DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
partypiratesat
HTML https://partypiratesat.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Spybusters
*****************************************************
#Post#: 3909--------------------------------------------------
The Clintons and Scientology
By: hellboy Date: March 1, 2016, 9:53 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Scientology is not a church, it is a dangerous cult based on
brainwash-techniques and oppression, a criminal mob that has
it's own secret service to threaten and put out opponents.
Scientology-founder L. Ron Hubbard wrote that church enemies may
"be deprived of property or injured by any means by any
Scientologist without any discipline of the Scientologist. May
be tricked, sued or lied to or destroyed."
Low-ranking members of the cult are refused medical treatment.
They are instead accused of not being "clear" enough, and
therefore put into concentration-camps to dwell in pain and
agony until they die. Members are deprived from their friends
and families who refuse to become members of the cult or who
leave it. Low ranking members are forced to give all their
possessions to the cult, and work like machines without an own
will for their masters and their profit. Scientology provides
anti-drug-treatment
HTML http://crackpots.us/
and educational facilities that are not
recognizable as Scientology-operated. People go there to get
cured or educated and end up as brainwashed slaves of mobsters.
The Clintons and Scientology have a long history of
collaboration. Scientology has funded the election-campaigns of
both Bill and Hillary. Several actors, all of them
Scientology-members, funded Hillary Clinton's campaign for
Senate with over $70.000,-, Tom Cruise presented Albert Gore
with $5.000,-, and John Travolta along with some other
Scientology-members gave a Gala-Diner in favor of the democrats
(entry-fee: $25.000,-).
In return right after Bill got elected in 1993 Scientology got
Tax-Exempt status like a religion, after the IRC had refused
that for decades, despite the mafia-methods used against its
employees
HTML http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/Cowen/essays/nytimes.html.
The New
York Times reports: "The full story of the turnabout by the IRS
has remained hidden behind taxpayer privacy laws for nearly four
years. But an examination by The New York Times found that the
exemption followed a series of unusual internal IRS actions that
came after an extraordinary campaign orchestrated by Scientology
against the agency and people who work there."
On the basis of the IRS ruling, the State Department formally
criticized Germany
HTML http://m.state.gov/md24410.htm
for discriminating against
Scientologists. The German government regards the organization
as a business, not a tax-exempt religion, the very position
maintained for 25 years by the U.S. government.
[quote="examiner"]How serious is Hillary and Bill Clinton's
relationship with Scientology?
The fact that Hillary Clinton has ties with Wall Street fat cats
and shady international business interests has already been
documented. The Daily Caller, in a Sunday piece, revealed that
Hillary and, to a certain extent, Bill Clinton has some ties
with the Church of Scientology. The story relates how Greg
Mitchell, the head of a lobbying firm called The Mitchell Firm
and a Scientologist, lobbied the Hillary Clinton State
Department to enlist its support for what it calls religious
freedom in foreign countries where the church is not recognized
as a legitimate religion.
Bill Clinton, as president, ordered the IRS to give Scientology
tax-exempt status as a recognized church in the United States.
The Clintons also have ties with Scientology through their
relationships with Hollywood supporters who are members of the
church, such as Tom Cruise and John Travolta, both of whom
lobbied Bill Clinton when he was president on issues of interest
to Scientology. The church is popular in the entertainment
community.
Scientology was created several decades ago by science fiction
writer L. Ron Hubbard and is based on bizarre beliefs concerning
psychotherapy and space aliens, as detailed by the Skeptical
Inquirer. Some evidence suggests that Hubbard created the church
as a money making scam. He is alleged to have said, “The way to
make a million dollars is to start a religion." Hubbard never
wrote this statement down, but the quote in various forms comes
from multiple sources.
More ominously, as the HBO documentary “Going Clear” documented,
the Church of Scientology engaged in psychological and sometimes
physical abuse of its members, an allegation the church has
denied. The church has also engaged in vigorous “lawfare”
against many of its critics, attempting to silence any adverse
publicity in the media and on the Internet.
