2013, 5:47 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Especially since cameras are so ubiquitous in this day and age,
       you can get those little GoPro cameras and just mount them on
       your person and go (in fact, that's the perfect "why are you
       filming this?" excuse now, you just turn it on and never turn it
       off, you have three cameras going on at the same time).
       #Post#: 17808--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Five Simple Rules to Fix the Found-Footage Genre
       By: Mac Date: March 18, 2013, 7:17 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The V/H/S movie and the sequel take that approach.... How do we
       incorporate innovate ways to explain the video?
       *****************************************************