URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Penny Can
  HTML https://pennycan.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Music
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 9402--------------------------------------------------
       Does Generation Y Like The Sound of MP3s Over CDs?
   DIR By: Mac
       Date: June 5, 2012, 12:46 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [glow=red,2,300]Does Generation Y Like The Sound of MP3s Over
       CDs?[/glow]
       --- Quote ---
       > Dr. Sean Olive from the executive team of Harman recently
       invited some select members of the press to visit their
       Northridge, California compound. The purpose of this visit was
       to hear the doctor's presentation on a compelling study that he
       recently finished on the topic of Generation Y possibly liking
       the lower-resolution sound of MP3 files better than that of
       full-resolution files from a compact disc. The sound from a
       compact disc has much more resolution and is much less
       compressed, but sources such as Wired Magazine and the New York
       Times have been floating non-scientific test balloons up with
       the idea that the largest generation ever, Generation Y,
       actually prefers the sound of lower-resolution to that of a
       higher-resolution compact disc. The editors are pulling
       inspiration from an unpublished study from Stanford University.
       The idea of kids choosing low-resolution MP3s over
       higher-resolution CDs isn't that farfetched if you think about
       it. Kids will often pick junk food over fine dining, so is it
       possible that they might do the same for what goes into their
       ears?
       >
       >
       > Dr. Olive dug in with the goal of reporting on his findings to
       the Audio Engineering Society and the world at large. He brought
       in test subjects in the Generation Y age range, including kids
       from the Los Angeles Unified School district via a local high
       school, as well as 40 college and grad students from Loyola
       Marymount, University of California Irvine, Cal Arts and beyond.
       There was also a test group of professional listeners that
       Harman uses for internal projects, so the test data was gathered
       from a subject pool that ran from very experienced listeners to
       grad students who have studied audio and music playback to kids
       who just know what they like to hear. Dr. Olive had the whole
       spectrum.
       >
       > The listening samples included both 128 MPS files and
       full-resolution (1440) files from compact discs, with musical
       material that ranged from audience applause to Jennifer Warnes
       and beyond. The double-blind tests were conducted in one of
       Harman's many testing facilities. The material was programmed
       randomly, played for nine listeners at a time sitting in two
       rows, with an average playback level at 78 db. The tests lasted
       no longer than 30 minutes. The room was acoustically treated and
       outfitted with a good audiophile-grade system.
       >
       > The results, you ask? Everybody liked the compact disc audio
       better. No one group had a significant preference for MP3 over
       CD, contrary to the earlier hypothesis. The more highly-trained
       listeners tended to have a slightly stronger preference for the
       sound of the compact disc than did the less-trained listeners
       but, overall, everyone pretty much agreed on what sounded best.
       >
       > The study went into some other questions, such as "Does
       Generation Y prefer higher-end speakers?" and "Do people from
       other countries have different tastes regarding loudspeakers?".
       Dr. Olive's full study can be read here to explore these topics.
       >
       > As for the issue of Generation Y being able to clearly hear
       the difference in higher-resolution audio, this study should end
       the question as to whether higher resolution is better.
       Honestly, it should have been easier to make the point, but Dr.
       Olive really broke out some beakers and Bunsen burners to prove
       it. Kids buy EA Sports Madden Football to the tune of over
       5,000,000 units at a price of over $50 per disc every year. Why?
       Because it's a great game with great audio and video effects,
       delivered in a format that is HD. Blindly hopeful audiophiles
       suggest that Generation Y is bringing back vinyl. They are not.
       Vinyl sells for less than $10 per new pressing and, when you
       look at the Soundscan numbers for all vinyl sold in 2010, you
       learn that the entire format sold just above the RIAA standard
       for a multi-platinum record.. That's right: every record on
       vinyl that sold in 2010 total equals one-twentieth of what
       Thriller sold on its own back in the day. Simply put, that's not
       enough volume to bet the farm on a low-res, standard-definition
       format. Generation Y loves music possibly more than any previous
       generation has. They have media, including music, in their lives
       nearly every waking minute of the day, but they clearly do not
       want low-resolution media if given the choice of
       higher-resolution media. They want the HD effect, be it a jolt
       from a Monster energy drink, the rush of an X-Games trick or
       stunning 1080p video and uncompressed 24-bit 7.1 audio playback
       from Blu-ray. If you want to get the attention of this
       all-important demographic, you need to grab it with sheer
       technological force. They want the WOW factor and don't have a
       ton of money to spend on it - yet.