The Daily Caller story has note revealed what if any service the
State Department has rendered in response to the Church of
Scientology’s lobbying efforts. The lobbying has continued after
Clinton left the State Department when John Kerry took over as
Secretary of State.[/quote]
HTML http://www.examiner.com/article/how-serious-is-hillary-and-bill-clinton-s-relationship-with-scientology
[quote="tmr"]Bill Clinton, Tom Cruise Plotted to Use Tony Blair
to Gain Tax Breaks for Scientology
Former British Prime Minister Tony Blair and his wife Cherie
were targeted by Hollywood actor Tom Cruise and former President
Bill Clinton to give tax breaks to the controversial Church of
Scientology, it is revealed today.
Clinton and Cruise plotted for months to overturn a legal ruling
which refused to grant Scientology charity status in Britain. At
one point the former President suggested he directly approached
Cherie Blair for help as ‘she was a practising lawyer and would
understand the details'.
These astonishing claims were made by former Scientology second
in command Marty Rathbun on German TV who described sitting in
the room at the Scientology base in Clearwater, Florida in 2003
with Tom Cruise when he called the former President. ‘It wasn’t
just one call it was many’, Rathbun confirmed later.
He said that the Hollywood star and the former President, then
involved in raising funds for his own Clinton Foundation
charity, spoke many times on how best to lobby the Prime
Minister and his wife so that they could use their influence to
change Scientology’s charity - and hence tax status - in
Britain.
...
Before he was given the award Cruise lobbied Clinton at every
opportunity, meeting him for dinner at the Hollywood homes of
director Steven Spielberg and producer David Geffen. He called
him numerous times at his Foundation office in Harlem, New York,
to work out the most effective strategy to overturn a 1999
Charity Commission ruling that Scientology, founded by science
fiction writer L Ron Hubbard in 1954, was not a charity and was
not eligible for tax breaks.
Rathbun, who was the Inspector General of the Religious
Technology Centre until 2004, said that he would audit Cruise -
the Scienotology equivalent to the confessional - and then he
would call Clinton or his staff in Harlem. ‘There was a lot of
back and forth’, he recalled. ‘At one point Clinton said to Tom
that it would be better to go through Cherie Blair as she was a
lawyer and had a tax background’.
...
Scientology in Britain has a long and chequered past. In the
1970s Harold Wilson’s government described the sect as ‘mafia
like’ and put senior officials under surveillance. In 1975,
internal correspondence from the Home Office said: ‘The Church
of Scientology does not merely persuade people to part with
their money. It is a harmful movement with an evil reputation.’
It classified the group as ‘an organisation designed to make
money, and perhaps also to gain power’ which targeted ‘the
anxious, the lonely, the inadequate, the credulous and deluded’.
In a High Court ruling in 1984, Judge Latey labelled the Church
of Scientology a "cult", "corrupt, sinister and dangerous...out
to capture people...and brainwash them."
...
the whole story
HTML http://www.themortonreport.com/celebrity/notables/exclusive-bill-clinton-tom-cruise-plotted-to-use-tony-blair-to-gain-tax-breaks-for-scientology/[/quote]
[quote]Hillary Clinton wrote to CMU for Scientology asking them
to fire Prof. David S. Touretzky
"Greenway talked about how the Church [of Scientology] has
gotten numerous letters sent to CMU about Touretzky including
one from Hillary Clinton asking that he be fired, but CMU still
stands behind him because they don’t care what he does on his
free time."
Mark "Marty" Rathbun: Scientology Infiltrates Carnegie Mellon
University
HTML http://markrathbun.wordpress.com/2014/03/06/scientology-infiltrates-carnegie-mellon-university/
The following is a report from Invest Aide OSA INT (Office of
Special Affairs International, the propaganda and dirty tricks
arm of David Miscavige’s church of Scientology International) on
dealing with Scientology critic David S. Touretzky – professor
at Carnegie Mellon University. Note that it is titled “DR”. That
stands for Daily Report. There are dozens of these daily reports
in OSA INT files on Touretzky. There are hundreds of such
reports on more effective critics. There are thousands of these
types of reports on those critics whom David Miscavige considers
a threat to himself personally and who have withstood
Scientology’s wrath over time. Ask yourself: should United
States taxpayers be subsidizing an organization that spends its
considerable dollars on such hijinks? And, what is with
Scientology’s apparent predilection for inserting sex toys into
their operations?
