DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
The Over 30s Forum
HTML https://over30s.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: General
*****************************************************
#Post#: 11347--------------------------------------------------
Re: UT14 chem styles/system etc.
By: EricCartman Date: September 18, 2013, 4:48 am
---------------------------------------------------------
This chem stuff is far too in-depth for me.
Personally ill just make teams with full chem as i always do,
apply chem styles and reap the benefits. I dont really see the
need or point in going in to this level of depth on it. Its
just chemistry :-\
#Post#: 11351--------------------------------------------------
Re: UT14 chem styles/system etc.
By: yago2k Date: September 18, 2013, 4:54 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=EricCartman No1 link=topic=129.msg11347#msg11347
date=1379497708]
This chem stuff is far too in-depth for me.
Personally ill just make teams with full chem as i always do,
apply chem styles and reap the benefits. I dont really see the
need or point in going in to this level of depth on it. Its
just chemistry :-\
[/quote]
It's interesting, because you have some numeric advantage of
Chem 10 vs 9 or 8, for example. And with the Chem bonus you can
get (Manager + Loyalty), it's now easier to have an out of
position player with adequate chem.
For what I'm seeing, having a, for example, max chem or close LW
Hazard playing as RW whould definitely be doable or at least,
you'd have some relative number to see where the chem penalty is
going. It might open interesting possibilities, specially with
formations out of the way.
#Post#: 11355--------------------------------------------------
Re: UT14 chem styles/system etc.
By: guest15 Date: September 18, 2013, 5:03 am
---------------------------------------------------------
yes yago, even so you dont need conversions anymore, i mean CAM
to CM, kiss goodbye to 10K if you set the chem correctly...
what i am still after is, what are ratios of the links, that is
not clear to me yet...
#Post#: 11356--------------------------------------------------
Re: UT14 chem styles/system etc.
By: EricCartman Date: September 18, 2013, 5:03 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=yago2k link=topic=129.msg11351#msg11351
date=1379498092]
[quote author=EricCartman No1 link=topic=129.msg11347#msg11347
date=1379497708]
This chem stuff is far too in-depth for me.
Personally ill just make teams with full chem as i always do,
apply chem styles and reap the benefits. I dont really see the
need or point in going in to this level of depth on it. Its
just chemistry :-\
[/quote]
It's interesting, because you have some numeric advantage of
Chem 10 vs 9 or 8, for example. And with the Chem bonus you can
get (Manager + Loyalty), it's now easier to have an out of
position player with adequate chem.
For what I'm seeing, having a, for example, max chem or close LW
Hazard playing as RW whould definitely be doable or at least,
you'd have some relative number to see where the chem penalty is
going. It might open interesting possibilities, specially with
formations out of the way.
[/quote]
sounds good when you put it like that. I'll let you and Cuz
figure it out and should i ever want to try that kinda tactic
then i will call upon your infinite wisdom. Doubt ill be
getting that creative tho. Some would question whether having
out of position players on full chem is a good thing tho, would
they not?
#Post#: 11357--------------------------------------------------
Re: UT14 chem styles/system etc.
By: KoolKiwi Date: September 18, 2013, 5:06 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Yeah ... I'm also kinda getting over this. I love the
stats/technical bits, but they're making it way too mathematical
to make it enjoyable.
If hybrids impact negatively ... it would put a big dent in the
enjoyment factor which in turn relates to longevity ... or lack
of.
The obvious alternative is say screw that ... spend 1.5-3.5k on
chem styles cards & boost the crap out of your team ::) ...
and that's what you've said Eric ;D
#Post#: 11358--------------------------------------------------
Re: UT14 chem styles/system etc.
By: KoolKiwi Date: September 18, 2013, 5:09 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Players out of position (CAM/CM) only get max 8. Play 10 & they
get another 1. So, 9 chem in that case saves the coins.
I think this UT ... all OCD will be thrown out the window and
will see how we go.
#Post#: 11360--------------------------------------------------
Re: UT14 chem styles/system etc.
By: EricCartman Date: September 18, 2013, 5:15 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Yep that sounds like what my approach will be Kiwi :P
#Post#: 11379--------------------------------------------------
Re: UT14 chem styles/system etc.
By: guest15 Date: September 18, 2013, 6:39 am
---------------------------------------------------------
one OCD i cant throw away is the symmetry in teams, i will push
it to get it...
#Post#: 11380--------------------------------------------------
Re: UT14 chem styles/system etc.
By: KoolKiwi Date: September 18, 2013, 6:43 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Ooh ... I've got a "World Vision" ad that came up ...
Telepathically hooking into my brain as I think about
potentially using my PayPal balance on UT ...
#Post#: 11472--------------------------------------------------
Re: UT14 chem styles/system etc.
By: Cuz Date: September 18, 2013, 11:47 am
---------------------------------------------------------
That's the guy I'm monitoring for the chem guide Yago. Patience
my friend.
The stuff you got from him there is new to me, had not seen him
post it before, will add it to the top when I've got a mo.
Moustache....
*****************************************************
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page