       >
       > What I would like to have seen in the study is a third
       comparison including the same music/audio played back at 24-bit
       192 kHz. All-knowing record executives suggest that the
       record-buying public simply can't hear the difference. With
       respect, that's total bullshit and I would like to see Dr. Olive
       prove it to them with facts. I am suggesting that anyone with
       any modicum of hearing left in their ears can easily discern the
       difference between the audio that a Blu-ray disc can deliver vs.
       what you get via a 30-plus-year-old compact disc. The increased
       resolution, plus the 120 dB dynamic range, allows a disc to play
       back audio in a way that is more analogous to the master tape. I
       bet that each and every group would demonstrate this in a study
       similar to the one that Dr. Olive has conducted. What would be
       interesting to see is how much more they like music in HD vs.
       music in SD (i.e., the compact disc) vs. music in S (I call it
       S, because MP3 files simply suck for audio quality).
       >
       > The labels will say that the physical disc is dead and that
       downloads are the only way to go. They are wrong again. A $59
       Blu-ray player can hook up to most AV systems via a $10 HDMI
       cable and provide a physically superior audio and video
       experience with 24/192 audio to 7.1 channels, while packing
       1080p video as needed. Oh, and unlike the CD that the labels are
       still trying to sell for $15.95, the Blu-ray comes with copy
       protection that's pretty hard to break. The CD has no copy
       protection at all.
       >
       > More people love music today than ever before - that's the
       good news. The idea that the major labels refuse to sell it at
       any level of high resolution is nothing short of a crime against
       the arts. Hollywood studios give you theater-quality surround
       sound on Blu-ray, yet I can't hear Electric Ladyland as close to
       the master tape as possible. Where is Congress when you need
       them? (Wait, don't answer that.) As for downloads, it would take
       Apple embracing music in HD to push past Blu-ray, as Apple is
       the dominant force in music sales, yet the Kings of Cupertino
       are focused on how to get media, apps and other goodies
       streaming wirelessly to your iPad, iPhone and pending
       Apple-based television. They are not focused on HD audio.
       Boutique audio companies like HD Tracks are tuned into HD audio,
       but offer too few records to appeal to buyers beyond the
       audiophile community. The majors and Apple could change the way
       we listen to music and give us reason to buy more
       high-performance audiophile equipment, yet they don't think we
       can hear it. Dr. Olive should prove it to them, as he has proven
       the MP3s-sound-better theory is wrong.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       #Post#: 9403--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Does Generation Y Like The Sound of MP3s Over CDs?
   DIR By: Chiprocks1
       Date: June 5, 2012, 12:55 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I think if the new generation only has access to one type of
       format, that being the MP3, they are going to accept that as the
       standard. Now when I say "access", I mean with iPods and
       like-minded devices, they will download and cherry pick the
       songs they want instead of the "hassel" of going to a store and
       buying a CD. With MP3's you get immediate access to whatever
       song/singer/band you are in the mood for.
       #Post#: 9404--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Does Generation Y Like The Sound of MP3s Over CDs?
   DIR By: Mac
       Date: June 5, 2012, 1:57 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       While reading through this I was thinking about access too. Part
       of the puzzle pieces are costs, availability, accessibility,
       etc. But I think the point of the report is not only figuring
       out if Gen Y can detect quality product and what they prefer,
       but at the very core, minus costs, hassle, etc, if given the
       opportunity, the better sound is what Gen Y will prefer. Thus
       the author’s summary, if making the quality product at the very
       least, available. Sure, if the only available thing is crap,
       they are going to pick crap. Make the playing field even and see
       which one they will pick.
       #Post#: 9405--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Does Generation Y Like The Sound of MP3s Over CDs?
   DIR By: Chiprocks1
       Date: June 5, 2012, 2:03 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Vinyl>8 Track>CD>MP3>Me singing
       [IMG]
  HTML http://i74.photobucket.com/albums/i266/Chiprocks1/Smilies/0%20All%20Smilies/HTL_biggrin.gif[/img]
       #Post#: 9409--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Does Generation Y Like The Sound of MP3s Over CDs?
   DIR By: Mac
       Date: June 5, 2012, 3:14 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       So does "Fingernails on a chalkboard go before or after your
       singing?
       I'm just askin'
       #Post#: 9410--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Does Generation Y Like The Sound of MP3s Over CDs?
   DIR By: Chiprocks1
       Date: June 5, 2012, 3:17 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       After 8 Track.
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 1