full report
HTML http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3131478/posts[/quote]
Going Clear: Scientology and the Prison of Belief
Written and directed by Academy Award® winner Alex Gibney and
based on the book by Pulitzer Prize winner Lawrence Wright,
GOING CLEAR: SCIENTOLOGY AND THE PRISON OF BELIEF is a
provocative tale of ego, exploitation and lust for power. The
film profiles eight former members of the Church of Scientology,
whose most prominent adherents include A-list Hollywood
celebrities, shining a light on how the church cultivates true
believers, detailing their experiences and what they are willing
to do in the name of religion
HTML https://documentaryaddict.com/films/going-clear-scientology-and-the-prison-of-belief
Scientologists believe that every human being is just a baring
for at "thetan", an immortal alien spirit. Do Americans really
want to give a person under influence of such people the
possibility to push that red button, because she might believe
that all thetans will rise from the fire as finally freed
intergalactic warriors?
Hillary also demanded the Moon-Unification-Cult
HTML https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun_Myung_Moon
should also be
given Tax-Exempt status like a religion, despite it being
charged by the United States government with willfully filing
false federal income tax returns, and found guilty. In return
she was given a regular page in Moon's own Washington Times.
Obviously Mrs. Clinton is ready to act in favor of any
organization that funds or supports her campaign, no matter of
what nature that organization is.
A person who has as close relations with dangerous mobsters like
Scientology as Hillary Clinton is not fit to be president of the
United States of America. She has proven that she is ready to
sell her soul and her presidency to just about everyone who is
willing to fund her campaigns, and she has shown that she will
do whatever her sponsors want in return. She claims she had such
great friends amongst European politicians, but the respect for
her is limited, because Europeans do not like to be lectured
about what is a religion and what is a criminal organization.
ahoy
hellboy
#Post#: 3924--------------------------------------------------
Hillary Clinton is totally wrong about Export-Import-Bank
By: hellboy Date: April 14, 2016, 10:03 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Export-Import-Bank not possible in the EU
HRC claims, that the Export-Import-Bank aka "bank of Boeing" is
necessary, because the EU supports it's companies as well. She
says she knew that, because she has spent so much time visiting
Europe. I don't know which Europe she has been to, but the
European Union strictly rules out direct payments to companies
to give them advantage in business competition. In fact some
major companies had to pay back such payments, and the companies
and the countries that payed were fined for breaking the rules
of fairness in capitalism. Isn't it embarrassing to Americans,
that Europeans are still the better capitalists, because we try
to force everyone to play by the same set of rules? We even do
that when others act in contrary to that, and a direct
competition like Boeing is to the European aircraft-producer
Airbus gets money from the state, and therefore has an advantage
in business, because it is the right thing to do. We don't act
against our own principles, just because others do that.
If HRC knows so much about European politics, how comes she
doesn't know this? Is that her so called experience? European
countries support companies by providing a working
infrastructure from which everyone profits, not just business,
they provide healthy workforce through guaranteed medical
healthcare and they provide free education up to university
degrees to have the best trained workers possible. And they
protect themselves from companies becoming too big to fail by
proper anti-trust-laws. We don't call that socialism at this
side of the pond, we call it reason. Bernie Sanders demands all
that, so he is a socialist in the political landscape of the US
by all means, but from a European point of view he is a straight
out liberal.
ahoy
hellboy
#Post#: 3925--------------------------------------------------
Hillary Clinton's Goldman Sachs transcripts will be leaked
By: hellboy Date: April 19, 2016, 9:41 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
There is no way that these Goldman-Sachs papers will not be
leaked. There are persons for sure who have a copy or their own
recording and are not in favor of the Democratic Party, and are
only waiting for the right moment to leak it. And that moment
will be very close to the election, when there will be no more
time to react.
Mrs Clinton has been sloppy with the protection of classified
information in the past, so nobody should expect that she was
able to protect these transcripts. Some people have them, and
they will leak them.
The superdelegates must not wait until then, and take their
responsibility serious. They must demand to see these
transcripts, if there is no way to get reasonable for Mrs
Clinton even behind closed doors, so they can decide whether
they contain things that could throw her out of the presidential
contest. Otherwise they would hand the presidency to Donald
Trump.
It is totally irresponsible of Mrs Clinton to think she could
keep the content of her speeches secret until the election, and
it is for sure not presidential to act like this. What's the
plan anyways? To keep it secret until she is president, and then
it would be to late to hold her responsible for it, and so
everything would be fine? That's crazy! If there is anything in
there that she wants to keep secret, and there must be
something, what else could be the reason to keep them secret, it
must be revealed before it is to late. And that is as soon as
possible.
ahoy
hellboy
#Post#: 3928--------------------------------------------------
TTIP: HRC's favourite trade-deal declared dead
By: hellboy Date: May 27, 2016, 5:13 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote="politico"]Back in 2012, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary
Clinton hailed a proposed transatlantic free trade pact as a
job-creating, growth-boosting “economic NATO” that would forge
new ties between old allies.
Three years later, hopeful presidential candidate Hillary
Clinton appears less enthusiastic.
“Can you make it go away?” was the only-half-joking response of
her campaign chairman, John Podesta, to a recent question on the
trade deal now being negotiated between the United States and
European Union.
Cooling ardor on both sides of the Atlantic threatens the very
existence of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership
(TTIP), which was launched in a series of promising talks
between Brussels and Washington in 2013.
Since then, TTIP has lost some of its shine, as the trade talks
attracted unprecedented levels of public opposition.
Over 2.6 million people across Europe have signed a petition to
stop TTIP and a smaller EU deal with Canada.
Concern over the impact of TTIP has united disparate groups —
from French farmers to German constitutional lawyers and
politicians on the left and right.
“TTIP represents a monumental power grab by corporations and it
must be stopped in its tracks,” Keith Taylor, a British Green
Party legislator told a recent European Parliament debate.
In the U.S., TTIP has been overshadowed by its Pacific
counterpart, the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). Skeptics, who
fear the impact of both deals on American jobs, include
progressive Democrats, Tea Party protectionists and labor
unions.[/quote]
HTML http://www.politico.eu/article/will-ttip-be-an-economic-nato/
In the EU every decision must be unanimous. In Austria meanwhile
all political parties declared, that there is no chance at all
that they would ever sign TTIP. That's why TTIP is to be
declared dead, and that's why the Clinton-campaign wants that
topic to "go away". Well, it will not just go away, this is a
major blow for her strategy on international trade. A strategy
made to serve the interests of Wall Street and companies like
Goldman Sachs, and that gives us an idea what Mrs Clinton said
in her speeches there, that she is so desperately trying to keep
secret.
ahoy
hellboy
#Post#: 4145--------------------------------------------------
Re: The Clintons and Scientology
By: hellboy Date: October 7, 2016, 6:07 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=hellboy link=topic=642.msg3925#msg3925
date=1461120075]
There is no way that these papers will not be leaked. There are
persons for sure who have a copy or their own recording and are
not in favor of the Democratic Party, and are only waiting for
the right moment to leak it. And that moment will be very close
to the election, when there will be no more time to react.
Mrs Clinton has been sloppy with the protection of classified
information in the past, so nobody should expect that she was
able to protect these transcripts. Some people have them, and
they will leak them.
[/quote]
Well, I told you so.
HTML https://theintercept.com/2016/10/07/excerpts-of-hillary-clintons-paid-speeches-to-goldman-sachs-finally-leaked/?utm_medium=twitter&utm_source=twitterfeed
Why the hack didn´t they listen? Noobs!
ahoy
hellboy
#Post#: 4149--------------------------------------------------
Re: The Clintons and Scientology
By: pet Date: October 9, 2016, 6:14 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Gehört nicht ganz zum Thema, weil das Internet und
seine atemberaubende Schönheit und Weisheit im Mittelpunkt
steht, aber hier ist ein längerer Kommentar zur
Präsidentschaftswahl:
HTML https://www.fischundfleisch.com/hawaiipiraten-von-oesterreich/hillary-gegen-trump-massenmedien-gegen-internet-26322
Interessiert auf F&F natürlich niemanden, weil es kein
Österreich- oder Flüchtlingsthema ist, aber vielleicht kommen
ab morgen ein paar Leute, denen im Büro fad ist (so ist
das eigentlich immer).
Was nicht im Artikel steht:
1.) Niveau im Wahlkampf sinkt weiter. Eine Schlagzeile lautet
"[Bill] Clinton kriegte Pipi-Lutschi und wurde trotzdem
wiedergewählt",
eine andere will mit geilen Bekenntnissen einer Verflossenen
Hillary als lesbisch hinstellen: "Bill [Clinton]: 'Hillary
leckte
noch mehr Muschi als ich". Es handelt sich nicht um meine
Übertreibungen,
sondern um naturgetreue Übersetzungen aus dem Englischen.
Was mir persönlich noch abgeht,
ist eine öffentliche Erklärung des Secret Service der 90er:
"Wir waren im Loyalitätskonflikt, weil die First Lady den
Präsidenten ständig ohrfeigte und dögelte. So brutal war
nicht einmal Barbara Eisenhower."
2.) Julian hat endlich wieder was geleakt, wie El Hel schon
oben erklärte, und auch dazugesagt: "Ab jetzt werden die
Leaks bis zur Wahl immer geiler und verbrecherischer, harhar!"
Er hat halt einen Pick auf die Clintons, seit ihre Mitarbeiter
öffentlich erklärten, sie wollen Julian tot sehen.
3.) Trumpi wird zur Last gelegt, ein Lustgreis zu sein, der
sich in einer sexy Radio-Show über sein Sexualleben
geäußert hat, in der er seine Schlampen objektifizierte.
Schlagzeile, Titelseite: "Pack sie an der Muschi!"
(Howard Stern, für wer ihn kennt. Jimbos Dreckschleuder
weiß mehr:
HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Howard_Stern)
Außerdem bezeichnete er irgendwelche Promis als "blad"
und "deppert", was aber nur hartgesottene Hillary-Apostel
empört.
4.) Hillary will laut Lippenbekenntnis die Damen besser
vor Vergewaltigern schützen, allerdings melden sich jetzt
laut Schlagzeilen Vergewaltigungsopfer, deren Vergewaltiger
von Hillary geschützt wurden -- als selbige Strafverteidigerin
war. Hillary ist offenbar on Record, wie sie lachend erzählt,
wie sie ein damals 12 Jahre altes Mädchen vor Gericht
als frühreifes Biest hinstellte, das eh gerne vergewaltigt
wird, weil es in ihrem Tagebuch stand.
Das ist ein wirklich extrem primitiver Wahlkampf -- NOCH
besser als Palin/McCain gegen Obama/Biden 2008! Endlich
Spaß und Unterhaltung in der Politik!
Wers nicht glaubt, soll sich den heutigen Drudge-Report
ansehen, es ist wirklich sehr schräg:
HTML http://drudgereport.com
#Post#: 4154--------------------------------------------------
HRC's claim wikileaks was Russian is so pathetic
By: hellboy Date: October 13, 2016, 5:11 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
The leaks are so far relatively boring. That politicians talk
differently to brokers then they talk to the public is no
surprise and was commonly expected. The idea of open borders may
be a nightmare for some paranoid nationalists, specially in
America, but it won't cost HRC the election. If Scrooge Mc.
Trump wasn't such a bizarre character, they still could have
made an impact, but that is speculative.
That's why it is so absurd, that the HRC-campaign is making that
completely ridiculous claim that wikileaks was controlled by
Russia. Maybe they are afraid of what is still to be revealed,
maybe they continue their revenge against that organization,
that reveals the total incompetence of the American
administrations and services depending Internet security.
Whatever the reason may be, the attempt to wipe all that is
publicized off the table by describing it as Russian propaganda
in favour of Trump is pathetic. But it is a signature-piece of
"Correct The Record", Clinton's organization for
social-media-propaganda, that has been seeking ways to diminish
the credibility of persons and organizations that reveal
inappropriate behavior by Clinton and her friends for years.
Let's face the facts: the co-founder and spokesman of wikileaks
is Julian Assange. He resides in the embassy of Ecuador in
London, threatened to be executed by the USA if extradited to
them, and has no connection to Russia whatsoever. The
wikileaks-servers are mirrored all over the world, to make sure
that a crackdown on them by a government of a single country
that has a bad conscience doesn't bring them down. They do that
on purpose, they have already experienced such incidents. All of
that is commonly known and can be found on their website as well
as on the Wikipedia-page about wikileaks:
[quote="Wikipedia"]Until August 2010, WikiLeaks was hosted by
PRQ, a Sweden-based company providing "highly secure,
no-questions-asked hosting services". PRQ is said to have
"almost no information about its clientele and maintains few if
any of its own logs". Currently, WikiLeaks is hosted mainly by
the Swedish internet service provider Bahnhof in the Pionen
facility, a former nuclear bunker in Sweden. Other servers are
spread around the world with the main server located in Sweden.
Julian Assange has said that the servers are located in Sweden
(and the other countries) "specifically because those nations
offer legal protection to the disclosures made on the site". He
talks about the Swedish constitution, which gives the
information providers total legal protection. It is forbidden
according to Swedish law for any administrative authority to
make inquiries about the sources of any type of newspaper. These
laws, and the hosting by PRQ, make it difficult for any
authorities to eliminate WikiLeaks; they place an onus of proof
upon any complainant whose suit would circumscribe WikiLeaks'
liberty, e.g. its rights to exercise free speech online.
Furthermore, "WikiLeaks maintains its own servers at undisclosed
locations, keeps no logs and uses military-grade encryption to
protect sources and other confidential information." Such
arrangements have been called "bulletproof hosting".
In August 2010, the Swedish Pirate Party announced it would be
hosting, managing, and maintaining many of WikiLeaks' new
servers without charge.[/quote]
HTML https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/WikiLeaks
The only "argument" for the accusation is the fact, that Edward
Snowden was forced to seek asylum in Russia, because Barack
Obama and Hillary Clinton threaten his life for being so brave
to make public the crimes of their administration against the
civil rights of citizens not only of America, but the whole
world. But Snowden is still only an informant to wikileaks.
Sincerely the most prominent and for sure one of the most
important, but still nothing more. Never ever has he been a part
of their administration, organization or staff. To build a claim
like the one wikileaks was controlled by Russia, only on the
fact that Snowden is hiding there, is bizarre.
This strategy makes Mrs Clinton more unfit to be president every
time she uses it. Still less unfit then trump, but unfit anyhow.
Americans should go for Johnson, he is in contrary to Trump and
Clinton a decent, honest guy.
ahoy
hellboy
#Post#: 4159--------------------------------------------------
Re: The Clintons and Scientology
By: marenostrum Date: October 15, 2016, 5:09 am
---------------------------------------------------------
THIS IS THE VIDEO HILARY CLINTORIS DOES NOT WANT YOU TO SEE!
PLS SHARE TO SHOOT DOWN THAT ILLUMINATI PARASITE PUPPET!
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5FvyGydc8no
#Post#: 4164--------------------------------------------------
Re: The Clintons and Scientology
By: hellboy Date: October 15, 2016, 4:36 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"Illuminati"? Really? Such conspiracy theory bullshit is the
reason why people who criticize HRC are not taken serious. It's
far too easy to point to such brainless fairy tales and put all
other accusations into the same bucket. It works the same way
for her like with Trump: if he wasn't so ridiculous, aggravating
and as we now know even criminal, Clinton wouldn't stand a
chance. Every other candidate would have beaten her easily.
Trump doesn't criticize her for what is really at hand, he
invents totally absurd conspiracy theories, talks about Bill or
her health. So if he mentions something serious, it is hardly
heard in his flood of stupidities. And people who attempt to
criticize her mentioning "illuminati" do her the same favour.
ahoy
hellboy
#Post#: 4165--------------------------------------------------
Re: The Clintons and Scientology
By: hellboy Date: October 25, 2016, 5:46 am
---------------------------------------------------------
HRC has now changed the narrative. Now she and her surrogates
claim, that Russia is using wikileaks to publish what their
hackers have hacked. The way they say it is: "the hack has
Russian fingerprints all over it." That is typical political
propaganda. It means that there is no proove whatsoever,
otherwise it would be presented.
They say that most American secret services are sure, that
Russian services have hacked the DNC and other American
organizations. That may be true, and makes sense for secret
services. But a member of Clinton's campaign-staff? Not so much.
The only reason they can present is still "Russia wants Trump as
president", and that is no reason for such things happening. It
seems like Clinton and her team want people to disrespect them
as much as Trump.
Wikileaks needs no Russian help to hack someone. Russia even
prosecutes their only Russian-born founding member, so they
aren't friends at all. A regime that oppresses democracy and
information like the Russian one is never too fond of
whistleblowers. They also are braggarts, so if they had hacked a
Clinton-staffer, they would also brag about that.
The leaks still haven't discovered anything shocking or
unexpected. So the claim that "it's all Russia!" isn't only
pathetic, it's unnecessary. The only thing the Clinton-camp is
showing by keeping it up, is a bad conscience.
ahoy
hellboy
*****************************************************